Connect with us

Vermont

Johnson: Black bears are an asset to Vermont landscapes and public health

Published

on

Johnson: Black bears are an asset to Vermont landscapes and public health


As a graduate scholar working in the direction of a grasp’s diploma in public well being, it turns into more and more clear how lucky I’m to dwell in Vermont and share the panorama with ample wildlife that contributes drastically to biodiversity. Many Vermonters take pleasure in wildlife watching as a method to merely scale back stress. Simply observing a mom bear are inclined to her cubs proper from our kitchen home windows, is an immediate dopamine increase. This was particularly wanted in the course of the COVID-19 lockdowns of the not-so-distant previous. Apart from our personal psychological well being, black bears, a keystone species, present public well being advantages associated to our shared surroundings. With bears now exiting their winter dens, it’s an opportune time to boost consciousness about their worth on our landscapes and their greatest risk: people.

It’s in our greatest curiosity to undertake a One Well being perspective, that means that well being is transdisciplinary, intertwined with the well being of wildlife and our shared surroundings. We should always preserve this in thoughts as we contemplate why black bears are worthy of improved protections. As a keystone species, these magnificent animals assist outline ecosystems, benefiting the well being of different wildlife species. A technique bears assist promote biodiversity is by seed dispersal: following meals, bears depart behind droppings that include seeds from the berries they eat, dispersing the seeds all through their habitat. Bears disperse over 200,000 seeds per hour per sq. km whereas foraging for fruits after which excreting them on the panorama! And after they dig for roots and bugs, they aerate the soil. Moreover, with the COVID-19 outbreak, many are paying nearer consideration to rising zoonotic illnesses (illnesses transmissible from animals to people). One in all these consists of brucellosis, a micro organism typically present in animal carcasses and their afterbirth that, if uncovered, could cause critical well being situations in people and home in addition to different wild animals. Predator species like coyotes are most useful at scavenging the carcasses, however black bears are opportunistic eaters as nicely and can feed on the stays, thus aiding within the discount of unfold of illness.

Regardless of the important position that bears play in our shared surroundings, they’re hunted and killed in astonishingly excessive numbers in Vermont, with 20 % of the Vermont bear inhabitants killed off over the last looking season — in lots of circumstances in exceptionally merciless methods. The explanation why Vermont Fish & Wildlife permits a looking season could shock you. The bear looking season shouldn’t be based mostly on the ‘organic carrying capability’ — the capability of the land — as a substitute, it’s based mostly on what the general public will tolerate, or the “social carrying capability.” Opposingly, in line with Vermont Fish & Wildlife information, almost two thirds of Vermont residents really need the bear inhabitants to stay the identical of their county, that means that Vermonters need bears of their communities. So, why are they being hunted so aggressively?

Advertisement

Vermont has one of many longest bear looking seasons within the nation, beginning September 1 by the tip of November, together with the usage of hounds. It additionally has an unacceptably lengthy hound “coaching” season that begins on June 1 and runs your entire summer time. Cubs are nonetheless tiny in June, and this exercise locations each the mom bears and their cubs in danger as hounders unleash packs of hounds on them, chasing them for miles by the woods, into roads and onto personal property. Throughout the 2021 looking season, virtually half of the 841 bears killed had been feminine. Because of this many cubs are left to die since they stick with their mom for 16 months, typically longer. Wildlife ecologists see feminine bears as having increased worth to the bear inhabitants than males as a result of they rear the younger. Bears have a low reproductive price, and due to this fact can not maintain this degree of killing yr after yr. Looking can also be altering bear conduct akin to forcing bears to vary their foraging habitats and turn into extra lively at night time, despite the fact that they don’t seem to be nocturnal, impeding their skill to forage efficiently.

Some “sportsmen” have argued — incorrectly — that bear populations and human-bear conflicts are positively correlated and that looking bears prevents future human-bear conflicts. Nonetheless, research show that “human–bear battle was not correlated with prior harvests, offering no proof that bigger harvests decreased subsequent human-bear battle.” One of the best ways to cut back conflicts with bears is by altering our conduct, akin to utilizing electrical fencing to safe hen coops and beehives. Regardless of what some might imagine, roughly 88 % of all bear “incidents’’ recorded by Fish and Wildlife in Vermont throughout 2021 had been merely {that a} bear was seen. That’s hardly a battle and never worthy of being labeled an “incident.”

So what can we do? For the reason that primary risk to bears is us, a very powerful factor we will do is change our conduct. Try the “Get Bear Good Society’s” ideas for deterring bears and managing attractants. We should reevaluate Vermont’s bear looking and hounding legal guidelines and do higher by these magnificent animals.

Isabella A. Johnson is a graduate scholar on the College of Vermont. The opinions expressed by columnists don’t essentially replicate the views of Vermont Information & Media.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage | Common Dreams

Published

on

Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage | Common Dreams


The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute – representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world – are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state’s damage caused by climate change.

The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.

Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.

The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

Advertisement

The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.

“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”

The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law – the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.

Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River.
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont
(Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)

Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Man Shot Near Central and Vermont: Police and Rescue Respond – ABQ RAW

Published

on

Man Shot Near Central and Vermont: Police and Rescue Respond – ABQ RAW


Albuquerque –

Just after 5:25 PM, a shot rang out in near Central and Vermont. A person reported being shot in the 8310 block of Central Ave NE. Officers from the Albuquerque Police Department were dispatched, but fortunately, the New Mexico State Police happened to be in the vicinity and arrived promptly. Officers promptly rendered life saving measures, while Albuquerque Fire Rescue dispatched a rescue unit from Station 5 to the scene.

The man, who was shot in the leg, will be transported to a local area hospital by AFR. Presently, their condition is not known, but if we learn more, we will update you.

APD’s gun violence reduction unit (GVRU) is being called out to investigate this shooting.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

U.S. Chamber, Oil Industry Sue Vermont Over Law Requiring Companies To Pay For Climate Change Damage

Published

on

U.S. Chamber, Oil Industry Sue Vermont Over Law Requiring Companies To Pay For Climate Change Damage


MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.

The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.

The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”

The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.

Advertisement

“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”

A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.

Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”

“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.

Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.

Advertisement

It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.

We Need Your Support

Other news outlets have retreated behind paywalls. At HuffPost, we believe journalism should be free for everyone.

Would you help us provide essential information to our readers during this critical time? We can’t do it without you.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Advertisement

Whether you give once or many more times, we appreciate your contribution to keeping our journalism free for all.

You’ve supported HuffPost before, and we’ll be honest — we could use your help again. We view our mission to provide free, fair news as critically important in this crucial moment, and we can’t do it without you.

Whether you give just one more time or sign up again to contribute regularly, we appreciate you playing a part in keeping our journalism free for all.

Support HuffPost

Advertisement

The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.

The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending