Vermont
Bill Greenwald: Vermont in good position to honor the Rights of Nature
This commentary is by Invoice Greenwald, a resident of Pownal.
The local weather disaster and its numerous results have been force-fed to the world for many years, usually together with the identical nerve-wracking statistics of elevated greenhouse fuel emissions, particularly CO2, melting of glaciers, decreased biodiversity and desertification proper across the nook.
The options, too, have largely remained the identical: scale back, reuse and recycle, drive much less, eat much less or no animal merchandise and purchase native for as many items as possible.
Environmentally acutely aware insurance policies in the USA exist, however might be circumnavigated with connections and finance to a sure diploma, however have had some success. Even in Vermont, a state that touts itself as sustainable and eco-friendly, has had points with Lake Champlain’s and the Winooski River’s water high quality, and a FedEx constructing in what was as soon as a wetland behind the scenic Whale Tales on Interstate 89.
Maybe it’s lastly time to take an historic worldview and codify it in Vermont’s Structure. This historic perspective is how the Pure World is considered in relation to the people who dwell on, and due to, it: as an intricate net of dwelling beings that should be acknowledged because the lifeblood of the planet.
Indigenous individuals the world over acknowledged this reality millennia in the past, however centuries of historical past have since commodified nature.
The up to date model for this view is the Rights of Nature, and recognition of those rights has begun the world over. Rights of Nature, in its easiest phrases, is the act of permitting nature itself to be celebration in a lawsuit and merely represented by an legal professional, whether it is wronged. “Wronged” doesn’t merely imply a tree was minimize down, or minor harm incurred, however that some side of the Pure World will probably be broken sufficient so the native ecosystem is incapable of continuous its current state of existence.
In essence, Nature can have the title of personhood bestowed upon it.
Rights of Nature had been acknowledged by the native Abenaki tribe, and a symbiotic relationship was taught of their, and plenty of different, Indigenous religions, which may usually be equated to legal guidelines.
It took till 2006 till any authorities entity on this planet would acknowledge these identical rights within the Western lexicon of legal guidelines. Tamaqua, Pennsylvania, a small city as soon as closely concerned in coal mining, was focused by hospital and business waste dumps. These dumps included human and chemical wastes, and farmers within the space had been inspired to spray this waste combination on crops as fertilizer.
Tamaqua’s response: A citizen-led motion ensuing within the passing of Ordinance 612, containing this wonderful clause: “Borough residents, pure communities and ecosystems shall be thought-about ‘individuals’ for functions of the enforcement of the civil rights of these residents, pure communities, and ecosystems.”
Vermont might not have the dramatic and scandalous waste-dumping Tamaqua noticed to unite behind, however Vermonters on either side of the political spectrum are inclined to imagine local weather change, and Vermont has the financial curiosity to guard nature as effectively. 74% of the state’s inhabitants imagine that local weather change is actual, 58% imagine local weather change can have a serious influence (an extra 21% anticipate a minor influence) on life in Vermont within the subsequent three many years.
The political skew in Vermont might play a task in these figures, as 57% of residents are Democrats, however caring in regards to the surroundings is a perception entrenched in being a Vermonter, not subscribing to a political celebration to the purpose of blindness.
Vermont is dwelling to over 6,000 farms, which generated over $700 million in 2020, and outside actions equivalent to fishing, searching, mountain climbing and water sports activities (in addition to lodging and eating) accounted for $3 billion in annual spending.
Rights of Nature coverage would guarantee sustainable farming, safety for forests from degradation, and pressure a extra substantial cleanup of Lake Champlain and different our bodies of water.
Rights of Nature just isn’t a coverage that might move into regulation if offered to the legation throughout this session, and even the following few classes, however it’s a essential paradigm shift for the survival of people and nature alike. Each one who reads this text and discusses its contents pushes the motion one step nearer into Vermont’s Vonstitution, setting precedent for different states to observe swimsuit.
The one method for such a special view of the pure world to be adopted is by getting the message out to the most important group attainable. So, unfold the phrase, speak to pals, coworkers, strangers on the road or on the path, any and everybody who will take heed to why Nature deserves its rights.
Do you know VTDigger is a nonprofit?
Our journalism is made attainable by member donations. In case you worth what we do, please contribute and assist maintain this important useful resource accessible to all.
Vermont
Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage | Common Dreams
The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute – representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world – are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state’s damage caused by climate change.
The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.
Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.
“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”
The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law – the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.
Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River.
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont
(Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)
Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Vermont
Man Shot Near Central and Vermont: Police and Rescue Respond – ABQ RAW
Albuquerque –
Just after 5:25 PM, a shot rang out in near Central and Vermont. A person reported being shot in the 8310 block of Central Ave NE. Officers from the Albuquerque Police Department were dispatched, but fortunately, the New Mexico State Police happened to be in the vicinity and arrived promptly. Officers promptly rendered life saving measures, while Albuquerque Fire Rescue dispatched a rescue unit from Station 5 to the scene.
The man, who was shot in the leg, will be transported to a local area hospital by AFR. Presently, their condition is not known, but if we learn more, we will update you.
APD’s gun violence reduction unit (GVRU) is being called out to investigate this shooting.
Vermont
U.S. Chamber, Oil Industry Sue Vermont Over Law Requiring Companies To Pay For Climate Change Damage
MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.
The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.
The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.
“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”
A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.
Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”
“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.
Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.
It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.
We Need Your Support
Support HuffPost
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.
The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.
-
Health1 week ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business5 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture5 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports5 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics3 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics3 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics1 day ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?