Connect with us

Politics

One of the most far-reaching vaccine mandate bills in California will not move forward

Published

on

Some of the far-reaching vaccine payments launched within the California Legislature this 12 months is not going to transfer ahead as deliberate after the proposal to require staff to be inoculated towards COVID-19 was shelved on the eve of its first listening to.

Citing improved situations and opposition from public security unions, Meeting Member Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland) stated she would maintain Meeting Invoice 1993, which might have required workers and unbiased contractors to be vaccinated towards COVID-19 as a situation of employment until they’ve an exemption primarily based on a medical situation, incapacity or spiritual beliefs.

The transfer comes as a gaggle of truck drivers protesting COVID-19 mandates round Washington, D.C., has stated it plans to move to California to oppose vaccine laws within the Golden State. AB 1993 is among the many payments listed on the Folks’s Convoy web site that the group plans to protest when it arrives in California.

Advertisement

AB 1993 was scheduled to be heard within the Meeting Committee on Labor and Employment on Wednesday.

“We launched AB 1993 due to the excessive quantity of staff, employers and public well being consultants who expressed the necessity for vaccine necessities, but felt unable to make these adjustments on their very own,” Wicks stated in an announcement. “We are actually in a brand new and welcome chapter on this pandemic, with the virus receding for the second. This supplies for us the chance to work extra collaboratively with labor and employers to handle considerations raised by the invoice.”

Wicks stated she was disenchanted by opposition from public security unions together with the California Assn. of Freeway Patrolmen, California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. and California Professionals Firefighters, noting that “it’s my hope that they’ll finally come to the desk to ensure all of their staff are vaccinated, and that each job sector in California has the instruments essential to hold their staff protected from COVID-19.”

State staff are presently required to be totally vaccinated towards COVID-19 or bear weekly testing. Vaccination charges amongst some state public security departments have remained a lot decrease than most people, together with with the California Freeway Patrol and California Division of Forestry and Hearth Safety, based on information from the state human assets division.

In Los Angeles, town has fended off authorized challenges from teams of firefighters and police workers searching for to halt native vaccine necessities.

Advertisement

The California Skilled Firefighters union stated a blanket vaccine mandate for all employers would undermine “the power and significance of native bargaining and labor negotiations.”

“We now have labored with coverage makers on proposals to make sure employee well being and security by paid sick go away and different coverage measures,” the union wrote in opposition, including that it has “labored to teach our members on vaccination choices and inspired them to have interaction their native authorities employers on points related to COVID-19 security protocols together with vaccination.”

Below the invoice, the Division of Truthful Employment and Housing and California Division of Occupational Security and Well being would have been required to work with the state’s public well being division on steering for employers on what would represent a legitimate exemption. Companies would face a penalty for failing to conform, though the quantity had but to be decided. Employers would have needed to notify the state that each one staff had been vaccinated towards COVID-19 by Jan. 1, 2023.

An evaluation of the invoice by the Meeting Committee on Labor and Employment raised a number of questions concerning the invoice, together with how the state would guarantee employers had been in compliance and the way workplaces could be investigated in the event that they had been suspected of failing to conform.

Tuesday’s announcement that Wicks would maintain off on the invoice comes after a earlier try additionally stalled. Final 12 months, Wicks deliberate to introduce a wide-ranging vaccine invoice however it was deserted within the remaining weeks of the legislative session. That proposal was by no means formally launched, however draft language of Wicks’ invoice was leaked and referred to as for Californians to point out proof of vaccination to enter many indoor companies and would have required each public- and private-sector staff to be totally vaccinated or repeatedly examined.

Advertisement

“Vaccines and vaccine necessities stay a crucial instrument for transferring from pandemic to endemic,” Wicks stated. “That work remains to be wanted, and it may nonetheless make sure that hundreds of thousands extra Californians develop into vaccinated. We are going to proceed to observe new variants and waves, interact with stakeholders on all sides, hearken to our public well being consultants, and be ready to take motion to maintain our staff protected and our financial system transferring.”

Different vaccine payments launched by Democratic lawmakers who shaped a vaccine working group this 12 months stay lively within the state Legislature, together with Senate Invoice 871 by state Sen. Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) to require the COVID-19 vaccine for all schoolchildren within the state. Senate Invoice 866 by Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) would permit kids 12 and as much as be vaccinated with out parental consent. And Meeting Invoice 1797 by Meeting member Akilah Weber (D-San Diego) would permit California college officers to extra simply examine pupil vaccine information by increasing entry to a statewide immunization database.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

California GOP lawmakers slam Newsom-backed budget as unsustainable, say Republicans left out of negotiations

Published

on

California GOP lawmakers slam Newsom-backed budget as unsustainable, say Republicans left out of negotiations

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a budget intended to close an estimated $46.8 billion deficit, but multiple Republican lawmakers say they were left out of negotiations. 

