Connect with us

Vermont

Vt. governor says lawmakers didn’t address his concerns in new Affordable Heat Act

Published

on

Vt. governor says lawmakers didn’t address his concerns in new Affordable Heat Act


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – Concern is popping out of the Vermont governor’s workplace over the brand new Inexpensive Warmth Act launched within the state Senate.

The Inexpensive Warmth Act is a more recent model of the Clear Warmth Normal that Gov. Phil Scott vetoed final 12 months.

In a letter despatched to the Senate Pure Assets and Power Committee on Friday, the governor’s workplace makes clear his considerations haven’t been addressed within the Inexpensive Warmth Act invoice.

The letter factors to the lack of knowledge on fiscal influence, like prices to buy, retire or commerce clear warmth credit. It additionally says there are insurance policies recognized as problematic within the Clear Warmth Normal that stay within the Inexpensive Warmth Act.

Advertisement

Associated Tales:

Report: Vermont not on monitor to assembly local weather necessities

Vermont Gov. Phil Scott outlines spending priorities in $8.4B funds handle

Vt. officers involved with assembly local weather goal timeline

Vt. lawmakers plan to reintroduce ‘clear warmth’ invoice

Advertisement

Vermont Legislature to deal with housing, workforce, local weather

Snow downside or no downside? Resorts involved as ski season heats up

Research: Vermont, New Hampshire virtually reverse on local weather motion coverage



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermont takes on 'Big Oil' with groundbreaking bill: 'The stakes are too high'

Published

on

Vermont takes on 'Big Oil' with groundbreaking bill: 'The stakes are too high'


Photo Credit: Getty Images

Advertisement

Vermont will be the first state in the US to hold “Big Oil” accountable with a law requiring payment for damages from the effects of climate change, per a report by CBS News.

Taking on Big Oil 

The state’s Republican governor, Phil Scott, sent a letter to Vermont’s General Assembly clearing the way for the Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program law (S.259) to pass without his signature. 

While he says he believes in the cause, Gov. Scott shared his reservations in the letter. He indicated that Vermont could have benefited from collaborating with other major players like New York and California instead of risking a stand on its own.

“Having said that,” Gov. Scott continued, “I understand the desire to seek funding to mitigate the effects of climate change that has hurt our state in so many ways.”

One Vermont state Representative, Martin LaLonde, released a reassuring statement of his own, clarifying that legal scholars vetted the bill and that they have a solid legal case. 

Advertisement

“The stakes are too high — and the costs too steep for Vermonters — to release corporations that caused the mess from their obligation to help clean it up,” he said, per CBS News.

Major polluters should pay

The bill would require entities found to have spewed more than 2.2 trillion pounds of planet-warming gases between 1995 and 2024 to pay up, according to CBS News. Vermont would use that money to deal with the disastrous effects of an overheating planet. 

And the industry certainly has the money to pay. In 2022, the U.S. oil and gas industry’s total revenue was $332.9 billion, as Statista reported. While that’s staggering enough, it’s a massive uptick from the $211.2 billion it earned the previous year.  

The damage

The rise in global temperatures has led to various severe climate impacts, including more flooding, fires, droughts, and increasingly powerful storm systems. 

Big Oil is to blame for much of the damage, with the United Nations stating that the use of dirty fuels accounts for more than 75% of polluting gases. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has estimated that in 2023 alone, climate-related disasters caused $92.9 billion in damage across the U.S., and Vermont was not immune to this damage. 

Advertisement

Looking forward

While federal efforts like the Inflation Reduction Act have created green incentives to help address the changing climate, the states must do their part. 

The Vermont Natural Resources Council expressed support for the Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program, stating, “[It] represents a major step forward in ensuring that responsible parties, like Big Oil — companies like ExxonMobil and Shell that have known for decades that their products are disrupting the climate — be required to also pay a fair share of the cleanup costs.” 

Lawsuits are also underway, seeking to hold the dirty energy industry accountable for its actions. More are likely to follow. 

Join our free newsletter for cool news and actionable info that makes it easy to help yourself while helping the planet.


Cool Divider
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

MAP: Where Vermont school districts struggled to pass a budget

Published

on

MAP: Where Vermont school districts struggled to pass a budget


Vermont school districts struggled more than usual to convince voters to approve budgets this spring as they faced double-digit property tax increases.

The increase was estimated to be 18.5%, ultimately whittled down to 13.8%.

It all came to a head three months ago when Vermonters in nearly a third of the state’s school districts voted down their school budgets.

Two districts — Enosburgh Richford and Barre Unified Unified Union School District — still haven’t passed their budgets.

Advertisement

Because Vermont’s education funding is statewide, individual budget cuts don’t translate into comparable savings for taxpayers, putting school districts in a bind.

“For every dollar we cut from the school budget, St. Johnsbury saves about 20 cents. The state keeps the rest and uses it to lower taxes in other towns,” said St. Johnsbury School Board Vice Chair Peter VanStraten in a letter to voters before a third (successful) budget vote. “This is not a vote on what is happening in Montpelier. Please keep that for November.”

Have questions, comments or tips? Send us a message. Or contact the reporter directly at corey.dockser@vermontpublic.org.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont man arrested in Bristol for stolen car and firearms possession

Published

on

Vermont man arrested in Bristol for stolen car and firearms possession


BRISTOL, CT (WFSB) – Connecticut State Police arrested a Vermont man for allegedly stealing a vehicle and possessing firearms on Thursday.

Connecticut State Police Troop H Dispatch received a report of a stolen vehicle from Vermont.

The vehicle was described as a white Ford F-550 truck with a car-carrier towing a GMC SUV.

Massachusetts State Police assisted in the investigation and informed Troop H that the stolen vehicle was last seen on I-91 near Windsor Locks.

Advertisement

Troopers later spotted the described vehicle on I-91 around Exit 34 in Hartford.

The driver, identified as Shawn Carpenter, 47, of Hartford, Vermont, was taken into custody.

During the arrest, troopers discovered two handguns with ammunition and drug paraphernalia in Carpenter’s possession.

Carpenter underwent a Standardized Field Sobriety Test, which he failed.

He refused to provide any information regarding the firearms found.

Advertisement

Upon contacting the registered owner of the stolen vehicle, they denied possessing the firearms and drug paraphernalia.

Carpenter faces multiple charges, including operating under the influence of drugs or alcohol, operating without a license, failure to maintain proper lane, two counts of illegal possession of a weapon in a motor vehicle, two counts of carrying a dangerous weapon, two counts of illegal carrying of a firearm while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, three counts of first-degree larceny, use of drug paraphernalia, and two counts of carrying a pistol without a permit.

He is currently held on a $150,000 bond and has been transferred to the Connecticut Department of Correction pending his scheduled arraignment at New Britain Superior Court.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending