Connect with us

Rhode Island

Education, housing and health care come out on top in lawmakers’ revised fiscal 2025 budget • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

Education, housing and health care come out on top in lawmakers’ revised fiscal 2025 budget • Rhode Island Current


Good news for transit riders, Medicaid providers and public school students, all of whom stand to benefit from the revised fiscal 2025 budget given first passage by a panel of House lawmakers Friday night.

The $13.9 billion spending plan unveiled late Friday falls just shy of the $14 billion high water mark that characterized fiscal 2024’s approved spending plan, but is $271 million more than what Gov. Dan McKee proposed in January.

The updated spending plan includes enough money to stave off service cuts at the financially struggling Rhode Island Public Transit Authority while offering Medicaid providers long-awaited reimbursement rate hikes in a single year, rather than the three-year incremental uptick McKee proposed. Meanwhile, a nearly $33.8 million boost in state aid to K to 12 schools, above what McKee called for, will offset a steep drop in federal funding, along with more dollars for multilingual learners.

“Through this budget, we are emphasizing education at every level and supporting children,” House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi said in a statement Friday afternoon.

Advertisement

Shekarchi stressed the changes as the result of a “truly collaborative process” including lawmakers in both chambers as well as Gov. Dan McKee. 

However, lawmakers have axed several components of Gov. Dan McKee’s original, $13.7 billion spending proposal, including $60 million in bonds to help pay for a new, dedicated state archives and a proposed rewrite of state income taxes for banks intended to stop Citizens Bank from shifting its investments, and employee base, outside the state.

“It has been a difficult budget because we feel the pain of Rhode Islanders,” Shekarchi said, speaking to reporters Friday night. “We tried to do the most good for the people that need it most.”

The House Committee on Finance’s 13-1 vote Friday sends the updated spending proposal to the full House of Representatives for consideration on June 7, with Rep. George Nardone, a Coventry Republican, casting the sole vote in opposition. Lawmakers must approve a final spending plan before the new fiscal year begins July 1.

At far left, Larry Berman, communications director for the Office of the House Speaker, points to a reporter during the proposed fiscal 2025 budget briefing on Friday, May 31, 2024, at the State House. Left to right are House Fiscal Advisor Sharon Reynolds, House Majority Leader Chris Blazejewski, House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi and House Finance Chairman Marvin Abney. (Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)

Top priorities: Housing and Washington Bridge

Acknowledging the skyrocketing cost to demolish and replace the I-195 Washington Bridge, the spending plan includes $80 million to cover the state’s share of the estimated $400 million cost. This includes repurposing unspent pandemic aid, as McKee suggested, but replaces the governor’s proposal to borrow against future gas tax revenue by instead allotting $40 million in long-term capital spending for the cost.

Advertisement

Combating the housing crisis, a top priority for Shekarchi, takes an even bigger role in the revised spending plan, with a historic $120 million bond to stimulate housing production, including authorization for a state public housing developer. This is $20 million more than the borrowing amount requested by Housing Secretary Stefan Pryor and included in McKee’s budget.

“We need to increase production, production, more production at every single level,” Shekarchi said.

Medicaid reimbursements, new health care initiatives

The updated budget also adds $40 million in state funding to the proposed increase in fee-for-service rates for Medicaid providers who work in behavioral health, community care and with infants and toddlers with developmental disabilities. The increase allows the state to meet the $100.3 million cost to offer rate hikes in a single year, as recommended by the Office of the Health Insurance Commissioner. 

Meanwhile, the understaffed Department of Children, Youth and Families will see a $21 million funding boost to cover workforce expansion, foster care and congregate services, among others.

A new $1 million restricted receipts account, to be managed by the treasurer, will help residents pay off medical debt, one of the proposals in a 25-bill health package put forth by the Rhode Island Senate. A separate bill funding a scholarship program for doctoral and nursing students who stay and work in the state was also added to the updated spending plan.

Advertisement

Help for RIPTA’s fiscal cliff, green economy bond

Amid outcries over service cuts to the embattled transit system, lawmakers allotted an extra $5 million to RIPTA – still $3 million shy of closing the agency’s funding deficit but enough to stave off any reduction in bus route locations or schedules, Shekarchi said.

Also heeding advocates’ calls to preserve and protect forest and farmland, a $53 million green economy bond now includes $13 million for the cause, while money to help rebuild the Newport Cliff Walk was trimmed from $8 million to $3 million to account for a newly awarded federal grant. 

House Fiscal Advisor Sharon Reynolds Ferland is shown. (Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)

Retirees 

Retired state workers and teachers clamoring to reinstate the compounded cost-of-living adjustments that ended under a series of pension reforms enacted in 2012 still won’t get exactly what they asked for. Rather than reinstatement and retroactively applying COLAs — an estimated $169 million cost according to a legislative review that ended earlier this year —the revised budget includes new COLAs effective July 1 for retirees who stopped working before the pension reforms took effect.

“These people are the oldest, the people who have been retired the longest,” Shekarchi said. “They didn’t have the opportunity work longe into the system.”’

For other retirees, the budget preserves McKee’s proposal to raise the minimum income that retired workers from any job can earn without being taxed – from $20,000 to $50,000 (or double for joint filers). 

Higher ed bonds

Two separate bond proposals supporting a Biomedical Sciences Building for the University of Rhode Island, and a separate Institute for Cybersecurity and Emerging Technologies at Rhode Island College were increased above McKee’s recommendation to reflect full funding requested by each school: $87.5 million and $73 million, respectively.

Advertisement

A fifth borrowing proposal, borrowing $10 million for three specific arts projects as well as grant money administered by the state arts council, was also added to the lawmakers’ version of the budget.

New state archives is out

No longer in the borrowing list: a $60 million bond that would have covered a portion of the $100 million price tag for a new state archives, a top priority for Secretary of State Gregg Amore.

Shekarchi cited lack of details on where the archive would go or a funding partner to cover the rest of the cost as reason why the revised budget does not include any borrowing for the project.

No tax rewrite for Citizens

The need for more information and time is also why Shekarchi said a proposed tax rewrite intended to benefit Citizens Bank was nixed from the updated spending plan.

“I don’t want to be the speaker who loses Citizens Bank,” Shekarchi said in a statement Friday. “I will roll up my sleeves and get to work with them over the summer so we can prefile legislation that can be vetted early in the year, but right now, we don’t have enough information to know whether this plan is the right move for our state.”

Advertisement

Rory Sheehan, a spokesperson for the bank, issued an emailed response Friday.

“We are disappointed that Budget Amendment 19 was not included in the State Budget,” Sheehan said. “This decision will make it difficult for the state to compete on a level playing field with Massachusetts and other states and is not in the best interest of Rhode Islanders.  We urge the Rhode Island General Assembly to address the issue before the end of the session.  We are committed to working diligently to achieve a positive outcome.”

No sales tax cut

McKee’s budget proposal offered a wishlist of extra spending items if state revenue beat expectations, including trimming the state sales tax. Senate President Dominick Ruggerio has also pushed for reducing the state sales tax to remain competitive with neighboring states.

Shekarchi’s response to a prospective sales tax cut?

“Absolutely not,” he said Friday.

Advertisement

The revised budget maintains the existing 7% sales tax while striking McKee’s proposal to cut the corporate minimum tax. However, McKee’s proposed 25-cent tax increase on cigarette packs survived, as did a slightly different version of the governor’s recommendation to tax vaping products.

Unlike years past, McKee and Ruggerio did not attend a press briefing on the budget held Friday night at the State House. Each indicated general support for the revised spending plan in prepared statements.

“I am pleased that the budget will invest in many Senate priorities, particularly in the areas of health care, child care, education and providing some needed relief to retirees,” Ruggerio, a North Providence Democrat, said.

“The Speaker and I are aligned in our priorities of improving the education, housing, and health of all Rhode Islanders, and this budget makes key investments in all those areas,” McKee said. “Like the Speaker, I too appreciate the collaborative spirit in which this budget was shaped.”

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Rhode Island

Pulled funding creates a bike path to nowhere. Let’s hope RI fixes it.

Published

on

Pulled funding creates a bike path to nowhere. Let’s hope RI fixes it.


play

I’ve long thought bike paths are among Rhode Island’s premier attractions, up there with the beaches, the mansions and the bay.

We like to knock government, but credit where it’s due, the state has done an amazing job building out an incredible pedaling network.

Advertisement

It’s clearly a priority.

At least I thought it was.

But they’ve just dropped the ball on what should have been a beautiful new stretch.

The plan was to finish a mile-long connector from the East Providence end of the Henderson Bridge all the way to the East Bay Bike Path.

There was even $25 million set aside to get it done.

Advertisement

Except WPRI recently reported that it’s now been canceled.

The main fault lies with the Trump administration, which is no friend of bike paths, and moved to kill that $25 million.

But it gets complicated, as government funding always does.

To try to rescue that money, the state DOT reportedly worked with the administration to refunnel it into a road project. Specifically, the $25 million will now be spent helping upgrade the mile-long highway between the Henderson Bridge and North Broadway in East Providence, turning it into a more pleasant boulevard.

Advertisement

That totally sounds worthy.

But it’s insane to throw away the bike path plan.

Especially for a particular reason in this case.

They’d already put a ton of money into starting it.

When state planners designed the new Henderson Bridge between the East Side and East Providence, they included a bike path.

Advertisement

It’s a beauty – well protected from traffic by a barrier, a great asset for safely riding over the Seekonk River.

The plan was to continue it another mile or so along East Providence’s Waterfront Drive, ultimately connecting with the East Bay Bike Path, which runs all the way to Bristol. Which, by the way, is one of the nicest bike paths you’ll find anywhere.

But alas, that connector plan has been canceled.

Advertisement

So the expensive stretch over the Henderson Bridge to East Providence is now a bike path to nowhere. Once the bridge ends, the path on it continues a few hundred yards or so and then, just … ends.

Too bad.

We were so close.

Most of the stories on the issue have been about the complex negotiation to rescue the $25 million by rerouting it to that nearby highway-to-boulevard project. But I don’t want to get lost in the weeds of that bureaucratic process here because it loses sight of the heart of this story.

Which is that an amazing new addition to one of the nation’s best state bike path systems has just been scrapped.

Advertisement

You can knock the Rhode Island government for blowing a lot of things.

The PawSox.

The Washington Bridge.

But they’ve done great with bike paths.

And especially, linking many of them together.

Advertisement

Example: not too many years ago, Providence bikers had to risk dicey traffic on the East Side to get to the more pleasant paths in India Point Park and on the 195 bridge to the East Bay Path.

But the state fixed that by adding an amazing connector that starts behind the Salvation Army building and beautifully winds along the water of the Seekonk River for a mile or so.

That makes a huge difference – and no doubt has avoided some bike-car accidents.

We were close to a comparable stretch on the other side of the river – that’s what the $25 million would have done.

But it’s now apparently dead.

Advertisement

Online commenters aren’t happy about it.

On a Reddit string, “Toadscoper” accused the state of being “complicit” with the feds in rerouting the money from bikes to cars.

And there was this fascinating post from FineLobster 5322, who apparently is a disappointed planner who worked on the project: “Mind you money has already been spent on phase one so rejecting it at this point is wasting money and also against the public interest … but what do I know? I only worked on the project as an engineer … I didn’t get into this to build more highways. I do it … to give back to communities and give them more access to their environment.”

Wow. One can imagine the state planning team is devastated. That’s not a small consideration. Good people go into government to make life better in Rhode Island, and it’s a bad play to take the spirit out of the job by first assigning a great human-scale project and then, after a ton of work, trashing it.

A poster named Homosapiens simply said, “We just accept this?”

Advertisement

Hopefully not.

The first stretch of the path over the Henderson Bridge is done, money already sunk.

What a shame to leave that as a path to nowhere.

It doesn’t have to happen.

Between Governor McKee and our Washington delegation, there’s got to be a way to get this done.

Advertisement

There’s got to be.

mpatinki@providencejournal.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick

Published

on

2 dead, 1 seriously hurt after crash on I-95 South in Warwick


WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.

Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.

According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.

The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.

Advertisement

The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.

A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.

State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.

The investigation remains ongoing.

Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.

Advertisement

Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.

Follow us on social media:

 

 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information

Published

on

Judge rejects DOJ push for Rhode Island voter information


A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.

Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.

Advertisement

McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.

“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.

Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”

“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”

The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.

Advertisement

The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.

The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.

At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.

The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.

Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending