Politics
GOP hope for Mayorkas impeachment trial dims as Senate Dems look for quick dismissal
As the Senate waits for the House to deliver its articles of impeachment against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, multiple Democrats expressed their expectation to Fox News Digital that they will be dismissed quickly, and a full trial will not play out.
Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., told Fox News Digital he “of course” thinks his fellow Democratic colleagues will move to table the articles when they are officially delivered to the Senate and lawmakers are sworn in to be jurors.
“It’s entirely political,” he said. “They’ve never shown any evidence of any kind of impeachable offense and then impeached him in the House anyway. It’s ridiculous.”
During the House Republicans’ retreat this week, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., revealed, “We’ve not sent it over yet. And the very simple answer for that, and the reason for it, is because we’re in the middle of funding the government in the appropriations process.”
RUBIO BILL AIMS TO WITHHOLD UN FUNDING FOR AFGHANISTAN UNTIL ASSURED IT DOESN’T SUPPORT TERRORISM
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testifies before the House Homeland Security Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on April 19, 2023. (REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger)
He noted that there is a small window in which the Senate will be required to process the articles, and “we didn’t want to interrupt the Senate and their floor time and their deliberation on appropriations, because we’ve risked shutting the government down.”
According to Johnson, they will be delivered in “due course.”
MASSIVE COALITION FORMS TO PROTECT LEFT-WING ‘SQUAD’ MEMBERS AGAINST ONSLAUGHT OF ELECTION SPENDING
In a narrow second attempt at impeaching Mayorkas last month, the House was successful. By a vote of 214-213, two articles of impeachment were approved against the DHS secretary. One accused him of having “refused to comply with Federal immigration laws” and the other of having violated “public trust.”
Reps. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis.; Ken Buck, R-Colo.; and Tom McClintock, R-Calif., voted against the impeachment.
The first attempt to pass the articles was brought down by four Republican defections, one of which was a procedural move by Rep. Blake Moore, R-Utah, which allowed the resolution to be brought back to the floor.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the impeachment articles will be delivered in “due course.” (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
“I expect it will be dismissed” by the Democratic caucus, Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., told Fox News Digital.
Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., similarly shared that he is hoping for a “quick dismissal.”
Also urging the Senate to get past the impeachment articles, Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., said, “Let’s turn the page and move on and deal with the problems and challenges that we face,” calling the impeachment both “nonsense” and “shameful behavior.”
$12B IN EARMARKS: CONGRESS’ ROLLER-COASTER HISTORY WITH EARMARK SPENDING TAKES ANOTHER TWIST
Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, speaks to reporters outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 6, 2022. (Anna Rose Layden/Getty Images)
Democrats are in the majority in the Senate and will ultimately decide how the body moves forward once the articles are delivered. And since it would only require a simple majority to table the impeachment, the upper chamber may opt to do so.
Their Republican counterparts signaled an expectation that Democrats will move to table the articles.
“I assume the Democrats will try and table it,” said Republican Whip John Thune, R-S.D., who added his conference will do “everything we can to get them to conduct a trial.”
SENATE VOTES TO CONFIRM US AMBASSADOR TO HAITI AMID GANG ATTEMPT TO SEIZE POWER IN CARIBBEAN COUNTRY
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., said she has heard “rumors” that Democrats were interested in tabling it. “I don’t expect a full trial to happen at this point,” she said. “But I think it should.”
Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., speaks during the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee markup of the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act of 2021 in Washington, D.C., on May 26, 2021. (Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
For many Democratic senators, it just isn’t on their radar. The Senate is notably working on several issues, including federal nominations; aid to Ukraine and Israel; Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act reform; Federal Aviation Administration re-authorization; and appropriations, with a March 22 deadline coming up for the last slate of funding bills.
“I haven’t given virtually any thought to the political charade around Secretary Mayorkas, so that’s just not been high on my radar screen,” said Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., who explained that “serious issues” surrounding China and Ukraine are taking precedence.
REPUBLICANS HAMMER JUDGE MCAFEE’S RULING IN FANI WILLIS CASE, CALLING IT ‘ELECTION INTERFERENCE’
“Who gives a s—?” said Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa. He added that the Mayorkas impeachment would not be the last of the “dumb s—” that House Republicans have done.
“Who gives a s—?” Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., said of the Mayorkas impeachment effort. (Nathan Howard/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
However, Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., and Ben Cardin, D-Md., emphasized the importance of their status as jurors in the matter of the DHS secretary’s impeachment.
“As an impartial juror on all of the above, I’ve always been the same with any type of impeachment that I’m not going to predetermine or have any bias towards what’s going to happen,” said Cortez Masto.
SCHUMER CALLS FOR NEW ISRAELI LEADER TO REPLACE NETANYAHU IN SENATE FLOOR SPEECH
Cardin echoed, “I’ve always taken the position as a juror, I shouldn’t talk about that publicly.” The senator noted, however, that he has “pretty strong views,” adding that reporters could probably guess them.
DHS did not provide comment on the Senate’s procedure for the articles of impeachment to Fox News Digital.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas is expected to face a House impeachment vote. (Getty Images)
Following the House’s vote last month, DHS spokesperson Mia Ehrenberg said in a statement, “House Republicans will be remembered by history for trampling on the Constitution for political gain rather than working to solve the serious challenges at our border.”
“Without a shred of evidence or legitimate Constitutional grounds, and despite bipartisan opposition, House Republicans have falsely smeared a dedicated public servant who has spent more than 20 years enforcing our laws and serving our country,” she continued.
Despite several Senate Republicans criticizing the House’s attempt to impeach Mayorkas, many Republicans have changed their tune and expressed their interest in the Senate holding a full trial.
Fox News Digital’s Liz Elkind contributed to this report.
new video loaded: Why Were These C.E.O.s in Beijing With Trump?
By Ana Swanson, Nour Idriss, Nikolay Nikolov and James Surdam
May 15, 2026
Politics
Senator John Kennedy introduces America to ‘Margaret,’ his elliptical trainer named after Thatcher
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Margaret Thatcher once ran Britain. John Kennedy’s “Margaret” mostly runs him into the ground.
Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., is going viral after posting a tongue-in-cheek workout video introducing followers to “Margaret” — his elliptical trainer named after former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher — while wearing a red bandanna and speaking directly to the camera from his Louisiana carport.
“Hey X, I have somebody I’d like you to meet,” Kennedy says at the start of the minute-long video posted to social media Friday.
“This is Margaret. Margaret is my elliptical trainer. I named Margaret after Margaret Thatcher because both kick butt and take names.”
ERIC SWALWELL’S ‘CRINGE’ WORKOUT VIDEO MOCKED FOR BENCHING LIGHT WEIGHT
Senator John Kennedy, R-La., posted the video showing his unconventional at-home workout routine with elliptical “Margaret” to social media channels Friday. (@SenJohnKennedy via X)
Kennedy goes on to explain that “Margaret” lives outside under the carport for three reasons: the machine is too heavy to move, his wife “won’t let” him bring it inside and because he enjoys getting in a workout during Louisiana summers.
The Senator said he enjoys working outside during Louisiana summers, a detail that drew disbelief from many viewers familiar with the state’s famously brutal heat and humidity.
“As you can see, Margaret, my elliptical trainer, is out here under my carport in Louisiana,” Kennedy says. “After Margaret kicks my butt, I look for air conditioning.”
The surreal, self-aware clip quickly drew thousands of reactions online, with users roasting Kennedy’s bandanna look while also praising the senator’s everyman personality.
SEN KENNEDY PRAISES FETTERMAN AS A ‘TOTAL BANGER,’ WHO ‘DOESN’T GIVE A DAMN’ ABOUT ANGERING LIBERALS
Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., talks to reporters in the basement of the U.S. Capitol on July 31, 2025, as Senate lawmakers work to finish legislative business before the August recess. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
“You are rocking the dadgum crap outta that bandana,” one user wrote. “I thought you were representing the Bloods for a minute. Tell Margaret I think she’s cute but evil.”
Others praised Kennedy’s personality and down-home delivery style.
“You are a gem to us normal folk Mr. Kennedy. Live long and prosper!” one supporter posted.
“Senator Kennedy is that kind of Southerner that makes you feel you’re sitting on the front porch having some bit of common sense enlighten you in that poetic Southern way,” another wrote.
The Louisiana Republican has long cultivated a folksy, humorous public image that often breaks through online with colorful one-liners and unconventional social media moments.
Sen. John Kennedy speaks before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington on March 21, 2022. (J. Scott Applewhite/Reuters)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Kennedy ended the video with a line that only added to the internet’s fascination.
“My work here is done,” he said. “And I can see myself out.”
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday turned down an appeal from Virginia Democrats whose new voter-approved state election map was canceled by the state’s Supreme Court.
The justices made no comment, and the legal outcome came as no surprise.
The U.S. Supreme Court has no authority to review or reverse rulings by state judges interpreting their state’s constitution — unless the decision turned on federal law or the U.S. Constitution.
But the Virginia ruling came as a political shock, particularly after 3 million voters had cast ballots and narrowly approved a new election map that would favor Democrats in 10 of its 11 congressional districts.
That would have represented an increase of four seats for Democrats in the House of Representatives.
Even worse for Democrats, the court setback in Virginia came a week after the Supreme Court’s ruling in a Louisiana case had bolstered Republicans.
In a 6-3 decision, the justices reinterpreted the Voting Rights Act and freed Republican-controlled states in the South to dismantle districts that were drawn to favor Black Democrats.
In the two weeks since then, the GOP has flipped seven districts in Tennessee, Alabama, Louisiana and Florida.
The Virginia Supreme Court decision pointed to a procedural flaw that turned on the definition of an “election.”
To amend the state Constitution, Virginia lawmakers must adopt the proposal twice — once before a “general election” and a second time after the election. It is then submitted to the voters.
Last fall, Democrats proposed to amend the state Constitution to permit a mid-decade redistricting.
However, by a 4-3 vote, the state justices said the General Assembly flubbed the first approval because it took place on Oct. 31 of last year, just five days before the election.
By then, they said, about 40% of the voters had cast early ballots.
In defense of the Legislature, the state’s attorneys said the proposed amendment was approved before election day, which complies with the state Constitution.
But the majority explained “the noun ‘election’ must be distinguished from the noun phrase ‘election day.’ ”
It reasoned that because early voters had already cast ballots before the constitutional amendment was first adopted, the proposal was not approved before the election.
The dissenters said the election took place on “election day” and the proposal had been adopted before that time.
The state’s lawyers adopted that view in their appeal and argued that under federal law, the election takes place on election day.
But the Supreme Court turned away the appeal with no comment.
The result is that a state amendment that won approval twice before both houses of the Legislature and in a statewide vote was judged to have failed.
The state says it will use the current map, which had elected Democrats to the House in six districts and Republicans in five.
-
Detroit, MI8 minutes agoHow many division wins will the Detroit Lions tally in 2026?
-
San Francisco, CA20 minutes agoSF’s economy may be at an “inflection point”
-
Dallas, TX26 minutes agoDallas Cowboys schedule wallpapers: Mobile and desktop versions available
-
Miami, FL32 minutes ago18-year-old man from NW Miami-Dade found safe, detectives say – WSVN 7News | Miami News, Weather, Sports | Fort Lauderdale
-
Boston, MA38 minutes agoMan hospitalized after slashing at Nubian Square MBTA Station – Boston News, Weather, Sports | WHDH 7News
-
Denver, CO44 minutes agoBroncos will travel 19,129 miles in 2026 (see where that ranks in the NFL)
-
Seattle, WA50 minutes agoSeattle Mariners reveal plan for next turn through rotation
-
San Diego, CA56 minutes agoWhere to watch San Diego Padres vs Seattle Mariners: TV channel, start time, streaming for May 16