Connect with us

Politics

Divisions, midterm concerns on display as California Democrats meet for convention

Published

on

Divisions, midterm concerns on display as California Democrats meet for convention

As California Democrats work to inspire their voters forward of midterm elections wherein their celebration is essentially anticipated to lose management of Congress, their annual conference on Saturday as an alternative devolved right into a showcase of division.

The occasion, which was held just about as a result of COVID-19 pandemic, featured audio system together with Vice President Kamala Harris, Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Gov. Gavin Newsom, who sought to deliver the celebration collectively over its successes from the final 12 months. However the bickering between varied factions overshadowed the pleas for unity by celebration officers who argued setting apart variations was important for his or her probabilities in November.

One labor chief accused some within the celebration of being “brazenly hostile” to his members and mentioned that the celebration wanted to return to its blue-collar roots.

“We aren’t a charity, and our help is rarely a given,” mentioned Andrew Meredith, president of the State Constructing & Development Trades Council of California, the day after he received right into a testy change with a committee chairwoman as he unsuccessfully tried to change the celebration’s environmental platform.

Advertisement

“We are going to all the time put the plight of our personal members on the forefront of what we do,” he mentioned. “We should chorus from changing into the mouthpiece for unrealistic coverage objectives that damage the working class and damage the poor.”

One other labor chief denounced the affect of company donations and lobbyists on some elected Democrats, punctuating his speech with an expletive.

“They don’t simply rely on Republicans to hold their water anymore. They flip to Democrats to do their soiled work,” mentioned Artwork Pulaski, the retiring longtime chief of the California Labor Federation.

A Latino chief warned Democratic politicians to keep away from paying solely lip service to their voters throughout marketing campaign season.

“Don’t take us without any consideration,” mentioned Angelica Salas, govt director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, including that Latinos make up 40% of California’s inhabitants. “We’re sturdy and vibrant. Our participation in elections will make sure that we transcend the rhetoric to actual change. You can’t say, ‘Sí, se puede’ in the course of the election after which say, ‘No se puede’ once you get elected.”

Advertisement

And the chief of the celebration’s progressive caucus, Amar Singh Shergill, complained that Democratic leaders didn’t worth members’ considerations.

“Now we have been silenced, we now have been pushed apart, we now have been informed we aren’t welcome,” he mentioned throughout a caucus assembly. “They usually’re taking a ton of soiled cash and cleansing it to elect the worst folks in that world.”

Regardless of California’s deep-blue tilt, the state’s Democratic leaders emphasised Saturday that the celebration should work arduous on this 12 months’s midterm elections to keep away from shedding floor to the Republican Celebration.

Although Newsom overwhelmingly beat again a recall try final 12 months, and Democrats management all statewide workplaces and have giant majorities within the state’s congressional delegation and Legislature, celebration leaders warned towards complacency. Greater than 6 million Californians voted for Donald Trump within the 2020 election — essentially the most in any state within the nation — and Republicans gained again three congressional seats in Congress right here.

“California has the ability to make or break our efforts to maintain the speaker’s gavel in Nancy Pelosi’s palms and out of attain for an amoral human being like [House Minority Leader] Kevin McCarthy,” mentioned Rep. Adam Schiff of Burbank. “Make no mistake, ought to he ever change into speaker, he’ll do no matter Trump calls for, together with overturning the following presidential election.”

Advertisement

Democrats should deal with defending Reps. Mike Levin of San Juan Capistrano, Katie Porter of Irvine and Josh More durable of Turlock, and on ousting GOP Reps. Michelle Metal of Seal Seashore, Younger Kim of La Habra, Mike Garcia of Santa Clarita, Ken Calvert of Corona and David Valadao of Hanford, Schiff mentioned.

“I don’t wish to sugarcoat it,” he added. “It gained’t be straightforward.”

Celebration Chairman Rusty Hicks mentioned he was not involved that the divisions would hurt the celebration’s efforts this 12 months.

“Any Democrat who’s engaged within the sturdy dialogue that takes place in a Democratic group additionally acknowledges what’s at stake in a 12 months like 2022, main into 2024 and past,” he mentioned in an interview. “The way forward for Democratic management of the Home comes via California. And so I’m not involved that the extraordinary time of fellowship we now have with each other goes to distract us from making calls, sending texts, knocking doorways, sending put up playing cards and giving to causes and candidates that matter essentially the most in 2022.”

One trigger for celebration on the conference was Newsom’s overwhelming victory in final 12 months’s recall election.

Advertisement

The governor mentioned Saturday that he “can be fully remiss if I didn’t simply … thanks humbly, thanks personally, selfishly, but in addition thanks, on behalf extra broadly of this state, for every little thing you probably did to push again towards that Republican recall.”

“In an off-year, an off-month election when folks thought we’d put down our guard, that we’d be lulled to sleep, we stepped up in extraordinary and unprecedented methods. … It’s only a proof level, a foundational level — after we are united as Democrats, every little thing’s attainable,” Newsom mentioned.

Newsom, who campaigned on his help for a single-payer healthcare effort however has been faulted by some in his celebration for not prioritizing it since taking workplace, urged supporters of the system to not lose hope. Progressives incurred a defeat within the Legislature this 12 months when a single-payer healthcare invoice wasn’t dropped at the ground for a vote due to a scarcity of help.

“Don’t assume we are going to abandon that,” Newsom mentioned. “However within the interim, pause and replicate on how far we’ve come.”

Greater than 3,600 delegates, elected officers and activists met on the digital conference this 12 months. The gathering lacked the pageantry and buzz of a conventional conference for the nation’s largest state Democratic Celebration — in contrast to in years previous, there have been no events with musical performances by artists equivalent to Widespread and DJ Samantha Ronson and no appearances by nationwide figures not from California equivalent to former President Invoice Clinton, then-Sen. Barack Obama, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

Advertisement

Harris and Pelosi had been among the many elected officers on the occasion who pressed the significance of Democrats voting within the upcoming midterm elections.

“It isn’t hyperbole to say what we do between now and November will decide our future,” Harris mentioned. “I do know you’ll be able to elect California Democrats up and down the poll in 2022. I do know you’ll shield our front-line members who’re most weak and broaden our attain into new areas of our state. It gained’t be straightforward, however it’ll be price it.”

Pelosi was among the many audio system who spoke about democracy in peril overseas and in the USA.

“We see threats throughout the Atlantic as Russia wages a diabolical, unprovoked warfare towards Ukraine, as a result of [Russian President Vladimir] Putin can’t stand to have a democracy at his doorstep,” she mentioned. “In the meantime, our nation faces threats to democracy as dwelling, as I discussed, a Republican Celebration orchestrating a cynical marketing campaign of voter suppression, and worse, election nullification. … I don’t say this calmly. Democracy and all that it stands for is on the poll.”

California is shedding a congressional seat for the primary time in its historical past, and Democrats face sturdy headwinds within the midterm election due to President Biden’s low approval rankings and rising inflation. Historic tendencies have additionally proven that the celebration in energy within the White Home usually loses seats in Congress halfway via their time period.

Advertisement

Although endorsements for many congressional and legislative races had been determined earlier than the conference, delegates voted on essentially the most contentious intraparty conflicts in addition to statewide contests on Saturday.

Two statewide races attracted maybe the best scrutiny — insurance coverage commissioner and controller.

Malia Cohen, a member of the state Board of Equalization, narrowly gained the nod within the controller’s race over Los Angeles Metropolis Controller Ron Galperin. Incumbent Insurance coverage Commissioner Ricardo Lara narrowly beat again a problem from Marin County Assemblyman Marc Levine and gained the celebration’s endorsement for his reelection bid.

Candidates in two congressional districts did not cross the 60% threshold required for state celebration backing. Lengthy Seashore Mayor Robert Garcia almost hit the benchmark for the nod within the forty second District, an open seat that spans southeast Los Angeles cities all the way down to Lengthy Seashore. Former federal prosecutor Will Rollins additionally didn’t meet the edge within the forty first District in Riverside County, which is presently represented by Republican Rep. Ken Calvert.

Endorsement outcomes are preliminary, should be licensed and may be contested and compelled to a flooring vote on Sunday.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Giffords group to spend $15 million to support Harris and anti-gun candidates

Published

on

Giffords group to spend  million to support Harris and anti-gun candidates

Gun control activists are ramping up spending to elect presumptive Democratic nominee Kamala Harris president and help Democrats capture the House of Representatives in November. 

GIFFORDS, a gun violence prevention group founded by former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, on Friday announced a $15 million campaign targeting battleground state voters. The ad buy is for television, digital advertising and direct mail, as well as for sending Giffords and surrogates to stump for Harris and down-ballot candidates who support tougher gun laws. 

“With just over 100 days until election day, GIFFORDS will redouble its efforts to support champions who are committed to saving lives — including ensuring that Vice President Kamala Harris becomes the next president of the United States,” said Emma Brown, executive director for GIFFORDS.

The multi-million dollar campaign will focus on swing states like Michigan and Arizona for the presidential election, and swing congressional districts in California and New York, which could determine control of the House of Representatives next year, NBC News first reported.

SOTOMAYOR FACES BACKLASH FOR GUN RIGHTS VIEWS AFTER BODYGUARDS SHOOT WOULD-BE CARJACKER: ‘INCREDIBLY IRONIC’

Advertisement

Giffords speaks during a campaign event for Vice President Kamala Harris, Thursday, July 25, 2024, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Joe Lamberti)

“Across the country, Americans are crystal clear: they want elected leaders who stand up to the gun lobby and put public safety first,” said Brown.

GIFFORDS pointed to internal polling conducted in June that found 70% of American voters in battleground districts are “extremely” or “very” concerned about gun violence. The group argues that key groups of voters — particularly women, Latino and Black Americans — strongly support tougher gun laws and will make the difference in close races if motivated to get to the polls.

“This year is critically important, and we look forward to supporting allies committed to preventing gun violence at every level of government — from the state legislative level to Congress, and giving Vice President Harris effective governing partners when she wins in November,” Brown said. 

A Fox News poll conducted in June found that 45% of Americans ranked guns as an “extremely important” issue, making it the 7th most “extremely important” to voters out of a list of 10 issues. The highest-ranked issues were “Future of American democracy” (68%), “Economy” (66%) and “Stability and normalcy” (58%). 

Advertisement

NRA DIGS UP HISTORY TO PUSH BACK ON KAMALA HARRIS’ CLAIM ON ‘ASSAULT’ BAN

Gabrielle Giffords

Giffords exits following a campaign event for Vice President Kamala Harris, Thursday, July 25, 2024 in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Joe Lamberti)

Erich Pratt, the senior vice president for Gun Owners of America, a Second Amendment group, cast doubt on the contention that gun control is a motivating issue for large swathes of voters.

“It’s undeniable that the policies of Kamala Harris and this administration are responsible for the crime crisis our nation currently faces. Threatened confiscation of common self-defense firearms, coupled with soft on crime officials at the state and local levels in major urban centers across the country, have not helped Americans feel safe,” Pratt told Fox News Digital in a statement. 

“If groups like GIFFORDS really cared about reducing violence, they’d be urging Harris, a former prosecutor herself, to mobilize U.S. attorneys offices against violent criminals. But instead, they would prefer to push unconstitutional disarmament that leaves everyday Americans defenseless. That won’t play well with swing state voters.”

WHO IS MARK KELLY? WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE SENATOR FROM ARIZONA AND POSSIBLE VP PICK

Advertisement
Mark-Kelly,-Kamala-Harris

Harris prepares to swear in Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) with his wife Gabrielle Giffords in the old senate chamber for the Ceremonial Swearing on Jan. 3, 2023, in Washington, D.C.  (Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

Gabrielle Giffords, a former Democratic representative from Arizona, was grievously wounded in a 2011 assassination attempt when a gunman shot her in the head at an event in her district. The former congresswoman co-founded her eponymous group a decade ago to “end the gun lobby’s stranglehold on our political system,” according to the GIFFORDS website. 

Her husband is Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., who is reportedly one of the top contenders to be Harris’ running mate. 

Giffords appeared at an event for Harris on Thursday at the Salt & Light church in Pennsylvania, where she met with community activists in Philadelphia. The predominantly Black neighborhood where she spoke has been impacted by gun violence, including an incident last weekend in which three people were killed and at least six others wounded. 

Giffords spoke briefly about her long recovery from the shooting in 2011, which killed six people during a meeting with constituents at a Tucson grocery store. Harris’ other surrogates, including Pennsylvania House Speaker Joanna McClinton, framed the November presidential contest as a choice between Harris, who would sign a ban on assault weapons, and more gun violence under Republican Donald Trump, who gun-rights groups back.

Advertisement

“We are overwhelmed with violence all across America from rural Pennsylvania to inner city neighborhoods like where we are today,” McClinton said. “We as voters can make a decision on having a more violent United States or safer communities in every part of America.”

Both Giffords and McClinton, an ally to Gov. Josh Shapiro, who is also under consideration for the Democratic vice presidential nomination — dodged questions about the veepstakes. Giffords aides told the Associated Press the event had long been planned before President Biden dropped out and endorsed Harris for his job, and certainly before her husband emerged as a potential candidate to run on the 2024 ticket. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Taking cue from Supreme Court, Breed to launch aggressive homeless sweeps in San Francisco

Published

on

Taking cue from Supreme Court, Breed to launch aggressive homeless sweeps in San Francisco

James Reem has lived in a tent on the corner of Fell and Baker streets for more than a year. An artist by trade, he said he was evicted from his apartment after troubles with his landlord and for a time lived out of a van. After the van got towed, someone gave him a tent and he turned to the streets.

His tent sits outside the city’s only DMV office, across the street from the Panhandle, a lush strip of greenery that opens into Golden Gate Park in a family-friendly neighborhood adorned by rows of manicured Victorians.

It’s a comfortable spot, said Reem, 59, with a sidewalk wide enough to accommodate his tent and still leave room for pedestrians. Some days, Reem is one of a dozen or more tent-dwellers on the concrete stretch.

“There are a few of us that stick together,” Reem said.

Advertisement

“They’re not concerned about the homeless,” James Reem said of San Francisco’s plans for encampment sweeps. “They’re concerned about getting rid of us.”

(Hannah Wiley / Los Angeles Times)

His adopted neighborhood is among dozens of sites likely to be targeted as the city launches what Mayor London Breed has said will be an assertive campaign to force people off the streets in response to a June ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court.

An estimated 8,300 people are living homeless in San Francisco. And despite a years-long effort to move people into temporary shelter or permanent housing, unsanctioned encampments remain a widespread and visible problem, often accompanied by garbage, theft and open drug use.

Advertisement

For years, Breed and other city officials said their hands were tied by decisions issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers many Western states, that deemed it cruel and unusual punishment to penalize someone for sleeping on the streets if no legal shelter was available.

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed that decision in a pivotal June 28 ruling, saying that cities in California and the West may enforce laws restricting homeless encampments on sidewalks and other public property.

On Thursday, citing the ruling, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order requiring state agencies to remove encampments in their jurisdictions. While the directive doesn’t require cities to follow suit, Newsom urged them to do so, characterizing the proliferation of encampments as a health and safety hazard that requires immediate action.

Breed, a fellow Democrat, has also embraced the ruling. She said last week that, armed with the high court’s decision, she will spearhead a “very aggressive” effort to clear homeless encampments beginning in August. She said the effort could include criminal penalties for refusing to disperse.

Breed was not available for an interview Friday, and her office has yet to provide details of what the sweeps will entail or where people living in tents are expected to relocate. Her spokesperson, Jeff Cretan, said some of those details would come into clearer focus next week.

Advertisement

During a July 18 mayoral debate hosted by the local firefighters union, Breed acknowledged her decision to orchestrate sweeps was “not a popular” one but said it was a necessary step.

“We have had to move from a compassionate city to a city of accountability,” she said. “And I have been leading the efforts to ensure we are addressing this issue differently than we have before.”

She said the city has worked over the last several years to add shelter beds and disperse outreach workers to offer services and support. But even when outreach workers offer shelter, according to the mayor’s office, those offers are rejected nearly 70% of the time.

Rows of tents fill a plaza at a sanctioned homeless encampment in San Francisco.

San Francisco has experimented with sanctioned tent cities in an effort to address the needs of its homeless population.

(Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Breed’s crackdown is likely to offer headlines out of San Francisco that counter the narratives promoted by conservative pundits as Vice President Kamala Harris ramps up her presidential campaign. Her Republican opponents have long tried to paint Harris, who rose to political power in 2004 as San Francisco’s elected district attorney, as a California liberal whose policies have helped contribute to the surging homelessness and retail crime plaguing her home state.

But the Supreme Court’s ruling is proving divisive for California’s local Democratic leaders. More left-leaning Democrats, including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, say the decision will allow cities to criminalize homelessness without doing anything to address the root causes, including addiction and a dearth of affordable housing. It’s a sentiment echoed by homeless advocates.

“This order won’t reduce homelessness or deter encampments, but it will leave vulnerable people even farther away from home and health than they are today,” Sharon Rapport, state policy director for the Corporation for Supportive Housing, said in an emailed statement.

Whether San Francisco has enough shelter beds to accommodate the potential wave of people pushed off the streets is unclear. Since Breed took office, the city has expanded shelter beds from about 2,500 to nearly 4,000, her office said, and has expanded permanent supportive housing to about 14,000 slots.

The DMV encampment where Reem lives is one of several that city officials have cleared time and again, only to see it return days later. So far this year, the encampment has been cleared more than a dozen times, according to the mayor’s office.

Advertisement

Reem says he feels safer outside than he does in an emergency shelter, where he worries about his belongings getting stolen. He said he would accept help from city workers. But he also said he thinks Breed’s plan is less about helping people like him than it is about clearing out tents that make the public uncomfortable.

“They’re not concerned about the homeless,” he said. “They’re concerned about getting rid of us.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump announces to crowd he 'just took off the last bandage' at faith event after assassination attempt

Published

on

Trump announces to crowd he 'just took off the last bandage' at faith event after assassination attempt

Former President Trump announced to a crowd Friday night he “just took off the last bandage” from his ear after an attempted assassination nearly two weeks ago.

The Believer’s Summit, hosted by Turning Point Action in West Palm Beach, focused on reaching voters of faith. Dr. Ben Carson, former HUD Secretary, preceded the former president.

“And we want to thank each and every one of the believers in this room for your prayers and your incredible support. I really did appreciate it,” Trump said.

TOP DEMOCRATIC SUPER PAC LAUNCHES MASSIVE $50M AD SPEND FOR HARRIS LEADING UP TO DNC

“Something was working. That we know. Something was working. So, I thank you very much. And I stand before you tonight, thanks to the power of prayer and the grace of Almighty God,” he added.

Advertisement

“As I think you can see, I’ve recovered well. And, in fact, I just took off the last bandage off of my ear.”

Former President Trump, the 2024 Republican presidential nominee, speaks at Turning Point Action’s Believers Summit in West Palm Beach, Fla., July 26, 2024.  (Chandan Khanna/AFP via Getty Images)

The crowd roared with applause as the former president gestured to his injured ear.

I just got it off,” he clarified. “I took it off for this group. I don’t know why I did that for this group, but that’s it. I think that’s it.”

Trump’s speech included attacks against his presumptive Democratic opponent, Kamala Harris, calling the vice president “a bum.”

Advertisement

“Three weeks ago, she was a bum, a failed vice president and a failed administration with millions of people crossing. And she was the border czar. Now they’re trying to say she never was,” the former president said.

TRUMP’S FORMER DOCTOR GIVES HEALTH UPDATE, CALLS OUT WRAY AS FBI AFFIRMS BULLET STRUCK FORMER PRESIDENT

“If radical liberal Kamala Harris gets in and, by the way, there are numerous ways of saying her name, they were explaining to me. … I said, don’t worry about it.

“Doesn’t matter what I say. I couldn’t care less if I mispronounce it or not. I couldn’t care less.”

Dr. Ronny Jackson, the former White House doctor, released a letter earlier Friday offering an update on Trump’s health after the assassination attempt July 13 in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Advertisement
US-VOTE-POLITICS-TRUMP2

Former President Trump, the 2024 Republican presidential nominee, speaks at Turning Point Action’s Believers Summit in West Palm Beach, Fla., July 26, 2024. (Chandan Khanna/AFP via Getty Images)

“I want to reassure the American people and the rest of the world that President Trump is doing extremely well,” Jackson said.

“He is rapidly recovering from the gunshot wound to his right ear. I will continue to be available to assist President Trump and his personal physician in any way they see fit and will provide updates as necessary and with the permission of President Trump.”

“What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle,” the FBI confirmed Friday to Fox News Digital.

Trump and running mate JD Vance, the Ohio senator, are scheduled to appear for a campaign rally in St. Cloud, Minnesota, Saturday.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending