New Hampshire
Success stories emerge as New Hampshire communities innovate housing crisis solutions | Manchester Ink Link
For New Hampshire to curb its current housing crisis it needs 23,500 units right now, 60,000 units by 2030, and 90,000 units by 2040. But despite these seemingly impossible targets, towns across the Granite State have found pockets of success.
Judi Currie discusses New Hampshire’s housing landscape with Nick Taylor, executive director of the Workforce Housing Coalition of the Greater Seacoast, Rob Taylor, land use and community development administrator for the town of Enfield, and Donna Benton, director of planning and community development in Dover.
This article has been edited lightly for length and clarity by Rosemary Ford and Caitlin Agnew
Judi Currie:
How did we get here?
Nick Taylor:
We really got here because of a shortage of supply. There’s just not enough housing units in New Hampshire right now, and that doesn’t make a difference whether you’re a senior, a young person, a family, a member of our workforce — certainly it hurts those at the bottom level of our income scale the hardest. We have not been building enough homes in New Hampshire. Why is that? There’s a few different factors, one of them certainly, restrictive land use zoning ordinances that have prohibited and made illegal many of the opportunities to build more affordable housing options. There’s also a long-term underinvestment in the financing programs that make below-market-rate housing effective and financially feasible. And there’s been a lack of investment in the trades so we don’t have the folks who can really go in and build the types of housing. But it really does come back to that lack of supply. There just aren’t enough homes in our state right now.
Judi Currie:
What has worked in your communities?
Donna Benton:
I think it starts with a supportive city council and supportive planning board that have that trust in their staff to get creative with their regulations and to not be afraid to change zoning regulations or subdivision regulations to try to help with that. Then certainly, it comes from the master plan and kind of the community vision as well.
Rob Taylor:
It’s gonna take a lot of different things. We’ve actually got a New Hampshire Housing Opportunities Planning Grant to redo our zoning ordinance. Simultaneously, we’re working on a master plan, sort of a phase two of our master plan, that we adopted in 2022. We started with big chapters — the housing chapter, transportation, economic development, and land use and so forth. Now we’re working on more chapters that sort of go hand in glove with those first chapters. We’re also working collaboratively with area businesses. Obviously, municipalities have a big role to play, but so do the state and the federal government and businesses, so we’re working sort of holistically in that regard.
Judi Currie:
What are some examples of successful projects you’ve seen recently in the greater Seacoast?
Nick Taylor:
The numbers can be so daunting about our housing gaps and vacancy rates and how much rents have gone up but there are some really great projects. We’re celebrating what is going on right now. Donna touched on one in Dover — the cottages at Back River Road, a small sort of tiny home cottage cluster development that is all workforce housing. The Portsmouth Housing Authority over the last year or two opened up Ruth Lewin Griffin Place, which is right downtown — again all workforce and affordable housing, walkable to jobs. Really great location there.
Our organization has also done a number of trips to these types of housing units so that folks can see with their own eyes what are some of these other options. We visited a resident-owned manufactured housing community in Newmarket, and we did a walking tour of downtown Exeter because some of the projects that are really successful you may not even know exist — duplexes, triplexes, accessory dwelling units, — things that just fit right in, but unless you’re really looking for them, you don’t know they’re there. So there’s a lot of great stuff going on. We have a long way to go, but we certainly have a lot of great folks making progress.
Judi Currie:
Now, we’ve got House Bill 1291, which increases the number of accessory dwelling units allowed by right; House Bill 1399, allowing the expansion of a single-family residence to two units, and House Bill 1400, which limits the requirements for parking spaces to one per unit. These measures have passed the House. Does that mean they’re a done deal?
Nick Taylor:
Nothing’s ever a done deal until the ink is dry in the legislature. So there’s a long way to go; it still has to get through the Senate, and then the governor would have to sign it. But when these bills passed, it was a really exciting time, because you had a lot of folks from all over these different coalitions come together and say it’s important that we have some basic standards in our state that all of our communities should abide by, that allow us to have more options.
This included the business community that is struggling with their workforce. This included AARP, whose members want to stay in their community but can’t find a place to downsize. This included the disability rights community. This included folks who think that there’s been some government overreach as well as folks who really want to move forward with a more equitable lens about how folks can attain housing. So it was a really exciting day for a broad coalition, but there’s still a long way to go before these are statewide laws.
Judi Currie:
Any other measures making their way through the legislature that you’d want to mention that you think could help?
Nick Taylor:
There are a few other initiatives that are mostly designed as sort of financing incentives.
There was legislation that is still being discussed around the real estate transfer tax that would not raise the tax but set aside the first $10 million that’s collected to the Affordable Housing Fund. So that’s an ongoing financing tool. There’s also discussion with the enabling legislation around the tax relief program that communities can implement called 79E that would help for office-to-residential conversion. So there’s a lot of things going on. But, you have folks here like Rob and Donna and their communities that have really taken the lead on this. It’s really time for some other communities to watch the successes that they’ve had, and sort of be part of the solution too.
Judie Currie:
Are there any community-specific differences between your town or your city and the rest of the state that you feel have made you guys leaders in housing?
Donna Benton:
I think it goes back to the community vision and the city officials. Dover’s lucky that we have a development-friendly community. We see that with our leadership. Then, we’re also lucky because we have a lot of public water and sewer and the utilities needed to create this extra density, whereas other communities might not. I think that’s one of the biggest differences.
Rob Taylor:
Here in the Upper Valley, we’re sort of the bedroom community for the core towns of the Upper Valley, which are Lebanon and Hanover and even across the river into Vermont, with White River Junction. We’re benefiting from investments that were made 50 years ago. Some significant clean water-type investment with our sewer collection system. We actually have capacity that not a lot of other communities can say they have. We actually pump our sewage to Lebanon for treatment. It’s a really great working relationship.
I think that’s one of the things that I’m most proud of is the sort of Upper Valley mindset up here, we’re sort of a region within two states, New Hampshire and Vermont, and there’s a lot of sort of collectivism here that we do work really well as multiple communities. We share resources and energy and so forth. But it does frustrate me because there are still communities in our area and elsewhere in the state that are sort of putting their head in the sand a little bit and not really sort of stepping up. I think that’s the important thing. We all need to be proactive. We can’t just sit back and wait for things to come to us. It’s gonna be all of these communities and nonprofits and different organizations working together and really going at this with concerted effort. I think that’s where I would sort of end my little diatribe here is that we’ve got to all work together on all different levels.
Judie Currie:
How do you balance local control versus loosening up the regulations to find those widespread housing solutions?
Rob Taylor:
Again, New Hampshire is very unique in that every town has its own little set of regs. That’s difficult for developers and that’s kind of what we have to break out a little bit. We talked about how what’s going on on the Seacoast in New Hampshire has been tremendous. You’ve got some great developers, you’ve got bandwidth down there. They’re doing some great things down there. I’ve been just blown away with what I see in places like Dover, Rochester and Portsmouth.
Up here, we’re a little bit disadvantaged in terms of we don’t have this sort of built-in developer core, so to speak, with regard to people that are ready to go. So we have to do a lot to try to attract people up here and get creative, but it’s starting to happen.
The big organizations up here, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, the largest employer in the state of New Hampshire is right in Lebanon. They got 10,000 employees right here. Last night, they told us that they have openings for like 3,000 positions. The big part of it is, where are they going to put ‘em? So, to their credit, they’re not standing back and being an observer of this problem. They’re being proactive. They’re putting their land into it. They’re putting master leases on development so that developers can rely that they’re going to have rentals, that once they build a place, it’s going to be rented. Actually, Hitchcock will guarantee that. Dartmouth College is the same kind of thing in the nearby town of Hanover. Huge footprint, very wealthy institution, but they’re suffering because they’re trying to hire staff and professors, and they have to find places for them. They literally will make offers to potential employees, and the people will accept the offer. Then, when they look around for housing, there’s nothing. There’s the problem in a nutshell, right there, if you ask me. So there’s a lot of work to do and we’re ready to get at it.
Judie Currie:
Well, it’s great to hear how communities are finding their own solutions, and we look forward to exploring more stories of creativity and out-of-the-box thinking. Nick Taylor, executive director of the Workforce Housing Coalition of the Greater Seacoast, Rob Taylor, land use and community development administrator for the town of Enfield, and Donna Benton, director of planning and community development for the city of Dover — thank you all for joining us.

The State We’re in a weekly digital public affairs show is produced by NH PBS and The Marlin Fitzwater Center for Communications. It is shared with partners in the Granite State News Collaborative, of which both organizations are members.
New Hampshire
N.H. city’s refusal to fly ‘Save Women’s Sports’ and ‘An Appeal to Heaven’ flags is unconstitutional, appeals court rules – The Boston Globe
A federal appeals court has ruled officials in Nashua, N.H., engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination when they denied requests to fly certain politically charged flags, while allowing others, on the city’s “citizen flag pole.”
Bethany and Stephen Scaer, whose requests to hoist banners with the slogans “Save Women’s Sports” and “An Appeal to Heaven” were rejected, teamed up with the Institute for Free Speech and filed a lawsuit in 2024 alleging their First Amendment rights were violated.
The trial court in New Hampshire initially concluded the Scaers hadn’t demonstrated a likelihood that their case would succeed, since the flags approved for display at City Hall constitute government speech. But three judges on the First Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision Monday, finding that the flagpole in question had actually been a venue for private speech all along.
The case relates to one Boston lost in 2022, when the US Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the city had unconstitutionally rejected an application to fly a Christian flag.
Even though Nashua sought to clarify its policy in response to that 2022 precedent, the city’s process for deciding which flags from the general public would be allowed still didn’t convert private speech into government speech, according to the First Circuit ruling.
“Nashua was doing no more than simply approving that private speech with which it agreed,” Judge Sandra L. Lynch wrote in the ruling, joined by judges Gustavo A. Gelpí and Jeffrey R. Howard.
In a statement, Beth Scaer said the ruling offers a sense of vindication.
“No one should have to face government censorship for expressing their beliefs,” she said. “We’re thrilled with this victory for free speech rights throughout New England.”
Nathan Ristuccia, an attorney with the Institute for Free Speech who argued the case on appeal, said his team is delighted by the ruling.
“As the First Circuit recognized, governments cannot get away with censorship by labeling that censorship ‘government speech,’” Ristuccia said.
Before the lawsuit was filed, Nashua Mayor James W. Donchess said the city declined to fly the “Save Women’s Sports” flag because officials interpreted it as implying transgender people should face discrimination.
The Scaers, who regularly demonstrate against gender-affirming medical interventions for minors and against inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s and girls’ sports, rejected the notion that their messaging is transphobic.
As for the “Appeal to Heaven” flag, which features a pine tree, Donchess said city officials want to avoid endorsing the additional meaning it has taken on in recent years.
The banner emerged during the American Revolution, with a nod to the Pine Tree Riot in New Hampshire, an act of American resistance that preceded the Boston Tea Party. More recently, the flag has also been used by Christian nationalists, including some who carried it to the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, when a violent mob delayed the certification of President Trump’s 2020 electoral defeat.
In her application to raise the “Appeal to Heaven” flag, Beth Scaer said she wanted to honor the soldiers from Nashua who fought and died at the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775. She and her husband said their request has nothing to do with the Capitol riot.
Nashua has also declined to fly several other flags since the 2022 policy update, including a “pro-life” flag and a Palestinian flag, according to the lawsuit.
Nashua’s attorney, Steven A. Bolton, said on Tuesday that the city has not yet determined whether to file an appeal. He noted that the appellate ruling calls for the trial court to grant interim declaratory relief while the case proceeds.
Bolton said the city has stopped inviting community members to fly their own flags.
“A new policy was adopted more than a year ago, and we no longer use the term ‘citizen’s flag pole,’” he said. “We no longer accept applications from other parties to fly flags on any of the poles on the City Hall grounds.”
Steven Porter can be reached at steven.porter@globe.com. Follow him @reporterporter.
New Hampshire
Nashua man dies after car crash and fire on Route 101 in Candia, investigation ongoing
CANDIA, NH (WGME) – Early Monday morning, a Nashua man died following a crash on Route 101 eastbound in Candia, New Hampshire.
Joseph H. Lavoie, 58, of Nashua, had been driving along Route 101 eastbound near Exit 3 when he lost control of his car, resulting in a drift off the right side of the highway before striking the cement bridge at the Old Candia Road overpass.
State troopers arrived at the scene to find Lavoie’s car on fire, though several passing drivers had helped to pull Lavoie out of his car. The fire was quickly extinguished.
Lavoie was taken to the hospital where he later died from his injuries.
JOIN THE CONVERSATION (1)
The crash remains under investigation. Anyone with information that may assist the investigation is asked to contact Trooper Kevin LeDoux via email at Kevin.P.LeDeoux@dos.nh.gov.
New Hampshire
New Hampshire’s Energy Landscape in 2025 – Concord Monitor
The biggest national news in 2025 often involved energy — how to make it, who gets to use it, who is going to need it. New Hampshire has sidestepped most of those questions so far but still saw plenty of energy news.
Goodbye, coal
The closing of the Merrimack Station power plant in Bow sounds like New Hampshire’s biggest energy news of the year and got a lot of national coverage along the lines of “New England shuts down coal!” but to be honest, it didn’t make much difference. The plant had been winding down for years, having run for fewer than 30 days in 2024, and would almost certainly have shut in a year or so because it lost what is known as capacity funding.
The more interesting question is what will replace it. Granite Shore Power President Jim Andrews has long touted plans to turn Merrimack Station, as well as the long-closed Schiller site in Portsmouth, into 21st century power plants using batteries and solar power, with perhaps some offshore wind assembly on the shores of the Piscataqua River.
But Donald Trump was elected and promptly began to trash wind and solar power, yanking subsidies and throwing up regulatory roadblocks. Granite Shore now says it is looking at all possibilities.
Both sites have excellent connections to the power grid, which makes them very valuable.
We need more electricity
New Hampshire, like New England in general, have not been swamped with proposals to build massive, power-hungry data centers for bitcoin mining and artificial intelligence. Those proposals have led to forecasts that national demand for electricity will spike by a quarter or more within a few years.
ISO-New England, the group that runs the six-state power grid, projects an 11% increase in electricity demand over the next decade, largely driven by the electrification of heating and transportation. That’s a lot, especially after years of stagnant demand, but it’s not panic-inducing.
Sidestepping regulation
New Hampshire is set to become the first state to allow energy providers to skip most utility regulation if they don’t connect to the grid. Supporters say it adds much-needed flexibility to the hidebound energy industry while critics call it a sop to very large energy users, such as data centers. It’s not clear how much it will be used, but it’s an interesting experiment, at least.
Community solar OK, wind not so much
The Republican-controlled legislature isn’t quite as anti-solar power as President Trump but it shows a lack of enthusiasm for renewable energy. They passed a bill loosening stormwater runoff rules for solar arrays but tightened the Renewable Energy Fund and as the year ended, they were looking to make severe changes to the Renewable Energy Portfolio.
On the other hand, there’s community solar. Thanks to a series of bills over the past few years, arrays up to 5 megawatts can share production with multiple customers, making big projects that opened or are being built in Exeter, Bedford, Derry, Warner and now Concord financially feasible. It seems likely that 2026 will set a record for the most solar added to the grid in New Hampshire. If the legislature would let private companies be community-solar customers, we’d do even better.
As for wind power, legislators echoed Trump’d hatred of the industry. Gov. Ayotte agreed to shorten the name of the Office of Offshore Wind Industry Development and Energy Innovation to simply the Office of Energy Innovation as part of removing virtually all support for wind power on land or in the sea. Not that we gave much support to begin with.
Ironically, this month saw New England receive a record amount of power from wind turbines — more than 1,600 megawatts at one point — as the Vineyard Wind offshore farm finally got up to speed.
What about natural gas? Nuclear? Heating oil?
As has been the case for many years, natural gas was the fuel to supply about half of New England’s electricity in 2025 and heating to about one-fifth of New Hampshire’s homes.
Many politicians are making noises about building more pipelines to bring in more natural gas from New York or Pennsylvania; Gov. Ayotte expressed support for bringing the proposed Constitution Pipeline, which was killed in 2020, back to life. Many argue that such work would be prohibitively expensive and make the region even more dependent on a single type of fuel.
Natural gas has traditionally been very cheap compared to other types of fuel but its price is increasingly affected by global patterns because of an increase in exports.
A separate question is whether the push to electrify the region’s heating can cut into our use of heating oil. Northern New England is by far the national leader in using that dirty fuel for heating; switching to electric heat pumps is almost always cheaper and definitely cleaner. New Hampshire is one of five states in the New England Heat Pump Accelerator, which looks to spend $450 million from Joe Biden’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act to encourage more heat pumps.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico7 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Maine7 days agoFamily in Maine host food pantry for deer | Hand Off