Connect with us

Vermont

New UVM program offers ‘boot camp’ for Vermont town officials  – VTDigger

Published

on

New UVM program offers ‘boot camp’ for Vermont town officials  – VTDigger


Montpelier City Manager Bill Fraser speaks as local municipal leaders issue a call to the state to take immediate action on the homeless issue in Montpelier on Wednesday, September 18. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Tierney Farago, the town administrator for Chelsea in Orange County, is new to the position and new to Vermont. So when she read about a course designed to help town managers gain key skills, she applied. 

Farago, 30, is one of 18 municipal leaders from 14 small towns in Vermont who are participating in what is being called a “boot camp” for town managers at the University of Vermont, which was announced this week in a press release.

Vermont Local Government Institute is a certificate program that started in September and ends in February, and is free to participants thanks to a $28,000 grant from the Leahy Institute for Rural Partnerships at UVM.

“Vermont’s towns are very small. Often our municipal leaders are working alone or they are working with a part time staff and there is a need for this kind of professional support,” said Patricia Coates, the institute’s director.

Advertisement

Developed in partnership with the Vermont League of Cities and Towns, the Vermont Town and City Management Association and UVM Professional and Continuing Education, the course covers a broad range of topics from open meeting law to grant management. 

Many small towns have seen high turnover among local administrators and the new hires are often coming in with less municipal experience, according to Ted Brady, executive director of the Vermont League of Cities and Towns, or VLCT. Town officials are also grappling with increasingly complicated and time-intensive workloads, such as applying to the Federal Emergency Management Agency for flood recovery funds. 

Given that many town managers do not have a lot of resources and often, not much managerial experience, the formalized training can really help fill the gap, Brady said.

Winooski City Manager Jessie Baker shares an update on a downtown development project to the Winooski City Council Monday night, Nov. 4, 2019. File photo by Jacob Dawson/VTDigger

Some veteran municipal managers, including Bill Fraser, the city manager in Montpelier, and Jessie Baker, the city manager of South Burlington, are helping to teach the course, according to the release.

Advertisement

“I want to help newcomers to the profession feel like there are no dumb questions,” Fraser said in the release. 

The first round of participants include new and mid-career managers as well as a treasurer and a selectboard member, Farago said. 

So far she said she likes it a lot. “I feel like it’s a really broad spectrum of information, I don’t feel like it’s too specialized so it applies to a lot of different municipal positions,” she said.

Chelsea Town Administrator Tierney Farago is one of 18 municipal leaders from small towns across Vermont attending a pilot “boot camp” for town managers at the University of Vermont this fall. Photo courtesy of Gayle Durkee

Farago said she has never worked in human resources, for example, so getting insight into how to conduct interviews and hire people is going to be really useful in her position.

The course is the first of its kind offered in Vermont, aside from a two-year certified public managers program at UVM, said Abigail Friedman at VLCT’s Municipal Assistance Center that helps small member towns with various requests. Staff at VLCT came up with the idea for the boot camp and helped develop the course. Friedman said she hopes it will help prepare new leaders and improve local governance statewide.

Advertisement

“We got a really great cross section of the state in this first cohort,” said Maureen Hebert, director of strategic initiatives at the continuing education center, called PACE, at UVM. “The networking piece making them connected via this whole program, and then being able to share resources will be really powerful.”

The part-time program includes in-person, virtual and self-directed study with courses covering leadership, human resources, grant writing, financial management and training in diversity, equity and inclusion. It aims to enhance networking and resource sharing among municipal leaders to help them better address challenging issues that Vermont continues to wrestle with such as housing and climate change.

While the program is funded for two years, the goal is to see how it works, make changes and make it valuable enough that a town might be willing to pay for a portion of the training going forward, Brady said.





Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

Wrong-way driver stopped on I-89, charged with DUI

Published

on

Wrong-way driver stopped on I-89, charged with DUI


BOLTON, Vt. (WCAX) – A wrong-way driver was safely stopped on Interstate 89 overnight Sunday.

Vermont State Police say just before 12:30 a.m., they stopped the car near marker 77, near Bolton.

The driver, Denise Lear, 60, of Revere, was charged with driving under the influence and gross negligent operation.

Lear is expected in court Monday.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WCAX. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Women’s Lacrosse Bested in Burlington by Vermont – University at Albany Great Danes

Published

on

Women’s Lacrosse Bested in Burlington by Vermont – University at Albany Great Danes


Score: UAlbany 4, Vermont 14

Location: Virtue Field | Burlington, Vt.

Records: UAlbany (10-5, 5-1 America East) | Vermont (8-6, 4-1 America East)

Short Story: UAlbany women’s lacrosse fell to the Vermont Catamounts on Saturday afternoon.

Advertisement

Key Stats

  • Grace Cincebox recorded a total of 14 saves with 13 goals allowed for a .565 save percentage.
  • Ravan Marsell led the Great Danes with two points on one goal and one assist.
  • Four different UAlbany players scored in the contest.
  • Reggie Williams was the team’s leader with three ground balls.
  • Delilah Mile caused a team high three turnovers.

 
How It Happened

  • The Catamounts came out of the gates hard and heavy, scoring all three goals between both sides in the first quarter.
  • Vermont would take an 8-0 lead in the second quarter before Amanda Williamson found the back of the net on a women-down goal to put the Great Danes on the board and make it 8-1.
  • The Great Danes would allow one more goal in the first half to trail 9-1 after 30-minutes of play.
  • Grace Cincebox would enter the half with 10 saves.
  • Riley Forthofer started the Great Danes off in the second half to make it a 9-2 game, before Vermont put up three more goals to take a 12-2 lead entering the final quarter of play.
  • Mya Carroll and Ravan Marsell both scored on back-to-back free-position goals to make it a 12-4 game.
  • The Catamounts finished the game with two more goals to take the win 14-4.

 
Up Next
The Great Danes will next have a bye week and wait to see the outcome of next week’s Vermont vs UMass Lowell game to see who will host the America East Tournament.

Social Central: Stay up to date with UAlbany women’s lacrosse by following the team on Instagram (@UAlbanyWLax), Facebook (UAlbany Women’s Lacrosse),  and X (@UAlbanyWLax) for all of the latest news and highlights throughout the year.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont lands two cities in America’s top 15 happiest list

Published

on

Vermont lands two cities in America’s top 15 happiest list


Is creativity the missing key to better health?

Research suggests creative activities like art, music and crafts may benefit mental health as much as other key health habits.

Here’s another reason Vermont is the best New England state: It’s home to one of the top 5 happiest cities in the United States.

Plus, it has another within the top 15.

Advertisement

Massachusetts, on the other hand, doesn’t even break the top 50. Nor, does Connecticut or Rhode Island.

The personal finance website analyzed 182 of the largest cities in the country, and ranked Boston 63rd overall. Although the city is home to some of the nation’s top universities, high-ranking hospitals, and well-regarded companies, it didn’t break the top 50.

To get the rankings, WalletHub compared the cities using 29 metrics, including life-satisfaction index, depression rate, poverty rate, job security, and acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, and cities were assigned an overall happiness score.

Here’s a look at how the cities ranked.

South Burlington is No. 4 happiest city, Burlington is No. 11

South Burlington came on top for Vermont in WalletHub’s list of the happiest cities in the United States, ranking at No. 4. In scored very high for emotional and physical well-being coming in at the No. 4 spot, which made up for coming in No. 48 for community and environment. It was No. 9 for income and employment ranking. That gave it a total happiness of score of 70.15

Advertisement

Burlington wasn’t far behind at all, taking the No. 11 spot on the list and a happiness score of 67.54. It’s highest score was for income and employment ranking where it came second. It ranked No. 13 for community and environment and No. 21 for emotional and physical well-being.

Happiest cities in the US, per WalletHub

Here are the 25 happiest cities in the U.S., and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. Fremont, California – 74.09
  2. Bismarck, North Dakota – 73.11
  3. Scottsdale, Arizona – 71.36
  4. South Burlington, Vermont – 70.15
  5. Fargo, North Dakota – 69.36
  6. Overland Park, Kansas – 68.45
  7. Charleston, South Carolina – 68.44
  8. Irvine, California – 67.99
  9. Gilbert, Arizona – 67.96
  10. San Jose, California – 67.79
  11. Burlington, Vermont – 67.54
  12. Madison, Wisconsin – 66.35
  13. Columbia, Maryland – 66.28
  14. Chandler, Arizona – 65.69
  15. Seattle, Washington – 65.62
  16. Plano, Texas – 65.34
  17. San Francisco, California – 64.99
  18. Lincoln, Nebraska – 64.90
  19. Portland, Maine – 64.59
  20. Tempe, Arizona – 64.30
  21. San Diego, California – 64.30
  22. Raleigh, North Carolina – 63.47
  23. Peoria, Arizona – 63.38
  24. Durham, North Carolina – 62.84
  25. Huntington Beach, California – 62.80

Least happy cities in the US, per WalletHub

Here are the 25 least happy cities in the U.S., and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. Detroit, Michigan (#182 overall) – 29.55
  2. Memphis, Tennessee (#181 overall) – 34.39
  3. Shreveport, Louisiana (#180 overall) – 34.93
  4. Cleveland, Ohio (#179 overall) – 36.50
  5. Huntington, West Virginia (#178 overall) – 37.20
  6. Toledo, Ohio (#177 overall) – 37.21
  7. Augusta, Georgia (#176 overall) – 38.24
  8. Fort Smith, Arkansas (#175 overall) – 38.66
  9. Dover, Delaware (#174 overall) – 39.08
  10. Akron, Ohio (#173 overall) – 40.11
  11. Baltimore, Maryland (#172 overall) – 40.28
  12. Birmingham, Alabama (#171 overall) – 40.37
  13. Baton Rouge, Louisiana (#170 overall) – 40.47
  14. Columbus, Georgia (#169 overall) – 40.61
  15. Montgomery, Alabama (#168 overall) – 41.35
  16. Gulfport, Mississippi (#167 overall) – 41.65
  17. Charleston, West Virginia (#166 overall) – 42.18
  18. Jackson, Mississippi (#165 overall) – 42.60
  19. St. Louis, Missouri (#164 overall) – 43.53
  20. Knoxville, Tennessee (#163 overall) – 44.04
  21. Wilmington, Delaware (#162 overall) – 44.34
  22. Little Rock, Arkansas (#161 overall) – 44.48
  23. Mobile, Alabama (#160 overall) – 44.85
  24. New Orleans, Louisiana (#159 overall) – 45.19
  25. Tulsa, Oklahoma (#158 overall) – 45.33

Where New England cities ranked

Here are the 12 happiest cities in New England, and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. South Burlington, Vermont (#6 overall) – 70.15
  2. Burlington, Vermont (#11 overall) – 67.54
  3. Portland, Maine (#19 overall) – 64.59
  4. Nashua, New Hampshire (#27 overall) – 62.49
  5. Manchester, New Hampshire (#51 overall) – 59.10
  6. Boston, Massachusetts (#63 overall) – 56.88
  7. Warwick, Rhode Island (#66 overall) – 56.59
  8. New Haven, Connecticut (#95 overall) – 54.14
  9. Bridgeport, Connecticut (#96 overall) – 54.01
  10. Providence, Rhode Island (#98 overall) – 53.52
  11. Worcester, Massachusetts (#116 overall) – 50.12
  12. Lewiston, Maine (#145 overall) – 47.28



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending