Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
Move fast and break things is the credo of the tech industry, which sees that strategy as the key to enormous profits. That model has been spectacularly successful — if your definition of success includes shoveling billions of dollars into the pockets of Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. But if success is measured by creating online town halls — places where people can come together to discuss matters that interest them, whether its politics or the latest recipe for strawberry rhubarb pie, without all the drama and chest thumping we find on Facebook or Xwitter — Front Porch Forum in Vermont is the model.
In 2006, Michael Wood-Lewis launched Front Porch Forum in 40 Vermont neighborhoods after several years running a neighborhood internet mailing list in Burlington. An engineer by training, Wood-Lewis was constantly tinkering with different ways of running the mailing list. Should users be anonymous or identified by their real names? Real names were best for building community, he decided. Should people outside a neighborhood be allowed to join? Not if you wanted to keep it feeling safe and intimate, he believed. Local businesses are permitted to join, but they have to pay for advertising. (Local ads make up most of the company’s revenue.) Should any topics be off limits? Not necessarily, but certain behaviors should be, Wood-Lewis decided.
What he learned quickly is that if you don’t set and strongly enforce rules for how people can talk to each other, things will get ugly in a hurry. “What we say is, attack the issue, not the neighbor,” Wood-Lewis told the Washington Post recently. “If your issue is a barking dog or hypodermic needles in the park, then let’s talk about that. But don’t say, ‘This particular person’ or ‘This particular dog.’ We can’t fact check that, and you could totally destroy someone’s reputation.”
Advertisement
Serving Vermont Since 2006
Front Porch Forum caught on quickly and began expanding across the state. In 2011, it played a leading role in mutual aid during major flooding. Growth surged again during the pandemic lockdowns of 2020 when people used the site to offer masks and coordinate grocery drop-offs for elderly neighbors. Flooding the last two years in Vermont has spurred fresh bursts of signups and activity, with the site now claiming 235,000 active members in a state with just 265,000 households. Front Porch Forum says nearly half of the adults in Vermont are active members. It is where Vermonters go to interact with their neighbors online — without disparaging each other.
While Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg have sought to frame their networks as forums for free speech, Wood-Lewis said he thinks of Front Porch Forum more like a corner pub. If a patron starts making a ruckus, moderators ask that person to tone it down, and they remove anyone who doesn’t comply. In rare instances, the site imposes a “topic timeout,” temporarily shutting down a debate the moderators feel has turned sour. But Wood-Lewis said the beauty of careful moderation is that, over time, most users learn to adhere to the site’s norms on their own.
At a time when Americans are increasingly disenchanted with social media, researchers are studying Front Porch Forum to try to understand what makes for a kinder, gentler online community. It has achieved critical mass in the Green Mountain State not by embracing the growth hacks, recommendation algorithms, and dopamine-inducing features that power most social networks, but by deliberately avoiding them.
New research from the nonprofit New Public finds Front Porch Forum is one of the few online spaces in America that leaves its users feeling more informed, more civically engaged, and more connected to their neighbors, rather than less so. What’s more, its users seem to genuinely like it. “I can’t imagine life in rural Vermont without FPF,” Don Heise of Calais, Vermont, told the Washington Post. He described it as “the glue that holds our community together.”
Move Slowly & Moderate
The secret to success for Front Porch Form is to move slowly and moderate heavily. It has no real-time feed, no like button, no recommendation algorithm, and no way to reach audiences beyond the local community. It offers users no reward for posting something provocative or sensational other than the prospect that your neighbors will see it and perhaps bring it up the next time you run into them at the grocery store. The company “ultimately exists to stimulate real world interactions among neighbors,” said Wood-Lewis. “It doesn’t exist to be an online metaverse. We’re not trying to hold people’s attention online 24/7. We’d love people’s attention for 10 minutes a day.”
Advertisement
While most tech giants view content moderation as a necessary evil, Front Porch Forum treats it as a core function. Twelve of its 30 full-time employees spend their days reading every user post before it’s published, rejecting any that break its rules against personal attacks, misinformation, or spam. The process is slow and laborious, but it seems to work. Front Porch Forum is the highest scoring platform ever on New Public’s “Civic Signals” criteria, which attempt to measure the health of online communities.
One recent topic that got a lot of attention was the decision by Tractor Supply to cut its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and abandon its climate commitments in response to a pressure campaign by reactionaries. The debate stayed civil, if sometimes testy, on Front Porch Forum. If anyone tried to post an ad hominem attack or denigrate a group of people, there was no evidence of it on the forum. Such posts are typically rejected by its moderators before publication. “I’m just not going to shop there,” one person posted. “Their bird seed is too expensive anyway!”
Front Porch users’ satisfaction shows how careful moderation and prioritizing civility over engagement can lead to a vastly different experience of social media, said Eli Pariser, co-director of New Public and author of a book entitled The Filter Bubble. “I think there’s a real social media fatalism that has set in, that it’s just irredeemably toxic, and never going to get any better. The goal here is to demonstrate that local conversations don’t have to be toxic. That’s a result of the business model and how they’re designed.”
81% Approval Rating
In a New Public survey of more than 13,000 Front Porch Forum users, led by University of Texas at Austin communications professor Talia Stroud, 81% of respondents reported feeling like the site makes them a “more informed citizen.” Just 26% of respondents said the same about Facebook and 32% about Nextdoor. Respondents were also more likely to report feeling safe and free to speak their minds on Front Porch Forum than on other social networks.
“It’s not totally shocking that the ‘slow food’ of social media is coming from Vermont,” a state famous for artisanal small businesses, Pariser said, acknowledging the model might not translate easily to larger, more diverse states. “But Vermont also has a class divide. And one of the things we think is notable about Front Porch Forum is it seems to kind of bridge those divides.”
Advertisement
While Wood-Lewis is experimenting with an expansion into Western Massachusetts and Upstate New York, he said he intends to keep it to a manageable size, and he has rejected offers to sell it to a larger company. “I agree that something like we’re doing is needed in a way that’s not being provided in the vast majority of the country,” he said. “But if you scale up a successful small enterprise, you by definition will lose what’s special about it.”
The Takeaway
Those of you who have never been to Vermont may have difficulty understanding all the nuances behind this story. Vermont is one of the most beautiful states in America, with first-class universities, great cities, rolling farmland, and some of the most amazing fall foliage you are likely to find anywhere. One of its US Senators is a Democrat, one is an Independent, and the governor is a Republican.
I visited Vermont during the Covid pandemic at a time when the rest of America was losing its mind. At a local farmers market in Waitesfield, the public was expected to wear masks and everyone did. The customers walked in an orderly counterclockwise direction to avoid most personal interactions, there were systems in place to accept payment without exchanging pathogens, and about 80% of the people were driving either a Subaru, a Volvo, or a Jeep — all with 4-wheel drive, of course.
I had a classmate in college who got a summer job working for Vermont Power. He would drive up, read the meter, then knock on the front door and present the bill. He was always paid in cash and he claims he doubled his wages by separating out the rare coins people gave him from the jars they had stashed in the pantry or under the bed. Vermonters are hard working, industrious, and frugal. They are also keenly aware that changes in the Earth’s climate seem to have targeted their state in ways that could hardly be guessed at just a decade or so ago. See Bill McKibben’s book Oil And Honey for more on that topic.
To address the climate crisis effectively, we need to be able to talk to each other without rancor and without racist or fascist tropes. It’s hard to see how the model for Front Porch Forum can be extended to other areas of the country without breaking the mold, but it would be interesting to see if some of the lessons learned by that forum could cool the toxic nature of most online communications today.
Advertisement
Featured image by ngoc202020 from Pixabay
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Latest CleanTechnica.TV Videos
Advertisement
Advertisement
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
Vermont has some big problems that desperately need fixing! Many of them are connected, in a variety of ways to a symptom rarely discussed. The population of Vermont is falling while the population of the United States is growing. Vermont has been losing people for the last few years. The reasons include deaths in Vermont outpace births; between 2023 and 2024 there were 1,700 more deaths than births. More people left the state than moved into Vermont. In another worrying sign the birthrate in the United States is down 25 percent since 2007 when the decline began. Another symptom may be that weekly take home pay in Vermont is about $400.00 less than the national average. Taken together these problems should set off alarms about our future.
S, it should not be a surprise that our schools throughout the state have a diminishing number of students while simultaneously school budgets are skyrocketing upward. Yes, it is costing us more to educate fewer students, and Vermonters are rarely wealthy. Maintaining quality schools is expensive. The average pay for public school teachers in the United States is $72,030. The average pay for a public-school teacher in Vermont is only $52,559. A nearly $20,000 gap is hardly an incentive to attract the best of the best. Good teachers are a precious commodity.
Gov. Phil Scott has demanded the Legislature do something about education costs in the Green Mountain State. Legislators have been spending much more time on this problem than any other facing the state. There have been various proposals, one of the latest is from Sen. Seth Bongartz of Manchester that would create a two year “ramp period” for school districts to merge voluntarily. Two years is a long time to wait when the problem is financially urgent. School mergers are inevitable in many areas which will mean the eventual closing of several small elementary schools. The closing in many cases means long bus rides for little kids.
Advertisement
One idea that has not been discussed is increasing, substantially, Vermont’s population over the next decade or so. We don’t have enough students to make financial sense for our small rural schools. We need more property-owning people whose taxes will help balance our cash-strapped education budgets. Why doesn’t the Legislature think about a campaign to entice people to move to the Green Mountain state?
In the 1960s Vermont’s economic development officials, under new Gov. Phil Hoff, launched a marketing campaign that was known as “Vermont the Beckoning Country.” The campaign was remarkably successful, bringing thousands of people to a place that at that time had largely skipped the Industrial Revolution. Vermont’s ski industry began growing by leaps and bounds then, bringing in large numbers of people new to the state. Entrepreneurs, many of them World War II veterans, began developing ski resorts in the Green Mountains. They attracted thousands of visitors and some of those visitors fell in love with Vermont. They stayed. These Flatlanders changed the state, making it more liberal, and more environmentally conscious. Gov. Hoff, the first Democrat elected governor since 1853, was followed by a wave of successful liberal politicians who turned Vermont from red to blue. People can differ about the whether the political transformation improved the state or destroyed it, but the state undoubtedly grew more prosperous.
Vermont has plenty of land that can be used to build new housing. New people can bring fresh ideas and the capital needed to create new businesses with good jobs. More families living in more houses means more property taxes going to schools. It should also lighten the load for the current financially stressed Vermonters.
A well-financed advertising campaign to entice new people to make Vermont their home will make us more prosperous. More taxpayers can be one of the many solutions needed to save our struggling education system.
Clear the cobwebs off the old slogan and invite a whole new crop of young, energetic families to Vermont the Beckoning Country!
Advertisement
Eric Peterson lives in Bennington. Opinions expressed by columnists do not necessarily reflect the views of Vermont News & Media.
BURLINGTON, Vt. (WCAX) – It was a pleasant Sunday with spring-like temperatures, but it also resulted in a few ice jams in rivers, which happened earlier than expected. The Ausable, Mad, Missisquoi and Great Chazy rivers flooded today due to ice jams. These rivers will recede tonight as temperatures get close to, or below, freezing. However, new ice jams may form, and additional rivers may flood on Monday as highs get even warmer. Expect partly sunny skies with highs in the upper 50s to low 60s. The wind may gust as highs as 40 mph. This will continue to support rapid snowmelt, which will run off into rivers and other bodies of water. Remember to never cross any flooded roads, and avoid going near river banks.
The threat for ice jams will continue into Thursday. A backdoor cold front may touch off a few showers on Tuesday, otherwise it will be partly sunny with highs ranging from the 40s north to the 50s and low 60s south. Computer models continue to bring a low pressure system in our area on Wednesday. It’s continuing to look a little warmer, though the heavier rain is now inching farther into Canada. That said, some rain is likely, and high temperatures will be at least in the low 40s, and may reach the 50s in southern parts of the region. Morning rain on Thursday will change to afternoon snow. A few inches accumulation is possible. Early highs in the 30s will fall through the 20s by afternoon, and overnight lows will be in the teens and low 20s, so everything will freeze up.
Friday will start off with some sunshine, then another, weaker system could bring a light rain/snow mix late in the day and overnight. A few inches of snow can’t be ruled out. A return to more seasonable temperatures will happen over the weekend with highs mainly in the mid-30s and lows in the teens and 20s. There’s the chance for snow showers both days, but significant weather isn’t expected.