Lawmakers passed the budget Wednesday after an agreement between Newsom and legislative leaders in which both sides made concessions and gained some wins.

The budget aims to close the deficit through $16 billion in spending cuts and temporarily raising taxes on some businesses.

Newsom praised the budget as “responsible” and said it prepared “for the future while investing in foundational programs that benefit millions of Californians every day.” 

‘I WOULD NEVER TURN MY BACK ON PRESIDENT BIDEN’: NEWSOM SHOWS SUPPORT AT PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

Advertisement

California Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks to reporters after a presidential debate between President Biden and Republican presidential candidate former President Trump in Atlanta, Thursday, June 27, 2024.  (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

“Thanks to careful stewardship of the budget over the past few years, we’re able to meet this moment while protecting our progress on housing, homelessness, education, health care and other priorities that matter deeply to Californians,” Newsom said. 

But some Republicans say they were left out of negotiations altogether. Republican Senator Roger Niello of Fair Oaks, Vice-Chair of the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, derided the budget as “the majority party’s budget.” He told Fox News Digital he only learned of the budget in an X post. 

Gov. Gavin Newsom

Gov. Gavin Newsom joined NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, Feb. 25, 2024. (Screenshot/NBC)

“This budget certainly reflects the majority party’s priorities, but it ignores the priorities of eight million residents of this state because none of my Republican colleagues were involved in development of the budget,” Niello said. 

The Republican lawmaker also called the budget package “nominally balanced but not sustainable.” 

Advertisement

ADAM CAROLLA SAYS HE’S LEAVING ‘HORRIBILE’ CALIFORNIA, PANS ‘SOCIOPATHIC’ NEWSOM: ‘SLIPPERY EEL OF NOTHINGNESS’

“It fails to rein in the past decade of irresponsible growth in government spending,” Niello said. “It relies on budget gimmicks, draws down our savings, and saddles future generations with debt.”

Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones of San Diego argued that California residents who are represented by a Republican in the legislature have effectively been denied a voice. 

“Each senator, whether Democrat or Republican, in California represents almost a million people and those million people each should have a voice on what happens in the legislature regarding the budget,” Niello said. 

He accused his Democratic colleagues of playing “shadow games with accounting” rather than “being responsible with California’s checkbook.” 

Advertisement
Sacramento aerial

State Capitol Aerial view of California Capitol in Sacramento. Lawmakers on Friday advanced a bill that would allow killer serving life without parole to petition for re-sentencing.  (Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

“They shifted, swept and shuffled money around, stealing it from disabled kids and taking money from a host of necessary services to fund unneeded social experiments and pet projects,” he said. “It’s unfathomable. But it’s real.”

The deficit was about $32 billion in 2023 before growing even bigger this year, with more deficits projected for the future in the nation’s most populous state. 

Saturday’s signing came just two years after Newsom and Democratic lawmakers were boasting about surpluses that totaled more than $100 billion, the product of hundreds of billions of dollars of federal COVID-19 aid and a progressive tax code that produced a windfall of revenue from the state’s wealthiest residents.

But those revenue spikes did not last as inflation slowed the economy, contributing to rising unemployment and a slowdown in the tech industry that has driven much of the state’s growth. The Newsom administration then badly miscalculated how much money California would have last year after a seven-month delay in the tax filing deadline.

Advertisement

The budget includes an agreement that Newsom and lawmakers will try to change the state constitution to let California put more money in reserve for future shortfalls.

Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom’s office but did not hear back.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Continue Reading

Politics

CNN Biden-Trump debate draws 51.3 million TV viewers, a major drop from 2020

Published

on

CNN Biden-Trump debate draws 51.3 million TV viewers, a major drop from 2020

The highly anticipated first presidential debate of the 2024 campaign averaged 51.3 million television viewers Thursday, far below the viewership the first time President Biden and former President Trump faced off in 2020.

The summer date for the event staged by CNN in Atlanta was likely a main factor in the Nielsen figure being significantly lower than the 73 million viewers who watched in late September 2020, when presidential debates are traditionally held.

Viewers also may be weary of the candidates, who both have low favorability ratings with the public.

The data does not include online viewing, which was likely substantial as the debate was available across numerous streaming platforms. CNN said its own streaming properties peaked at 2.3 million simultaneous live views at 9:47 p.m. Eastern.

The event itself was often a brutal viewing experience as Biden appeared unfocused and lost his train of thought at times. The audience also was subjected to a multitude of misstatements from Trump about his economic record, abortion, the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol and other topics.

Advertisement

The showdown was produced by CNN and moderated by its anchors Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, the first time a single network had complete editorial control over a general election presidential debate. A video feed of the proceedings was provided to other broadcast and cable outlets to simulcast.

CNN took some fire on social media and in post-debate critiques over its decision not to fact-check the candidates in real time, which was largely seen as an advantage to Trump and his ability to flood the zone with falsehoods.

The debate was held in a studio without an audience or candidate entourages, creating a sterile atmosphere over 90 minutes.

But Biden’s stunningly lackluster performance — considered the worst since President Reagan struggled through his first debate with Walter Mondale in 1984 — was the story of the night. Even in the Democrat-friendly confines of MSNBC, the dominant theme during post-debate analyses was whether the party will consider replacing the 81-year-old Bidenon the ticket.

CNN’s ability to put its brand name on the event helped on the ratings front. The network averaged 9.53 million viewers to itself — a 5% improvement over its audience for the first 2020 debate.

Advertisement

Fox News, the ratings leader in cable news, finished in second place on the night with 9.3 million viewers. Even though Fox News cooperated on CNN’s terms for carrying the simulcast and promoted it heavily, its conservative commentators frequently told viewers that Tapper and Bash were biased against Trump and that he would not get a fair shake. They changed their tune after the event.

ABC was the most-watched broadcast network for the event with 9.21 million viewers, followed by NBC (5.17 million), CBS (4.8 million), MSNBC (4.1 million), the Fox broadcast network (3.48 million), Telemundo (829,000), Univision (704,000), Fox Business Network (372,000) and HLN (251,000).

Continue Reading

Politics

Ex-Rep. Charlie Rangel, 94, questions whether Biden belongs in nursing home, not White House

Published

on

Ex-Rep. Charlie Rangel, 94, questions whether Biden belongs in nursing home, not White House

Former Harlem Congressman Charles Rangel — who is 94 years old — wondered whether President Biden belongs in a nursing home instead of the White House following last week’s debate disaster.

“I have never been more shocked and embarrassed by any presidential debate than I was last Thursday,” Rangel, who served in Congress from 1971 to 2017, said Sunday on 770 WABC radio’s “The Cats Roundtable.” 

“One [candidate is] a convicted felon who has no respect for the truth, for morality. The other seemed so damned confused I didn’t even know whether he knew where the hell he was at in terms of responding to the moderator.”

Rangel, a Democrat, told host John Catsimatidis he “would not object” to both candidates taking cognitive tests to determine their fitness. Trump is 78, just three years younger than Biden.

FAUCI GIVES HIS OPINION ON WHETHER 81-YEAR-OLD BIDEN IS FIT TO RUN FOR A SECOND TERM

Advertisement

President Biden looks down as he participates in the first presidential debate of the 2024 elections with former President and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump at CNN’s studios in Atlanta, Georgia, on June 27, 2024. (ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

“It’s clear that Biden was shaky in responding … One has to think about what happens in [the next] four years.”

Biden’s debate performance was so troubling that voters have to be reminded that Trump could be sentenced to prison time for his conviction in the Stormy Daniels hush money case, Rangel said.

BIDEN DEBATE DEBACLE: 10 EYE-OPENING MEDIA RESPONSES, FROM MSNBC PANIC TO ‘THE VIEW’ CALLING FOR REPLACEMENT

He said in most states Republicans and Democrats will vote for their party nominee despite their flaws, and the election comes down to seven battleground states.  

Advertisement
People watching the debate on TV

New Yorkers watch the 2024 Presidential Debate between Trump and Biden in New York City, on June 27, 2024. (Lokman Vural Elibol/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“If Trump is in jail, Republicans will vote for him. If Biden is in a nursing home, [the Democrats] are going to vote for him,” he said. 

BIDEN’S ‘DISASTER’ DEBATE PERFORMANCE SPARKS MEDIA MELTDOWN, CALLS FOR HIM TO WITHDRAW FROM 2024 RACE

But Rangel wasn’t ready to abandon Biden, noting he was good on the stump the day after the debate.

Trump during CNN debate

Former President using his hands to convey his point at the debate (Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images)

“He was so on point, so articulate. He was better than he was at the State of the Union [address]. And I wondered, ‘Where the hell was that Joe Biden [during the debate]?’” he said.

Biden intends to seek re-election despite calls from the liberal New York Times, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and even some Democrats that it’s time for him to step aside for the good of the party and the country.

Advertisement

 

Former Congressmen Charles Rangel makes a speech

Former U.S. Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., questioned whether President Biden belongs in a nursing home following the debate with Trump. (Seth Wenig-Pool/Getty Images)

During the debate, Biden frequently stumbled over his answers and at one point froze and then said “I beat Medicare.”

Rangel, during the latter part of 46 years in Congress, struggled with his physical health but appeared mentally sharp.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending