Connect with us

Politics

Russia-Ukraine war: Congress eyes MiG-29 fighter jet transfer as next White House pressure point

Published

on

NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

A rising and bipartisan group in Congress is pushing President Biden to facilitate the switch of Poland’s MiG-29 fighter jets to Ukraine amid Russia’s brutal invasion, regardless of statements by the U.S. navy that such a transfer could be high-risk, low-reward. 

The White Home is leaning on that place from the navy in its opposition to offering the jets, together with that Ukraine does probably not want the plane. However Biden already ceded to strain from Congress to take a more durable stance towards Russia a number of occasions for the reason that struggle began. And dozens extra members from each events Sunday known as on the president to assist Ukraine get its palms on the Polish fighter jets President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is petitioning for. 

“We, the 58 members of the Drawback Solvers Caucus, urge continued U.S. dedication to the sovereignty of Ukraine and the liberty of the Ukrainian individuals within the face of Russia’s ongoing invasion,” the average, bipartisan Home Drawback Solvers Caucus (PSC) stated Sunday. “We strongly consider that the U.S. should present extra protection materiel to Ukrainians defending their nation.”

Advertisement

On this picture from video supplied by the Ukrainian Presidential Press Workplace and posted on Fb early Saturday, March 12, 2022, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks in Kyiv, Ukraine.  Zelenskyy is asking on NATO to supply Ukraine with fighter jets. 
(Ukrainian Presidential Press Workplace through AP)

UKRAINIAN PREGNANT WOMAN, BABY DIE AFTER RUSSIAN AIRSTRIKE ON MATERNITY HOSPITAL: LIVE UPDATES

The PSC went on to name on Biden to assist in giving the Ukrainians Stinger missiles, drones and Soviet-era MiG-29 fighter jets that Poland is providing to ship to Ukraine. 

The Biden administration virtually instantly after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine imposed harsh sanctions towards Russia. Then it leveled much more sanctions concentrating on Russia’s monetary establishments after strain from Congress. Then Congress pressed for a ban on Russian oil imports. The Home was going to go a invoice to that impact earlier than Biden lastly introduced the ban final week. 

Now, after initially signaling an openness to serving to make the MiG-29 switch occur, the White Home seems to have shut the door on the likelihood, to the chagrin of many in Congress. 

Advertisement

The issue is, how do you get them to Ukraine with out it elevating the involvement of NATO… As soon as that airplane takes off from Poland. Nicely, it is an air raid on Russian forces taking off from Poland.

— Rep. Brad Sherman. D-Calif., on Fox Information Stay

“It is a bipartisan message… Ship these MiGs,” Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, stated at a Senate GOP press convention Thursday. “The query is nicely, why aren’t they being despatched?… Sufficient discuss, persons are dying. Ship them the planes that they want. They are saying they want MiGs. Folks say, ‘Nicely, possibly that is not the perfect weapon for them.’ That is what they are saying they need. They’re there.”

HOW MISCALCULATIONS AND MISPERCEPTIONS COULD LEAD TO US-RUSSIA CONFLICT

“Once we say we will do one thing, and we do not do it, we’re sending blended messages to Putin. And that reveals an absence of resolve,” Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, added on “Your World,” final week. 

Democrat Sens. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., each backed the availability of the fighter jets in a listening to earlier Thursday. 

Advertisement
Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Robert Menendez, D-N.J., arrives to meet with fellow Democrats, at the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 8, 2022. 

Senate International Relations Chairman Robert Menendez, D-N.J., arrives to satisfy with fellow Democrats, on the Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, March 8, 2022. 
(AP Picture/J. Scott Applewhite)

“There’s bipartisan help for offering Ukraine with fighter jets of neighboring international locations that they might know learn how to fly and interact in,” Menendez, chairman of the Senate International Affairs Committee, stated Thursday. “Time is of the essence. The Ukrainians are getting bombarded and so they do no have, at the least as their nation’s leaders recommend and assert, the wherewithal to compete within the sky… I do not perceive why we’re not working expeditiously to facilitate planes to Ukraine.” 

“It’s disappointing to see the reluctance on the a part of the administration and it’s coming throughout as indecision and bickering,” Shaheen stated.

Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., additionally instructed reporters there’s actually no “categorical distinction between supplying missiles and anti-tank weapons and supplying plane.” The U.S. has been supplying missiles and anti-tank weapons to Ukraine for the reason that begin of the struggle, and even earlier than that. 

However the president and his allies say those that are pushing for the jets are usually not desirous about the potential penalties. 

PUTIN MAINTAINS 95% OF AVAILABLE COMBAT POWER IN UKRAINE AS WAR PERSISTS: DOD OFFICIAL WARNS

Advertisement

The White Home referred to feedback from U.S. European Command Commander Gen. Tod D. Wolters when requested about the potential of serving to Polish jets make it into Ukraine. 

Two Polish Air Force Russian made Mig 29s fly above and below two Polish Air Force U.S. made F-16 fighter jets during the Air Show in Radom, Poland, on Aug. 27, 2011. Ukraine is requesting the U.S. help transfer Polish MiGs to its armed forces. 

Two Polish Air Pressure Russian made Mig 29s fly above and under two Polish Air Pressure U.S. made F-16 fighter jets throughout the Air Present in Radom, Poland, on Aug. 27, 2011. Ukraine is requesting the U.S. assist switch Polish MiGs to its armed forces. 
(AP Picture/Alik Keplicz, File)

“We consider the simplest option to help the Ukrainian navy of their struggle towards Russia is to supply elevated quantities of anti-tank weapons and air protection techniques, which is on-going with the worldwide group,” Wolters stated in an announcement. “USEUCOM assesses the navy usefulness of extra fastened wing air to Ukraine can be high-risk and low acquire.” 

“The switch of MiG-29 plane won’t appreciably enhance the effectiveness of the Ukrainian Air Pressure… Due to this fact, we assess that the general acquire is low,” Wolters added. “Lastly, the intelligence group assesses the switch of MiG-29s to Ukraine could also be mistaken as escalatory and will end in Russian escalation with NATO…producing a excessive threat state of affairs.”

Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., raised the identical concern on “Fox Information Stay” Saturday. 

Advertisement

“The issue is, how do you get them to Ukraine with out it elevating the involvement of NATO?” he stated. “It is one factor to ship in a truck with weapons in it. It crosses the border after which it is in Ukraine… As soon as that airplane takes off from Poland. Nicely, it is an air raid on Russian forces taking off from Poland.”

Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman additionally stated on “Fox Information Sunday” transferring the jets could be “very sophisticated” and argued “backfilling them was just about inconceivable.”

The White Home is giving no indication it would budge on its stance towards serving to present MiG-19s to Ukraine. 

Fox Information’ Ryan Flynn, Jacqui Heinrich, Kimberly Anderson and Jesse Bedell contributed to this report. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Ex-Rep. Charlie Rangel, 94, questions whether Biden belongs in nursing home, not White House

Published

on

Ex-Rep. Charlie Rangel, 94, questions whether Biden belongs in nursing home, not White House

Former Harlem Congressman Charles Rangel — who is 94 years old — wondered whether President Biden belongs in a nursing home instead of the White House following last week’s debate disaster.

“I have never been more shocked and embarrassed by any presidential debate than I was last Thursday,” Rangel, who served in Congress from 1971 to 2017, said Sunday on 770 WABC radio’s “The Cats Roundtable.” 

“One [candidate is] a convicted felon who has no respect for the truth, for morality. The other seemed so damned confused I didn’t even know whether he knew where the hell he was at in terms of responding to the moderator.”

Rangel, a Democrat, told host John Catsimatidis he “would not object” to both candidates taking cognitive tests to determine their fitness. Trump is 78, just three years younger than Biden.

FAUCI GIVES HIS OPINION ON WHETHER 81-YEAR-OLD BIDEN IS FIT TO RUN FOR A SECOND TERM

Advertisement

President Biden looks down as he participates in the first presidential debate of the 2024 elections with former President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump at CNN’s studios in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 27, 2024. (ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

“It’s clear that Biden was shaky in responding … One has to think about what happens in [the next] four years.”

Biden’s debate performance was so troubling that voters have to be reminded that Trump could be sentenced to prison time for his conviction in the Stormy Daniels hush money case, Rangel said.

BIDEN DEBATE DEBACLE: 10 EYE-OPENING MEDIA RESPONSES, FROM MSNBC PANIC TO ‘THE VIEW’ CALLING FOR REPLACEMENT

He said in most states Republicans and Democrats will vote for their party nominee despite their flaws, and the election comes down to seven battleground states.  

Advertisement
People watching the debate on TV

New Yorkers watch the 2024 Presidential Debate between Trump and Biden in New York City, on June 27, 2024. (Lokman Vural Elibol/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“If Trump is in jail, Republicans will vote for him. If Biden is in a nursing home, [the Democrats] are going to vote for him,” he said. 

BIDEN’S ‘DISASTER’ DEBATE PERFORMANCE SPARKS MEDIA MELTDOWN, CALLS FOR HIM TO WITHDRAW FROM 2024 RACE

But Rangel wasn’t ready to abandon Biden, noting he was good on the stump the day after the debate.

Trump during CNN debate

Former President using his hands to convey his point at the debate (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

“He was so on point, so articulate. He was better than he was at the State of the Union [address]. And I wondered, ‘Where the hell was that Joe Biden [during the debate]?’” he said.

Biden intends to seek re-election despite calls from the liberal New York Times, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and even some Democrats that it’s time for him to step aside for the good of the party and the country.

Advertisement

 

Former Congressmen Charles Rangel makes a speech

Former U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., questioned whether President Biden belongs in a nursing home following the debate with Trump. (Seth Wenig-Pool/Getty Images)

During the debate, Biden frequently stumbled over his answers and at one point froze and then said “I beat Medicare.”

Rangel, during the latter part of 46 years in Congress, struggled with his physical health but appeared mentally sharp.

Continue Reading

Politics

Ali: Racism and bigotry get a pass in 2024 as Trump talk that once shocked is normalized

Published

on

Ali: Racism and bigotry get a pass in 2024 as Trump talk that once shocked is normalized

President Biden has “become like a Palestinian.” The comment from former President Trump at Thursday’s debate in Atlanta was meant to be an insult aimed at his opponent’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war.

Despite the implicit bigotry of the barb, Trump’s vilification of an entire people in the form of a crude jab barely made the news.

There is plenty of analysis coming out of the 90-minute live debate — Biden’s terrible performance, Trump’s fountain of lies — but what I find most heartbreaking is the quiet acceptance of casual racism as part of our political discourse.

The former president’s bigoted rhetoric onstage last night doesn’t even qualify as a minor talking point in today’s discussions about the CNN telecast.

When Trump descended from the escalator and into the campaign scene in 2015, numerous headlines and stories were generated in response to his race-baiting comments about Mexican “rapists” and a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

Advertisement

Now, during one of the most-watched television events of the year, such ugliness has barely caused a ripple.

The stakes are much higher now than nine years ago, therefore we’re directing our energies elsewhere. This election is about upholding democracy and defeating fascism. But if we’re willing to accept derogatory remarks about race, faith or people as part of a campaign to win votes, we’ve given up.

During the debate, Trump claimed that Biden’s failed immigration policy resulted in millions of dangerous immigrants taking “Black jobs.” And if that weren’t xenophobic enough, Trump broadened his scare speak to include the loss of “Hispanic jobs” as well.

What exactly is a Black or Hispanic job? It’s hard to say because no one on the debate stage or behind the moderator desk bothered to ask. Co-anchors Dana Bash and Jake Tapper instead let the stunningly racist remarks glide through unchallenged, as if racial stereotyping were protected under CNN’s debate rules of no real-time fact-checking.

To be fair, the first debate of the 2024 presidential campaign was anything but business as usual.

Advertisement

Biden looked frail and bewildered. Trump was uncharacteristically controlled. And CNN served as a staging company rather than a news outlet. Post-debate discussions across multiple platforms have been dedicated to deconstructing the scene — the incumbent’s poor performance, his opponent’s avalanche of lies — yet they’ve largely overlooked the ugly leveraging of race and bigotry in their wider analysis of the event.

In short, there’s been little soul-searching about how such blatantly discriminatory statements were able to sail through undisputed.

The CNN broadcast revealed a sad truth about American politics in 2024: Xenophobic fear-mongering once relegated to the far-right fringe is now an acceptable starting point for mainstream dialogue about American politics and presidencies.

The conflation of Palestinians with the villainous dark side of a good vs. evil conflict is nothing new, especially from the MAGA-verse. Sadly, it’s not surprising that Trump’s Palestinian comment is being viewed as a bizarre and somewhat funny moment rather than a gross disparagement of an entire people.

Loaded slurs and statements about Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims are still an acceptable form of bigotry and hatred, even in these supposed “woke” times. I had hoped that dynamic might shift in my lifetime, but the media’s continued implied connections between Palestinians and Hamas, Muslims and terror, Arabs and spooky otherness, tells me not to keep my hopes up.

Advertisement

As for Black and Hispanic jobs, Thursday’s debate was more proof that we’re becoming inured to the racism of the right. The mainstream media — even left-leaning outlets — are so desensitized by MAGA’s repurposing of archaic stereotypes that they barely reacted to the association of Black and brown communities with crime, low-paying jobs, poverty, etc.

Hateful rhetoric has to be particularly egregious to trigger an outcry, and that’s a sign that intolerance is winning.

Pushing back against Trump’s demeaning commentary should have been Biden’s job on that debate stage, and he failed. CNN and the rest of the media also failed to highlight the danger of normalizing racism for votes.

If this approach wins the White House, we all lose.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump puts Biden on defense for Medicare Advantage cuts

Published

on

Trump puts Biden on defense for Medicare Advantage cuts

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Medicare benefits have emerged as an election hot topic, putting President Biden in a likely precarious situation with senior voters after slashing the popular Medicare Advantage program’s benefits ahead of the election. 

“I will not cut one penny from Social Security or Medicare, which Joe Biden is destroying by letting millions of people come into our country. He’s destroying Medicare and Social Security,” Trump said during his rally on Temple University’s campus in Philadelphia last weekend, setting the stage for ongoing attacks against his 2024 competitor. 

Advertisement

“Joe Biden has cut Medicare Advantage for the last two years. Did you know that? He’s cut your Medicare Advantage, which is a total betrayal of seniors. And just check, you’ll see it. He has cut you down for two years straight.”

Medicare was cited again during the first presidential debate of the election cycle on Thursday, where Biden’s disastrous performance included him saying, “We finally beat Medicare” as he stumbled over his words. 

“He’s right, he did beat Medicare, beat it to death,” Trump fired back. “And he’s destroying Medicare because of all these people are coming in, they’re putting them on Medicare, they’re putting them on Social Security.”

BIDEN ADMIN THREATENING YOUR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PLAN. HERE’S WHAT THEY’RE NOT TELLING YOU

Former President Trump called out President Biden for claiming he was at Ground Zero following the 9/11 terror attacks in 2001. Trump visited the site in New York City days after the Twin Towers were struck.    (Getty Images )

Advertisement

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, specifically, are private health insurance plans that contract with Medicare, and are used by more than 33 million Americans. The program mostly enrolls adults over the age of 65, but also offers benefits to people of all ages with disabilities. Traditional Medicare, conversely, is a federal health insurance program for adults over the age of 65, as well as younger individuals with disabilities. 

BIDEN HOPES SENIORS WON’T NOTICE THIS CUT IN THEIR BENEFITS BEFORE THE ELECTION

The Biden administration in April finalized plans to cut MA benefits, which experts said could lead to an additional $33 a month for out-of-pocket costs, or $396 a year, for enrollees. Critics of the cuts said they would be especially devastating to seniors living on fixed incomes who are already coping with ongoing inflation issues. 

Fox News Digital spoke to a former nurse, Republican New York congresswoman, and Consumer Product Safety Commission Chairwoman Ann Marie Buerkle, who said the cuts could prove devastating for the Biden administration, as the 46th president hits this election cycle’s fever pitch. 

HEALTH CARE COSTS UP TO 300% HIGHER FOR PRIVATELY INSURED PATIENTS THAN THOSE WITH MEDICARE, REPORT REVEALS

Advertisement

“By letting far-left socialists control his policy agenda, Biden made a huge blunder that will jeopardize his support from the 33 million Americans enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans who will see their premiums go up, co-pays increase, and benefits decline before November,” said Buerkle.

Joe Biden Medicare event in Florida

President Biden speaks about his administration’s plans to protect Social Security and Medicare and lower health care costs, Feb. 9, 2023, at the University of Tampa in Florida. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

The cuts come as the left-wing faction of Congress continues promoting “Medicare-for-all” legislation, which would establish a universal single-payer national health insurance system. Buerkle said the Biden administration’s cuts this year “actively sabotage MA,” likely in a backdoor attempt to promote a government-focused system, such as “Medicare-for-all.” 

“Far left ideologues like Elizabeth Warren hate Medicare Advantage’s success as a public-private partnership because it undermines their argument for government-run health care, aka ‘Medicare-for-all.’ Biden has let these far left ideologues in his administration actively sabotage MA so they can prop up a government-run model and achieve their socialist agenda,” she said. 

The sentiment was echoed in an op-ed published by Fox News Digital in May, by Heritage Action executive vice president Ryan Walker.  

REPUBLICANS WARM TO SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE REFORM AS 2024 ELECTION NEARS

Advertisement

“Biden and his allies want to cut MA in favor of more government-run, fee-for-service  ‘Medicare-for-all’ – which would mean fewer options for physicians and coverage, like vision and hearing. Recently, progressive ringleader Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., and a coalition of 59 far-left House Democrats sent a letter to Biden arguing for ‘strengthening Traditional Medicare’ and redirecting funds ‘incorrectly going to MA,’” Walker wrote. 

Medicare card

The Biden administration pushed back that “any claim that this Administration is cutting Medicare is categorically false” and “disinformation,” adding that “protecting Medicare is a key priority for President Biden and one of our highest priorities at HHS.”

“This is cherry picking numbers. Under the rate announcement, payments to Medicare Advantage plans are expected to increase by 3.7% next year, equivalent to over $16 billion. A $16 billion increase is not a cut,” the White House told Fox News Digital. 

“Leave it to deep-pocketed insurance companies and industry front groups to characterize this year’s increase in Medicare Advantage payments as a cut. Disinformation being pushed out by high-paid industry hacks and their allies hurt Medicare beneficiaries and the Medicare Trust Fund.”

The administration added that it proposed a 1% increase in payments to insurance companies that provide Medicare Advantage order to “ensure they are accurately and appropriately compensated for covering the services their enrollees receive.” 

Advertisement

“Like the 1% percent increase in payments that we are proposing for 2024, recovering overpayments from insurance companies is not a cut in payments – any such claim is categorically false.”

joe biden on the debate stage

President Biden during the first presidential debate of the 2024 elections between himself and former President Trump in Atlanta on Thursday, June 27, 2024. (Kevin D. Liles for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Buerkle previously wrote in an op-ed this year that Medicare benefits could be a “winning issue for Republicans,” citing that the states that voted for Trump in 2016, but switched to Biden in 2020 – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – are home to a majority of seniors who get their health care through MA. 

“51% of Medicare-eligible Americans choose MA, and that number grows each year. Nearly all of them self-report satisfaction with the program. So, for 51% of seniors, Medicare Advantage is Medicare, so cuts to the program equate to cuts to Medicare. Trump understands that increasing health care costs for society’s most vulnerable population before an election is a stupendously dumb idea. Other Republicans should follow his lead,” Buerkle told Fox News Digital. 

The MA plans are overwhelmingly supported by those enrolled, with a 2021 analysis finding 90% of enrollees reporting they are satisfied with the plan. Biden had also vowed during his State of the Union address in March that he would protect Social Security and Medicare from any cuts. 

BIDEN CLAIMS HIS DEBATE PERFORMANCE WON OVER ‘MORE UNDECIDED VOTERS THAN TRUMP’ AT NJ FUNDRAISER

Advertisement

“Tonight, let’s all agree once again to stand up for seniors. Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block. If anyone here tries to cut Social Security or Medicare or raise the retirement age, I will stop you,” Biden said during the State of the Union. 

Donald Trump

“I will not cut one penny from Social Security or Medicare,” former President Trump has said. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

Not only will these cuts increase out-of-pocket costs for seniors enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans by an average of $396 next year, cutting Medicare Advantage hurts Medicare solvency, too, since it’s less costly to the federal government compared to original Medicare and studies have shown that Medicare Advantage could help extend Medicare solvency by 17 years. MA delivers the same benefits as original Medicare for just 83 cents on the dollar,” Buerkle added. 

THE NEW YORKER EDITOR CALLS FOR BIDEN TO STEP DOWN AFTER ‘ANTAGONIZING’ DEBATE PERFORMANCE

The cuts have faced no shortage of condemnation from Republicans and conservatives, who sounded off in April that seniors on fixed incomes would suffer further financial strains. 

President Biden

President Biden speaks during a campaign event in Philadelphia on April 18, 2024. (Hannah Beier/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“America’s seniors are among the most vulnerable people in our society. Most live on a fixed income – Biden’s inflation has been a baked-in tax to everything they purchase. Now, he’s raising the price of the advantage plan – a plan that millions of seniors rely on,” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz posted on X. “This is unacceptable.”

Advertisement

DOCTORS EXPRESS CONCERN ABOUT BIDEN’S APPARENT COGNITIVE ISSUES DURING DEBATE: ‘TROUBLING INDICATORS’

“President Trump delivered on his promise to protect Social Security and Medicare in his first term, and President Trump will continue to strongly protect Social Security and Medicare in his second term,” Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News Digital. 

BIDEN DEBATE DEBACLE: 10 EYE-OPENING MEDIA RESPONSES, FROM MSNBC PANIC TO ‘THE VIEW’ CALLING FOR REPLACEMENT

“The only candidate who poses a threat to Social Security and Medicare is Joe Biden–whose mass invasion of countless millions of illegal aliens will, if they are allowed to stay, cause Social Security and Medicare to buckle and collapse. By unleashing American energy, slashing job-killing regulations, and adopting pro-growth America First tax and trade policies, President Trump will quickly rebuild the greatest economy in history and put Social Security and Medicare on a stronger footing for generations to come.”

Axios reported earlier this year that Biden administration officials believed benefits for enrollees would remain stable through next year. Researchers, however, said the Biden campaign was taking a gamble with the cuts ahead of the election. 

Advertisement

 

“President Biden’s team is gambling that MA beneficiaries won’t realize before the election the benefits Biden’s team is causing them to lose come January 2025,” Raymond James analyst Chris Meekins told the outlet. 

Continue Reading

Trending