Connect with us

Rhode Island

LEOBOR reform, safe firearms storage clear legislative hurdles, heading to McKee • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

LEOBOR reform, safe firearms storage clear legislative hurdles, heading to McKee • Rhode Island Current


The Rhode Island General Assembly took historic steps Thursday to pass contested reforms on disciplining police officers accused of misconduct and safe storage of firearms.

The updates to the Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights (LEOBOR) and safe gun storage now head to Gov. Dan McKee’s desk.

McKee has already signaled his support on social media  for the safe storage bill, but spokesperson Olivia DaRocha did not immediately respond to questions Thursday about whether he would sign the LEOBOR reform bill.

Ruggerio’s return

The long-awaited updates to the LEOBOR bill came the same day that Senate President and bill sponsor Dominick Ruggerio returned to Smith Hill, making his first appearance in the chamber in roughly six weeks due to illness.

Advertisement

Ruggerio did not preside over the chamber.

The Senate’s 33-4 vote to pass his bill, along with identical legislation by Deputy House Speaker Raymond Hull, came after roughly 45 minutes of debate, including a last-minute update intended to assuage concerns about whether police body camera footage could be made public.

“I am grateful to the many stakeholders from all sides of this issue who have worked over the past several years to develop and refine this legislation,” Ruggerio, a North Providence Democrat, said in a statement. “While there will be some who say this bill goes too far and others who say it doesn’t go far enough, I think the bill strikes a responsible balance that brings necessary and appropriate reforms to LEOBOR.”

Adopted in 1976, LEOBOR protects police officers from being fired immediately or put on leave without pay when misconduct charges against them arise. The law has been criticized by social justice advocates who say it’s unfair for police to review internal misconduct.

Under the existing law, accused officers appear before a panel of three active or retired police officers — with one picked by the chief, one by the officer under investigation, and a third chosen by both or a presiding Superior Court judge.

Advertisement

The approved legislation calls for the three hearing officers to be randomly chosen by the Police Officers Commission on Standards and Training. The panel would also include a retired judge and an attorney “selected in consultation with the Rhode Island Supreme Court’s committee on racial and ethnic fairness.”

The legislation also removes the prohibition preventing police chiefs from making public statements about cases that have not yet had a LEOBOR hearing or releasing video evidence.

Senate President Dominick Ruggerio, left, shares a laugh with Sen. David Tikoian during his return to the Senate floor June 6, 2024. (Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)

Amending the amended bills

Ruggerio’s bill previously cleared the Senate 35-0 in January before it was changed to match Hull’s in the House. The bills were again amended Thursday to address concerns brought by  a coalition of open government groups in a May 10 memo that warned the bill could potentially decrease the transparency lawmakers intended.

The group pointed to a provision that would prohibit police chiefs from releasing video evidence for minor violations. The legislation, advocates wrote, does not point out what constitutes as “minor,” which, they argued, could open the door for departments to hide any video recordings.

“It is deeply troubling and sadly ironic that, as a result of this provision, a bill designed to promote greater police transparency does the opposite,” the memo read.

Advertisement

Sen. Dawn Euer, a Newport Democrat, introduced a floor amendment to ensure LEOBOR bill does not limit release of police body-worn camera video under the state’s Access to Public Records Act (APRA) — a move the chamber unanimously approved.

“This basically makes it clear that no matter the tier of offense, the rules around APRA would still apply,” Euer said.

The Rhode Island chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union and Common Cause Rhode Island appeared not totally satisfied with the update.

“We appreciate the Senate’s action in amending the bill to eliminate the House version’s ban on public access to body camera footage involving so-called minor incidents of police misconduct,” the groups said in a joint statement Thursday. “At the same time, by also tying public access to Attorney General regulations, we believe this amendment could allow future restrictions on access to body camera footage.”

Sen. Jonathan Acosta, a Central Falls Democrat, unsuccessfully proposed another floor amendment giving police chiefs power to immediately fire an officer found to have used deadly force in violation of departmental rules — a move that was also attempted by House progressives last month, only to get tabled by members of that chamber.

Advertisement

Acosta’s amendment failed by a vote of 12-25. Following the vote, Black Lives Matter Rhode Island PAC Director Harrison Tuttle issued a statement expressing disappointment.

“The Rhode Island General Assembly must confront the challenge of overcoming the overwhelming influence of police unions so that Black and Brown people can be protected from police violence and communities are safer for everyone,” Tuttle said. “It is only then that we commit to centering police accountability to make that positive vision a reality.”

The amended bills were subsequently approved by House 57-10 without discussion.

Gun safety advocates fill the Senate gallery on June 6, 2024. (Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)

Safe storage likely on the way

In a landmark victory for gun safety advocates, the Senate voted 30-6 to approve bills mandating that all firearms not in use be stored in a locked container or equipped with a tamper-resistant lock.

The companion bills by Rep. Justine Caldwell, an East Greenwich Democrat, and Sen. Pamela Lauria, a Barrington Democrat, make unsafe storage of firearms a civil offense punishable by a fine of up to $250 for the first offense and $1,000 for the second. A subsequent violation would be a criminal charge punishable by up to six months in prison and a fine of up to $500. 

“We have insurance mandates for the coverage of pediatric cancer because it’s unacceptable not to do all we can to prevent children from dying of cancer. We require appropriate restraints in vehicles because it’s unacceptable not to protect children from dying in car crashes,” Lauria said in a statement. “But gun violence, not cancer or car collisions, is the leading cause of death for children, and that’s unacceptable when we have the tools to decrease its occurrence.”

Advertisement

Under an existing state law passed in 1995, gun owners convicted of “criminal storage of a firearm” can be fined up to $1,000 if a loaded firearm left within reach of a child 16 or younger causes an injury.

The pair of bills would also revise the existing law to increase the severity of the criminal charge to a first-degree charge, punishable by up to five years in prison and up to $5,000 in fines in cases where an injury results.

Before they were approved on the House floor May 28, House Judiciary Chairman Robert Craven declared that the bill would make Rhode Island’s gun storage legislation the most comprehensive in the nation.

“That sounds to me like hyperbole,” Gregg Lee Carter, a professor emeritus of sociology at Bryant University who researches gun control, said in an interview Tuesday.

Still, he said it is a lot stronger than the existing law on Rhode Island’s books. 

Advertisement

Carter said 26 states have safe firearms storage and child access protection laws. The strongest of the laws hold a gun owner accountable for storing a gun unsafely such that an unauthorized person, child or adult, can gain access to it.

The weakest laws only make the gun owner liable if the unauthorized user actually uses the gun to harm themselves or others. Of the 26 states having a safe storage law, only five are at the strongest level: Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and Oregon.

Rhode Island now joins the list.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

Rhode Island

Pulled funding creates a bike path to nowhere. Let’s hope RI fixes it.

Published

on

Pulled funding creates a bike path to nowhere. Let’s hope RI fixes it.


play

I’ve long thought bike paths are among Rhode Island’s premier attractions, up there with the beaches, the mansions and the bay.

We like to knock government, but credit where it’s due, the state has done an amazing job building out an incredible pedaling network.

Advertisement

It’s clearly a priority.

At least I thought it was.

But they’ve just dropped the ball on what should have been a beautiful new stretch.

The plan was to finish a mile-long connector from the East Providence end of the Henderson Bridge all the way to the East Bay Bike Path.

There was even $25 million set aside to get it done.

Advertisement

Except WPRI recently reported that it’s now been canceled.

The main fault lies with the Trump administration, which is no friend of bike paths, and moved to kill that $25 million.

But it gets complicated, as government funding always does.

To try to rescue that money, the state DOT reportedly worked with the administration to refunnel it into a road project. Specifically, the $25 million will now be spent helping upgrade the mile-long highway between the Henderson Bridge and North Broadway in East Providence, turning it into a more pleasant boulevard.

Advertisement

That totally sounds worthy.

But it’s insane to throw away the bike path plan.

Especially for a particular reason in this case.

They’d already put a ton of money into starting it.

When state planners designed the new Henderson Bridge between the East Side and East Providence, they included a bike path.

Advertisement

It’s a beauty – well protected from traffic by a barrier, a great asset for safely riding over the Seekonk River.

The plan was to continue it another mile or so along East Providence’s Waterfront Drive, ultimately connecting with the East Bay Bike Path, which runs all the way to Bristol. Which, by the way, is one of the nicest bike paths you’ll find anywhere.

But alas, that connector plan has been canceled.

Advertisement

So the expensive stretch over the Henderson Bridge to East Providence is now a bike path to nowhere. Once the bridge ends, the path on it continues a few hundred yards or so and then, just … ends.

Too bad.

We were so close.

Most of the stories on the issue have been about the complex negotiation to rescue the $25 million by rerouting it to that nearby highway-to-boulevard project. But I don’t want to get lost in the weeds of that bureaucratic process here because it loses sight of the heart of this story.

Which is that an amazing new addition to one of the nation’s best state bike path systems has just been scrapped.

Advertisement

You can knock the Rhode Island government for blowing a lot of things.

The PawSox.

The Washington Bridge.

But they’ve done great with bike paths.

And especially, linking many of them together.

Advertisement

Example: not too many years ago, Providence bikers had to risk dicey traffic on the East Side to get to the more pleasant paths in India Point Park and on the 195 bridge to the East Bay Path.

But the state fixed that by adding an amazing connector that starts behind the Salvation Army building and beautifully winds along the water of the Seekonk River for a mile or so.

That makes a huge difference – and no doubt has avoided some bike-car accidents.

We were close to a comparable stretch on the other side of the river – that’s what the $25 million would have done.

But it’s now apparently dead.

Advertisement

Online commenters aren’t happy about it.

On a Reddit string, “Toadscoper” accused the state of being “complicit” with the feds in rerouting the money from bikes to cars.

And there was this fascinating post from FineLobster 5322, who apparently is a disappointed planner who worked on the project: “Mind you money has already been spent on phase one so rejecting it at this point is wasting money and also against the public interest … but what do I know? I only worked on the project as an engineer … I didn’t get into this to build more highways. I do it … to give back to communities and give them more access to their environment.”

Wow. One can imagine the state planning team is devastated. That’s not a small consideration. Good people go into government to make life better in Rhode Island, and it’s a bad play to take the spirit out of the job by first assigning a great human-scale project and then, after a ton of work, trashing it.

A poster named Homosapiens simply said, “We just accept this?”

Advertisement

Hopefully not.

The first stretch of the path over the Henderson Bridge is done, money already sunk.

What a shame to leave that as a path to nowhere.

It doesn’t have to happen.

Between Governor McKee and our Washington delegation, there’s got to be a way to get this done.

Advertisement

There’s got to be.

mpatinki@providencejournal.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick

Published

on

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick


WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.

Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.

According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.

The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.

Advertisement

The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.

A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.

State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.

The investigation remains ongoing.

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Advertisement

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Follow us on social media:

 

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information

Published

on

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information


A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.

Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.

Advertisement

McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.

“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.

Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”

“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”

The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.

Advertisement

The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.

The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.

At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.

The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending