Connect with us

New Jersey

D.C. Dispatch: What N.J.’s members of Congress did in Washington this week – New Jersey Globe

Published

on

D.C. Dispatch: What N.J.’s members of Congress did in Washington this week – New Jersey Globe


New Jersey politicians have gotten through their primaries – and for most of them, that likely means they’re safe for re-election in the fall. But the work in Washington continues, with the House and Senate debating a major defense bill, legislation protecting IVF, contempt charges against the attorney general, and more.

Here’s some of what New Jersey’s 13 members of Congress did this week (and some of what they did last week, too, since D.C. Dispatch was off).

Making amends

The biggest-ticket item on the House agenda this week was the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) – and just like last year, it’s becoming a bit of a boondoggle.

Advertisement

An initial version of the NDAA, an annual must-pass bill laying out the policies and budget of the Department of Defense, passed the House Armed Services Committee in May on a near-unanimous vote. But in a series of votes over the last three days, House Republicans added controversial amendments related to abortion, transgender health care, diversity equity and inclusion offices, and more that turned the bill into a much more partisan exercise.

The NDAA ultimately passed the House this morning on a 217-199 vote, with no New Jersey Democrats voting in favor; just six Democrats nationwide supported it. Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-Montclair), a Navy veteran who sits on the Armed Services Committee that wrote the original bill, accused Republicans of “hijacking” it to advance their agenda.

“I know as a veteran that we must do better for our servicemembers and military families, but today’s bill has once again been hijacked by the far right – not to improve our military or national security, but to drive an agenda that makes America look small, attacks women, and ultimately will be detrimental to the greatest fighting force in the world,” Sherrill said on the House floor.

The exact same process happened to last year’s NDAA, which eventually went through rounds of negotiations in the House and Senate that reverted it to a largely bipartisan piece of legislation. It remains to be seen whether this year’s NDAA will follow the same trajectory.

In-vitro veto

Advertisement

Over in the Senate, the biggest debate this week was over in-vitro fertilization: specifically, an unsuccessful push by Democrats to advance a bill that would guarantee nationwide access to fertility treatment, which has been in the news since the Alabama Supreme Court issued a ruling in February threatening IVF in that state.

Almost every present Democratic senator voted to advance the bill, with many of them speaking on the Senate floor about their own experiences with IVF. But the motion failed 48-47 (it needed 60 votes to move forward) thanks to opposition from all but two Senate Republicans, who largely said they supported IVF but claimed the bill was a “show vote” – a blockade that drew condemnation from New Jersey Senator Cory Booker.

“I am profoundly disappointed that Senate Republicans have voted today to deny countless families the opportunity and the right to make their own deeply personal decisions about starting a family,” Booker said. “I will never stop fighting for the fundamental freedoms of all Americans, and I will continue to advocate for comprehensive reproductive health care that is affordable and accessible to everyone in this country.”

The vote was the latest in a series of Democratic efforts to put doomed bills on important issues up for a vote, following similar bills on contraception and immigration that came up in weeks prior. None of the bills ever had much of a chance of succeeding, but a key objective was achieved: putting senators from both parties on the record on

This Garland is your land

Advertisement

Last week, every New Jersey Democrat signed onto a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland asking the Justice Department to cease its support for privately owned Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention centers in New Jersey.

In 2021, New Jersey passed a law that prohibited the state from contracting with private immigrant detention facilities like the Elizabeth Detention Center (and like another proposed facility in Newark, Delaney Hall). But last year, the law was declared unconstitutional by U.S. District Court Judge Robert Kirsch, a decision that New Jersey’s House Democrats criticized in their letter.

“In our opinion, the district court decision is misguided and has the very real and very unfortunate effect of undermining the will of New Jerseyans and their elected officials who all worked tirelessly to ensure the closure of the Elizabeth Detention Center and end the use of private immigration detention centers in our State,” the letter states.

The letter, which was led by Reps. Rob Menendez (D-Jersey City), Andy Kim (D-Moorestown), and Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Ewing), calls on the attorney general to withdraw from the litigation as an interested party, a move which they say would be in line with President Joe Biden’s past positions on private detention facilities.

“We believe that refraining from registering a statement of interest more fully aligns with the previous comments made by then candidate, Mr. Biden, to end the federal government’s use of privately operated immigration detention centers,” the letter states.

Advertisement

Get well soon!

Rep. Watson Coleman announced last Thursday that she has been diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis, a back condition requiring surgery that will keep her out of Washington for several weeks.

“While I will need to remain in New Jersey during my recovery, I want my constituents to know that both my district office here in Ewing, and my Washington D.C. office remain open and able to serve your needs,” Watson Coleman said in a statement. “Regrettably, this means I will have to miss some votes. However, bills that I have co-sponsored, co-led, and introduced will keep progressing through the legislative process, and I will continue to introduce, sponsor, and support new legislation while I recover.”

(Indeed, despite being at home, Watson Coleman introduced a new bill on Wednesday, the Homes for Young Adults Act, that aims to reduce homelessness among young Americans.)

The congresswoman said she expects to return to Washington “by the end of the month.”

Advertisement

We CARE too

This week, the House Energy and Commerce Committee unanimously approved legislation authored by Rep. Chris Smith (R-Manchester) to reauthorize and improve the country’s research into autism.

The bill – the Autism Collaboration, Accountability, Research, Education, and Support (CARES) Act of 2024 – increases the scope and funding of a number of federal autism programs, and is now set to head to the House floor for passage.

“This critical legislation will make a huge difference for the 1 in 36 children and 1 in 45 adults with autism in the United States by providing robust funding for durable remedies and early intervention work to combat autism,” Smith said in a statement.

It’s the continuation of a longtime mission for Smith, who has worked over the years to improve federal autism research and programs. The bill that passed this week is in fact the third Autism CARES Act Smith has shepherded through Congress, after previous reauthorization acts that were signed into law in 2014 and 2019.

Advertisement

This Garland is my land

In the latest phase of the Republican-led House’s battle against the Biden administration, the House approved a resolution on Wednesday holding Attorney General Garland in contempt of Congress over his refusal to release audio of special counsel Robert Hur’s interview with President Biden.

Unsurprisingly, the vote was an almost entirely party-line affair, with New Jersey Republicans voting yes and New Jersey Democrats voting no. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-Dennis), a member of the House Judiciary Committee who has been at the forefront of the GOP effort to investigate the Biden family, castigated Democrats for their unanimous opposition.

“Every single Democrat just voted to let Attorney General Merrick Garland off the hook for breaking the law and ignoring congressional subpoenas instead of releasing the tapes of President Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Hur,” Van Drew tweeted. “Just how bad are those tapes?”

But the resolution – which follows in the footsteps of contempt votes against attorneys general under both Presidents Obama and Trump – isn’t set to go anywhere, since the Justice Department announced today that it’s not following through on contempt charges against Garland, which essentially puts an end to the proceedings.

Advertisement

Other Garden State plots

•Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-Wyckoff) held an event in Hackensack on Tuesday with Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Illinois) to promote the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act, a legislation package aimed at decreasing Black maternal mortality and improving health outcomes for Black mothers.

“We are blessed to live in the greatest country in the world, but our health outcomes should reflect that fact,” Gottheimer said. “We cannot stand by as thousands of women pass away from preventable conditions and thousands of babies grow up, robbed of their moms. That’s why I’m taking steps with Congresswoman Underwood to put a stop to our country’s maternal health crisis.”

•At the Jon Bon Jovi Service Area along the Garden State Parkway on Monday, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-Long Branch) and Ed Potosnak, the head of the League of Conservation Voters of New Jersey, blasted big oil companies and touted the congressman’s investigation into inflated gas prices.

“Big Oil’s insatiable profit-seeking greed could force families to skip their summer road trips to the shore because they cannot afford to fill up,” Pallone said. “In my role on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, I am fighting to hold these companies accountable for potential market manipulation and price fixing, which not only rips off hardworking Jersey drivers, but could also threaten our entire tourism economy.”

Advertisement

•The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday dismissed a challenge to the availability of the abortion drug mifepristone, which drew widespread praise from New Jersey Democrats – and from one Republican, Rep. Tom Kean Jr. (R-Westfield).

“I am pleased with the Supreme Court’s decision to reject a lawsuit seeking to inhibit the distribution of abortion medication,” said Senator Bob Menendez, echoing many of his fellow Democrats. “However, it never should have come to this… Ever since Roe v. Wade was overturned, we have seen numerous attempts to undermine women’s reproductive rights across the nation and this failed lawsuit was no different.”

“Today’s unanimous SCOTUS ruling appropriately leaves decisions of reproductive health to elected state legislatures,” Kean said.

•The Supreme Court’s decision today overturning a ban on bump stocks, however, was not so popular with New Jersey politicians. (Bump stocks are a tool that allow semiautomatic guns to fire at machine gun-like speeds; they were banned by the Justice Department in 2018 after a gunman used them to kill 60 people at a music festival in Las Vegas.)

“The Supreme Court’s radical decision today to strike down the federal ban on bump stocks will make Americans less safe from gun violence and mass shootings, period,” Senator Booker said of the decision. “It defies logic to say that a bump stock yields anything less than a machine gun. As Justice Sotomayor said in her dissent, ‘When I see a bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.’”

Advertisement



Source link

New Jersey

Corruption trial of Sen. Menendez resumes Tuesday • New Jersey Monitor

Published

on

Corruption trial of Sen. Menendez resumes Tuesday • New Jersey Monitor


The corruption trial of Sen. Bob Menendez is scheduled to resume Tuesday after a three-day break caused when co-defendant Fred Daibes tested positive for COVID-19.

During a remote hearing Monday, lawyers in the case said they believe the case will continue until at least the week of July 8, a bit later than Judge Sidney H. Stein had warned jurors when the trial began. Prosecutors said they expect to rest their case by June 25 and defense attorneys said they will present a case that will take about two weeks.

Tuesday is expected to see more testimony from U.S. Attorney Philip Sellinger, who told jurors last week that Menendez had asked him to “look at” criminal charges the U.S. Attorney’s Office had filed against Daibes under Sellinger’s predecessor. When Sellinger’s bosses forced him to recuse himself from the Daibes matter, Sellinger said, Menendez ended their friendship.

Prosecutors are also expected to call to the stand Michael Soliman, a former adviser to Menendez.

Advertisement

There was some debate Monday over a defense witness, attorney Michael Critchley, who has asked to be deposed remotely instead of coming to the courtroom to limit potential exposure to COVID-19.

“The deep concern, your honor, is COVID, and specifically knowing that one of the defendants has taken ill with it, that others were certainly exposed to it, and a deep concern over perhaps another lawyer or more having tested positive. Mr. Critchley is leaving for Europe on Wednesday,” his lawyer, Kevin Marino, told Stein.

Prosecutors objected, but Stein allowed defense attorneys to schedule a video deposition of Critchley.

Critchley was in Trenton on Monday representing George Norcross III, an insurance executive and Democratic power broker indicted by the state Attorney General’s Office and charged with racketeering. Norcross has denied the charges.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Stomping Grounds: Recession? Menendez, Trump and Hoffman – New Jersey Globe

Published

on

Stomping Grounds: Recession? Menendez, Trump and Hoffman – New Jersey Globe


New Jerseyans aren’t always civil, but it’s still possible for a liberal Democrat and a conservative Republican to have a rational and pleasant conversation about politics in the state.  Dan Bryan is a former senior advisor to Gov. Phil Murphy and is now the owner of his own public affairs firm, and Alex Wilkes is an attorney and former executive director of America Rising PAC who advises Republican candidates in New Jersey and across the nation, including the New Jersey GOP.  Dan and Alex are both experienced strategists who are currently in the room where high-level decisions are made.  They will get together weekly with New Jersey Globe editor David Wildstein to discuss politics and issues.

More than half of Americans (incorrectly) think the country is in a recession.  Since you’re both advising candidates, how do you tell them to talk about the economy?

Dan Bryan: We’re in a tough atmosphere for incumbents. The economy is strong, but people don’t feel it. And anyone spending their time telling voters they’re wrong about the economy is in for a long campaign. So here’s how I’d advise a candidate (say, one running for reelection to a high office) to talk about the economy:

“Listen, by basic economic markers, we all know America’s economy is strong. Unemployment is down, GDP is up, the stock market is thriving, and people are making more money than they were just four years ago.

“But people don’t *feel* like the economy is strong, and I don’t blame them. It’s never been more expensive to raise a family in this country, and people know it because they live that reality every day. Imagine being a young family today, trying to buy a house in this market, at these interest rates. They’re trying to afford increased childcare and healthcare costs, and try to save for an unsure retirement. Working families are getting squeezed from every angle, and they know it.

Advertisement

“But here’s the difference between me and my opponent: I wake up every day fighting for those families, working to make their lives better. My administration is working to bring down college costs, help families buy their first home, and make childcare more affordable. We work day and night to deliver for working families, and help them afford to build their own American Dream. I’m running for reelection not because I think things are perfect, but because I know that job’s not done.

“Meanwhile, my opponent wakes up every single day disdainful of the middle class in America and desperate to cut taxes for the wealthy and corporations. Don’t take it from me, take it from him – he’s already promising tax cuts for his wealthy donors. He’ll make things worse for working families, and better for corporations and the ultra wealthy.

“While he wakes up every day sucking up to them, I’ll continue to wake up every day fighting for American working families.”

Alex Wilkes: I think Dan would agree with me in principle that if you’re explaining, you’re losing. A vast majority of the people answering pollsters’ questions probably can’t define what a recession is (I offer that as an explanation, not an insult, by the way).

But it’s a rose by any other name for most Americans. The bottom line is that most people recognize that their personal economic situation is worse under Joe Biden than it was four years ago. They understand it because they live it every day. It is truly breathtaking to go into a store and realize how little $100 gets you in groceries. I have 2 children – one born in 2020 and the other born last year. The very same infant formula I have used for both is $15 more expensive today than it was 4 years ago. These are real, appreciable differences that every voter can see in their own bank account. 

Advertisement

So Democrats can act like a schoolmarm and try to Merriam-Webster their way out of this mess, or they can – as other prominent Democrats, like David Axlerod, have done –acknowledge that “Bidenomics” and other attempts at obfuscation on this important issue have been an abysmal failure.

The star witness in the Menendez corruption trial claimed the three-term senator from New Jersey used to ring a bell to summon his wife.  Based on what you’ve read or heard, how is Bob Menendez doing?  

Alex: I just want to tell the young girl getting ridiculed for voting for Romney-Ryan in 2012 because of invented controversies like “binders full of women,” that I would ultimately be vindicated on just so many levels. It’s almost fifteen years later, and now the Democrats don’t just bully women into voting for them, they actually summon them like cattle!

I do, however, want to thank Bob Menendez for just an absolutely spectacular series of news cycles for Republicans here in New Jersey. Bisou bisou, mon amour!

Dan: In the words of Pete Campbell, not great, Bob!

It’s interesting how little chatter there is about this case. My guess – he’s going to lose reelection (if he follows through with it) and is, more or less, already out of public life in New Jersey. People have already moved on, regardless of the outcome of the case.

Donald Trump keeps talking about competing in New Jersey.  Is that real?

Advertisement

Dan: Absolutely. New Jersey is clearly his for the taking. All it’ll take is plenty of time, energy, and tens of millions of dollars spent here by the Trump campaign, and I think they have a real shot! (David – please forward this to the Trump campaign)

Alex: To be realistic, Joe Biden is going to go on an advertising blitz in the fall that will surely reshape the national conversation we are having right now, but I don’t think it’s at all far-fetched to say that Donald Trump will narrow Democrats’ margins in places that have traditionally been strongholds for the party. It may even make some states competitive. Looking at Ann Selzer’s latest Iowa poll, for example, it’s not a stretch to believe that Trump may be not just looking at a repeat performance in states like Michigan and Wisconsin, but that he also may come close to capturing elusive Minnesota.

For years, we’ve been warned about the Democrats’ strong performance with white, wealthy, college-educated voters, but their myopic focus on the coastal elite has come at a price. Traditional parts of the Democratic coalition like working class voters, and even percentages of black and Hispanic voters that should make them nervous, are leaving the party in droves. Is it any wonder when that same party drives up the costs of household goods for the people who can afford it the least and treats illegal immigrants better than veterans and first responders?

Trump may not win New Jersey, but if he narrows Biden’s margin of victory here slightly, that will have the potential for huge ramifications in the down-ballot races.

Governor Murphy’s latest — and possibly last — nomination to the New Jersey Supreme Court is John Hoffman, a former acting attorney general and now the counsel to Rutgers University.  He’s an independent with close ties to members of Gov. Chris Christie’s administration.  Is this an easy confirmation?

Alex: Most likely. Too bad for everyone else waiting for a divorce or custody hearing that Murphy and Scutari couldn’t find as agreeable of a solution on lower court nominees.

Advertisement

Dan: I’ve seen a few surprised X (sigh) reactions to this nomination by those that may be less familiar with New Jersey politics. So as a reminder, there is a tradition in New Jersey for Governors to alternate Supreme Court nominations between the Democratic and Republican parties, to maintain balance.

I don’t know much about Hoffman himself, but I’m glad Governor Murphy is committed to maintaining balance on the court.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

Radio host and teachers union president join New Jersey's 2025 governor's race

Published

on

Radio host and teachers union president join New Jersey's 2025 governor's race


A conservative New Jersey radio host and the head of the state’s biggest teachers union launched campaigns for next year’s gubernatorial election.

Bill Spadea, who hosts a morning radio show for 101.5 FM, said in a video posted Monday that he’s running for the Republican nomination next year. Spadea cast his candidacy as conservative, anti-abortion, pro-Second Amendment and strongly in favor of former President Donald Trump, this year’s presumed Republican presidential nominee.

Sean Spiller, the president of the New Jersey Education Association and mayor of Montclair, announced his bid for the Democratic nomination, joining a crowded field. Spiller said in his launch video that he’s running to help residents get “their fair share.”

Spadea joins state Sen. Jon Bramnick, a moderate who’s been critical of Trump, and former Assembly member Jack Ciattarelli in the GOP contest. Ciattarelli ran unsuccessfully in the prior two gubernatorial contests, but in 2021, he came within several points of defeating Murphy.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending