Finance
India Shelter Finance Corporation Ltd. Lauded with CARE AA-/Stable Rating by Care Edge: Solidifying Leadership in Affordable Housing Finance
NewsVoir
New Delhi [India], June 29: India Shelter Finance Corporation Limited (ISFCL) is pleased to announce that CARE Ratings Limited has upgraded the credit rating of our Long Term Bank Facilities, amounting to Rs. 1,335.00 crores. The rating for ISFCL has been revised from CARE A+; Positive (Single A Plus; Outlook: Positive) to CARE AA-; Stable (Double A Minus; Outlook: Stable). The upgraded rating reflects our commitment to financial stability and growth, and we have enclosed the credit rating letter issued by CARE Ratings Limited for your reference.
India Shelter has been recognized for its operational excellence, strategic growth initiatives, and profound understanding of its diverse clientele’s needs. The recent upgrade to a CARE AA-; Stable rating by CARE Ratings Limited, a leading rating agency, stands as a testament to the India Shelter’s robust growth trajectory and innovative approach towards fostering financial inclusion across the heartland of India.
Empowering Aspirations and Facilitating Homeownership
India Shelter’s mission revolves around transforming the dream of homeownership into reality. By offering specialized financial solutions tailored to the unique needs of the self-employed and low-income groups, India Shelter underscores its dedication to affordable housing finance. The accolade from CARE Ratings Limited celebrates India Shelter’s prowess in navigating the intricacies of the affordable housing finance landscape and its clear vision for future expansion.
A Torchbearer of Strategic Expansion and Technological Innovation
The CARE AA-; Stable rating further recognizes India Shelter’s strategic geographical expansion and adept use of technology to enhance service delivery. With a significant footprint across various states and a strong presence in key regions, India Shelter has achieved deep market penetration. The company’s forward-thinking, technology-first approach has streamlined operations, fortified its credit appraisal system, and significantly propelled its scalable and sustainable business model.
Steering Ahead with Confidence
Augmented by the CARE AA-; Stable rating, India Shelter is geared for sustained growth in the affordable housing finance domain. The company remains steadfast in its commitment to expanding its reach and enriching its product array to meet the evolving demands of its customers. Focused on operational leverage and maintaining a healthy capital adequacy ratio, ISFCL is dedicated to realizing its pledge of providing “A Shelter for All Indians.”
India Shelter Finance Corporation Ltd. provides affordable home loans and loan against property in Tier 2 and 3 geographies in India. India Shelter provides home loans to customers from low-and middle income segments who are building or buying their first homes. The company has strong distribution moat with its Pan-India network in 15 states via 223 branches and maintains a granular portfolio. The company is being run by an experienced professional management team backed by marquee investors.
(ADVERTORIAL DISCLAIMER: The above press release has been provided by NewsVoir. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of the same)
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
First Published: Jun 29 2024 | 1:00 PM IST
Finance
Austin financial staff propose delaying bond to 2028
AUSTIN (KXAN) — The city of Austin has released its final bond recommendation to city council members and the mayor. It’s one of at least three base options city council is expected to consider later this month.
City staff ultimately recommended the city council not pursue a bond in 2026 — but rather in 2028 — citing the “decision tree” city council adopted earlier this year.
“Staff also recognizes that there are priority funding areas that will need to be considered in the FY 2027 budget process for programs within the existing bond propositions that have reached 90% of the funds expended,” staff wrote. Those areas include transportation, watershed protection and parks.
In a work session Tuesday, many city council members expressed they still wanted to move forward with a bond this year — especially one that focuses on parks.
“Parks are so central to the identity of Austin; they’re so valued by people here — almost uniquely — amongst so many communities that I know. They are essentially out of capital funds … and I do feel an obligation to continue to get them some capital dollars,” Mayor Pro Tem Chito Vela said.
The Bond Election Advisory Task Force proposal
There are at least two additional base proposals up for consideration: One from a task force that’s been working for roughly a year and a half to identify the city’s greatest needs and another from a group of five city council members that focuses on parks.
The Bond Election Advisory Task Force (BEATF) has identified a package that would cost the city roughly $767 million and would tackle major projects in affordable housing, parks, transportation and flood mitigation.
The BEATF proposal puts money in the following buckets:
- $200 million: Affordable housing
- $175 million: Parks and open space
- $106 million: Facilities (libraries, museums, the Austin animal center)
- $25 million: Homeless Strategy Office (helping fund a new 1,200 bed shelter)
- $147 million: Transportation
- $113 million: Storm and flood mitigation infrastructure
You can find the full list of recommended projects here.
The ‘parks’ proposal
Last month, a group of city council members proposed an additional 2026 bond idea, worth more than $400 million, but that also includes a second bond ask in 2028. The focus of that bond is parks.
In a message board post, five council members pitched the following for a 2026 bond:
• $250-$260 million for parks projects, not including any maintenance facilities
• $50-$60 million for community facilities, such as libraries and cultural arts
• $75-$80 million for active transportation projects
“Should this option ultimately be pursued, we would then use the work of the BEATF and staff for the non-parks categories as the starting point for a 2028 bond discussion,” the council members said.
The BEATF then reworked that additional option — which is not their preferred proposal, but satisfies the ask from some council members — that would come in at $436 million.
The breakdown is:
- $225 million: Parks and open space
- $106 million: Facilities
- $25 million: Homeless Strategy Office
- $80 million: Transportation
You can find the breakdown of that option here.
City staff also put forward a version of this scenario which would cost roughly $390 million.
The breakdown of that alternate proposal is:
- $92 million: Transportation
- $250 million: Parks and Recreation
- $48 million” Community facilities
What happens next?
Council members and the city will now need to narrow down which of these proposals — if any of them — will be the final proposal.
In a work session, council members suggested they would not be able to have a decision made by the end of the month (staff initially put a placeholder for that vote on the May 28 council agenda). Mayor Pro Tem Vela told staff he would like to see a vote happen in July.
The deadline to call an election is in August and voters would have the ultimate say in November.
How much would these cost you?
City staff previously said that for every $100 million in additional debt the city takes on, the average Austin homeowner will see their bill go up by $14.34 annually.
It’s worth noting that your property tax bill will go up over the next several years regardless of whether a bond is approved or not in 2026. City staff say the city still has more than $2 billion in outstanding debt.
Finance
Aussie suburbs with the largest superannuation losses from collapsed funds: ‘Still unaware’
There are still thousands of Australians who have lost retirement savings in their superannuation accounts that likely don’t realise. The Australian securities regulator is urging people to double check their account to make sure you’re not impacted by the high-profile collapse of two investment funds.
Some 12,000 Aussies had their superannuation funds switched into Shield and First Guardian. But years later about 9,000 still haven’t made an official complaint with the financial ombudsman, with only about 3,000 seeking compensation so far.
“In our view that’s not enough,” ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland told Yahoo Finance.
“We suspect a lot of people are still unaware.”
RELATED
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has shared postcode data with Yahoo Finance, showing the suburbs with the worst loses stemming from the $1 billion disaster.
Of the top postcodes across the country, four are in Queensland – 4740 Mackay, 4350 Toowoomba, 4670 Bundaberg and 4209 Coomera Pimpama.
Four are in Victoria – 3029 Truganina, 3064 Craigieburn, 3030 Werribee/Hoppers Crossing and 3977 Cranbourne/Cranbourne East/Cranbourne North.
While two others are in Western Australia – 6112 Armadale and 6171 Baldivis.
“Queensland, Victoria and WA are over represented,” Kirkland said.
“But really what we’re trying to say with releasing this data is that there are people who are affected by this in every part of the country.”
The top postcodes for each Australian jurisdiction
|
NSW |
2259 |
Wyong · Tuggerah · Lake Munmorah. |
|
VIC |
3977 |
Cranbourne · Cranbourne North · Cranbourne East |
|
QLD |
4740 |
Mackay · North Mackay · West Mackay |
|
SA |
5114 |
Smithfield · Craigmore · Blakeview |
|
WA |
6112 |
Armadale · Piara Waters · Harrisdale |
|
TAS |
7250 |
Launceston · Riverside · Newstead |
|
NT |
0830 |
Palmerston City · Durack · Gray |
|
ACT |
2620 |
Queanbeyan · Googong · Karabar |
Aussies urged to reach out to their superannuation fund
Many people may still not realise they were invested in Shield and First Guardian, because the funds sat behind well-known platforms or financial advisers. So if you happen to be in one of these postcodes and have not looked at your super in a few years, it is really worth checking, he said.
“If they’re not sure weather they invested in Shield or First Guardian they should reach out to the superannuation fund and ask about that,” Kirkland urged.
Finance
Lending Momentum Builds for 2026
-
Boston, MA4 minutes agoUnresponsive teenage boy pulled from pond in Andover, Massachusetts
-
Denver, CO10 minutes agoLatest Power Rankings May Reflect NFL’s True View of Broncos’ Schedule
-
Seattle, WA16 minutes agoWhat is the cheapest 2026 World Cup match in at Lumen Field in Seattle?
-
San Diego, CA22 minutes agoVideo shows man with child dive for cover amid Islamic Center shooting
-
Milwaukee, WI28 minutes agoYin, one of the Milwaukee County Zoo’s Chinese alligators, has died
-
Atlanta, GA34 minutes agoAtlanta United caught ball watching at Epcot in feeble U.S. Open Cup exit
-
Minneapolis, MN40 minutes agoNFL roundup: Minneapolis to host 2028 draft; Nashville gets 2030 Super Bowl
-
Indianapolis, IN46 minutes agoAmerican Red Cross opens new donation centers in Indianapolis and Noblesville