Connect with us

Politics

If Putin wants to remake the Soviet Union, what country would Russia target next?

Published

on

If Putin wants to remake the Soviet Union, what country would Russia target next?

NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

“I’ve learn most of every thing he’s written,” President Biden stated of Russian President Vladimir Putin final week. “He has a lot bigger ambitions in Ukraine. He needs to, in reality, reestablish the previous Soviet Union. That’s what that is about.”

Many specialists imagine that Biden is true. In an usually cited and maybe extremely revealing remark years in the past, Putin stated that he believed the autumn of the Soviet Union was the best geopolitical tragedy of the twentieth century. 

Putin presently has his fingers full with a stronger-than-expected resistance to his conflict on Ukraine – together with at residence – although his huge army is anticipated to finally prevail. Most imagine, nevertheless, that it isn’t a matter of if, however somewhat when and the place, the Russian president begins pressuring, coercing or attacking different nations as he tries to reconstitute one thing akin to the Soviet Union.

The Baltics

Many are retaining one eye on Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania as Putin wages his conflict on Ukraine. That is as a result of the three Baltic States sit sandwiched between Russia, its shut ally Belarus, the Baltic Sea and the Russian territory of Kaliningrad. 

Advertisement

A map reveals the boundaries of the previous Soviet Union, with NATO “Baltic” states highlighted. Many speculate these nations might face covert motion and cyberattacks from Russia quickly.
(Fox Information)

RUSSIA INVADES UKRAINE: LIVE UPDATES

As a result of all three nations are NATO members, it isn’t anticipated that Putin would take bodily aggressive motion towards them, in accordance Penn State professor emerita of political science Donna Bahry. 

“The Baltics are weak, however a direct Russian army strike towards NATO nations appears unlikely for now,” Bahry informed Fox Information Digital. “That doesn’t rule out Russian efforts comparable to cyberattacks and different covert actions. In actual fact, all three Baltic nations have skilled cyberattacks from Russia for some years.”

Former Protection Intelligence Company officer Rebekah Koffler additionally informed Fox Information Digital {that a} army assault is very unlikely. However she stated Putin could hit the Baltics with “non-kinetic actions” that might embrace not solely cyberattacks however digital warfare, “any form of destabilization like covert ops,” and even staging a protest.

Advertisement

“He’s not gonna go along with army operations or any form of kinetic motion towards any NATO nation such because the Baltics,” she stated. “However because the battle escalates, and particularly if he is on the shedding facet, I totally anticipate him to ratchet up non-kinetic actions.”

RUSSIA HIKES KEY RATE TO 20%, TELLS COMPANIES TO SELL FX

R Avenue Institute Cybersecurity and Rising Threats Director Tatyana Bolton, in the meantime, informed Fox Information Digital that whereas Putin’s timeline is probably not fast, she believes Putin needs to finally achieve management of the Baltics. She stated the West ought to do every thing in its energy to salvage Ukraine, which she stated could be key to deterring any future Putin assault on the Baltics. 

Russian President Vladimir Putin during a news conference in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Feb. 1, 2022. 

Russian President Vladimir Putin throughout a information convention within the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, Feb. 1, 2022. 
(Yuri Kochetkov/Pool Photograph by way of AP)

“This might take months or years, however I feel that is precisely what he is making an attempt to do. He is making an attempt to take one piece at a time to reassemble what he believes was the best nation on this planet,” Bolton stated. 

Koffler additionally stated it is extremely unlikely Russia would take kinetic motion quickly towards different NATO members or some other “actually Western nation.” This would come with, she stated, non-NATO members Finland and Sweden, regardless of hypothesis about Putin’s curiosity within the Swedish island of Gotland. 

Advertisement

Different post-Soviet states 

Romania and Georgia could face a extra fast menace than the Baltics, Bahry and Koffler stated. 

Any space the place the Russians have their quote-unquote peacekeeping forces… or something that has disputed territory [is vulnerable].

— Former Protection Intelligence Company officer Rebekah Koffler

“Will Putin now transfer shortly towards different post-Soviet states? Extra army assaults on different post-Soviet nations appear unlikely for now,” Bahry stated. “However Putin might ramp up stress on the nations with nearer ties to the EU, comparable to Moldova and Georgia — for instance, by recognizing the independence of Transnistria or annexing South Ossetia.”

Koffler stated these former Soviet states are certainly “weak,” as a result of they don’t seem to be in NATO and since they’ve disputed territory.

UKRAINE FM SLAMS ‘TRAITORS TO HUMANITY’ FOR LEAVING RUSSIA SWIFT LOOPHOLES: ‘MONEY SOAKED IN OUR BLOOD’

Advertisement

“Positively a menace to Moldova,” Koffler stated. “Any space the place the Russians have their quote-unquote peacekeeping forces… or something that has disputed territory comparable to Transnistria in Moldova, comparable to Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia.”

Koffler stated these areas “may very well be on the goal record, together with on this section of the operation, particularly if he’s perceiving that he is on the shedding facet.” What might maintain Putin again from going after these areas, Koffler stated, is the very fact a lot of his army is preoccupied in Ukraine for now. 

The boundaries of the former Soviet Union are shown on a map. Former Defense Intelligence Agency officer Rebekah Koffler said any former Soviet state that's not in NATO is vulnerable to Russian action right now. 

The boundaries of the previous Soviet Union are proven on a map. Former Protection Intelligence Company officer Rebekah Koffler stated any former Soviet state that is not in NATO is weak to Russian motion proper now. 
(Fox Information)

What the West can do

Even though kinetic motion is unlikely, Koffler stated it’s nonetheless crucial to “shore up” the Baltics with Western troops. However she stated that should be carried out rigorously “in order that Putin does not interpret our actions as offensive as an alternative of defensive… Keep in mind, he is paranoid.” 

Retired CIA station chief Dan Hoffman additionally acknowledged the difficulty with the notion of NATO build up troops within the Baltics. He stated a buildup of Western forces in these three states bordering Russia would feed into the “enemy on the gates” propaganda Putin makes use of on his individuals. However, Hoffman stated, it is nonetheless crucial to extend the western army presence within the Baltics. 

Advertisement

“Even when there’s a 2% likelihood Putin invades Estonia, you higher be there and prepared with an entire lot of troops or else that’s 100% of you getting your a– kicked,” he stated.

Bahry stated “NATO would have problem countering a direct Russian strike on the Baltics proper now,” however that the SWIFT sanctions the West is imposing are “a giant step.” In the long run, Bahry stated, power independence often is the West’s greatest transfer to counter Russia. 

“European nations must be diversifying each the categories and provides of power they use, to scale back dependence on Russian gasoline exports,” she stated. “That’s not simply an power safety difficulty for Europe. It’s additionally a method to scale back the stream of income going to the Russian authorities and its army.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Blinken questioned for State Department hosting in-house therapy sessions after Trump win

Published

on

Blinken questioned for State Department hosting in-house therapy sessions after Trump win

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., took aim at Secretary of State Antony Blinken after it was reported that the State Department held therapy sessions for employees who were upset by President-elect Trump’s election victory.

“I am concerned that the Department is catering to federal employees who are personally devastated by the normal functioning of American democracy through the provision of government-funded mental health counseling because Kamala Harris was not elected President of the United States,” Issa said in a letter to Blinken last week.

The letter comes after a Free Beacon report earlier this month that detailed two alleged therapy sessions that were held at the State Department after Trump’s victory, with sources telling the outlet that one such instance amounted to an information “cry session.”

TRUMP BRINGS BACK FORMER AIDE SEBASTIAN GORKA, EX-STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ALEX WONG TO SERVE IN ADMIN

Rep. Darrell Issa argued that the reported sessions were “disturbing.” (AP Photo/Gregory Bull)

Advertisement

In another instance, an email went out to agency employees and touted a separate  “insightful webinar where we delve into effective stress management techniques to help you navigate these challenging times” after Trump’s victory, according to the report.

“Change is a constant in our lives, but it can often bring about stress and uncertainty,” the email said. “Join us for an insightful webinar where we delve into effective stress management techniques to help you navigate these challenging times. This session will provide tips and practical strategies for managing stress and maintaining your well being.”

In his letter to Blinken, Issa argued that the reported sessions were “disturbing” and that “nonpartisan government officials” should not be suffering a “personal meltdown over the result of a free and fair election.”

Trump at a campaign event

President-elect Trump at a campaign event in Austin, Texas. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

MATT GAETZ SAYS HE WILL NOT SERVE IN THE UPCOMING SESSION OF CONGRESS

While the Republican lawmaker acknowledged that the mental health of the agency’s employees was important, he questioned the use of taxpayer dollars to counsel those upset about the election, demanding answers on how many sessions have been conducted, how many more are planned, and how much the sessions are costing the department.

Advertisement

Issa also raised fears that the sessions could also call into question the willingness of some of the State Department’s employees to carry out Trump’s new vision for the agency.

Secretary Blinken

Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks during a ceremony on May 10, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Kevin Wolf)

“The mere fact that the Department is hosting these sessions raises significant questions about the willingness of its personnel to implement the lawful policy priorities that the American people elected President Trump to pursue and implement,” the letter said. “The Trump Administration has a mandate for wholesale change in the foreign policy arena, and if foreign service officers cannot follow through on the American people’s preferences, they should resign and seek a political appointment in the next Democrat administration.”

The State Department did not immediately respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Ali: Neo-Nazi marches. 'Both sides' framing. This is who we are. But it doesn't have to be.

Published

on

Ali: Neo-Nazi marches. 'Both sides' framing. This is who we are. But it doesn't have to be.

Last week in Columbus, Ohio, a dozen or so people marched through the city waving Nazi flags and yelling racial epithets.

Disturbing, to be sure, and a grim sign of the times.

But almost as troubling was the reaction from CNN anchor Dana Bash. After airing a video of the march on Monday’s edition ofInside Politics,” she said it was unclear “which side of the aisle” these white nationalists came from.

“A group of neo-Nazis paraded through that city wearing, waving swastikas, covering their faces,” Bash said during the segment with Rep. Greg Landsman (D-Ohio). “This is not the first time this sort of thing has happened in Ohio in particular. And, of course, it’s continuing to spread. We don’t know what side of the aisle this comes from. I mean, typically neo-Nazis are from the far right,” she said before noting that Landsman, who is Jewish, had “far left” protests outside his house.

Conflating neo-Nazis with protesters for Palestinian human rights is in itself problematic, but blurring the hard right’s direct connection to white nationalism with “let’s be fair to both sides” comments was inexcusable.

Advertisement

Basic rule: Nazis should never be given the benefit of the doubt, or any leeway for that matter. Neither should the political movements that empower them.

Bash wasn’t the only media personality to shy away from condemning the people and parties that embolden fascism. “Morning Joe” hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, frequent critics of Donald Trump, revealed Monday that they’d recently visited the president-elect and members of his team at Mar-a-Lago to “restart communications.”

Brzezinski preempted questions about their decision with another question: “For those asking why we would go speak to the president-elect during such fraught times, especially between us, I guess I would ask back, why wouldn’t we?”

By the time the “Daily Show” aired that evening, host Jon Stewart had an answer: “Uh, because you said he was Hitler.”

The about-face of news anchors who as recently as last month voiced concerns about the future of the country under a second Trump term sparked plenty of criticism. Ratings plunged after the segment, with some detractors accusing the couple of obeying the president-elect in advance for fear of retaliation once he’s back in the White House. If true, their concern wouldn’t be unfounded. Trump has waged war on the media from Day One, referring to them often as “fake,” “crooked” and an “enemy of the state.”

Advertisement

I’d like to believe that these media figures aren’t folding like cheap suits, but maybe that’s wishful thinking. There’s a lot of that going around these days. Democratic leaders have been throwing pennies in a well since 2016, repeating the mantra, “This is not who we are. This is not who we are.” At least it put a rosier sheen on the rising tide of bigotry and violence unleashed by MAGA.

Aspirational thinking is healthy and admirable, but not in all cases. And in this case, it’s also not particularly accurate, because as the election results attest, this is who we are. Trump’s retribution approach resonated more with voters than Kamala Harris’ promises of a united future. Trump voters may not have fully agreed with his torrent of hate speech, “Access Hollywood” grab ‘em comments or labeling of fellow Americans as “the enemy within,” but they also weren’t bothered enough by it all to not vote for him.

And let me be clear, I’m not conflating the majority of Trump voters with those idiots marching in Ohio. What I am saying is that when news personalities like Bash and the “Morning Joe” crew operate on the unspoken premise that there are two sides to the story and we should give fascism a chance, it serves no one but the aspiring strongman.

Ignoring the obvious seemed to be what Bash was doing. But her viewers probably could discern which side those neo-Nazis were aligned with when they paraded through Columbus.

Journalists across social media were immediately on the case. Nick Martin, who runs the Informant, a publication covering hate and extremism in the U.S., posted a response to her comments. It was a selfie of a founder of the neo-Nazi groups in question, taken at a Trump rally.

Advertisement

Other examples of MAGA’s ties with white power were so fresh they were reported in the same news cycle.

Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon, former Fox News host Pete Hegseth, was one of 12 National Guard members removed from security duty for President Biden’s 2021 inauguration over his potential extremist ties. Hegseth has tattoos associated with white nationalist movements, including a symbol popular with Christian nationalists referred to as a Jerusalem cross.

On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly parroted propaganda used in Nazi Germany when pledging to “root out the communists, Marxists, fascists and the radical-left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country.”

Commentary in the Hill revealed that when he spoke that line at a 2023 rally in New Hampshire, he barely modified from its original 1930s Nazi form. The previous year he dined with prominent white supremacist and Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes at Mar-a-Lago.

And we all remember when during his first term he defended violent white nationalists who marched in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017, saying they included “some very fine people.”

Advertisement

Trump wants you to believe that. But we don’t have to. It’s time we admitted that we aren’t all that good, and that we need to be better.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fred Harris, former Democratic senator from Oklahoma and presidential candidate, dies at 94

Published

on

Fred Harris, former Democratic senator from Oklahoma and presidential candidate, dies at 94

Fred Harris, a self-described populist Democrat from Oklahoma who served eight years in the U.S. Senate before an unsuccessful campaign for president in 1976, has died. He was 94.

Harris’ wife, Margaret Elliston, confirmed his death to the Associated Press in a text message on Saturday, writing: “Fred Harris passed peacefully early this morning of natural causes. He was 94. He was a wonderful and beloved man. His memory is a blessing.”

Harris, who was living in New Mexico, died in a hospital in Albuquerque, Elliston told The New York Times.

Harris first served for eight years in the Oklahoma State Senate after winning election in 1956. He then launched his career in national politics in 1964 when he won a Senate race to fill the vacancy left by Sen. Robert S. Kerr, who died in January 1963.

GAME SHOW HOST CHUCK WOOLERY OF ‘WHEEL OF FORTUNE,’ ‘LOVE CONNECTION,’ DIES AT 83

Advertisement

Sen. Fred R. Harris, D-Okla., holds a copy of the report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders as he and two other members of the commission discuss the study on the television-radio program “Issues and Answers,” in Washington, March 3, 1968. (AP Photo/Bob Daugherty, File)

“I’ve always called myself a populist or progressive,” Harris said in a 1998 interview. “I’m against concentrated power. I don’t like the power of money in politics. I think we ought to have programs for the middle class and working class.”

As a U.S. senator, Harris was a member of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, the so-called Kerner Commission, appointed by then-President Lyndon Johnson to investigate the urban riots of the late 1960s.

Fred Harris

Sen. Fred Harris of Oklahoma served in the U.S. Senate for eight years. (AP Photo, File)

The commission released its report in 1968, declaring, “our nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white — separate and unequal.”

Thirty years later, Harris co-wrote a report that concluded the commission’s “prophecy has come to pass,” stating that “the rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer and minorities are suffering disproportionately.”

Advertisement

COLIN PETERSEN, BEE GEES ORIGINAL DRUMMER, DEAD AT 78

In 1976, Harris ran a failed bid to earn the Democratic presidential nomination, bowing out of the race after poor showings in early contests. The more moderate Jimmy Carter went on to win the presidency.

Harris moved to New Mexico that year and became a political science professor at the University of New Mexico. He wrote and edited more than a dozen books, mostly on politics and Congress. In 1999, he broadened his writings with a mystery set in Depression-era Oklahoma.

Fred Harris

Former Oklahoma Sen. Fred Harris stands outside his Corrales, N.M., home, Friday, July 23, 2004. Harris died Saturday at a hospital in Albuquerque, his wife said. He was 94. (AP Photo/Jake Schoellkopf, File)

Harris was born Nov. 13, 1930, in a two-room farmhouse near Walters, in southwestern Oklahoma. The home had no electricity, indoor toilet or running water. He worked on the farm starting at age 5, driving a horse in circles to supply a hay bailer with power – earning 10 cents a day.

He later worked part-time as a janitor and printer’s assistant to help pay for his education at the University of Oklahoma, where he earned a law degree in 1954. He practiced law in Lawton before beginning his career in politics.

Advertisement

Harris married his high school sweetheart, LaDonna Vita Crawford, in 1949, and had three children, Kathryn, Byron and Laura. After the couple divorced, Harris married Margaret Elliston in 1983. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending