Politics
Column: California must stop taking away child support from kids and families
This appears counterintuitive in such a liberal state, nevertheless it’s a truth: California rips off little one help funds supposed for mothers who obtain authorities assist.
It’s largely Washington’s fault due to a federal legislation enacted practically a half-century in the past.
Not solely California, however most states interact on this shameful heist primarily based on federal pointers.
They seize little one help cash not solely from these moms, however others who used to obtain authorities assist and have gotten off it.
To Gov. Gavin Newsom’s credit score, he’s proposing to go partway in righting this improper. He’s asking for laws to permit former assist recipients to obtain all of the little one help they’re entitled to. However present recipients would proceed to have their funds docked.
The governor and Legislature ought to do the morally right factor and allow all little one help — whether or not for former or present assist beneficiaries — to go the place it’s imagined to: the youngsters. Not authorities vaults.
“We now have this huge, elaborate little one help system that doesn’t give the cash to the youngsters,” says Michael Herald, coverage director for the Western Heart on Legislation and Poverty. “They forgot the phrase ‘little one.’
“Ask the general public, ‘The place do you assume the cash goes when the federal government collects little one help?’ ‘It goes to children.’ No. It doesn’t.”
A lot of the public doesn’t have a clue about this, I think. Most, that’s, besides the moms — or in some instances fathers — who’re on CalWORKs, the state’s main monetary help program. They’re well-aware of the shortchanging.
So are the dads — or typically the mothers — who’re ordered to pay little one help. They resent — and infrequently resist — spending meager cash to pad authorities checking accounts reasonably than assist their children.
This sorry authorities observe had escaped me till lately, once I learn Instances reporter Mackenzie Mays’ completely researched piece.
To resolve this, you’ve acquired to wade via numerous indecipherable gunk crafted in obscure governmentese. I’ll attempt to keep away from that entice right here.
Mainly, the federal authorities in 1975 required that every one mothers or dads who utilized for money help additionally open a toddler help case. Even when the non-custodial dad or mum was already making common funds. And no matter whether or not the mother didn’t wish to, maybe fearing the dad’s reprisal.
The feds wished to verify the kid help funds stored flowing. States had been assigned the job of amassing the cash, typically via counties.
Then the mugging: Governments break up a lot of the gathering to partially reimburse themselves for his or her public help prices.
This scheme was reaffirmed in President Clinton’s 1996 “Welfare to Work” reform.
Till January, California allowed solely $50 of month-to-month little one help to “move via” to the households. Then the quantity was raised to $100 for a household with one little one and $200 for these with two or extra children. Any funds above that, the state grabs.
Sacramento retains half for itself, sends 45% to Washington and the counties get 5%.
It’s a bit completely different for mothers who’ve gotten off assist however are nonetheless owed little one help. If it’s cash that’s overdue — funds that had been skipped whereas the household was receiving CalWORKs checks — the state takes all of it. If a cost is updated, all of it goes to the household.
However that is getting too deep within the weeds.
Greg Wilson, govt director of the Little one Help Administrators Assn., places it in perspective: “The state and federal governments acquired used to the income that this program generates. It’s troublesome to shift coverage.”
“However that is 2022,” he provides. “In 1975, we didn’t assume this was rooster. Our understanding of easy methods to help kids has developed. It’d be horrible if what we thought was good in ’75, we nonetheless thought was good.”
Newsom agrees, at the least partly.
He proposes to permit all former CalWORKs households to obtain the complete little one help they’re entitled to, whether or not it’s in arrears or on time. The state Legislative Analyst Workplace estimates that 69,000 households would profit.
Neither the state, the feds or counties would take a lower. Federal legislation permits that.
It could imply $187 million for households. And the state basic fund can be $105 million quick in “reimbursements.”
However that doesn’t assist the households at present receiving CalWORKs advantages. They’d nonetheless be stiffed.
Month-to-month assist is round $800 for many households of a mom and little one residing in a high-cost county, in accordance with state knowledge. Newsom has proposed a 7% enhance. However they need to additionally get their full little one help.
That might price the state an estimated $150 million — half of it a required kickback to the feds.
“It’s nice to present cash to households that was on welfare,” Herald says. “However they’re typically doing higher than households nonetheless on it — the poorest households within the state. We’re not saying don’t do what the governor proposed. Go forward. However don’t go away these different children out, for God’s sake.”
Colorado determined 5 years in the past to permit assist recipients their full share of kid help. To nobody’s shock, the dads felt higher about paying — and more and more did.
“Collections went up way over anticipated,” says Chaer Robert, legislative director for the Colorado Heart on Legislation and Coverage. “Fathers knew the cash was going to their children, not the federal government.”
Newsom and Democratic legislators are all the time pushing children’ packages — little one improvement, transitional kindergarten …
They need to cease snatching the youngsters’ little one help.
President Trump declared on Sunday that he would bring “Columbus Day back from the ashes” and reinstate its celebration as a holiday.
“I am hereby reinstating Columbus Day under the same rules, dates, and locations, as it has had for all of the many decades before!” the president said in a post on Truth Social, referring to the federal holiday named for Christopher Columbus, the Italian explorer who sailed to the Americas on behalf of Spain more than 500 years ago.
The holiday has long been criticized by those who condemn the explorer for paving the way for European colonialism, which brought catastrophic diseases and led to the decimation of Indigenous populations in America.
But Columbus Day was never canceled as a federal holiday. The second Monday in October is still widely referred to as such in the United States, and for many, it remains an important part of Italian American heritage.
With his declaration, Mr. Trump appeared to be referring to a proclamation issued by former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. in 2021. That decree also recognized the day as Indigenous Peoples’ Day, which recognizes the Indigenous communities that have lived in the Americas for thousands of years, and called for it to be celebrated alongside Columbus Day.
“The Democrats did everything possible to destroy Christopher Columbus, his reputation, and all of the Italians that love him so much,” Mr. Trump claimed in his social media post on Sunday.
In 2021, Mr. Biden became the first U.S. president to formally recognize Indigenous Peoples’ Day, vowing to “honor America’s first inhabitants and the Tribal Nations that continue to thrive today.”
But Mr. Biden did not rename the longstanding holiday, which is still officially known as Columbus Day. While several states and dozens of cities recognize it as Indigenous Peoples’ Day, it is not considered a federal holiday, though there have been occasional efforts in Congress to make it one.
Mr. Biden’s 2021 declaration came amid heightened public debate about the erasure of Indigenous people in celebrations of Christopher Columbus, whose landing in North America led to centuries of exploitation and slaughter of Native American populations. At the time, dozens of Christopher Columbus statues were taken down, many in the midst of the Black Lives Matter protests that followed the death of George Floyd in May 2020.
The U.S. military has pummeled over 800 targets since mid-March in a campaign aimed at eliminating Houthi terrorists and restoring freedom of navigation in the Red Sea, according to an update from Central Command.
Since the start of “Operation Rough Rider” on March 15, U.S. forces have executed an “intense and sustained campaign” to dismantle the Iran-backed Houthi terrorist organization’s capabilities, CENTCOM said Monday. The strikes have destroyed critical military infrastructure, including command centers, air defense systems, advanced weapons manufacturing sites and stockpiles of anti-ship missiles and drones.
“These strikes have killed hundreds of Houthi fighters and numerous Houthi leaders, including senior Houthi missile and UAV officials,” the statement read.
The Houthis’ ability to launch attacks on international shipping has taken a major hit. U.S. officials say ballistic missile launches have dropped by 69%, while attacks by one-way suicide drones have fallen by 55% since the operation began.
TRUMP SAYS HE’LL BE ‘LEADING THE PACK’ TO WAR WITH IRAN IF DEAL PROSPECTS WHITHER AWAY
A missile is launched from a warship during the U.S.-led coalition operation against Iran-backed Houthi militia, from an undisclosed location, in this handout picture released on Jan. 12, 2024. (US Central Command via X/Handout via Reuters/ File Photo)
The Ras Isa Port – previously a key Houthi fueling hub – was also destroyed, cutting off a vital revenue stream the group used to fund its terror activities.
The update came after concerns over the rapid rate at which the offensive campaign has depleted munitions stockpiles, and congressional officials say the campaign has already cost over $1 billion, the New York Times first reported.
The Houthis have said they will continue to lob projectiles and launch drones toward Western commercial and military ships in the Red Sea in a show of solidarity with the Palestinians in Gaza and Hamas.
Houthi supporters rally to show support to the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, in Sanaa, Yemen, on March 15. (Reuters/Khaled Abdullah)
Sunday’s update was the first after six weeks of bombing on how many targets had been struck.
It did not reveal how many civilians had been killed or the cost of the campaign. The U.S. now has two aircraft carriers in the region and has sent in new fighter, bomber and air defense units.
NEW NAVY CHIEF ‘REGRETS’ COSTLY MISSILE INTERCEPTORS AGAINST HOUTHIS, PUSHES FOR CHEAPER RED SEA DEFENSE
“To preserve operational security, we have intentionally limited disclosing details of our ongoing or future operations. We are very deliberate in our operational approach, but will not reveal specifics about what we’ve done or what we will do,” the statement read.
Despite U.S. claims of success, some lawmakers and military analysts have questioned whether the strikes are achieving lasting results. Critics argue that while the campaign has degraded some Houthi capabilities, it has not fully stopped attacks on shipping vessels, U.S. Navy ships, or international maritime traffic.
A crater created by a U.S. airstrike. (Donald Trump/Truth Social)
“We will continue to ratchet up the pressure until the objective is met, which remains the restoration of freedom of navigation and American deterrence in the region,” the statement said.
The Houthi offensive was at the center of a bombshell report on a Signal group of top Trump Cabinet officials who used the chat to discuss details and, in the case of Vice President JD Vance, air complaints about the planned strikes.
“I think we are making a mistake,” Vance wrote in the Signal chat, later published by The Atlantic.
“I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now.” The commercial ships being attacked in the Red Sea are largely European.
The Trump administration escalated its showdown with Democrat-led states and cities over immigration enforcement on Monday, announcing that the president will sign executive orders that will “unleash America’s law enforcement to pursue criminals” and direct federal agencies to publish a list of “sanctuary cities” that do not cooperate with immigration agents.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described the sanctuary city executive order in a morning news briefing as “focused on protecting American communities from criminal aliens.”
The order, she said, will direct the attorney general and secretary of Homeland Security to publish a list of state and local jurisdictions that “obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws.”
“It’s quite simple,” Leavitt said in the briefing with border czar Tom Homan. “Obey the law, respect the law, and don’t obstruct federal immigration officials and law enforcement officials when they are simply trying to remove public safety threats from our nation’s communities.”
Trump is focusing on immigration — a key platform of his 2024 election campaign — as he approaches his 100th day in office. After the two executive orders are signed, Leavitt said, the president will have signed more than 140 executive orders in three months, a number that she described as “rapidly approaching the total number signed by the Biden administration over the course of four years in office.”
But the administration is already running into legal roadblocks as it seeks to penalize sanctuary cities.
Last week, a federal judge in California barred the Trump administration from denying or conditioning the use of federal funds to San Francisco and more than a dozen other municipalities that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick said that parts of Trump’s executive orders were unconstitutional, and that the defendants are prohibited “from directly or indirectly taking any action to withhold, freeze, or condition federal funds.”
As a blue state with a massive immigrant population, California is a key player in the nation’s immigration showdown.
After Trump’s November election victory, Gov. Gavin Newsom drafted a conceptual plan to help undocumented immigrants under threat of deportation and called a special legislative session to approve $25 million in additional state funds for possible litigation against the Trump administration.
The Los Angeles City Council also backed a “sanctuary city” law that forbids city employees and resources from being involved in federal immigration enforcement. The law would not prevent federal agents from carrying out mass deportations across Los Angeles, but was intended as a sign that City Hall backs the sprawling region’s immigrants.
On Friday, FBI agents arrested Hannah Dugan, a county judge in Milwaukee, accusing her of obstructing an immigration arrest.
Asked if the Trump administration would lock up a federal judge or a Supreme Court justice, Leavitt said: “Anyone who is breaking the law or obstructing federal law enforcement officials from doing their jobs is putting theirselves at risk of being prosecuted. Absolutely.”
Childhood home of Atlanta’s first Black mayor renovated into affordable housing for Spelman staff
Outages hit Minneapolis neighborhood despite severe weather missing area
No parade for Indy Juneteenth 2025, but other events still happening
Moon Township megachurch wants to resume hosting outdoor services
Deputy Brandon R. Sikes Obituary April 26, 2025 – Thomas Poteet & Son Funeral Directors
-
News1 week agoHarvard would be smart to follow Hillsdale’s playbook. Trump should avoid Biden’s. | Opinion
-
Politics7 days agoVideo: Hegseth Attacks the Media Amid New Signal Controversy
-
Culture5 days agoNew Poetry Books That Lean Into Calm and Joy Amid Life’s Chaos
-
News1 week agoMaps: Where Do Federal Employees Work in America?
-
Technology1 week agoPete Hegseth reportedly spilled Yemen attack details in another Signal chat
-
Politics1 week agoPope Francis and US presidents: A look back at his legacy with the nation's leaders
-
World7 days agoNew Zealand’s minor gov’t party pushes to define women by biological sex
-
Politics1 week agoJD Vance has ‘exchange of opinions’ on issues like deportations during meeting with top Vatican official