Rhode Island
Why RI must keep Victory Day a state holiday | Opinion
Rep. Patricia A. Morgan, R-West Warwick, was elected to the House of Representatives in November 2020 after previously serving in the House from 2011 through 2018.
On Feb. 27, the House held a hearing on bill H7326, introduced by Democrat Rep. Jennifer Stewart (D-Pawtucket). She and other “progressive” representatives think that celebrating Victory Day in Rhode Island is an affront to an “inclusive” culture. They want to cancel Victory Day and replace it with a so-called Peace and Remembrance Day, because, among other off-base criticisms and invidious slanders, we should not be celebrating the death of civilians during World War II (which we already aren’t doing).
Her prepared statement provides an insight into the twisted worldview of the Left. In their minds, the patriotic folks who established Victory Day ignored reality. They believe the people in charge during World War II made decisions that were morally problematic and troubling, and that Victory Day celebrates a mythologized history that revisionist scholars have exposed as a fairy tale and supplanted with the ugly truth of American conduct during the war. They call into question anything that might be construed as good, or as having a positive impact.
The list of indictments of World War II continued to grow — Representative Stewart was on a roll.
More: War stories: Patricia Morgan’s family legacy drives her resolute support of veterans
It seems that “modern historians” have cast doubt on the necessity of using the atomic bomb to end the war. She also enlightened us with the absurd assertion by revisionist left-wing scholars that American soldiers were responsible for 50 million civilian casualties.
Her reasoning was filled with spurious and hackneyed charges that focused on American soldiers and failed to mention our enemy’s culpability.
This is a glimpse into the mind of the radical left.
The problem for me is that it ignores history in favor of revisionist Marxist pseudo-scholarship that seeks to undermine our country. These radicals are systematically picking through our nation’s history and methodically destroying every piece that serves as a bond that holds us together as a nation.
Not long ago, Americans could unite around the war effort in World War II as a shining example of collective sacrifice in service of noble ends, and a time when there was a clear delineation of good and evil and no doubt which side America was on.
By denigrating our history, they dissolve our ties in the present. By attacking our ancestors, they attack us.
Today, Victory Day commemorates a community of shared burden, striving for the common good, and the celebration of total victory against a brutal, implacable, expansionist empire. Tomorrow, if the activists get their way, it will be replaced with a day when we are supposed to feel bad about all the things America did in World War II that offend the delicate sensibilities of the emotional children on the Left.
Medal mystery: Cranston soldier’s WWII heroism earned military’s highest honor – twice
The truth is military victories are built on defeating the enemy. Rhode Islanders who celebrate Victory Day want to show their gratitude to those who fought for our country and for our values. Some 92,000 Rhode Islanders fought in that war, one out of every 10 citizens; 2,200 were killed. They sacrificed to stop fascist regimes from taking over the world.
It should concern every American that the plain old facts are seemingly not taught in our schools anymore. Grievance and advocacy have taken their place using pseudo history built on ideologically driven rubbish.
I made my thoughts clear during the hearing: Historical facts are not up for debate. Nor are they open to scholarship that evolves and modernizes them.
War is hell and civilians get caught in the middle. But casting aspersions on American soldiers who sacrificed for our country is not open to debate. All of us should thank them for supplying that Great Victory.
Rhode Island
R.I. legislative commission recommends medical school at URI, suggests $20m in ‘seed funding’ – The Boston Globe
“It’s clear that enabling Rhode Island students to more affordably enter the primary care field, and supporting them once they make that choice, is both feasible and necessary,” Lauria said.
URI President Marc Parlange, also the commission’s co-chairman, said the medical school would be a “natural and strategic extension” of URI’s work. “It would help address Rhode Island’s primary care shortage while strengthening our state’s economy,” he said in a statement.
Lauria said the commission is calling for the state to provide $20 million in “initial seed funding” for the medical school in the state budget for fiscal year 2027, and $22.5 million in annual state funding beginning in 2029, when the first class of students would arrive. The commission also recommended the General Assembly create “a dedicated, recurring budget line to support ongoing medical school planning, accreditation, and initial operational activities.”
In an October report, the Tripp Umbach consulting firm told the commission the school’s start-up costs would total $175 million, and the commission called for exploring federal grants, a direct state budget appropriation, and a statewide bond referendum.
The consultants projected the medical school would be financially stable by its third year of operation, with costs offset by tuition revenue, clinical partnerships, and research growth. And the consultants projected the school would end up generating $196 million in annual economic activity, support about 1,335 jobs, and contribute $4.5 million in annual state and local tax revenue.
During a Rhode Map Live event in June, some officials called the medical school proposal a distraction from addressing the immediate need to provide more financial support and to improve the shortage of primary care doctors.
“In terms of the problem we face today, that won’t fix it,” Attorney General Peter F. Neronha said at the time. “As the head of Anchor [Medical Associates] said to me when I talked to him, that’s like telling the patient that the inexperienced doctor will be with you in a decade.”
But Lauria said the Senate is pursing short-term, medium-term, and long-term solutions to the shortage of primary care doctors, and the medical school is a long-term solution.
In the short term, Lauria said legislators pushed to speed up a Medicaid rate review aimed at boosting reimbursements for primary care doctors. And she noted the Senate passed legislation prohibiting insurers from requiring prior authorization for medically necessary health care services.
Lauria, who is a primary care nurse practitioner, said Rhode Island is lagging behind other states in Medicaid reimbursement rates. For example, she said, she practices medicine in East Greenwich, but if she did so 23 miles away Massachusetts, she could make 20 percent to 30 percent more.
Senate President Valarie J. Lawson, an East Providence Democrat, noted if the Legislature doesn’t act now on a public medical school, it might be having the same conversation in a decade, she said.
Lawson said her own primary care doctor is retiring at the end of March. “We know that we need to recruit physicians here and we need to retain them,” she said.
The commission report acknowledged that a URI medical school would not solve the state’s primary care problem. “Educating more clinicians is necessary but not sufficient for increasing supply,” the report states.
Doctors tend to stay where they train, so Rhode Island must have a plan to produce more primary care doctors through a residency strategy that incentivizes training more primary care doctors and trains them in places such as community health centers, the report states. Appropriate payment for primary care, reduced administrative burdens for clinicians, and lower uninsured rates could also be considered.
The commission called for creating a Primary Care Commission “to ensure continued focus on achieving a primary care–oriented system of care.” The commission also called for the development of a scholarship program linked to a minimum five-year obligation to local primary care practice.
The commission voted 15-0 in favor of the report. Senator Thomas J. Paolino, a Lincoln Republican on the commission, said, “The importance of this issue cannot be understated. My colleagues and I continually hear from constituents frustrated by skyrocketing healthcare costs, severe workplace shortages, and especially limited access to primary care.”
The commission began its work in 2024 when then-Senate President Dominick J. Ruggerio named 21 people to the panel. In February 2025, the Joint Committee on Legislative Services approved $150,000 for a feasibility study. Tripp Umbach made a presentation on its draft of the report in May.
Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at edward.fitzpatrick@globe.com. Follow him @FitzProv.
Rhode Island
McKee’s proposed FY2027 budget drops GLP-1 drugs for weight loss from Medicaid
Rhode Island
As Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut dig out of major snowstorm, light snow continues with abnormally cold temps ahead with new potential storm looming
Southern New England hasn’t even finished digging out of over a foot of snow that dropped Sunday into Monday without talks of a significant storm possible in the coming days.
According to the National Weather Service, periods of light to moderate snow continue behind
low pressure as it pulls offshore Monday.
The surface low is well into the north Atlantic by noon today and the expected dry slot has moved overhead shutting off efficient snow making. So, while lingering wrap around moisture will continue to produce light snow across the region today, lack of moisture and the strong forcing that we saw on Sunday will mean much less in the way of additional snowfall today. Overall, expecting 1-2 inches in inland Southern New England with 2-5 inches more likely as you get closer to the extreme eastern and northeastern MA coastline. This is where NE wind
trajectory off the water together with convergence ahead of a front late in the day will lead to a pickup in snow coverage by the afternoon/evening.
After Monday, abnormally cold and mostly dry air enters with yet another storm possible off the coast next weekend.
Quiet weather then follows our active start to the week as dry, abnormally cold NW flow lingers overhead most of the week. Temperatures remain well below normal each day. Normal
highs/lows for late January are in the mid 30s and low 20s respectively; we are forecasting highs in the teens and 20s with lows in the single digits thanks to an anomalously cold airmass
overhead. A few shortwaves rounding the broader trough could bring some flurries off and on but on the whole, things look dry. The National Weather Service continues to monitor a potential storm off the coast toward next weekend. Can we make it 3 Sunday coastal storms in a row? We`ll see!
-
Sports1 week agoMiami’s Carson Beck turns heads with stunning admission about attending classes as college athlete
-
Illinois6 days agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Pittsburg, PA1 week agoSean McDermott Should Be Steelers Next Head Coach
-
Lifestyle1 week agoNick Fuentes & Andrew Tate Party to Kanye’s Banned ‘Heil Hitler’
-
Pennsylvania2 days agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Sports1 week agoMiami star throws punch at Indiana player after national championship loss
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoNortheast Ohio cities dealing with rock salt shortage during peak of winter season
-
Science1 week ago‘It is scary’: Oak-killing beetle reaches Ventura County, significantly expanding range