Politics
Biden Supreme Court pick Jackson recognizes history of her selection, promises to be ‘independent’
NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
President Biden’s Supreme Court docket nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson Monday stated she is going to adhere to the boundaries of her job as a decide if confirmed, and acknowledged the historical past behind her nomination to the court docket as a Black lady.
“Throughout this listening to I hope that you will notice how a lot I like our nation, and the Structure, and the rights that make us free,” Jackson instructed the Senate Judiciary Committee. “I stand on the shoulders of so many who’ve come earlier than me, together with Choose Constance Baker Motley, who was the primary African-American lady to be appointed to the federal bench and with whom I share a birthday.”
Jackson added: “Like Choose Motley, I’ve devoted my profession to making sure that the phrases engraved on the entrance of the Supreme Court docket constructing, ‘Equal Justice Beneath Legislation,’ are a actuality and never simply a great.”
Supreme Court docket nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson listens to opening statements throughout her affirmation listening to earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee, Monday, March 21, 2022, in Washington. (AP Picture/Evan Vucci)
GRAHAM SLAMS ‘VICIOUS’ LIBERAL EFFORT TO ‘TAKE DOWN’ CHILDS, PICK JACKSON FOR SUPREME COURT
Jackson made the feedback in her opening assertion at her affirmation listening to, which is able to run by Thursday, together with questioning from senators Wednesday and Thursday.
Jackson additionally heaped thanks on a number of of her relations, together with her dad and mom, brother, in-laws, husband and daughters.
“My dad and mom taught me that in contrast to the numerous boundaries that that they had needed to face rising up, my path was clearer,” she stated. “In order that if I labored laborious and I believed in myself and in America, I might do something or be something I needed to be.”
Jackson additional praised Justice Stephen Breyer, who she beforehand clerked for and who she is going to change if confirmed.
“Justice Breyer specifically not solely gave me the best job that any younger lawyer might ever hope to have, however he additionally exemplifies what it means to be a Supreme Court docket justice of the very best degree of ability and integrity, civility, and charm,” she stated. “This can be very humbling to be thought of for Justice Breyer’s seat, and I do know I might by no means fill his sneakers. But when confirmed I’d hope to hold on his spirit.
U.S. Supreme Court docket Justice Stephen Breyer holds up a replica of the U.S. Structure as Breyer proclaims he’ll retire on the finish of the court docket’s present time period, on the White Home in Washington, U.S., January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
(REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)
Jackson additionally dedicated to adhering to the boundaries positioned on the judicial department, together with neutrality.
“If I’m confirmed, I decide to you that I’ll work productively to assist and defend the Structure and this grand experiment of American democracy that has endured over these pas 246 years,” she stated. “I’ve been a decide for practically a decade now, and I take that accountability and my obligation to be impartial very significantly.”
She added: “I do know that my position as a decide is a restricted one, that the Structure empowers me solely to determine circumstances and controversies which might be correctly offered. And I do know that my judicial position is additional constrained by cautious adherence to precedent.”
Jackson’s feedback adopted introductions from former D.C. Circuit Court docket of Appeals Choose Thomas Griffith and College of Pennsylvania Carey Legislation College professor Lisa Fairfax. Griffith notably is taken into account a conservative authorized luminary and was appointed by former President George W. Bush.
JUDGE JACKSON MAY GET SOME REPUBLICAN VOTES: AG BILL BARR
“I’ve had many alternatives to return to evaluation her work and observe her work through the years as a decide, and on a number of events I reviewed her choices on enchantment,” Griffith stated. “Though we didn’t all the time agree on the end result the legislation required, I revered her diligent and cautious method, her deep understanding and her collegial method, indispensable traits for achievement as a justice on the Supreme Court docket.”
Supreme Court docket nominee Choose Ketanji Brown Jackson greets Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., as she arrives for her affirmation listening to earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday, March 21, 2022, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Picture/Jacquelyn Martin)
Fairfax has been pals with Jackson since legislation college and praised her because the form of one who is “the primary name you make for recommendation about your profession to the primary knock you hear on the door after studying you might be recognized with most cancers.”
A number of senators, in the meantime acknowledged the historic nature of the Jackson’s appointment.
“The arc of the ethical universe is lengthy, and it bends in direction of justice,” Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., stated. “Nicely, right this moment, America is witnessing the literal bending of the arc.”
“Choose Jackson, you already know, together with your presence right here right this moment, you might be writing a brand new web page within the historical past of America, a very good web page,” Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., stated.
“I’ve stated prior to now, and I believe it is good for the court docket to appear to be America. So depend me in on the concept of creating the court docket extra numerous,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., stated.
Supreme Court docket nominee Choose Ketanji Brown Jackson gestures throughout her affirmation listening to earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee Monday, March 21, 2022, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Picture/Carolyn Kaster)
REPUBLICANS LAY GROUNDWORK FOR ATTACKS IN HISTORIC JACKSON CONFIRMATION HEARING, DEMOCRATS DEFEND NOMINEE
Jackson’s feedback got here after greater than 4 hours of opening statements from senators wherein Republicans gave the impression to be laying the groundwork for assaults on Jackson’s file and Democrats preemptively arrange their defenses.
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., named a number of youngster pornography circumstances that Jackson confronted when she was a federal district decide. He highlighted that in each such case, Jackson sentenced the defendant extra evenly than what federal sentencing pointers beneficial or federal prosecutors requested for. Actually, a few of the sentences have been the lightest allowed by legislation, Hawley stated.
“Some have stated that the federal sentencing pointers are too harsh on youngster intercourse crimes… I am unable to say I agree with that,” Hawley stated.
U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) meets U.S. Supreme Court docket nominee and federal appeals court docket Choose Ketanji Brown Jackson, in his workplace at the USA Capitol constructing in Washington, U.S., March 9, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
(REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein)
COLLINS CALLS SUPREME COURT PICK JACKSON ‘IMPRESSIVE’ AFTER MEETING, BUT REMAINS UNDECIDED
Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, complained of delays in getting paperwork on Jackson’s time on the U.S. Sentencing Fee and stated a very powerful factor he seems for in a nominee is “judicial philosophy.”
“The courts are usually not vested with a policymaking authority. In keeping with our Structure, courts hear circumstances and controversies and determine them. Nothing extra, nothing much less,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, added. “That is an vital distinction to recollect within the days that lie forward.”
Democrats, in the meantime, alleged that Republicans are off-base with these assaults.
“There may be merely no proof to assist these unfounded assaults,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., stated.
“Choose Jackson isn’t any judicial activist. She will not be a puppet of the so-called radical left. She’s been praised by Republican-appointed judges for her jurisprudence,” Leahy stated.
Over the next six days, various dignitaries, supporters and ordinary citizens will celebrate Jimmy Carter at several funeral events across the country that honor his life and career in public service, from his boyhood farm in rural Georgia to Washington and back.
The gestures of remembrance have all been carefully selected to reflect the 39th president’s rural roots in the small town of Plains, Ga., his political career in Georgia and Washington, and his legacy of global advocacy in Atlanta.
Here is the full schedule of events.
Saturday, Jan. 4
At 10:15 a.m., the Carter family will arrive at Phoebe Sumter Medical Center in Americus, Ga. There, former and current members of the Secret Service detail that protected Carter will escort his body to a hearse, which will then leave for Plains, the former president’s hometown.
The motorcade is expected to pass through Plains, pausing for a moment at his childhood farm. During that stop, the National Park Service will toll the farm bell 39 times, marking Carter’s service as the 39th president.
Once the motorcade leaves Plains, it will head for Atlanta, where it is scheduled to arrive at 3 p.m. Once there, the motorcade will pause for a moment of silence at the Georgia State Capitol, where Carter once served as governor.
A private service will then be held at the Carter Center in Atlanta, where the former president established his presidential library and headquarters for an organization dedicated to championing democracy, fighting diseases and other global causes.
Beginning at 7 p.m., the public will be able to pay their respects at the Carter Center through early Tuesday.
Tuesday, Jan. 7
Public visitation will end at 6 a.m.
At 9:30 a.m., there will be a ceremony marking Carter’s final departure from the Carter Center. His family will then travel with his body to Washington.
They will first fly to Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, arriving at 12:45 p.m. A motorcade will then take them to the U.S. Navy Memorial, in recognition of Carter’s military service.
At 2 p.m., Carter’s body will be transferred to a horse-drawn military wagon, as part of a procession to the U.S. Capitol in Washington. At the Capitol, Carter will lie in state, with a 3 p.m. service scheduled for lawmakers to pay their respects.
The public will be able to visit until midnight, and then again on Wednesday through early Thursday.
Thursday, Jan. 9
Carter will leave the Capitol at 9 a.m., with a ceremony. The procession will head to Washington National Cathedral, where a national funeral service will take place at 10 a.m.
The funeral is expected to end by 11:15 a.m., at which point the family will accompany the coffin back to Joint Base Andrews to fly to Georgia. Once back in Georgia, a motorcade will drive to Plains.
Once the motorcade arrives at Maranatha Baptist Church, where Carter taught Sunday school for many years, a private funeral service will take place at 3:45 p.m.
An hour later, the motorcade is expected to travel to the Carter home, where his wife, Rosalynn, is buried. There, the Navy will conduct a ceremonial flyover, another tribute to Carter’s service both as a lieutenant and commander in chief.
Carter will finally be buried alongside his wife. A private interment ceremony, scheduled for 5:20 p.m., will conclude the services.
Politics
Musk renews harsh rebuke of Dems who rejected deporting sex offenders: Vote out ‘every one’
Tech billionaire and Trump ally Elon Musk renewed criticism of the more than 150 House Democrats who voted against deporting illegal immigrants convicted of sex offenses, demanding each of the lawmakers be voted out of office.
“There is no excuse. Please post the list of people who opposed this law and want to keep illegals who are convicted sex offenders in America,” Musk posted to his X account on Saturday referencing a September House vote.
“They all need to be voted out of office. Every one of them.”
The Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act passed the House in September, after all 215 present Republicans voted in favor of the bill, and were joined by 51 Democratic colleagues. A total of 158 Democrats, however, voted against the bill.
158 DEMS VOTE AGAINST BILL TO DEPORT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHO COMMIT SEX CRIMES
President-elect Trump and Elon Musk watch the launch of a test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket on Nov. 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
The Democrats who voted against the bill came under scrutiny in September, and are facing renewed criticism on social media this month as commenters resurrect the vote ahead of President-elect Trump taking office this month.
“The bill targeted rapists, pedophiles, domestic abusers, and stalkers, ensuring they couldn’t stay in the U.S. Opponents claimed it ‘demonized immigrants,’ but how does protecting convicted predators help anyone – especially their victims?” X show host Mario Nawfal posted to his account Saturday, sparking Musk to weigh in.
“Deporting violent offenders isn’t ‘fearmongering’ – it’s basic public safety. Why would anyone vote to keep criminals who prey on women and children?” Nawfal added.
EX-BORDER CHIEF WARNS OF ‘SIGNIFICANT THREAT’ AS MIGRANT NUMBERS SKYROCKET: ‘ENTIRE SECTORS’ MISSING AGENTS
The legislation would deport illegal immigrants convicted of sex crimes, and would also deem illegal immigrants who admit to domestic violence or sex-related charges – or are convicted of them – to be inadmissible in the U.S., Fox Digital previously reported. The legislation is currently with the Senate, and was referred to the Judiciary Committee.
Representatives of the 119th Congress are sworn in during the first day of session in the House Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 3, 2025. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Notable Democrats who voted against the legislation included Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., former California Rep. Adam Schiff, who now serves in the Senate, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
Musk’s call for the Democrats to be voted out of Congress over the vote comes after he vowed in December to fund moderate Democratic politicians in deep blue districts, “so that the country can get rid of those who don’t represent them.”
CLYBURN BRUSHES OFF MUSK’S PLAN TO FUND MODERATES IN DEMOCRATIC DISTRICTS
President-elect Trump greets Elon Musk as he arrives to attend a SpaceX Starship launch on Nov. 19, 2024, in Brownsville, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
Musk is also slated to serve alongside Vivek Ramaswamy to lead an upcoming presidential advisory committee, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which will work to cut excessive government spending and slash the size of the government under Trump’s second administration.
According to the office of the House clerk, the 158 Democrats who voted against the legislation are:
- Alma Adams, North Carolina
- Pete Aguilar, California
- Gabe Amo, Rhode Island
- Jake Auchincloss, Massachusetts
- Becca Balint, Vermont
- Nanette Barragán, California
- Joyce Beatty, Ohio
- Ami Bera, California
- Donald Beyer, Virginia
- Sanford D. Bishop Jr., Georgia
- Earl Blumenauer, Oregon
- Suzanne Bonamici, Oregon
- Lisa Blunt Rochester, Delaware
- Jamaal Bowman, New York
- Shontel Brown, Ohio
- Julia Brownley, California
- Cori Bush, Missouri
- Salud Carbajal, California
- Tony Cárdenas, California
- André Carson, Indiana
- Troy Carter, Louisiana
- Greg Casar, Texas
- Ed Case, Hawaii
- Sean Casten, Illinois
- Kathy Castor, Florida
- Joaquin Castro, Texas
- Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, Florida
- Judy Chu, California
- Katherine Clark, Massachusetts
- Yvette Clarke, New York
- Emanuel Cleaver, Missouri
- James Clyburn, South Carolina
- Steve Cohen, Tennessee
- Gerald Connolly, Virginia
- Luis Correa, California
- Jim Costa, California
- Jasmine Crockett, Texas
- Jason Crow, Colorado
- Danny Davis, Illinois
- Madeleine Dean, Pennsylvania
- Diana DeGette, Colorado
- Rosa DeLauro, Connecticut
- Suzan DelBene, Washington
- Mark DeSaulnier, California
- Debbie Dingell, Michigan
- Lloyd Doggett, Texas
- Veronica Escobar, Texas
- Anna Eshoo, California
- Adriano Espaillat, New York
- Lizzie Fletcher, Texas
- Bill Foster, Illinois
- Valerie Foushee, North Carolina
- Lois Frankel, Florida
- Maxwell Frost, Florida
- John Garamendi, California
- Jesús “Chuy” Garcia, Illinois
- Robert Garcia, California
- Sylvia Garcia, Texas
- Dan Goldman, New York
- Jimmy Gomez, California
- Al Green, Texas
- James Himes, Connecticut
- Steny Hoyer, Maryland
- Valerie Hoyle, Oregon
- Jared Huffman, California
- Glenn Ivey, Maryland
- Jonathan Jackson, Illinois
- Sara Jacobs, California
- Pramila Jayapal, Washington
- Hakeem Jeffries, New York
- Henry “Hank” Johnson, Georgia
- Sydney Kamlager-Dove, California
- Bill Keating, Massachusetts
- Robin Kelly, Illinois
- Ro Khanna, California
- Dan Kildee, Michigan
- Derek Kilmer, Washington
- Andy Kim, New Jersey
- Raja Krishnamoorthi, Illinois
- Ann Kuster, New Hampshire
- Greg Landsman, Ohio
- Rick Larsen, Washington
- John Larson, Connecticut
- Barbara Lee, California
- Summer Lee, Pennsylvania
- Teresa Leger Fernandez, New Mexico
- Ted Lieu, California
- Zoe Lofgren, California
- Doris Matsui, California
- Lucy McBath, Georgia
- Jennifer McClellan, Virginia
- Betty McCollum, Minnesota
- Morgan McGarvey, Kentucky
- James McGovern, Massachusetts
- Gregory Meeks, New York
- Rob Menendez, New Jersey
- Grace Meng, New York
- Kweisi Mfume, Maryland
- Gwen Moore, Wisconsin
- Joseph Morelle, New York
- Seth Moulton, Massachusetts
- Kevin Mullin, California
- Jerrold Nadler, New York
- Grace Napolitano, California
- Richard Neal, Massachusetts
- Joe Neguse, Colorado
- Donald Norcross, New Jersey
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York
- Ilhan Omar, Minnesota
- Frank Pallone, New Jersey
- Nancy Pelosi, California
- Scott Peters, California
- Brittany Pettersen, Colorado
- Dean Phillips, Minnesota
- Chellie Pingree, Maine
- Mark Pocan, Wisconsin
- Katie Porter, California
- Ayanna Pressley, Massachusetts
- Mike Quigley, Illinois
- Delia Ramirez, Illinois
- Jamie Raskin, Maryland
- Deborah Ross, North Carolina
- Raul Ruiz, California
- C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, Maryland
- Linda Sánchez, California
- John Sarbanes, Maryland
- Mary Scanlon, Pennsylvania
- Janice Schakowsky, Illinois
- Adam Schiff, California
- Bradley Schneider, Illinois
- Robert “Bobby” Scott, Virginia
- David Scott, Georgia
- Terri Sewell, Alabama
- Brad Sherman, California
- Darren Soto, Florida
- Melanie Stansbury, New Mexico
- Haley Stevens, Michigan
- Marilyn Strickland, Washington
- Mark Takano, California
- Shri Thanedar, Michigan
- Mike Thompson, California
- Bennie Thompson, Mississippi
- Rashida Tlaib, Michigan
- Jill Tokuda, Hawaii
- Paul Tonko, New York
- Norma Torres, California
- Ritchie Torres, New York
- Lori Trahan, Massachusetts
- David Trone, Maryland
- Lauren Underwood, Illinois
- Juan Vargas, California
- Marc Veasey, Texas
- Nydia Velázquez, New York
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Florida
- Maxine Waters, California
- Bonnie Watson Coleman, New Jersey
- Nikema Williams, Georgia
- Frederica Wilson, Florida
The Democrats who voted against the legislation came under fierce scrutiny in September from conservatives.
“If you vote against it, you’re sexist against women,” South Carolina Republican Nancy Mace, who introduced the legislation, said in September to Fox Digital.
Migrants attempt to cross into the U.S. from Mexico at the border Dec. 17, 2023 in Jacumba Hot Springs, California. (Nick Ut/Getty Images)
ELON MUSK AGREES WITH RON PAUL’S CALL TO ‘ELIMINATE FOREIGN AID’
“I mean, truly, because we’re talking about illegals who are here who are committing domestic violence, rape and murder on women and children – they’ve gotta go. They shouldn’t be allowed into our country.”
“158 Democrats just voted AGAINST deporting migrants for s*x offenses. This is a slap in the face to every victim and their family members. Democrats hate you and your children,” popular conservative X account Libs of TikTok posted at the time.
Democrats who voted against the bill characterized it as xenophobic and an example of “fearmongering” against immigrants.
“Here we are again, debating another partisan bill that fear mongers about immigrants, instead of working together to fix the immigration system,” Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., said during debate on the bill.
“I probably shouldn’t be too surprised. Scapegoating immigrants and attempting to weaponize the crime of domestic violence is appearing to be a time-honored tradition for Republicans.”
Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report.
Will President-elect Donald Trump’s vow to “launch the largest deportation program in American history” truly keep millions of immigrants out of the country? My research on deportees over the last five years suggests it won’t.
Here’s why: They’ll come back.
One of the migrants I interviewed was deported to a perilous town in northern Mexico, where he found himself in immediate danger on arriving at a bus terminal. Members of a criminal group demanded that he provide a contraseña — a password he didn’t have — or face kidnapping. He ultimately borrowed $1,500 from a friend to pay them off, remain free and make his way back to the United States.
His experience is an example of the risks deportees face in their countries of origin. Those dangers — and the relative safety of the only homes they have — often motivate them to undertake harrowing journeys back to the United States.
Although data on deportees is somewhat limited, the evidence we have shows that people re-immigrate after deportation more frequently than many might expect. In fiscal 2020, for example, the federal government classified 40% of deportations as “reinstatements of removal,” meaning the deportees had reentered the United States after being removed or ordered to leave. A 2019 report by the American Immigration Council, a pro-immigration advocacy group, similarly noted that such reinstatements of removal generally make up 40% of deportations annually. From 2011 to 2020, approximately 1.3 million deportations affected people who had been deported before.
That’s because deportation policies are at best blunt instruments that take little account of the human lives they ensnare. Those who view mass deportation as a solution to unauthorized immigration ignore the deep roots, sense of belonging, family ties and resolve that drive people back to the country they call home.
Undeterred by deportation, people I’ve interviewed have found ways to return to the United States with or without permission. Their stories reveal the rarely discussed truth that deportation is not necessarily the end of migration; it is often a temporary, futile interruption.
I spoke to another man who was born in Mexico but raised in the United States, served in the military and struggled with post-traumatic stress. Because of a minor cannabis possession charge, he was deported to a country he barely remembered. In 2021, more than a decade after his exile, he returned to the only land he considers his own, the United States.
“You can travel the world,” he told me, “but eventually, your heart and spirit will call you home.”
Another Mexican-born, U.S.-raised military veteran I interviewed was also deported over a marijuana charge. Feeling “erased from existence,” he risked his life to return less than a month later.
“I don’t need a paper to tell me I’m an American,” he told me.
These stories expose a fundamental flaw of mass deportation. In contrast to the cyclical migration patterns of earlier decades — when migrants, mostly men, moved back and forth between the United States and Mexico with relative ease in response to the labor market — today’s cycle is driven by government coercion and unbreakable bonds. Forced departures lead to inevitable returns as deportees are pulled back by connections that no amount of enforcement can sever.
The coyotes who smuggle them have become part of what the anthropologist Jason De León calls a “border-security-industrial complex.” If their illicit businesses were publicly traded, their stocks would be soaring on renewed demand. Meanwhile, border enforcement policies push migrants into treacherous terrain where they face dehydration, hypothermia and death in the desert.
For deportees, returning is an act not just of determination, but of survival. Some are lucky enough to make it back, but as the Spanish saying goes, “Tanto va el cántaro al agua hasta que se quiebra”: The pitcher goes to the well until it finally breaks. Deportation policies push people to take increasingly greater risks to return to the only homes they’ve ever known. The next attempt could always be their last.
Deportation may well become the defining issue of our era if we continue down this punitive path. When mass deportations fail, what will follow? Will we see modern-day versions of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s executive order authorizing forced removal and incarceration of Japanese Americans, complete with “relocation centers”?
Under a very different executive order signed by President Biden in 2021, the Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs departments prioritized the return of deported U.S. military members and their families. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA, similarly sought to recognize longtime residents’ ties to the country and restore their place in the American communities they call home.
Such policies live up to American ideals of justice and inclusion by embracing those who, in every meaningful way, already belong. Mass deportation would betray those values, put even more lives at risk and very often fail on its own terms.
Saúl Ramírez is a fellow at Harvard Law School and a doctoral candidate in sociology at Harvard.
Companies could pass on the cost of congestion pricing tolls to consumers.
'The Brutalist,' 'Emilia Perez' triumph at Golden Globes
Lions’ 2025 Home and Away Opponents Revealed
South Carolina tops growth ranking list for U.S. states in 2024, according to U-Haul
1 critically injured in shooting near San Francisco homeless shelter
Colorado Rockies game no. 116 thread: Zac Gallen vs José Ureña
Why Marjorie Taylor Greene was ‘kicked out’ of the Freedom Caucus according to Rep. Buck
See it: Tesla crashes into Columbus convention center at 70 mph
Fox News Politics: Georgia the whole day through
Death of missing Oregon girl found in stream ruled homicide
New Orleans Attacker Visited City Twice and Made Trips to Egypt and Canada
Musk renews harsh rebuke of Dems who rejected deporting sex offenders: Vote out ‘every one’
Scholz condemns Musk's support for far-right AfD
FBI says suspect in New Orleans attack twice visited the city to conduct surveillance
As Democrats Reel, Two Front-Runners Emerge in a Leadership Battle
-
Health1 week agoNew Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24982514/Quest_3_dock.jpg "Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks")
Technology1 week agoMeta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business5 days agoThese are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture5 days agoThe 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports4 days agoThe top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics3 days agoNew Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics3 days agoCarter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics1 day agoWho Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?