Connect with us

New York

Why Hundreds of New York City Prosecutors Are Leaving Their Jobs

Published

on

New York Metropolis’s prosecutors are leaving in droves, citing pandemic burnout, low salaries and two intersecting legal guidelines that basically modified the character of their jobs.

“They only merely can’t do it anymore,” Darcel Clark, the Bronx district legal professional, mentioned in a Friday interview. “The cash shouldn’t be the place it ought to be, and the work-life stability is simply unmanageable.”

On this 12 months’s first three months alone, 104 prosecutors have left the Bronx district legal professional’s workplace, 36 have left Brooklyn’s and 44 Manhattan’s. The 9 Staten Island assistant district attorneys who’ve left this 12 months represented about 10 p.c of that workplace’s prosecutorial workers. The Queens workplace advised the New York Metropolis Council that it was on observe this 12 months to greater than double final 12 months’s resignations.

Prior to now fiscal 12 months, the Manhattan and Brooklyn district attorneys, who’ve about 500 prosecutors every, misplaced nearly a fifth of that work power, a pointy improve from attrition averages earlier than 2020. The Bronx is shedding attorneys at an identical tempo.

When the pandemic arrived in New York two years in the past, it disrupted practically all courtroom proceedings. On the similar time, two new state legal guidelines took impact governing discovery — the sharing of all proof, potential proof and different case-related materials.

Advertisement

The primary regulation requires prosecutors to acquire and hand over lots of of paperwork on many instances, a demanding job that may impede interviewing witnesses and in any other case making ready for courtroom. A second regulation ties the handover of that materials to the speedy trial clock, creating deadline stress for prosecutors to gather all the fabric as soon as fees are filed. (That regulation is called Kalief’s regulation, named for Kalief Browder, a youngster who dedicated suicide after being held on Rikers Island for 3 years with no trial.)

As an example, if a defendant blew right into a breathalyzer, a protection legal professional is entitled to 6 months value of calibration experiences on that machine. Prosecutors even have a seamless obligation handy over an identical variety of calibration experiences filed after the defendant used the machine.

The brand new legal guidelines aren’t the one cause for departures. District attorneys say that their city-funded budgets are too skinny to permit them to pay prosecutors competitively. Regardless of the price of dwelling in Manhattan and Brooklyn, beginning salaries for prosecutors in these boroughs is $72,000. Within the Bronx it’s $75,121.

And, after all, the pattern has coincided with the pandemic, which has brought about file numbers of voluntary resignations throughout all industries.

District attorneys say their staff are struggling. Ms. Clark mentioned her workplace’s attorneys, inundated with paperwork, may make $30,000 extra doing comparable duties for regulation corporations, which could additionally allow them to make money working from home. “Why not do this?” she mentioned.

Advertisement

The district attorneys are changing their earlier staff after they can, usually exchanging skilled prosecutors for untested ones.

State lawmakers rewrote the invention regulation in 2019 after protection attorneys mentioned that prosecutors have been withholding key proof. The earlier regulation required them to show over sure proof solely after protection attorneys had requested it in writing.

As a result of defendants — a disproportionate variety of whom are individuals of shade — weren’t aware of the total scope of the proof in opposition to them, they usually accepted plea offers, somewhat than threat going to trial.

“The protection bar was principally fully at the hours of darkness about what the case was even about,” mentioned John P. Buza, a former prosecutor on the Manhattan district legal professional’s workplace who now practices protection regulation as a associate at Konta, Georges & Buza, P.C.

Public defenders argued that with out stress on prosecutors to show over exculpatory info, their purchasers have been perpetually prone to wrongful conviction.

Advertisement

The invention regulation modified that. Prosecutors at the moment are obligated to show over 21 sorts of fabric, together with all electronically created or saved info related to a case.

Prosecutors now should hustle to acquire reams of paperwork — a lot of it produced by the New York Police Division — and submit it to protection attorneys or threat seeing a case tossed out. Prosecutors usually work as many as 100 instances concurrently, and a big proportion of their instances now generate important paperwork.

Ms. Clark mentioned that the workload had led to immense stress on her assistants, who “really feel that their instances are going to get dismissed or that I’m going to fireside them.”

“Once they have all this stress on them, they’d somewhat go elsewhere the place their high quality of life is best,” she mentioned. “They don’t need to work nights, weekends, holidays and do all this discovery.”

Caitlin Nolan, an 11-year veteran of the Manhattan district legal professional’s workplace, mentioned in an interview Friday that she began on the lookout for a brand new job final spring, amid the challenges of engaged on a low wage, the on a regular basis difficulties of the pandemic and frustration with the brand new legal guidelines. She left the workplace in January.

Advertisement

“It was troublesome to adjust to as a result of there was a lot we have been anticipated to provide,” she mentioned, including that having to supply details about witnesses — who would categorical concern to her about defendants understanding their identities forward of a trial — was significantly nerve-racking.

In current testimony submitted to the New York Metropolis Council, the Manhattan district legal professional, Alvin Bragg illustrated the burden. He reported that earlier than 2020, his workplace used about 32 terabytes of information storage. At this time, it makes use of 320 terabytes, a 900 p.c improve over two years.

Tina Luongo, the legal professional answerable for the legal protection follow on the Authorized Assist Society, mentioned that she agreed that prosecutors — and public defenders — wanted more cash for aggressive salaries, significantly in mild of the invention legal guidelines.

“Excessive workloads, even excessive workloads for public defenders, diminish morale. I’m not going to disclaim that,” she mentioned, including that she anticipated the state to supply native prosecutors with tens of tens of millions of {dollars} for staffing in its coming price range.

However, she mentioned, “It can’t be the case and it should not be the case that the way in which you resolve a workload downside is to decrease the rights of any individual accused of a criminal offense.”

Advertisement

Mr. Buza mentioned that his former colleagues should not saying that the rules underlying the brand new legal guidelines are unjust or misguided, however are merely overwhelmed by the way in which the job total has modified, with the necessity to chase down paperwork for which they’re legally accountable — even when they won’t bear in mind such supplies exist.

Folks go into the job as a result of they’ve an concept as to what it means to be a prosecutor and go into courtroom and take a look at instances, and so they find yourself simply principally importing discovery,” he mentioned.

Final month, Gov. Kathy Hochul proposed modifications to the invention regulation that may forestall a choose from dismissing a case if a prosecutor was in “substantial compliance” with discovery obligations. Ms. Luongo mentioned that varied counterproposals have been underneath negotiation.

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

-
Jury Deliberation Re-charge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
-
PART: 59
Χ
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
4909
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 30, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates, RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
PART: 59
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
4815
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
X
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 29, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE
PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR.,
ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates,
RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Published

on

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Violent confrontations at a pro-Palestinian rally in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, on Saturday reflected what some local officials and protest organizers called an unexpectedly aggressive Police Department response, with officers flooding the neighborhood and using force against protesters.

At the rally, which drew hundreds of demonstrators, at least two officers wearing the white shirts of commanders were filmed punching three protesters who were prone in the middle of a crosswalk. One officer had pinned a man to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the ribs, a 50-second video clip shows. Another officer punched the left side of a man’s face as he held his head to the asphalt.

The police arrested around 40 people who were “unlawfully blocking roadways,” Kaz Daughtry, the department’s deputy commissioner of operations, said on social media on Sunday.

Mr. Daughtry shared drone footage of one person who climbed on a city bus, “putting himself and others in danger.” The Police Department, he wrote, “proudly protects everyone’s right to protest, but lawlessness will never be tolerated.”

Neither Mr. Daughtry nor the police commented on the use of force by officers. A spokeswoman for Mayor Eric Adams did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the police response. The Police Department’s patrol guide states that officers must use “only the reasonable force necessary to gain control or custody of a subject.”

Advertisement

Bay Ridge has a significant Arab American population and hosts demonstrations in mid-May every year to commemorate what Palestinians call the Nakba, or “catastrophe” — when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were forced from their homes during the war that led to Israel’s founding in 1948.

Andrew Gounardes, a state senator and a Democrat who represents the area, said local politicians had been in touch with the commanding officer of the 68th police precinct before the preplanned protest and said there had been no indication that there would be such a heavy police response. He called the videos he saw of the events “deeply concerning.”

“It certainly seems like the police came ready for a much more aggressive and a much more confrontational demonstration than perhaps they had gotten,” he added.

Justin Brannan, a Democrat who is the city councilman for the area, said the protest was smaller than last year’s but that officers had come from all over the city to police it. He said their approach appeared to be directed by 1 Police Plaza, the department headquarters in Manhattan.

“These were not our local cops. Clearly, there was a zero-tolerance edict sent down from 1PP, which escalated everything and made it worse,” Mr. Brannan said.

Advertisement

“I’m still waiting on information and details about the arrests that were made,” he added, “but from my vantage point, the response appeared pre-emptive, retaliatory and cumulatively aggressive.”

The Republican state assemblyman whose district includes parts of Bay Ridge, Alec Brook-Krasny, had a different perspective. He said an investigation would determine whether the officers’ actions were warranted, but he said some protesters were “breaking the law” by refusing to clear the street.

“I think that those bad apples are really hurting the ability of the other people to express their opinions,” Mr. Brook-Krasny said.

Some local residents supported the police and said they were tired of the protests’ disruptive impact. “Enough is enough,” said Peter Cheris, 52, a 40-year resident of Bay Ridge, who said he had viewed the videos of the protest. “If you’re going to break the law, you deserve it,” he said.

Donna Lieberman, the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, singled out the presence of the Police Department’s Strategic Response Group, a unit that is sometimes deployed to protests and has been the subject of several lawsuits brought by the civil liberties union and other groups.

Advertisement

The police unit’s handling of the demonstration “was a violation of New Yorkers’ right to speak out and risks chilling political expression,” Ms. Lieberman said in a statement. “N.Y.C.L.U. protest monitors witnessed violent arrests, protester injuries, and even arrests of credentialed members of the press.”

She added: “The continual pattern of N.Y.P.D. aggression against pro-Palestine demonstrators raises important questions about the city’s disparate treatment of speakers based on their message.”

Abdullah Akl, an organizer with Within Our Lifetime, the pro-Palestinian group that organized the protests, said the response took organizers aback, particularly for a demonstration that occurs every year in Bay Ridge and is known to be frequented by families with children.

“It was really an unusual and unprecedented response,” Mr. Akl said.

He said he witnessed two men being pushed to the ground. One of them can be seen in a video with blood streaming down the side of his face. Nerdeen Kiswani, chair of Within Our Lifetime, said three protesters — including the two who can be seen being punched — were treated for their injuries at hospitals.

Advertisement

The Police Department has arrested hundreds of demonstrators since street protests began shortly after the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7 and Israel’s subsequent invasion of Gaza. The protests have been largely peaceful, with few injuries or violent clashes.

In a turning point, on April 30 officers cleared Hamilton Hall at Columbia University, which had been occupied by protesters for 17 hours. Many officers showed restraint during the arrests, though a handful were filmed pushing and dragging students as they removed them from the building.

On Sunday, Ms. Lieberman said police response to the protests in Bay Ridge underscored the importance of implementing the terms of a $512,000 settlement the civil liberties union and the Legal Aid Society reached with the city this month. The settlement set new terms for how the Police Department manages protests, creating a tiered system that dictates how many officers can be sent to demonstrations and limits the use of the Strategic Response Group. It will take years to put into practice.

The settlement is one of several that stemmed from the George Floyd racial justice protests in 2020. Last year, the city agreed to pay $13.7 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that claimed unlawful police tactics had violated the rights of demonstrators in Manhattan and Brooklyn. In March, the city agreed to pay $21,500 to each of roughly 300 people who attended another Black Lives Matter protest in 2020 in the Bronx. Those people were penned in by the police, then charged at or beaten with batons, according to a legal settlement.

Andy Newman and Camille Baker contributed reporting.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending