Connect with us

New York

New York’s Bail Laws Are Changing Again. Here’s How.

Published

on

New York’s Bail Laws Are Changing Again. Here’s How.

One of the vital contentious gadgets in New York’s $220 billion funds deal had little to do with fiscal points: For the second time, legislators revised legal guidelines governing bail for felony defendants that that they had handed simply three years in the past.

These measures barred judges from setting bail for defendants charged with much less severe crimes; these defendants have been launched whereas they awaited trial with out posting bail. One other regulation handed in 2019 additionally pressured prosecutors to satisfy extra stringent necessities for turning over proof to protection legal professionals.

Governor Kathy Hochul, a average Democrat, pushed for modifications in these legal guidelines throughout an election yr marked by rising gun violence.

The New York Metropolis mayor, Eric Adams, signaled on Friday that he was not satisfied by the settlement to revise the regulation reached in Albany final week as a part of state funds negotiations, saying in a tv interview that it’s “solely halftime” and “clearly, there’s extra to be performed.” However some prosecutors in New York City welcomed the modifications.

Public defenders have argued that the method was pushed by politics and never information. The revised regulation, they contend, will lead to extra individuals being held at Rikers Island — which disproportionately holds individuals of coloration and is already in disaster — whereas public security won’t profit.

Advertisement

Right here’s a information to the modifications and the way they have been made:

Bail is a sum of cash {that a} defendant posts in alternate for freedom earlier than a trial. It’s returned when a case has concluded. New York rewrote bail legal guidelines in 2019 in order that fewer individuals awaiting trial landed behind bars as a result of they might not afford to publish bail.

Below the laws, judges have been now not capable of set bail for a wide-ranging checklist of misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies. These included housebreaking, stalking, assault with out severe harm, many drug offenses and a few sorts of arson and theft. Folks charged with these offenses have been launched to await trial, though some have been topic to monitoring.

And in circumstances the place bail may very well be set, the brand new guidelines compelled judges to think about a defendant’s capacity to pay and to decide on the “least restrictive” means vital to make sure that defendants returned to court docket.

The brand new guidelines have been applied, partially, to forestall low-income defendants from being disproportionately jailed as a result of they might not pay.

Advertisement

However these modifications, which took impact in January 2020, have been met with fierce backlash from many district attorneys, judges, regulation enforcement officers and Republicans. Critics, together with Dermot F. Shea, the previous New York Metropolis Police Division commissioner, blamed the laws for a spate of great crimes shortly after the brand new guidelines went into impact, with little proof to help that argument.

Supporters of the regulation famous that crime statistics can change for a lot of causes, and researchers say that it’s tough to isolate the impression of reforms from the social disruptions attributable to the pandemic.

After a wave of criticism from regulation enforcement officers and Republicans, lawmakers agreed upon an preliminary set of modifications.

These measures, which handed in April 2020 and took impact that July, added two dozen crimes to the checklist of great expenses for which a choose might impose money bail. They included intercourse trafficking, grand larceny, second-degree housebreaking, vehicular assault and any crime that ends in a loss of life.

The revisions additionally added circumstances underneath which a choose might take into account a defendant’s felony historical past in setting bail. Setting bail was allowed for sure “persistent offenders,” for instance, or when new felonies have been dedicated by somebody on probation or parole, even when the offenses have been nonviolent.

Advertisement

Bail grew to become a matter of debate once more this yr after Mr. Adams unveiled an formidable public security plan in January.

In New York, bail is imposed solely to make sure that individuals return to court docket; judges aren’t imagined to set excessive bail for defendants who they suppose could be a public security threat. New York is the one state with no so-called dangerousness normal. Mr. Adams wished judges to have the ability to take into account a defendant’s dangerousness.

Final month, Ms. Hochul started to push lawmakers to vary the regulation, casting her plan as focused tweaks quite than wholesale rollbacks. Progressive politicians have disputed that characterization.

Though the modifications adopted within the funds are comparatively modest in comparison with these initially proposed, their impact is to offer judges extra discretion in a number of key areas within the felony course of.

Whereas judges nonetheless should select the least restrictive means to make sure a defendant returns to court docket, and can’t explicitly assess a defendant’s “dangerousness,” they might want to weigh particular components in setting bail, together with whether or not a defendant is accused of inflicting “severe hurt” to somebody and whether or not a defendant has a historical past of utilizing or possessing a gun.

Advertisement

The regulation additionally expands the variety of crimes for which defendants could be required to pay bail, by creating stricter guidelines for individuals accused of repeated offenses that hurt individuals or property. Below the brand new regulation, bail could be set even for some minor offenses comparable to shoplifting, if a person commits a couple of such offense in a sure timeframe.

In an effort to keep away from imprisoning individuals who have dedicated crimes of poverty, lawmakers included an exception for thefts which might be thought of “negligible,” although it isn’t but clear how that time period might be outlined.

The impression of each of those provisions will tremendously depend upon how judges interpret them, and the diploma to which they’re seen as an invite to impose stricter circumstances on individuals awaiting trial.

Judges in New York can already set bail for many gun crimes. The brand new regulation provides a number of much less generally charged crimes to that checklist, together with the sale of a firearm to a minor.

The regulation additionally lowers the edge required to convey a cost of gun trafficking.

Advertisement

The state’s discovery regulation — which governs how the prosecution shares proof with the protection in a case — was rewritten in 2019. Protection attorneys had mentioned that prosecutors have been taking too lengthy to show over essential details, leaving defendants to languish for months awaiting trial. The revision required the prosecutors to show over 21 varieties of fabric, together with all electronically created or saved data pertaining to a case, in a decent timeframe, or threat having it dismissed.

The brand new regulation preserves this requirement however clarifies the expectations for prosecutors, and it provides judges extra discretion over whether or not a case needs to be thrown out when deadlines aren’t met. Ms. Hochul described the modifications as being aimed toward stopping automated dismissals of circumstances when prosecutors operated “in good religion,” regardless that they did not make a disclosure.

Jonah E. Bromwich contributed reporting.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New York

Trump Tries to Move Hush-Money Case to Federal Court Before Sentencing

Published

on

Trump Tries to Move Hush-Money Case to Federal Court Before Sentencing

Former President Donald J. Trump sought to move his Manhattan criminal case into federal court on Thursday, filing the unusual request three months after he was convicted in state court.

The long-shot bid marks Mr. Trump’s latest effort to stave off his sentencing in state court in his hush-money trial, in which he was convicted of falsifying records to cover up a sex scandal.

He is scheduled to receive his punishment on Sept. 18, just seven weeks before Election Day, when he will square off against Vice President Kamala Harris for the presidency.

“The ongoing proceedings will continue to cause direct and irreparable harm to President Trump — the leading candidate in the 2024 presidential election — and voters located far beyond Manhattan,” Mr. Trump’s lawyers, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, wrote in the filing.

Their filing came even as the Trump legal team is awaiting the result of a separate effort to postpone the sentencing; it opened a second front that could complicate the first.

Advertisement

On Aug. 15, Mr. Trump asked the state court judge who presided over the trial, Juan M. Merchan, to delay the sentencing until after Election Day. Mr. Trump’s lawyers argued that they needed more time to challenge his conviction on the basis of a recent Supreme Court ruling granting presidents broad immunity for official acts.

The Manhattan district attorney’s office, which won the conviction of Mr. Trump on May 30, has argued that the Supreme Court’s ruling has “no bearing” on their case, which centers on Mr. Trump’s cover- up of a sex scandal involving a porn star. But the Manhattan prosecutors deferred to the judge on whether to delay the sentencing, leaving the door open for Justice Merchan to punt until after the election.

Justice Merchan was expected to rule on the delay request next week, and it is unclear whether Mr. Trump’s federal petition would disrupt that. In the federal filing, the former president’s lawyers asked a judge to find that Justice Merchan was barred by law from sentencing Mr. Trump while their attempt to move the case was underway.

It seemed possible that effort might backfire. If the federal judge does not grant the lawyers’ request, they will have further alienated Justice Merchan as he prepares to sentence their client. Mr. Trump faces up to four years in prison, though he could receive a shorter sentence, or merely probation.

There are signs the federal judge might be skeptical. Mr. Trump already tried — and failed — to move the case to federal court. Last year, soon after the former president was indicted, he asked the same federal judge to remove the case from Justice Merchan, arguing that it concerned official acts as president.

Advertisement

The judge, Alvin K. Hellerstein, rejected that argument.

“The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the matter was a purely personal item of the president — a cover-up of an embarrassing event,” Judge Hellerstein wrote in an opinion last year. “Hush money paid to an adult film star is not related to a president’s official acts. It does not reflect in any way the color of the president’s official duties.”

It is unclear how soon Judge Hellerstein might take up Thursday’s request, or whether he will hold a hearing to entertain it. In their filing, Mr. Trump’s lawyers cast aspersions on the New York State court system, saying its procedures had “proven inadequate” to protect federal interests and, if allowed to continue, would “result in further irreparable harm to President Trump.”

The unorthodox filing suggested that Mr. Trump’s lawyers are likely to make any and every attempt they can to delay the sentencing, even if Judge Hellerstein balks.

A spokeswoman for the district attorney’s office declined to comment.

Advertisement

The filing on Thursday captured two of Mr. Trump’s favorite legal strategies: delay, and attacks on Justice Merchan.

The former president has on three occasions sought to oust Justice Merchan from the case, claiming he is biased, and lobbing personal attacks at the judge’s daughter, who is a Democratic political consultant. The judge has rejected each request and assailed the claims as “rife with inaccuracies and unsubstantiated claims.”

Continue Reading

New York

Video: Heavy Downpour Floods New York City Streets

Published

on

Video: Heavy Downpour Floods New York City Streets

new video loaded: Heavy Downpour Floods New York City Streets

transcript

transcript

Heavy Downpour Floods New York City Streets

Drivers navigated flooded roads, including major highways, as a storm hit the New York City region.

Announcement: Bainbridge Avenue Jerome Avenue.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in Extreme Weather

Continue Reading

New York

Senator Menendez’s Resignation Letter

Published

on

Senator Menendez’s Resignation Letter

ROBERT MENENDEZ
NEW JERSEY
COMMITTEES:
BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN
AFFAIRS
FINANCE
FOREIGN RELATIONS
The Honorable Phil Murphy
Governor of New Jersey
Office of the Governor
Trenton, N.J. 08625
Dear Governor Murphy,
United States Senate
WASHINGTON, DC 20510-3005
July 23, 2024
528 SENATE HART OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20510
(202) 224-4744
210 HUDSON STREET
HARBORSIDE 3, SUITE #1000
JERSEY CITY, NJ 07311
(973) 645-3030
208 WHITE HORSE PIKE
SUITE 18-19
BARRINGTON, NJ 08007
(856) 757-5353
This is to advise you that I will be resigning from my office as the United States Senator from
New Jersey, effective on the close of business on August 20, 2024.
This will give time for my staff to transition to other possibilities, transfer constituent files that
are pending, allow for an orderly process to choose an interim replacement, and for me to close
out my Senate affairs.
While I fully intend to appeal the jury’s verdict, all the way and including to the Supreme Court,
I do not want the Senate to be involved in a lengthy process that will detract from its important
work. Furthermore, I cannot preserve my rights upon a successful appeal, because factual matters
before the ethics committee are not privileged. This is evidenced by the Committee’s Staff
Director and Chief Counsel being called to testify at my trial.
I am proud of the many accomplishments I’ve had on behalf of New Jersey, such as leading the
federal effort for Superstorm Sandy recovery, preserving and funding Gateway and leading the
federal efforts to help save our hospitals, State and municipalities, as well as New Jersey families
through a once in a century COVID pandemic. These successes led you, Governor, to call me the
“Indispensable Senator.”
I thank the citizens of New Jersey for the extraordinary privilege of representing them in the
United States Senate.
Sincerely,
Pabet Menang.
Robert Menendez
United States Senator
New Jersey
cc: The Honorable Kamala Harris, President of the Senate
The Honorable Ann Berry, Secretary of the Senate

Continue Reading

Trending