Connect with us

Pennsylvania

The Republican race for Pennsylvania governor: WPSU talks with Melissa Hart | WITF

Published

on

The Republican race for Pennsylvania governor: WPSU talks with Melissa Hart | WITF

  • Anne Danahy/StateImpact Pennsylvania

Advertisement
The Republican race for Pennsylvania governor: WPSU talks with Melissa Hart | WITF

Courtesy Of The Marketing campaign

The Democratic main for Governor will not be aggressive in Pennsylvania this 12 months. However 9 Republicans are vying for his or her celebration’s nomination to be governor. WPSU invited all these candidates for interviews main as much as the Might 17 main. Right here’s the dialog WPSU’s Anne Danahy had with Melissa Hart.

Anne Danahy 
Melissa Hart, thanks for speaking with us.

Melissa Hart 
It’s good to be with you immediately.

Advertisement

Anne Danahy 
You served within the state Senate and U.S. Home, and also you now work as an legal professional. You’re additionally one in every of 9 candidates on this race, you all agree on a number of the points. So what units you aside from the opposite candidates?

Melissa Hart 
Yeah, I feel it’s essential really that voters take note of our abilities and skills. Apart from the truth that, you understand, we could agree on a difficulty or two, or 10. It’s much less related than who we’re as individuals, what we’ve been in a position to accomplish. If we’ve been elected, if we perceive authorities, if we perceive the non-public sector. I’m the one particular person on this race who really has served a big period of time in state. Ten years I used to be a state senator, I chaired the state Senate Finance Committee, then I used to be six years within the federal authorities. I’m the one one in every of us really who has the stability of each state and federal service. However the cause I’m really on this race is as a result of the final 15 years the place I’ve been working within the non-public sector as an legal professional at a small agency, working with small enterprise individuals, and I’m additionally on the board of administrators, which is a really energetic board of a lender that solely lends to small enterprise individuals. So I’ve been just about pushed into this race by the considerations of these Pennsylvanians who’ve been attempting to construct our financial system and discovering that they hit a brick wall usually when coping with the state.

Anne Danahy 
Are you able to be particular? What are you listening to from them? What varieties of points would you want to handle

Melissa Hart 
Yeah, they’re throughout the board. However to start with, although, it’s the unimaginable and rising paperwork and the very uncooperative, I’d say uncooperative state companies. I feel this governor actually and COVID collectively have put us ready the place our state companies are extra fascinated about being the individuals who give directives, however not the individuals who help Pennsylvanians in compliance, for instance, with laws, or with getting licensed. I talked to a girl the opposite day, whose daughter is a nurse practitioner, and she will be able to’t get her license to follow. She’s been ready for months and months. And as you understand, our healthcare system wants her and has wanted her. However the state will not be cooperative and ensuring that we have now the individuals we’d like able to go although she’s certified. In order that instance is No. 1. I wish to work with these companies to ensure that they’re buyer service-oriented. But additionally the problems I’ve confronted concerning power. The event of power in Pennsylvania has stalled in below this administration. And we have to release each the households who personal the properties, the businesses who wish to assist them produce. And likewise we have to make the connections with the market. So the pipelines which are being stalled once more, by this administration. We have to ensure that we make the connections and in addition make the connections to the ports, in order that the liquification, for instance of our pure gasoline will be completed. After which that may be marketed. It’s good for all of Pennsylvania. It’s not simply, you understand, the people who find themselves within the power trade, as a result of then we have now cheaper power. And that helps all of the smaller cities that was once depending on manufacturing. As we work to onshore manufacturing in America, Pennsylvania can be a magnet for that. And clearly top-of-the-line locations due to our power prices.

Anne Danahy 
You’ve known as for training reform, together with faculty selection for households. How would that work? And would it not embody utilizing tax {dollars} to help non-public faculties?

Advertisement

Melissa Hart 
Yeah, there’s no tax {dollars} going straight to personal faculties, as a result of our Structure doesn’t enable for spiritual faculties. However we do enable grants again to folks and that’s what would occur right here in Pennsylvania, if we did go a college selection invoice. Once I was a state senator, I sponsored faculty selection. We had been unable to get it handed on the time. I additionally labored with a company out of Washington known as the Heart for Schooling Reform, which is predicated actually on the market to offer mother and father the management over the kids’s training. So I’m supportive of a lot of various things as a result of each little one is totally different. So each little one learns in a different way. And so every guardian ought to have the chance to place their little one in the kind of training that works finest the place that little one is most certainly to succeed, as a result of that’s what they need for his or her future. So I help homeschooling, I help faculty selection, which might enable a guardian to decide on a special faculty district, it additionally would supply a guardian the chance to decide on a non-public faculty, whether or not spiritual or not, and that will likely be as much as them. They are going to get a rebate of a few of their taxes in order that that will assist them defray the price of training. However I additionally do help charters, that are public faculties. And most of the latest and finest charters within the Commonwealth are those which are specializing in science and know-how. We’ve had sadly, a dearth of graduates who’re inspired within the sciences and inspired in arithmetic. And so what occurs in our financial system is we’re quick the individuals we’d like for these technical careers. It’s essential for us to deal with that. We will additionally, the truth is enhance our vo-techs, which is part of our highschool system, however they haven’t been maintaining with the wants of the market. So we have to work with trade to ensure that these vo-techs are instructing the children the issues they know. To allow them to stroll out of highschool into a great paying job.

Anne Danahy
Melissa Hart, we have now only a few seconds left, what would you say your high precedence can be when you had been elected?

Melissa Hart 
I feel the state must be centered on customer support as an alternative of the state anticipating us to serve the companies, which I discover appalling. In order that’s one factor that definitely needs to be turned on its head. However the different is that oldsters want to have the ability to select their faculties. We have to get the state out of the enterprise of instructing loopy ideologies and again to widespread sense. Look, mother and father elevate their youngsters, and so they educate them the values that their household holds. The varsity ought to deal with educational topics, and never be concerned by any means in what lots of people are calling indoctrination. And in a number of circumstances, it appears to be like like that’s what it’s. We have to deal with instructing youngsters the reality, not some educational’s view of one thing. So the opposite challenge for me is ensuring that voter integrity is addressed.

We had a wholesale change of our voting system, which was inappropriate and uncalled for, with Act 77. I’d repeal that. I’d work with the legislature to repeal that. Return to the system that we had earlier than. As a result of there was actually no trigger for the change. Folks had entry to the vote, there was no main voter fraud or something that we had been knowledgeable about earlier than. So let’s return to that prior system in order that our counties can really course of the ballots in the way in which they’re funded to do that, this crush of mail in ballots that don’t enable us to know who even gained a race is simply unreasonable and ridiculous. And now we’ve seen that it’s in opposition to the Pennsylvania structure. So let’s return to the fundamentals, return to: you need to order an absentee poll and also you should be a sound applicant just like the state Commonwealth Courtroom dominated. After which we additionally, for my part, should add one factor to the system. And that may be a requirement for image ID and authorities voter ID for every voter so that every of us know that after we vote our votes not going to be canceled out by somebody who’s not a sound voter.

Anne Danahy 
Melissa Hart, thanks for speaking with us.

Advertisement

Melissa Hart 
Nicely, it’s good to be with you immediately. I recognize the chance.


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

More funding could be coming to a Pa. affordable housing program

Published

on

More funding could be coming to a Pa. affordable housing program


Shapiro’s proposal would not increase PHARE funding to $100 million overnight, instead adding $10 million to the ceiling each year until 2028. He also proposed adding $50 million to the Whole-Home Repairs Program, a separate grant for low-income homeowners to address problems like leaking roofs, unsafe electrical wiring, and broken furnaces.

Shapiro also pitched scrapping PHARE’s current funding formula in favor of what his budget proposal calls a “guaranteed” transfer. Bonder noted, the current formula sometimes results in PHARE receiving less money than its cap allows. The guaranteed transfer would mean funds reliably hit the cap every year.

This higher sum would be overwhelmingly funded via the state’s realty transfer tax, one of several funding sources for PHARE, along with natural gas impact fees and money from the National Housing Trust Fund. Money from the transfer tax goes to several areas of the budget, including the general fund, and Bonder said the state’s current surplus means there is spending flexibility.

State House Democrats back Shapiro’s proposal as written, according to their spokesperson, Beth Rementer. But state Senate Republicans would need to be won over in budget negotiations.

Advertisement

The state budget was due June 30, but lawmakers are still haggling over the final package.

Asked for comment, a spokesperson for state Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Scott Martin (R., Lancaster) responded, “We do not have an update to share on that issue at this time.”

State Sen. Elder Vogel Jr. (R., Beaver), who sponsored the legislation over the past two sessions, is somewhat optimistic.

“We’re hopeful that we’re going to see a cap increase,” Vogel’s communications director, Abby Chiumento, said. “With negotiations ongoing, we don’t know what’s going to be in the final budget.”

PHARE was signed into law in 2010. The legislation that led to the program’s establishment received near-unanimous support in both chambers.

Advertisement

The Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, which is affiliated with but not run by the state, chooses the recipients of PHARE grants. The recipients range from nonprofits to county governments.

The program “allows municipalities and localities and counties to figure out how they can best use the dollars,” said Allegheny County Executive and former Democratic state representative Sara Innamorato. “For us, it’s addressing homelessness, but if there’s a community that wants to create more first-time home buyers, they can design a program around that.”

Innamorato, who sponsored the PHARE cap increase bill in the state House when she served there, argues more funding is overdue.

“There’s many projects that are worthy that go unfunded every year,” she said. “We could always use more money to invest in addressing housing needs.”

Spotlight PA is an independent, nonpartisan, and nonprofit newsroom producing investigative and public-service journalism that holds the powerful to account and drives positive change in Pennsylvania.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey stands by Biden, says voters will decide on issues, not bad debate

Published

on

Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey stands by Biden, says voters will decide on issues, not bad debate


PHILADELPHIA, PA – SEPTEMBER 21: Senator Bob Casey (D- PA) addresses supporters before former President Barack Obama speaks during a campaign rally for statewide Democratic candidates on September 21, 2018 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Midterm elect

Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey said Monday that President Joe Biden is able to run a strong race and serve a second term in the Oval Office, standing by his close ally in the critical battleground state following a disastrous debate performance that’s prompting some national Democrats to question his candidacy.

Advertisement

Casey had stayed quiet about Biden’s performance before making his first public appearances since Thursday night’s debate, including a campaign stop in Scranton, Pennsylvania, the blue-collar hometown that he shares with Biden and that the president name-checked in the debate.

Casey, who is also seeking reelection in November, acknowledged that Biden had a bad debate, but also suggested that voters have bigger concerns.

“He had a bad night and debate, but I think people know what’s at stake,” Casey told reporters, arguing that voters are more concerned about issues like abortion, labor and voting rights and the fate of democracy.

Advertisement

“I’ve been at this a while, and I know his work,” Casey said. “And I also know that the American people and the people of Pennsylvania are going to focus on these races in the way that I just outlined.”

Casey would not elaborate on why he thinks Biden is fit and said he doesn’t worry that Biden’s debate performance would affect his own race for Senate.

Advertisement

They lead the ticket together in a battleground state that is critical to the Democrats’ fortunes in holding the White House and Senate. No Democrat has won the White House without Pennsylvania’s support since Harry S. Truman in 1948.

Casey’s opponent, former hedge fund executive David McCormick — like other down-ballot Republicans — has seized on Biden’s performance, accusing Casey of lying about Biden’s fitness to be president and suggesting that Biden’s Cabinet should consider forcing him out of office, using the 25th Amendment.

The president’s debate performance last week left many donors, party strategists and rank-and-file DNC members publicly and privately saying they want the 81-year-old Biden to step aside to allow the party to select a younger replacement at the Democratic National Convention in August.

Advertisement

Biden spent the weekend trying to stabilize his campaign, then gathering with family as previously planned at Camp David, where they discussed the path forward.

The president and his team characterized his debate performance as an outlier, arguing one bad night shouldn’t define him or jeopardize the election.

Advertisement

Biden told a Saturday fundraiser on Long Island that he didn’t have a “great night” at the debate, but that former President Donald Trump’s falsehoods and reminders about the January 6, 2021, insurrection had resonated more with undecided voters.

McCormick, for his part, hasn’t commented on a blatant falsehood Trump told during the debate about the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by his supporters. Trump falsely claimed the attackers were “a relatively small number of people that went to the Capitol and in many cases were ushered in by the police.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Cheyney University of Pennsylvania no longer on probation, school says

Published

on

Cheyney University of Pennsylvania no longer on probation, school says


Cheyney University, the oldest historically Black college in the United States (HBCU) is no longer on probation. 

Advertisement

According to the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, the university has had its accreditation reaffirmed after the commission placed the school on probation last November due to alleged “insufficient evidence” that it was in compliance with multiple university standards.

The HBCU released the following statement Monday:

“Cheyney University appreciates Middle States Commission on Higher Education’s (MSCHE) review of our accreditation and its decision to remove our probationary status as of June 27, 2024. This reaffirmation of accreditation by MSCHE validates our unwavering commitment to academic and operational excellence. It also reinforces our view that an accreditation process must be fair and transparent for all institutions of higher education, including HBCUs.

Advertisement

While we agree with this decision, we remain disappointed by the process to arrive at this long-overdue outcome and will continue to advocate for equity and transparency. This current Commission decision is consistent with the assessment of three separate MSCHE-appointed peer evaluator teams that visited Cheyney’s campus between February 2023 and April 2024 and formally reported that Cheyney appears to meet the Commission’s Standards of Accreditation and Requirements of Affiliation. Middle States’ decision reflects the undeniable progress Cheyney University of Pennsylvania has achieved under the stewardship of our administration, the dedication of faculty and staff, and the relentless support of our countless advocates who have stood by Cheyney throughout this entire process so we can serve our students and continue to uphold the legacy of our institution.” 

The university says MSCHE has requested that the school submit a customary monitoring report, due March 1, 2025 as a part of its accreditation action. 

Advertisement

“Our next evaluation visit by Middle States is scheduled for 2030-2031, part of our eight-year accreditation cycle,” the statement concluded.

“As a part of its accreditation action, MSCHE, has requested that the university submit a monitoring report, which is customary, due March 1, 2025. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending