Connect with us

Vermont

City Center vision coming together, South Burlington officials say – VTDigger

Published

on

City Center vision coming together, South Burlington officials say – VTDigger


South Burlington officials, residents and guests cut the ribbon in front of new municipal and community buildings at 180 Market St. in July 2021. File photo by The Other Paper

This story by Liberty Darr was first published in The Other Paper on Nov. 21

As the state’s second-largest city, South Burlington has for decades had plans for a downtown area ripe with commerce, community and connectivity and data now shows those plans are coming to fruition.

The idea for a thriving city center dates back 50 years ​​when South Burlington was officially incorporated as a city in 1971. Those plans for a vibrant downtown began taking shape nearly 10 years later as the term “City Center” would appear in three master plans that followed.

But it wasn’t long ago that the heart of City Center, the roughly 100 acres wedged between Dorset and Hinesburg roads most notable for housing the state’s only Target and Trader Joe’s, looked much different than it does today.

Advertisement

While the city hit a milestone in 2021 when it cut the ribbon on brand new municipal and other community buildings at 180 Market St., Ilona Blanchard, community development director and an employee of the city for over a decade, remembers that even paving that street was a major accomplishment for the city.

“If you were here 15 years ago, half of Market Street was paved and the other half was a dirt road,” she said, letting out a laugh. “When I came here, we had to borrow a grader from an adjoining community to grade it.”

But after what state and local officials recognize as a critical housing shortage, data shows that South Burlington has become one of the largest suppliers of new homes in the state.

A recent analysis put together by the Vermont Housing Financing Agency for the Department of Housing and Community Development, known as the “Vermont Housing Needs Assessment 2025-2029,” outlined staggering statistics for the state of just under 650,000 people.

In recent years, the report outlines that the supply of available homes has simply not kept pace with the increased demand to live in Vermont.

Advertisement

To accommodate projected growth in households living year-round in Vermont, replace homes that are lost from the housing stock due to disrepair, normalize vacancy rates and house the homeless, Vermont is likely to need an additional 24,000-36,000 total homes across the state over the next five years.

Without increased supply, Vermont’s home sale and rental markets will continue to grow even tighter than they currently are, the report says, with prices likely to continue to skyrocket and further intensify an affordability crisis throughout the state.

State auditor finds ‘substantial mistakes’ in Burlington’s tax increment financingAdvertisement

According to the report, Vermont’s homeowner vacancy rate — the number of homes on the market compared to the total number of actual households — is estimated at 1.2 percent, below the 2.0 percent rate considered indicative of a healthy housing market, with Chittenden County at a notably low vacancy rate of .5 percent, reflecting the high demand for homes in the region.

While the Legislature made monumental strides in housing legislation over the last two years — Act 47 and working to modernize Vermont’s 50-year-old land use law, Act 250 — meant to spur development and limit obstacles to building housing, a campaign, Building Homes Together, launched by Chittenden County Regional Planning, Champlain Housing Trust and non-profit developer Evernorth aims to build nearly 1,000 units of housing per year in the county over the next five-year period.

But in October, the group announced that Chittenden County had drastically failed to meet that goal with 720 units built in 2023.

Housing plans

Nearly 40 percent of those homes — 290 — were in South Burlington’s city limits. That trend, director of planning and zoning Paul Conner said, has been happening over the last 10 years and is something the city has specifically planned for and welcomed.

Advertisement

The boom can mostly be traced to 2012 when the city took steps to implement a financing model that city manager Jessie Baker said is one of the most powerful economic tools available to municipalities: tax increment financing or TIF. To most, the idea is mysteriously complex, but to city officials like Blanchard, that was the catalyst for much of the growth seen today.

The TIF district, a subset of the 300-acre City Center, was officially adopted by the city council in 2012 and allows the municipality to take out debt to build public infrastructure projects and pay off the debt using future tax revenue from new development.

​​The idea is that as the infrastructure is built and improved, it attracts private sector investment in new and renovated buildings and incrementally increases the value of the grand list, or the total value of all city property.

St. Albans City voters to decide on $11.4 million bond for new housing project and other downtown improvementsAdvertisement


Since its inception, more than 500 homes have been built in the district; 187 are under construction, and 46 have been permitted and are awaiting construction. Of those, 139 are perpetually affordable. These numbers do not include the roughly 200 new homes built within City Center, but outside of the TIF district.

“When I think about the TIF district, I think about it as the kernel or the seed,” Blanchard said. “What we’re seeing right now is we have now established a downtown market in South Burlington, which we did not have before and the TIF district as an economic tool has established this form of the downtown. It’s the core of it. But that also means that it is blazing the way for other properties in the area to build on the success that is here.”

Advertisement

Baker noted that a large portion of these numbers comes from the University of Vermont and the University of Vermont Medical Center’s investment in housing but countered the common perception that since the institution’s faculty, staff and students have first-right of refusal to the housing, it’s not really adding positively to the housing stock.

“I think that’s a real misconception,” she said. “A lot of these folks are folks that will be otherwise living in our community, in other apartment buildings or condos or pricing out other folks who want to live here. It’s important to always note that adding capacity across the living spectrum is adding capacity. It’s not fighting between our neighbors on what capacity that is, whether it is affordable housing, student housing, designated housing, it is still adding new homes.”

Competing goals

But with that growth, both Baker and Conner noted that there is simultaneously an increased focus on things like environmental protection, climate resiliency and connectivity. All these are also areas of focus that the city’s planning department and commission focused on when crafting the new land use regulations that were just passed by the city council earlier this month. But the team also noted that the battle between the need for housing and protecting portions of Vermont’s landscape is not always easy to balance.

Like many neighboring communities, some residents in South Burlington have voiced opposition to development and lawsuits over environmental and aesthetic concerns have frequently ended up in court.

“Zoning is an incredibly strong tool to be strategic as a community,” Baker said. “I think South Burlington is really trying to thread that needle right now and actively participate in all the climate conservation efforts and the housing efforts, and I think that’s a hard conversation in our community, and that’s a hard conversation at the state level.”

Advertisement

While South Burlington is partly leading the way for housing goals in the county, the work to meet demand is not possible without collaboration with surrounding communities, Conner and Baker said, which reflects the way people inherently move through the county on a daily basis.

“They don’t live their daily lives within the bounds of one single municipality,” Conner said. “They use Chittenden County and beyond every day for their everyday needs. The community uses our core communities interchangeably every day, and so it’s therefore our responsibility collectively to make sure that the transportation, housing, the services, all that is provided to the way people live.”

The growth over the last 10 years is only set to continue as the city has plans for even more infrastructure projects — all approved by voters — to create a more walkable, thriving downtown and includes projects like the planned walking and biking bridge over I-89.

“It’s always really thrilling to go outside and to see people walking on Market Street and sitting at the bench in front of the library and city hall, seeing the seniors in the senior center,” Blanchard said. “Our downtown is about people, and it’s just so great to see people using it in the way that it was intended.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermont Afghan allies react to “re-examination” of status

Published

on

Vermont Afghan allies react to “re-examination” of status


BURLINGTON, Vt. (ABC22/FOX44) – After an Afghan national was charged in the shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C., the Vermont Afghan Alliance is criticizing the Trump administration’s response as “deeply harmful.”

United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, or USCIS, posted on X Wednesday night that they would stop processing all immigration requests for Afghan nationals immediately.

The Vermont Afghan Alliance, a group connecting the Afghan community in Vermont with housing, immigration, and language services, said that they feared misinformation while thanking the Afghan community in Vermont for their contributions.

“An act of one individual, on his own, cannot be attributed to an entire community or nationality… These individuals face persecution by the Taliban for their loyalty to the U.S. and fled everything – including family – for safety here.”

Advertisement

The most recent U.S. Census was before many Afghans sought refuge in the United States following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, but according to the Associated Press, 100 refugees out of the first group of 37,000 chose to settle in Vermont.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Medicare Advantage plans are leaving Vermont. Now what? – VTDigger

Published

on

Medicare Advantage plans are leaving Vermont. Now what? – VTDigger


Bouncing from plan to plan for Medicare coverage has become an inadvertent, annual tradition for Becky Beerwald.

When she moved to Essex Junction from the Connecticut coast in 2023, she selected a Medicare Advantage plan before it was discontinued for the following year. Then she enrolled in a Vermont Blue Advantage plan, only for the insurer to announce in October that it would not offer the plans in 2026. This fall, she went back to the drawing board but in an insurance landscape almost entirely stripped of the Medicare Advantage plans that nearly 51,000 people in the state had relied on. 

Beerwald is just one of the thousands of Vermonters trying to make sense of the coverage that remains available now that Medicare Advantage has essentially left the state.

Advertisement


This year’s open enrollment period for Medicare, which runs through Dec. 7, has been a “challenging one,” said Sam Carleton, who directs the State Health Insurance Program, a state entity that provides guidance for Medicare beneficiaries. The small office has been flooded with inquiries since the start of October, when BlueCross Blue Shield and United Healthcare’s departures from the Advantage market became public. Agewell, the elderly support agency Carleton leads in Northwestern Vermont has also seen a surge in interest for the webinars they offer to explain how Medicare works and how people can get the coverage they need under it.

Medicare is the federal health insurance program for people 65 and older and those with certain disabilities. 

Advertisement

Medicare has four parts: Part A covers inpatient care while Part B broadly covers outpatient care, medical devices and preventative care, among other things. Together, these two are regarded as original Medicare. It generally covers 80% of the cost of services, meaning many people who opt for traditional Medicare coverage also opt for something known as a Medigap plan, or supplemental insurance, sold by a private insurer that can help cover the remaining 20% of costs. 

Medicare Part D offers prescription drug coverage, which is also provided by a private insurer. 

Part C plans bundle all of that — and often include additional benefits like dental, or vision. These plans, known as Medicare Advantage plans, are offered by private insurers. 

While many people like their Advantage plans, others can feel trapped in them because they require approval before covering some drugs and services and often require people to see in-network providers.

When the insurers providing Medicare Advantage plans in Vermont announced the end to their coverage, it gave some people a welcomed exit ramp from plans that are otherwise difficult to leave, explained Kaj Samsom, the commissioner of the Department of Financial Regulation, the state office that regulates insurers.

Advertisement

“This event, as really truly unfortunate as it is for folks who are no longer in Medicare Advantage and no longer have other options, there are some people who are probably happy,” Samsom said.

Tax Commissioner Kaj Samsom. File photo by Mike Dougherty/VTDigger

When an insurer withdraws a plan, it triggers something called a special enrollment period, which comes with different privileges than the regular open enrollment period.

In particular, it means people searching for new plans get something called “Guaranteed Issue Rights.” These rights mean that insurance companies cannot charge someone more for their insurance based on pre-existing health conditions — things like diabetes or cancer — that would make care more expensive for the insurer to pay out. 

When someone is new to Medicare and enrolling for the first time, they are also protected from this type of underwriting. But after that initial enrollment, Medigap plans can reject or charge sicker patients more based on their health history. Samsom referred to this as the “one way street” of Medicare Advantage, where individuals can’t switch to traditional Medicare without the massive cost of a Medigap supplement plan looming over them.

Advertisement

Now, nearly all Vermonters who bought Medicare Advantage plans will need to opt into original Medicare, with the option to buy the supplemental Medigap plans — protected from underwriting during this special enrollment. 

The issue of underwriting became particularly concerning to Beerwald. As she scoured the best Medigap plan, she said some insurers asked for her health history, despite her guaranteed issue rights. 

When open enrollment began, Beerwald said she started calling the insurers offering the least expensive Medigap plans for 2026: Medco, State Farm and Aflac. 

Each insurer offers a selection of Medigap plans: A, B, C,  D, F, G. These letter plans are standardized, so that plans with the same letter include the same benefits, no matter which insurer sells them. Price should be the only difference. 

Beerwald said she wants a G plan because it offers the best coverage with the most diverse beneficiary pool — because of a 2015 law, people who became eligible for Medicare after 2020 can’t buy Medigap plans C or F. That restriction effectively leaves plans’ pool older. Plans D and G now offer similar coverage, without the age restriction.

Advertisement
A slide from a webinar titled “Age Well Medigap” organized by the State Health Insurance Assistance Program on Tuesday, Nov. 25. Screenshot via YouTube

“My mother lived until almost 102 my dad was 87, so I’ve got a long life ahead of me,” Beerwald said. “I don’t want to be in the older pool, I want to be in the younger pool.” 

She said she worries that as the pools under plans C and F grow older and smaller over time, their premiums will soar or the plans could disappear altogether. 

“I don’t want to be in the lurch again. I want to be in the popular plan with the popular kids,” she said. 

Insurers she found that honored the guaranteed issue rights for plan G charged higher premiums. She did notice, however, that insurers would honor these rights for C and F plans. 

Eventually, she bought a TVHP Medigap Blue Plan G from BlueCross BlueShield of VT, for about $258 per month, she said.

Advertisement

Still, the fact that she encountered some insurers who would not honor the guaranteed issue for every letter plan conflicted with her understanding of how the law should protect that right.

Beerwald’s quest to understand and rectify this issue offers a window onto the maelstrom that can arise when private insurers are tasked with delivering a government service. She said she reached out to the state office tasked with regulating insurers, their consumer protection line, U.S. Rep. Becca Balint’s office, SHIP and Carleton, in an attempt to make sense of it all.

“I certainly feel that frustration. I mean, you’re in a circumstance where you’ve lost your insurance, you received notice from the federal government that you are getting a special enrollment period, and you’re able to get another plan. You’ve done the legwork. … You’ve made a choice, and you then call this insurance company, those insurance companies say sure we’ll sell you a policy, but only if you send us all your medical records. That stinks,” Carleton said.  

However, Carleton and the Department of Regulation told Beerwald — and confirmed to VTDigger — that it is legal for insurers to not apply guaranteed issue rights to every letter plan. 

It comes down to one small matter of wording in the regulation that applies to Medigap plans:  “It’s a ‘must’ for (plans) A, B, C, F,” Department of Regulation Deputy Commissioner Mary Block said. “It’s a ‘may’ for G, for people before that 2020 date.” 

Advertisement

“So some insurance companies will offer it, some will not,” she added.  

There’s nothing the state can do to rectify this frustration, according to Block, since federal law dictates Medigap plan regulations. 

“In Vermont, we don’t have the discretion to say Plan G is always going to be available to everybody,” she said. 

Block added that other consumers have run into confusion when dealing with insurance brokers, who may not be aware of which customers are receiving guaranteed issue rights and may mix up forms. 

The best way to combat that, Samson said, is for people to advocate for themselves and make it very clear when they are on the phone that they need the guaranteed issue rights. 

Advertisement

Beerwald remains unsatisfied with their explanation.

Now, the only remaining Medicare Advantage plans in the state are Humana plans in six counties — including Orange, Windham and Windsor, where many of the available care comes from providers in the Dartmouth Health network. However, Dartmouth Health has long been out of network for Humana. During a Nov. 19 town hall with the Vermont congressional delegation, Balint raised particular concern over this and cautioned beneficiaries in those counties to choose new plans.

Carleton assured that even in the counties where Humana remains, if people have lost their other Advantage plan, they should still receive guaranteed issue rights for Medigap plans if they chose to buy one and opt into original Medicare. 

“What prompts the special enrollment period is your plan leaving, not necessarily the loss of all Medicare Advantage plans,” he said. 

Carleton said he worries about the overall sticker shock that comes with Medigap plans, and  fears some people will opt into original Medicare and forgo supplemental plans, leaving them vulnerable to the 20% of costs that original Medicare doesn’t cover.

Advertisement

Beerwald said she’s going to end up paying more than $7,500 for insurance this year. After her Medigap plan, she said she’s buying a drug plan, vision and hearing plans, as well as a dental plan, to cover the cost of extensive dental work she needs 

She said she worries not just for herself but for other older adults who are not as savvy as navigating all the pitfalls of the insurance system. But for now, she is locked in to her BlueCross BlueShield’s plan for at least a year and whatever 2026 may have in store. 





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont Joins Virginia, Washington, New Mexico, South Carolina, Minnesota and Others in Facing Successive Decline in US Tourism Last Month: Everything You Need to Know – Travel And Tour World

Published

on

Vermont Joins Virginia, Washington, New Mexico, South Carolina, Minnesota and Others in Facing Successive Decline in US Tourism Last Month: Everything You Need to Know – Travel And Tour World



Published on
November 26, 2025

Vermont, Virginia, Washington, New Mexico, South Carolina, Minnesota, and others saw a decline in US tourism last month due to lingering pandemic effects and changing travel trends. This successive downturn in tourism across multiple states highlights a broader shift in the nation’s travel landscape. While Vermont’s scenic autumn landscapes and winter sports once attracted droves of visitors, it too faced a significant drop in tourism. Similarly, Virginia’s rich historical offerings, Washington’s urban and outdoor attractions, and New Mexico’s unique cultural experiences all saw fewer travelers. States like South Carolina and Minnesota, known for their coastal resorts and outdoor adventures, are also feeling the impact. As traveler preferences evolve and the effects of the pandemic continue to reverberate, the U.S. tourism industry faces significant challenges, with states across the country working hard to adapt and recover.

Vermont’s Tourism in Trouble: A 25.10% Decline

Vermont, a state renowned for its breathtaking fall foliage and outdoor adventures, has suffered a staggering 25.10% decline in tourism. Visitors, who typically flock to Vermont for its charming autumn landscapes and winter sports, have been deterred by the lasting effects of the pandemic and changing travel habits. The state’s tourism industry, heavily reliant on seasonal visitors, has taken a major hit. Local businesses, from quaint inns to ski resorts, are facing significant challenges as Vermont works to find ways to attract tourists back.

Virginia’s Slight Dip: A 1.39% Decline in Visitor Arrivals

Virginia, home to a rich historical heritage and scenic landscapes, has experienced a relatively modest decline in tourism, down by 1.39%. Despite its cultural treasures, like Monticello and Williamsburg, and natural beauty such as the Blue Ridge Mountains, the state has seen fewer travelers in recent years. The pandemic and the evolving travel landscape have influenced this slight dip, though Virginia’s tourism sector remains resilient. Efforts to promote outdoor experiences and historical sites are aimed at restoring the state’s appeal to history buffs and nature lovers alike.

Washington: A Major Drop of 18.55% in Tourism

Washington state, a hub for both urban excitement and natural wonders, has seen a dramatic 18.55% decline in tourism. Known for its iconic landmarks like the Space Needle and Mount Rainier, as well as its outdoor offerings, Washington’s tourism sector has been impacted by travel restrictions and shifts in traveler preferences. International and corporate travel has dropped, and many potential visitors are seeking alternative destinations. Washington is working hard to revive its tourism industry by focusing on its vast outdoor activities and urban attractions to draw back eager travelers.

New Mexico: A Small But Steady Decline of 1.27%

New Mexico, famous for its unique blend of Native American culture, art, and stunning landscapes, has experienced a 1.27% drop in tourism. The state’s appeal lies in its desert vistas, historic pueblos, and vibrant arts scene, but changing travel trends and lingering effects of the pandemic have led to fewer visitors. While the decline is small, it signals the need for New Mexico to continue to adapt and highlight its cultural experiences and outdoor adventures in order to attract more travelers to its one-of-a-kind destinations.

South Carolina’s Struggles: A Sharp 27.90% Drop

South Carolina has faced a devastating 27.90% decline in tourism, with its renowned coastal attractions, including Myrtle Beach and Charleston, feeling the brunt of the downturn. The state’s tourism sector, which thrives on beach resorts, golf courses, and rich history, has been hit hard by reduced demand. The COVID-19 pandemic and changing traveler preferences for closer, more accessible destinations have further deepened the impact. South Carolina is working to bounce back by focusing on its charm as a vacation spot for relaxation, history, and culture.

Minnesota’s Setback: A 7.33% Decline in Visitor Numbers

Minnesota, known for its picturesque lakes and outdoor adventures, has experienced a 7.33% decline in tourism. The state’s natural beauty, including the Boundary Waters and its many parks, typically draws nature enthusiasts, but the pandemic and evolving travel trends have slowed this influx. With fewer travelers seeking distant adventures, Minnesota’s tourism industry has faced setbacks. Nevertheless, the state continues to push its outdoor offerings and festivals, hoping to revive interest and bring visitors back to enjoy its scenic landscapes and unique attractions.

Conclusion

Vermont, Virginia, Washington, New Mexico, South Carolina, Minnesota, and others have all experienced a decline in U.S. tourism last month, marking a troubling trend that reflects broader shifts in the travel industry. The lingering effects of the pandemic continue to disrupt tourism, with many travelers altering their habits and seeking more accessible, closer destinations. These states, known for their unique attractions—from Vermont’s fall foliage and Virginia’s historical landmarks to South Carolina’s beaches and New Mexico’s cultural heritage—are feeling the impact of changing travel preferences.

Vermont, Virginia, Washington, New Mexico, South Carolina, Minnesota, and others saw a decline in US tourism last month due to lingering pandemic effects and changing travel trends.

Advertisement

As the industry navigates these challenges, states are focusing on adapting to new trends in order to revitalize their tourism sectors and attract visitors once again.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending