Connect with us

New Jersey

Orsted wants out of $300M forfeiture for scrapped New Jersey offshore wind farms

Published

on

Orsted wants out of $300M forfeiture for scrapped New Jersey offshore wind farms


On Monday, a spokeswoman, Alexandra Altman, said Murphy’s administration “is evaluating Orsted’s recent statements and correspondence, and will take any and all actions necessary to ensure Orsted honors its commitment and responsibility to the state.”

The company agreed to put up a $100 million guarantee that it would have Ocean Wind I built by the end of 2025. It also was obligated to pay an additional $200 million toward the development of the offshore wind industry in New Jersey.

Orsted wrote off $4 billion last week, due largely to costs associated with the cancellation of its two New Jersey projects.

The cancellations added fresh uncertainty to an industry seen by supporters as a way to help end the burning of planet-warming fossil fuels, but derided by opponents as inherently unworkable without massive financial subsidies.

Advertisement

And it is another political headache for Murphy and Democrats shortly before elections for the state Legislature in which opposition to offshore wind has become an important part of Republican campaigns.

New Jersey still has several other offshore wind projects in various stages of development, with four new proposals submitted in August alone. They join the one remaining project of the three originally approved by the state, Atlantic Shores. That is a project by Shell New Energies US and EDF Renewables North America.

Atlantic Shores said last week it remains committed to its project, though it hinted in a statement that it, too, is seeking additional help.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Jersey

Corruption trial of Sen. Menendez resumes Tuesday • New Jersey Monitor

Published

on

Corruption trial of Sen. Menendez resumes Tuesday • New Jersey Monitor


The corruption trial of Sen. Bob Menendez is scheduled to resume Tuesday after a three-day break caused when co-defendant Fred Daibes tested positive for COVID-19.

During a remote hearing Monday, lawyers in the case said they believe the case will continue until at least the week of July 8, a bit later than Judge Sidney H. Stein had warned jurors when the trial began. Prosecutors said they expect to rest their case by June 25 and defense attorneys said they will present a case that will take about two weeks.

Tuesday is expected to see more testimony from U.S. Attorney Philip Sellinger, who told jurors last week that Menendez had asked him to “look at” criminal charges the U.S. Attorney’s Office had filed against Daibes under Sellinger’s predecessor. When Sellinger’s bosses forced him to recuse himself from the Daibes matter, Sellinger said, Menendez ended their friendship.

Prosecutors are also expected to call to the stand Michael Soliman, a former adviser to Menendez.

Advertisement

There was some debate Monday over a defense witness, attorney Michael Critchley, who has asked to be deposed remotely instead of coming to the courtroom to limit potential exposure to COVID-19.

“The deep concern, your honor, is COVID, and specifically knowing that one of the defendants has taken ill with it, that others were certainly exposed to it, and a deep concern over perhaps another lawyer or more having tested positive. Mr. Critchley is leaving for Europe on Wednesday,” his lawyer, Kevin Marino, told Stein.

Prosecutors objected, but Stein allowed defense attorneys to schedule a video deposition of Critchley.

Critchley was in Trenton on Monday representing George Norcross III, an insurance executive and Democratic power broker indicted by the state Attorney General’s Office and charged with racketeering. Norcross has denied the charges.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Stomping Grounds: Recession? Menendez, Trump and Hoffman – New Jersey Globe

Published

on

Stomping Grounds: Recession? Menendez, Trump and Hoffman – New Jersey Globe


New Jerseyans aren’t always civil, but it’s still possible for a liberal Democrat and a conservative Republican to have a rational and pleasant conversation about politics in the state.  Dan Bryan is a former senior advisor to Gov. Phil Murphy and is now the owner of his own public affairs firm, and Alex Wilkes is an attorney and former executive director of America Rising PAC who advises Republican candidates in New Jersey and across the nation, including the New Jersey GOP.  Dan and Alex are both experienced strategists who are currently in the room where high-level decisions are made.  They will get together weekly with New Jersey Globe editor David Wildstein to discuss politics and issues.

More than half of Americans (incorrectly) think the country is in a recession.  Since you’re both advising candidates, how do you tell them to talk about the economy?

Dan Bryan: We’re in a tough atmosphere for incumbents. The economy is strong, but people don’t feel it. And anyone spending their time telling voters they’re wrong about the economy is in for a long campaign. So here’s how I’d advise a candidate (say, one running for reelection to a high office) to talk about the economy:

“Listen, by basic economic markers, we all know America’s economy is strong. Unemployment is down, GDP is up, the stock market is thriving, and people are making more money than they were just four years ago.

“But people don’t *feel* like the economy is strong, and I don’t blame them. It’s never been more expensive to raise a family in this country, and people know it because they live that reality every day. Imagine being a young family today, trying to buy a house in this market, at these interest rates. They’re trying to afford increased childcare and healthcare costs, and try to save for an unsure retirement. Working families are getting squeezed from every angle, and they know it.

Advertisement

“But here’s the difference between me and my opponent: I wake up every day fighting for those families, working to make their lives better. My administration is working to bring down college costs, help families buy their first home, and make childcare more affordable. We work day and night to deliver for working families, and help them afford to build their own American Dream. I’m running for reelection not because I think things are perfect, but because I know that job’s not done.

“Meanwhile, my opponent wakes up every single day disdainful of the middle class in America and desperate to cut taxes for the wealthy and corporations. Don’t take it from me, take it from him – he’s already promising tax cuts for his wealthy donors. He’ll make things worse for working families, and better for corporations and the ultra wealthy.

“While he wakes up every day sucking up to them, I’ll continue to wake up every day fighting for American working families.”

Alex Wilkes: I think Dan would agree with me in principle that if you’re explaining, you’re losing. A vast majority of the people answering pollsters’ questions probably can’t define what a recession is (I offer that as an explanation, not an insult, by the way).

But it’s a rose by any other name for most Americans. The bottom line is that most people recognize that their personal economic situation is worse under Joe Biden than it was four years ago. They understand it because they live it every day. It is truly breathtaking to go into a store and realize how little $100 gets you in groceries. I have 2 children – one born in 2020 and the other born last year. The very same infant formula I have used for both is $15 more expensive today than it was 4 years ago. These are real, appreciable differences that every voter can see in their own bank account. 

Advertisement

So Democrats can act like a schoolmarm and try to Merriam-Webster their way out of this mess, or they can – as other prominent Democrats, like David Axlerod, have done –acknowledge that “Bidenomics” and other attempts at obfuscation on this important issue have been an abysmal failure.

The star witness in the Menendez corruption trial claimed the three-term senator from New Jersey used to ring a bell to summon his wife.  Based on what you’ve read or heard, how is Bob Menendez doing?  

Alex: I just want to tell the young girl getting ridiculed for voting for Romney-Ryan in 2012 because of invented controversies like “binders full of women,” that I would ultimately be vindicated on just so many levels. It’s almost fifteen years later, and now the Democrats don’t just bully women into voting for them, they actually summon them like cattle!

I do, however, want to thank Bob Menendez for just an absolutely spectacular series of news cycles for Republicans here in New Jersey. Bisou bisou, mon amour!

Dan: In the words of Pete Campbell, not great, Bob!

It’s interesting how little chatter there is about this case. My guess – he’s going to lose reelection (if he follows through with it) and is, more or less, already out of public life in New Jersey. People have already moved on, regardless of the outcome of the case.

Donald Trump keeps talking about competing in New Jersey.  Is that real?

Advertisement

Dan: Absolutely. New Jersey is clearly his for the taking. All it’ll take is plenty of time, energy, and tens of millions of dollars spent here by the Trump campaign, and I think they have a real shot! (David – please forward this to the Trump campaign)

Alex: To be realistic, Joe Biden is going to go on an advertising blitz in the fall that will surely reshape the national conversation we are having right now, but I don’t think it’s at all far-fetched to say that Donald Trump will narrow Democrats’ margins in places that have traditionally been strongholds for the party. It may even make some states competitive. Looking at Ann Selzer’s latest Iowa poll, for example, it’s not a stretch to believe that Trump may be not just looking at a repeat performance in states like Michigan and Wisconsin, but that he also may come close to capturing elusive Minnesota.

For years, we’ve been warned about the Democrats’ strong performance with white, wealthy, college-educated voters, but their myopic focus on the coastal elite has come at a price. Traditional parts of the Democratic coalition like working class voters, and even percentages of black and Hispanic voters that should make them nervous, are leaving the party in droves. Is it any wonder when that same party drives up the costs of household goods for the people who can afford it the least and treats illegal immigrants better than veterans and first responders?

Trump may not win New Jersey, but if he narrows Biden’s margin of victory here slightly, that will have the potential for huge ramifications in the down-ballot races.

Governor Murphy’s latest — and possibly last — nomination to the New Jersey Supreme Court is John Hoffman, a former acting attorney general and now the counsel to Rutgers University.  He’s an independent with close ties to members of Gov. Chris Christie’s administration.  Is this an easy confirmation?

Alex: Most likely. Too bad for everyone else waiting for a divorce or custody hearing that Murphy and Scutari couldn’t find as agreeable of a solution on lower court nominees.

Advertisement

Dan: I’ve seen a few surprised X (sigh) reactions to this nomination by those that may be less familiar with New Jersey politics. So as a reminder, there is a tradition in New Jersey for Governors to alternate Supreme Court nominations between the Democratic and Republican parties, to maintain balance.

I don’t know much about Hoffman himself, but I’m glad Governor Murphy is committed to maintaining balance on the court.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

Radio host and teachers union president join New Jersey's 2025 governor's race

Published

on

Radio host and teachers union president join New Jersey's 2025 governor's race


A conservative New Jersey radio host and the head of the state’s biggest teachers union launched campaigns for next year’s gubernatorial election.

Bill Spadea, who hosts a morning radio show for 101.5 FM, said in a video posted Monday that he’s running for the Republican nomination next year. Spadea cast his candidacy as conservative, anti-abortion, pro-Second Amendment and strongly in favor of former President Donald Trump, this year’s presumed Republican presidential nominee.

Sean Spiller, the president of the New Jersey Education Association and mayor of Montclair, announced his bid for the Democratic nomination, joining a crowded field. Spiller said in his launch video that he’s running to help residents get “their fair share.”

Spadea joins state Sen. Jon Bramnick, a moderate who’s been critical of Trump, and former Assembly member Jack Ciattarelli in the GOP contest. Ciattarelli ran unsuccessfully in the prior two gubernatorial contests, but in 2021, he came within several points of defeating Murphy.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending