Connect with us

Massachusetts

What to watch in Massachusetts’ primary election

Published

on

What to watch in Massachusetts’ primary election


BOSTON (AP) — Republicans hoping to carry on to the Massachusetts governor’s workplace are selecting between a Donald Trump-backed candidate and a extra reasonable businessman in Tuesday’s main election.

Massachusetts is simply the most recent blue state to characteristic a top-of-the-ticket contest between a conservative candidate endorsed by Trump and a extra centrist opponent. In latest primaries in Maryland and Connecticut, GOP voters have opted for the Trump loyalists, doubtlessly worsening their possibilities of successful a common election.

The winner of Tuesday’s Massachusetts main will tackle Democratic Lawyer Common Maura Healey in November. If elected, she can be the state’s first brazenly homosexual governor and the primary lady elected governor of Massachusetts. Republican Jane Swift served as appearing governor after Gov. Paul Cellucci stepped down in 2001 to turn into U.S. ambassador to Canada.

Advertisement

The governor’s workplace is open this 12 months as a result of in style GOP Gov. Charlie Baker opted towards working for a 3rd time period.

What to look at:

Former state Rep. Geoff Diehl, who has Trump’s endorsement, goes up towards businessman Chris Doughty, a political newcomer, within the Republican main for governor.

Diehl, who launched a failed marketing campaign for U.S. Senate towards Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren in 2018, is in style amongst Republican activists. He received the social gathering’s endorsement with 71% of delegates on the state social gathering conference in Might, however he may face a more durable climb in a common election in a state during which Trump received solely 32% of votes in 2020.

Diehl has opposed COVID-19 mandates, falsely claimed the 2020 presidential race was rigged, fought towards the extension of mail-in voting and stated he helps the Supreme Court docket choice overturning Roe v. Wade.

Advertisement

Trump — a critic of Baker, who publicly refused to vote for Trump in 2016 and 2020 — endorsed Diehl final October, saying in a press release that he’s “robust on Crime, Election Integrity, our now underneath siege Southern Border, loves our Army, and has a giant deal with taking good care of our Vets.”

Doughty described himself as reasonable when he entered the race however has since embraced the label of conservative as he tries to attraction to Republican main voters. Doughty has stated his expertise working a producing firm offers him the know-how to be a profitable chief government.

He has stated he desires to make Massachusetts extra inexpensive for residents and companies. He has described himself as “pro-life,” however acknowledges the state’s highest courtroom has acknowledged a proper to abortion and stated he does not have an curiosity in altering that.

Baker hasn’t endorsed both candidate.

Healey, who’s received two statewide races for legal professional common, is working nearly unopposed, together with her sole rival dropping out of the race in June, although she stays on the poll. Healey is hoping to interrupt a political “curse” in Massachusetts, referring to a string of unsuccessful campaigns by attorneys common for governor.

Advertisement

Regardless of being thought-about a Democratic stronghold, Massachusetts has a historical past of electing Republican governors as a test on a Legislature during which Democrats maintain overwhelming majorities. These Republican governors, together with Mitt Romney, have sometimes been fiscally conservative however extra socially reasonable.

Baker stated in December that he opted to not search reelection so he may deal with serving to the state emerge from the pandemic. He credited his administration’s deal with points over character as a giant motive for his success with voters, which he stated stands “other than quite a lot of the bipartisan noise that’s created in politics usually nowadays.”

The election additionally options a number of statewide contested Democratic primaries, together with for legal professional common and secretary of the commonwealth.

Two Democrats are jockeying for the highest regulation enforcement workplace: former Boston metropolis councilor Andrea Campbell and employees’ rights legal professional Shannon Liss-Riordan. Every week earlier than the election, a former assistant legal professional common, Quentin Palfrey, introduced he was suspending his marketing campaign and endorsed Campbell.

The winner will face Republican Jay McMahon, a trial legal professional who beforehand ran towards Healey and misplaced, in November.

Advertisement

If elected, Campbell can be the primary Black lady to carry the workplace in Massachusetts. She’s received the endorsement of a number of high-profile elected officers, together with Healey, Sen. Edward Markey and half the state’s congressional delegation.

Liss-Riordan has the backing of Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and former appearing Boston Mayor Kim Janey.

Within the race for secretary of the commonwealth, Democratic incumbent William Galvin is hoping to win an eighth time period in workplace. He is fielding a main problem from fellow Democrat Tanisha Sullivan, a lawyer and president of the Boston department of the NAACP. Sullivan can be the primary Black individual to serve within the publish within the state.

There are additionally contested races within the Democratic main for auditor and for the Democratic and Republican races for lieutenant governor.

Not one of the state’s 9 incumbent Democratic U.S. Home members is dealing with main challengers. There are two contested Republican primaries, within the eighth and ninth congressional districts.

Advertisement

The Massachusetts main lands on the day after Labor Day, elevating considerations a few doubtlessly low turnout, though early voting started on Aug. 27.

A brand new state regulation makes “no excuse” mail-in ballots and early voting everlasting fixtures in Massachusetts elections. Lots of the voting choices included within the new regulation had been applied through the peak of the coronavirus pandemic and proved in style.

The regulation additionally will increase poll entry for voters with disabilities, service members abroad and incarcerated people.


Observe AP for full protection of the midterms at https://apnews.com/hub/2022-midterm-elections and on Twitter, https://twitter.com/ap_politics.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Obituary for Peter J. Grudzien at Daniel T. Morrill Funeral Home

Published

on

Obituary for Peter J. Grudzien at Daniel T. Morrill Funeral Home


North Brookfield / Sturbridge Peter J. Grudzien, 85, formerly a longtime resident of Sturbridge, passed away on Friday, Sept. 19th, in the UMass Memorial Health Harrington, Southbridge, after a long illness. He leaves his wife of 66 years, Willa A. Power Grudzien his son, Bill Grudzien and his wife Denise



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

N.H. leads 25 states in seeking Supreme Court review of ‘unconstitutional’ Mass. gun law

Published

on

N.H. leads 25 states in seeking Supreme Court review of ‘unconstitutional’ Mass. gun law


Local News

The effort calls into question whether or not Massachusetts’ firearm regulations for out-of-state visitors are unconstitutional.

The attorneys general of 25 Republican-led states say that Massachusetts’ gun regulations pose a constitutional problem. Joe Raedle/Getty Images

New Hampshire is leading an effort from 25 states to challenge a Massachusetts gun law, and this month, they’re taking it to the Supreme Court.

The centerpiece of the argument is the Pheasant Lane Mall in Nashua, N.H., which reaches across state lines into Tyngsborough. If shoppers park on the south side of the mall’s parking lot, they might end up crossing state lines during a visit.

Advertisement

The attorneys general of New Hampshire and 24 other Republican-led states say this poses a potential problem for firearm holders. A New Hampshire resident who is legally carrying a firearm on their home state’s side of the parking lot may inadvertently be breaking the law when they cross the lot into Massachusetts, where it is illegal to carry without a permit.

Joining New Hampshire are the attorneys general of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming, who are calling the arrangement unconstitutional. The states have rallied behind Phillip Marquis of Rochester, N.H., to ask the Supreme Court to protect out-of-state residents from Massachusetts’ firearms regulations.

“The geography of the mall is such that a New Hampshire resident might find themselves in Massachusetts if she parks on the south side of the parking lot or visits Buffalo Wild Wings,” reads a brief from the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office to the Supreme Court. “If that person is carrying a firearm without a Massachusetts license — which would be constitutionally protected activity in most of the mall—that person risks being charged as a felon and facing mandatory incarceration in Massachusetts.”

The trouble began for Marquis in 2022 when he was in a car accident in Massachusetts, according to the brief. When police arrived, he informed them that he had a pistol on him and was subsequently charged with carrying a firearm without a license.

Marquis previously sued the Commonwealth for the burdens that Massachusetts’ firearms permit law creates on out-of-state visitors, but the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied his claims. They ruled in March that the state’s nonresident firearms licensing laws were constitutional, according to court documents.

Advertisement

Claiming that the Massachusetts court denied him his Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights, Marquis has petitioned the Supreme Court to federally overrule that court’s decision. In his petition, Marquis invoked New York State Rifle & Police Association, Inc. v. Bruen, where the court established that state firearms restrictions must be covered by the Second Amendment or adhere to historical firearms regulations.

Using Bruen, Marquis and the Republican attorneys general supporting him are aiming to prove that there is no justification for applying Massachusetts’ firearms restrictions to out-of-state residents and that to do so would be unconstitutional. However, the state’s Supreme Judicial Court found the law constitutional even under Bruen because it intends to prevent dangerous people from obtaining firearms, just as historical regulations have done.

“To the extent that the Commonwealth restricts the ability of law-abiding citizens to carry firearms within its borders, the justification for so doing is credible, individualized evidence that the person in question would pose a danger if armed,” the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision read. “Both case law and the historical record unequivocally indicate that this justification is consistent with ‘the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.’”

It’s not immediately clear if the Supreme Court will respond to Marquis’ appeal or when it will make any kind of decision, but lower courts are at something of a crossroads with how and when to apply Bruen to gun possession cases. As such, they are looking to the Supreme Court for a more definitive answer.

Since the proof of historical context that Bruen requires has led to some uncertainty, any ruling that these lower courts make is likely to amount to a partisan decision. However, if the Supreme Court provides more substantive clarity in a response to Marquis, these lower courts just might find the answer they are seeking.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Mass. State Lottery winner: 2 $100,000 Mass Cash prizes won Friday

Published

on

Mass. State Lottery winner: 2 0,000 Mass Cash prizes won Friday


Massachusetts State Lottery players won two $100,000 prizes Friday from the day’s “Mass Cash” drawings.

The winning tickets were sold at the Roslindale Food Mart on Washington Street and McSheffrey’s of the South End convenience store (with Mobil gas) on Main Street in Woburn.

Mass Cash drawings happen twice daily, at 2 p.m. and at 9 p.m. It costs just $1 to play.

Overall, at least 625 prizes worth $600 or more were won or claimed in Massachusetts on Monday, including 6 in Springfield, 22 in Worcester and 14 in Boston.

Advertisement

The Massachusetts State Lottery releases a full list of winning tickets every day. The list only includes winning tickets worth more than $600.

The two largest lottery prizes won so far in 2025 were each worth $15 million. One of the prizes was from a winning “Diamond Deluxe” scratch ticket sold in Holyoke, and the other was from a “300X” scratch ticket sold on Cape Cod.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending