Connect with us

New York

4 Takeaways From the Hearing on Dismissing Charges Against Eric Adams

Published

on

4 Takeaways From the Hearing on Dismissing Charges Against Eric Adams

A federal judge on Wednesday afternoon questioned Mayor Eric Adams of New York, Mr. Adams’s lawyer and a top Justice Department official over the department’s decision to seek the dismissal of corruption charges against Mr. Adams.

It was the latest episode in a legal saga that has led to resignations of prosecutors and city officials and calls for the mayor to be removed from office.

For a hearing on a request that has roiled New York’s political and legal communities, the proceedings on Wednesday were surprisingly tame. For 90 minutes, the judge, Dale E. Ho, methodically examined the rationale of the Justice Department official, Emil Bove III, the acting deputy attorney general, for requesting to dismiss the charges without prejudice (which means they could be brought again in the future). He also sought to establish that Mr. Adams had knowingly consented to the government’s motion.

Mr. Adams was indicted in September on charges of bribery, fraud, soliciting illegal foreign campaign contributions and conspiracy as part of a scheme involving the Turkish government. On Wednesday, Mr. Bove argued that dismissing the case was “a standard exercise of prosecutorial discretion,” and that Mr. Adams’s indictment had negatively affected the “national security and immigration objectives” of President Trump.

Here are four takeaways from the hearing:

Advertisement

The mayor was jeered on Wednesday when he arrived at the courthouse in Lower Manhattan. A small crowd of protesters chanted “We don’t need a MAGA mayor — Adams out now!” But Mr. Adams, smiling, strode past them, flashing a thumbs up.

Inside the courtroom, he projected a similar calm as Judge Ho asked questions related to allegations that the Justice Department was seeking to drop the charges in exchange for his cooperation with Mr. Trump’s immigration policies — which have set off a crisis of confidence about Mr. Adams’s independence. The mayor told the judge under oath that he had not been coerced or made a deal with prosecutors. He also confirmed that he understood that the Justice Department could revive the case against him.

“I have not committed a crime, and I don’t see them bringing it back,” Mr. Adams said, sitting next to his lawyer, Alex Spiro. “I’m not afraid of that.”

Judge Ho was even-keeled as he waded into a court case with unprecedented implications for the Justice Department, and with little precedent to refer to.

He questioned both sets of lawyers, and at times appeared self-deprecating, even apologizing for his “elementary” questions. But he also appeared to go out of his way to create a meticulous record that he can scrutinize as he weighs how to rule.

Advertisement

To be sure, his role is narrow: whether to dismiss a case based on a motion from the Justice Department. But his ruling will have an immediate effect on the future of the mayor of America’s largest city, and may well hold implications for how justice will be administered during President Trump’s second term. Aware of this, he took care to ask both simple and complex questions and to reiterate each position clearly after arguments were presented.

The hearing was procedurally unique, as there was no lawyer or party arguing in court to keep the case against Mr. Adams alive. That kept the proceeding largely amicable.

But Mr. Bove and Mr. Adams’s lawyers grew defensive at times as the hearing wore on, notably when Judge Ho asked whether the case was being dismissed as part of a quid pro quo with the mayor. They also pushed back when Judge Ho raised “friend of the court” briefs from outsiders arguing against the government’s request to drop the charges.

“You have a record, undisputed, that there is no quid pro quo,” Mr. Bove said. He later called one brief challenging the government’s case, which was filed on behalf of a series of former U.S. attorneys, “partisan noise.”

For his part, Mr. Spiro said that a quid pro quo “never happened” and then swore to an oath in court to that effect, something that Judge Ho did not ask him to do. And in an emotional plea toward the end of the hearing, Mr. Spiro claimed that Mr. Adams was being “actively harmed by this ongoing process.”

Advertisement

Although Judge Ho acknowledged that it was “not in anyone’s interest here for this to drag on,” he told the parties that he did not want to “shoot from the hip” and issue a decision during the hearing. He did not give a specific timeline and asked for “patience as I consider these issues carefully.”

In the meantime, it doesn’t appear that emotions over the case will cool anytime soon. After the hearing, Mr. Bove released a blistering statement inviting other Justice Department officials to resign if they disagreed with the request to dismiss the charges against Mr. Adams.

“For those who do not support our critical mission, I understand there are templates for resignation letters available on the websites of The New York Times and CNN,” Mr. Bove wrote.

New York

Read the Indictment Against Nicolás Maduro

Published

on

Read the Indictment Against Nicolás Maduro

intentionally and knowingly combined, conspired, confederated, and agreed together and with each other to violate Title 18, United States Code, Section 924(c).
35. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that NICOLÁS MADURO MOROS, DIOSDADO CABELLO RONDÓN, RAMÓN RODRÍGUEZ CHACÍN, CILIA ADELA FLORES DE MADURO, NICOLÁS ERNESTO MADURO GUERRA, a/k/a “Nicolasito,” a/k/a “The Prince,” and HECTOR RUSTHENFORD GUERRERO FLORES, a/k/a “Niño Guerrero,” the defendants, and others known and unknown, during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime for which they may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, to wit, for MADURO MOROS, CABELLO RONDÓN, and RODRÍGUEZ CHACÍN, the controlled substance offenses charged in Counts One and Two of this Superseding Indictment, and for FLORES DE MADURO, MADURO GUERRA, and GUERRERO FLORES, the controlled substance offense charged in Count Two of this Superseding Indictment, knowingly used and carried firearms, and, in furtherance of such crimes, knowingly possessed firearms, and aided and abetted the use, carrying, and possession of firearms, to wit, machineguns that were capable of automatically shooting more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger, as well as destructive devices, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 924(c)(1)(A) and 924(c)(1)(B)(ii). (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 924(o) and 3238.)

36.

FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS

As a result of committing the controlled substance offense charged in Count One of this Superseding Indictment, NICOLÁS MADURO MOROS, DIOSDADO CABELLO RONDÓN, RAMÓN RODRÍGUEZ CHACÍN, the defendants, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Sections 853 and 970, any and all property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the defendants obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the offenses, and any and all property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit,

23

25

Continue Reading

New York

Video: New York City Hit With Heaviest Snowfall in Years

Published

on

Video: New York City Hit With Heaviest Snowfall in Years

new video loaded: New York City Hit With Heaviest Snowfall in Years

transcript

transcript

New York City Hit With Heaviest Snowfall in Years

A winter storm blanketed the Greater New York area, leading to more than 400 flight cancellations across the region’s major airports. Parts of Long Island saw up to nine inches of snow.

I think it was absolutely beautiful. We’re from North Carolina, so it was great to come up to New York and see the snow.

Advertisement
A winter storm blanketed the Greater New York area, leading to more than 400 flight cancellations across the region’s major airports. Parts of Long Island saw up to nine inches of snow.

By Jorge Mitssunaga

December 27, 2025

Continue Reading

New York

Vote For the Best Metropolitan Diary Entry of 2025

Published

on

Vote For the Best Metropolitan Diary Entry of 2025

Every week since 1976, Metropolitan Diary has published stories by, and for, New Yorkers of all ages and eras (no matter where they live now): anecdotes and memories, quirky encounters and overheard snippets that reveal the city’s spirit and heart.

For the past four years, we’ve asked for your help picking the best Diary entry of the year. Now we’re asking again.

Advertisement

We’ve narrowed the field to the five finalists here. Read them and vote for your favorite. The author of the item that gets the most votes will receive a print of the illustration that accompanied it, signed by the artist, Agnes Lee.

The voting closes at 11:59 p.m. on Sunday, Dec. 21. You can change your vote as many times as you’d like until then, but you may only pick one. Choose wisely.

Advertisement

Click “VOTE” to choose your favorite Metropolitan Diary entry of 2025, and come back on Sunday, Dec. 28, to see which one our readers picked as their favorite.

Click “VOTE” to choose your favorite Metropolitan Diary entry of 2025, and come back on Sunday, Dec. 28, to see which one our readers picked as their favorite.

Two Stops

Advertisement

Dear Diary:

It was a drizzly June night in 2001. I was a young magazine editor and had just enjoyed what I thought was a very blissful second date — dinner, drinks, fabulous conversation — with our technology consultant at a restaurant in Manhattan.

I lived in Williamsburg at the time, and my date lived near Murray Hill, so we grabbed a cab and headed south on Second Avenue.

“Just let me out here,” my date said to the cabby at the corner of 25th Street.

Advertisement

We said our goodbyes, quick and shy, knowing that we would see each other at work the next day. I was giddy and probably grinning with happiness and hope.

“Oh boy,” the cabby said, shaking his head as we drove toward Brooklyn. “Very bad.”

“What do you mean?” I asked in horror.

“He doesn’t want you to know exactly where he lives,” the cabby said. “Not a good sign.”

I spent the rest of the cab ride in shock, revisiting every moment of the date.

Advertisement

Happily, it turned out that my instinct about it being a great date was right, and the cabby was wrong. Twenty-four years later, my date that night is my husband, and I know that if your stop is first, it’s polite to get out so the cab can continue in a straight line to the next stop.

— Ingrid Spencer

Ferry Farewell

Ferry Farewell

Advertisement

Dear Diary:

On a February afternoon, I met my cousins at the Staten Island Ferry Terminal. Their spouses and several of our very-grown children were there too. I brought Prosecco, a candle, a small speaker to play music, photos and a poem.

We were there to recreate the wedding cruise of my mother, Monica, and my stepfather, Peter. They had gotten married at City Hall in August 1984. She was 61, and he, 71. It was her first marriage, and his fourth.

I was my mother’s witness that day. It was a late-in-life love story, and they were very happy. Peter died in 1996, at 82. My mother died last year. She was 100.

Advertisement

Peter’s ashes had waited a long time, but finally they were mingled with Monica’s. The two of them would ride the ferry a last time and then swirl together in the harbor forever. Cue the candles, bubbly, bagpipes and poems.

Two ferry workers approached us. We knew we were in trouble: Open containers and open flames were not allowed on the ferry.

My cousin’s husband, whispering, told the workers what we were doing and said we would be finished soon.

They walked off, and then returned. They said they had spoken to the captain, and they ushered us to the stern for some privacy. As the cup of ashes flew into the water, the ferry horn sounded two long blasts.

Advertisement

— Caitlin Margaret May

Unacceptable

Unacceptable

Dear Diary:

Advertisement

I went to a new bagel store in Brooklyn Heights with my son.

When it was my turn to order, I asked for a cinnamon raisin bagel with whitefish salad and a slice of red onion.

The man behind the counter looked up at me.

“I’m sorry,” he said. “I can’t do that.”

Advertisement

— Richie Powers

Teresa

Teresa

Dear Diary:

Advertisement

It was February 2013. With a foot of snow expected, I left work early and drove from New Jersey warily as my wipers squeaked and snow and ice stuck to my windows.

I drove east on the Cross Bronx Expressway, which was tied up worse than usual. Trucks groaned on either side of my rattling Toyota. My fingers were cold. My toes were colder. Got to get home before it really comes down, I thought to myself.

By the time I got home to my little red bungalow a stone’s throw from the Throgs Neck Bridge, the snow was already up to my ankles.

Inside, I took off my gloves, hat, scarf, coat, sweater, pants and snow boots. The bed, still unmade, was inviting me. But first, I checked my messages.

There was one from Teresa, the 92-year-old widow on the corner.

Advertisement

“Call me,” she said, sounding desperate.

I looked toward the warm bed, but … Teresa. There was a storm outside, and she was alone.

On went the pants, the sweater, the coat, the scarf, the boots and the gloves, and then I went out the door.

The snow was six inches deep on the sidewalks, so I tottered on tire tracks in the middle of the street. The wind stung my face. When I got to the end of the block, I pounded on her door.

“Teresa!” I called. No answer. “Teresa!” I called again. I heard the TV blaring. Was she sprawled on the floor?

Advertisement

I went next door and called for Kathy.

“Teresa can’t answer the door,” I said. “Probably fell.”

Kathy had a key. In the corner of her neat living room, Teresa, in pink sweatpants and sweaters, was sitting curled in her armchair, head bent down and The Daily News in her lap.

I snapped off the TV.

Startled, she looked up.

Advertisement

“Kathy! Neal!” she said. “What’s a five-letter word for cabbage?”

— Neal Haiduck

Nice Place

Nice Place

Advertisement

Dear Diary:

When I lived in Park Slope over 20 years ago, I once had to call an ambulance because of a sudden, violent case of food poisoning.

Two paramedics, a man and a woman, entered our third-floor walk-up with a portable chair. Strapping me in, the male medic quickly inserted an IV line into my arm.

Out of the corner of my eye, I could see his partner circling around and admiring the apartment.

Advertisement

“Nice place you’ve got here.” she said. “Do you own it?”

“Yeah,” I muttered, all but unconscious.

Once I was in the ambulance, she returned to her line of inquiry.

“Do you mind me asking how much you paid for your apartment?”

“$155,000,” I croaked.

Advertisement

“Wow! You must have bought during the recession.”

“Yeah” I said.

They dropped me off at Methodist Hospital, where I was tended to by a nurse as I struggled to stay lucid.

At some point, the same medic poked her head into the room with one last question:

“You wouldn’t be wanting to sell any time soon, would you?”

Advertisement

— Melinda DeRocker

Illustrations by Agnes Lee.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending