It’s like “attempting to chop down a tree with a sock,” he mentioned, throughout a latest panel dialogue at Harvard College. “It’s simply not going to occur.”

There’s room for disagreement, after all.

Social media performed essential roles within the Arab Spring and within the rise of the Black Lives Matter motion. Nevertheless it’s secure to say that Twitter and Fb by no means changed into the civic forces that many hoped for.

And Victor, a lawyer and part-time good-government activist, has spent the final yr and a half working with information scientist Nathan Sanders and dozens of volunteers with the nonprofit Code for Boston to construct one thing very completely different for the Commonwealth’s little nook of the Web.

It’s known as the Massachusetts Platform for Legislative Engagement, or MAPLE. And it’s about as removed from Twitter as you will get.

There’s no method to flay the opposition on the positioning. And there’s no doom scrolling. It’s all in regards to the sensible and significant work of policymaking.

MAPLE, launched simply a few weeks in the past, scrapes the state Legislature’s web site for info on pending payments and makes it straightforward for the general public to weigh in. Customers can draft testimony and, with the clicking of a button, submit it to their state representatives, state senators, and the chairs of the related legislative committees.

MAPLE has some social media options. Customers can learn others’ testimony. And in just a few weeks, they need to be capable to comply with the teams they belief — environmental advocacy organizations, maybe, or civil liberties outfits.

However there might be no follower counts. No filter bubbles or remark sections. Simply an earnest effort to patch up a broken democracy.

That’s the essential purpose of an intriguing boomlet of “civic tech” in Massachusetts.

A couple of yr in the past, Lawrence Lessig, the Harvard regulation professor and outstanding democracy reform advocate, helped launch deliberations.us, which brings individuals from throughout the political spectrum collectively for video chats on points like Electoral Faculty reform.

And MIT’s Middle for Constructive Communication has constructed a intelligent system for recording small-group conversations on matters like public well being or policing and utilizing synthetic intelligence to establish themes and pull out audio clips to be used in stories, advocacy campaigns, and native journalism.

However as properly constructed as these instruments could also be, latest historical past suggests it is going to be powerful for them to chop via all of the Twitter tantrums and TikTok memes.

Google “civic tech graveyard” and also you’ll discover an precise civic tech graveyard — the place, within the phrases of the cheeky researchers behind the venture, “you may go to, have fun, and pay your respects to the tasks which might be now not with us.”

The deceased embrace myriad makes an attempt to curb faux information, a web site that aimed to attach neighbors to vacant heaps in want of some love, and an MIT effort to get individuals concerned in “governance round infrastructure points and planning.” By some means, that one didn’t catch hearth.

However there have been some sign successes — if not on this nation, then overseas.

Probably the most celebrated took root in Taiwan after a gaggle of protesters often known as the Sunflower Motion occupied the island-state’s parliament in 2014 to decry a controversial commerce take care of China that had been drafted behind closed doorways.

The combat raised broader questions on transparency and public enter. And when it died down, the federal government turned to a gaggle of civic hackers often known as g0v (pronounced “gov zero”) to provide you with new automobiles for civic engagement.

One of the vital consequential was vTaiwan, which brings collectively 1000’s of residents for in-person conferences and on-line discussions guided by a machine-learning system often known as Polis. The know-how teases out variations and — simply as essential — highlights sometimes-hidden areas of settlement. And in recent times, it has formed substantive laws on every part from revenge porn to Uber regulation.

Crafting one thing related in the USA would require authorities to take tech extra significantly, says Jennifer Pahkla, founding father of Code for America and writer of the forthcoming “Recoding America: Why Authorities is Failing within the Digital Age and How We Can Do Higher.”

“Within the US,” she says, “policymakers are the essential and highly effective individuals, and so they see digital as a element of implementation which is manner, manner down within the hierarchy.”

One other downside, says Lessig, the Harvard regulation professor, is that in a democracy as damaged as ours, residents are skeptical that they’ll have a lot impression — offline or on.

“You possibly can say, ‘Be a part of — click on right here — and we’ll change the Structure,’” he says. “Nevertheless it doesn’t take lengthy for them to comprehend that there’s truly not a lot probability to alter the Structure.”

One of many first duties for American civic tech, then, is to present individuals a cause to take a position their time in politics, he says. And small-scale dialogue of native points — the place individuals can really feel like their voices are heard — is an effective place to begin.

That’s what deliberations.us is after. Lessig says the group is hoping to deploy its platform in Massachusetts excessive colleges and schools this fall.

And the mannequin might discover its manner into native politics, too.

Harvard professor and former Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate Danielle Allen’s nonprofit Companions in Democracy is planning to make use of deliberations.us or an analogous on-line automobile to assist form a democracy reform agenda for the state within the coming months.

If the deliberations.us mannequin and the MIT system develop, it is going to be in no small half as a result of they’re grounded within the interesting exercise of person-to-person dialog.

The most recent entrant to Massachusetts’ civic tech area — MAPLE — traffics in one thing a little bit drier: the small print of well being care and financial coverage.

However it will possibly nonetheless succeed. If the positioning turns into a go-to software for advocacy teams hoping to provoke members and flood the Legislature with public remark, Beacon Hill must listen.

Victor is hopeful.

He says MAPLE consulted with dozens of native organizations because it was constructing the software, aiming for one thing they’d need to use. He’s banking on word-of-mouth, too. And the individuals behind the platform are even hoping that its Twitter deal with, @MapleTestimony, will drive some visitors to the positioning.

Perhaps, then, the 280-character consideration machine can do one thing helpful for democracy in spite of everything.

David Scharfenberg might be reached at david.scharfenberg@globe.com. Observe him on Twitter @dscharfGlobe.