There won’t be huge changes for the Newport Lobster Company, a 23-year-old Rhode Island-based seafood supplier, now that it’s part of the Bellevue Asset Management (BAM) group of companies […]
Want to keep reading?
Sign up for a FREE TRIAL to have full access to our articles for 7 days!
Have an account? Log in here:
Enter the email address associated with your account.
We’ll send you instructions to reset your password.
Advertisement
We’ve sent a link to to change your password.
Please check your inbox to reset your password securely and easily.
The RI Natural History Survey presented its initial findings on the twenty-fifth annual Rhode Island BioBlitz at Middletown Town Hall on Thursday night. This BioBlitz, which took place on June 7-8, 2024, surveyed the biodiversity at the Norman Bird Sanctuary, making the Middletown sanctum one of two repeat locations a BioBlitz has been held (the other repeat being Roger Williams Park). The first time the sanctuary was surveyed for biodiversity was in 2001 at the second annual BioBlitz. The twenty-three-year gap between the two surveys gives Rhode Island officials, scientists, conservationists, and the general public the ability to compare datasets tailored to one specific Rhode Island site and begin to make hypotheses about the health of the local environment over a long period of time.
“A BioBlitz is an effort by volunteers to find as many species as possible within twenty-four hours on one piece of land,” explains Dr. David Gregg, the executive director of the RI Natural History Survey. The idea was created in 1997, and Rhode Island started leading expeditions in 2000. The Rhode Island BioBlitz is the longest running BioBlitz in the history of the event.
While the purpose of a BioBlitz is, of course, to catalogue local biodiversity, the RI Natural History Survey views the BioBlitz as a way to further other goals of citizen science projects, which include: to introduce everyone to the idea of (hands-on) conservation; to form a welcoming community of people interested in nature, conservation, and backyard ecology; to encourage communication about the environment; to engage with science and with nature; and to get kids outdoors, learning and exploring.
What nature can support is the limit in trying to document as many species as possible. “Does this place support this organism” is the question to ask when considering documenting a species during the BioBlitz. Or, for a more specific rule, the RI Natural History Survey counts cultivated plants, but not annuals or crops. The key test to think about whether this specific organism would still be at this specific place if humans were no longer there (no human intervention).
Advertisement
Even with that limit in place, the 2024 BioBlitz broke multiple records. In total, 1,426 species were found on Norman Bird Sanctuary Property (about 250 acres of land, which is relatively small for a BioBlitz, according to Gregg) through the efforts of 395 participants and volunteers. The species count was “a good hundred species more than the next BioBlitz,” and Gregg credits the record-breaking number of volunteers to Norman Bird Sanctuary’s fantastic “brand” as a conservation area and a beloved community hub. In terms of student participation, about 52 kids from kindergarten through grade six, 20 seventh and eighth graders, 24 undergraduates, and 10 graduate students were dedicated to the community science project.
Comparing the 2001 survey to the 2024 survey at the Norman Bird Sanctuary, the total number of species found increased by 85 percent. Only one species of moss was found in 2001 compared to 79 different species from this past BioBlitz. Likewise, there was a 500 percent increase in the species of spiders found, and a 160 percent increase in crustaceans. “This is a broadly diverse place,” Gregg explained. “A lot of taxa broke records.” He also noted that the vascular plant count seemed to have decreased between the two datasets, but admitted that the 2001 survey included Oakland Forest, which might a source of the discrepancy.
To keep discovery efforts similar across the different types of organisms, participants were split up into teams, who then reported in their findings. The moth team found 246 species of moths, a new record. At this, Gregg reminded the audience that “every species correlates with a niche,” so discovering 246 species of moths at the Norman Bird Sanctuary means that there are 246 niche habitats (for moths). Some of the moths found included the beautiful Green Marvel – which Gregg personally referred to as the “Mint Chocolate Chip Moth” – the Abbott Sphinx, and the Trumpet Vine Sphinx moth. The latter is native to the South, were trumpet vines grow. Through the efforts of this BioBlitz, the RI Natural History Survey documented that Rhode Island is becoming the northern tip of the moth’s range.
“Rhode Island is the boundary between cold northern and warm southern,” Gregg explained, which can be increasingly seen as climate change makes its impact felt, and as ranges for different organisms are expanding and contracting. The state’s latitudinal spot, diversity of habitats, and unique weather patterns and climate make Rhode Island the “last hang-on” for both Southern and Northern species.
Other teams had various amounts of success. The beetle team found 112 species, and another team documented 91 species of flies, which sounds like quite a bit, but was, in fact, a mildly deflating number to see. “A bunch of people who were looking for flying insects were surprised they didn’t get more,” Gregg said. Potential cause of the low level of insects could be the two large fields of swallows that inhabits the front sections of the Norman Bird Sanctuary.
Advertisement
There was a large bee team at the BioBlitz who used the event as an opportunity to continue the state’s efforts to atlas bees and pollinator insects; they found 40 species of bees and wasps on the property. Also found were 21 species of ants, 24 species of fish (16 saltwater, 8 freshwater – numbers that did not satisfy nor impress Gregg), 5 types of turtles, 8 amphibians, and 15 mammals that included raccoons, deer, and the Southern flying squirrel. Participants from URI, Roger Williams, Salve Regina, and Wheaton College documented a whopping 75 species of algae.
The birding team had a strong turnout of participants. “This is a site that is stewarded for bird conservation, and we had good bird teams [at both Norman Bird Sanctuary BioBlitzes],” Gregg said, referencing the turnout for the 2001 BioBlitz. This team documented a total of 92 bird species, including rare ones like the piping plover, bobolinks, and osprey; compared to the survey in 2001, that is an increase of 12 bird species and it could correlate to successful continuous stewardship of the land.
Vascular plants were recorded at 282 total species, with maybe two species (one is still in question) on the rare list. “This is diversity, not rarity,” Gregg explains. But while finding rare species can be exciting, the overall diversity of the site can be even more encouraging; the sheer number of different plant species at Norman Bird Sanctuary showcases the good ecological health from a site that has been used for various purposes over the centuries – from wild land to sheep farming and corn production, to vineyards and orchards to bird conservation efforts and land stewardship.
Gregg did note that 40 species on the vascular plant list were invasive. The Norman Bird Sanctuary has had an ongoing battle against invasive species for years. Some of the invasives were known offenders, like the three kinds of privet and the Amur corktree. Others were more surprising, like the chocolate vine, which is a “relatively new invader,” the Russian olive, and the tree of heaven, also known as “the primary host plant for the spotted lantern fly.” Despite the worrisome significance that the tree of heaven was found on the property, Gregg noted that a recent study found that if the spotted lantern fly does not feed on the tree of heaven, birds will eat them. The invasive insect is only unpalatable to birds and acquires its toxicity if they eat from the tree. Cut down the tree and stop one invasive problem may prove helpful in solving the other.
Finally, Gregg reported that the BioBlitz documented 69 species of fungi and 62 species of lichen. The fungus teams had struggled to find deep, warm humus in the woods, and therefore struggled to find some larger varieties of mushrooms. The lack of humus might be because the woodlands on the property are a relatively new forest, and because privet and other invasive plants have shallow root systems that lock out nutrients and moisture from seeping deeper into the soil. The lack of humus and the mushrooms species that thrives in its presence is a sign of a less than healthy forest floor.
Advertisement
These findings, however, are preliminary, and all conjectures made from them are only observational hypotheses. More research is required to answer questions like “What might be impacting soil health?” “What is the long-term trend of bird diversity?” “How is the changing climate affecting the biodiversity of the Norman Bird Sanctuary and the state?” and “Why did the BioBlitz not find even more aquatic species (especially fish)?” For concrete answers, deeper studies are needed, and Gregg recommends venturing into the more remote, hard-to-get-to areas of the sanctuary to continue surveying the biodiversity of the area.
The 2025 RI BioBlitz will be held June 6-7 at the Steere Hill Preserve in Glocester off of Route 44. The “big parcels of old forest” and the remoteness of the site should make the upcoming BioBlitz a “blockbuster” in terms of species count. Those who want to participate should plan ahead and be aware of the tough conditions this remote location will bring: there will be no power or water, so volunteers and team members should come prepared.
Did you lose your AirPods at this beach this summer?
They may not be gone after all. A single pair of AirPods was among the 21,662 pounds of trash that volunteers collected along Rhode Island’s shoreline this fall, according to Save the Bay’s 2024 International Coastal Cleanup report published Friday.
Far more prolific — and concerning to environmental advocates — were the thousands of cigarette butts, empty bottles, straws and disposable food containers collected and categorized as part of the annual cleanup effort.
Save the Bay report: Plastic beat cigarette butts as No. 1 beach trash
Advertisement
Cigarette butts were the top find — comprising more than one-fifth of the nearly 115,000 pieces of trash collected by 2,700 volunteers between September and November 2024. Plastic and foam pieces took the number two spot, followed by food wrappers, beverage containers, and a laundry list of other items, including a surprising number of shoes and slippers (260). In 2023, plastic beat out cigarettes for the No. 1 spot for the first time in the 35-year history of the Rhode Island event.
Less trash, including less plastic, doesn’t mean litterbugs have reformed their ways. Save the Bay chalked up the trimmed back trash piles to lack of rainfall in 2024.
“We know from experience the shocking number of small plastics that end up in the wrack line after major storm events, as rain washes debris from streets all over the watershed into storm drain systems and into the Bay,” July Lewis, volunteer and internship manager for Save The Bay, said in a statement. “Grates often catch larger items like bottles, while small plastic pieces slip right through. The dry weather during fall meant fewer bottle caps and tiny bits of plastic were washing up. Unfortunately, these plastic pieces still accumulate on land and will still wash into the Bay during the next rainstorm.”
That’s especially problematic because plastic never truly disappears; instead, it breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces known as “microplastics” which contaminate bodies of water and can harm the wildlife that live there.
“Despite efforts to reduce single-use plastic waste, its persistence highlights the urgent need for sustainable alternatives, robust waste management systems and community-wide action to protect the Bay’s delicate balance,” the report stated.
Advertisement
One perennial solution put forth by environmental advocates and lawmakers: a state bottle-deposit refund program, which could incentivize recycling of plastic and glass bottles and cans that otherwise end up in state waterways and roads. An 18-member legislative panel has been studying the issue since June 2023, but struggled to find middle ground between environmental and business groups.
“The best way to reduce the amount of single-use plastic containers that are polluting our Bay and local ecosystem is for Rhode Island to adopt a recycling refund system for beverage containers, also known as a ’bottle bill’,” Jed Thorp, Save the Bay’s advocate director, said in a statement. “Recycling refund systems have been proven – with decades of data – to reduce litter and increase recycling rates.”
Gov. Dan McKee’s proposed fiscal 2026 budget did not offer any funding for a bottle bill program, though he included $100,000 for First Lady Susan McKee’s signature Litter Free Rhody initiative.
If Tuesday’s State of the State address was effectively Governor Dan McKee’s kickoff to his reelection campaign, he now has a better idea of where he stands with the voters as he begins the nearly two-year marathon to the Democratic primary.
A new survey from Morning Consult shows that McKee finished 2024 with a 44 percent approval rating and a 40 percent disapproval rating, which makes him the least-popular governor in New England but still largely contradicts much of the conventional wisdom in Rhode Island politics that he is a sitting duck in 2026.
Morning Consult conducts online surveys on the approval ratings of governors every three months. McKee’s 44 percent approval rating in the fourth quarter of 2024 is similar to previous quarters, although he was above 50 percent approval in the second and third quarters of 2023.
Here’s a breakdown of approval ratings for New England governors for the fourth quarter of 2024.
Advertisement
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Vermont Governor Phil Scott (R)
75 percent approve / 18 percent disapprove
New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu (R)
Advertisement
65 percent approve / 29 percent disapprove
(Sununu did not seek reelection, and Governor Kelly Ayotte was sworn in this month.)
Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont (D)
63 percent approve / 30 percent disapprove
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey (D)
Advertisement
60 percent approve / 29 percent disapprove
Maine Governor Janet Mills (D)
54 percent approve / 39 percent disapprove
Rhode Island Governor Dan McKee (D)
44 percent approve / 40 percent disapprove
Advertisement
The bigger picture: McKee would obviously much rather be in the position of any of his counterparts in New England, but he continues to see a path to reelection.
No one is basing their political future on polling from Morning Consult, but this is one of those classic cases where anyone interested in being Rhode Island governor can find a silver lining.
⚓ If you’re McKee, it’s “See, I’m not in as bad shape as the local media wants to believe.”
⚓ If you’re likely Democratic rival Helena Foulkes, it’s “McKee is trending in the wrong direction, and I haven’t spent a dime to remind voters of any of his mistakes.”
⚓ If you’re House Speaker Joe Shekarchi, it’s “Let’s see where McKee is in nine months.”
Advertisement
This story first appeared in Rhode Map, our free newsletter about Rhode Island that also contains information about local events, links to interesting stories, and more. If you’d like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday, you can sign up here.
Dan McGowan can be reached at dan.mcgowan@globe.com. Follow him @danmcgowan.