Connect with us

Massachusetts

Massachusetts vs. Christians on transgenderism: When religious discrimination becomes state establishment of religion

Published

on

Massachusetts vs. Christians on transgenderism: When religious discrimination becomes state establishment of religion



Kitty and Matthew Burke, a Catholic couple facing fertility struggles, wanted to become foster parents, and they eventually wanted to adopt. Too bad for them, they live in Massachusetts and are observant Catholics.

The state rejected their application to become foster parents on the basis that they “would not be affirming to a child who identified as LGBTQIA.” The Burkes are suing Massachusetts in a case that alleges clear religious discrimination.

UP FOR DEBATE: WHERE TRUMP, DESANTIS, AND REST OF REPUBLICAN 2024 FIELD STAND ON KEY ISSUES

But the case, being argued on the Burkes’ behalf by the Becket Law, and the state’s regulations on adoption point toward something more devious: Massachusetts is establishing a state religion, with its own faith-based dogma and spirituality, and ruling nonadherents to be second-class citizens.

Advertisement

Massachusetts regulations dictate that all foster and adoptive parents must abide by the teachings of gender ideology, specifically the notion that children have an interior gender that is undetermined by their biological sex — and that children have the right to change their gender.

The Code of Massachusetts Regulations reads thus: “A foster/pre-adoptive parent applicant must demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Department the ability … to promote the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of a child placed in his or her care, including supporting and respecting a child’s sexual orientation or gender identity.”

As the Burkes say in their complaint, this is “an absolute bar for Catholics who agree with the Church’s teaching on sex, marriage, and gender.”

When Washington state enforced similar regulations against a Seventh-day Adventist couple, a federal court blocked their enforcement, explaining that it was religious discrimination: “If the only factor weighing against an otherwise qualified applicant has to do with their sincerely held religious beliefs, the Department must not discriminate against a foster care applicant based on their creed.”

But calling these regulations religious discrimination doesn’t quite go far enough. Massachusetts and Washington didn’t merely create rules that discriminate against Catholics and Seventh-day Adventists. They discriminate against Muslims and Pentecostals too.

Advertisement

These state regulations also discriminate against secular, irreligious couples who do not believe that a boy who declares himself really a girl is actually a girl.

Lots of people, including the governing class of Massachusetts, believe that a boy who declares himself really a girl may in fact be a girl who was just “assigned the wrong gender at birth.”

This belief only became elite dogma in the last few years. It is also a belief not at all required by logic or science. Its premise is that we all have inner genders with no biological markers, which is ultimately a spiritual belief. It is believed on faith alone.

If you do not share this faith-based spirituality, Massachusetts believes you are not fit to adopt or foster children. Thus Massachusetts has once again established a state religion — one that happens to be harmful to children.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

At Massachusetts General Hospital, $1.9 billion ‘signature’ Ragon building takes shape – The Boston Globe

Published

on

At Massachusetts General Hospital, .9 billion ‘signature’ Ragon building takes shape – The Boston Globe


Three years into its anticipated seven-year timeline, construction is well underway on Massachusetts General Hospital’s massive new $1.9 billion clinical care facility on its Boston campus.

At over 1.5 million square feet, the Phillip and Susan Ragon Building will house the Mass General Cancer Center and the Corrigan Minehan Heart Center. Its two inpatient towers will contain 482 single-bed rooms, and the facility will include rooms for operations, imaging, infusions, and exams.

When the project along Cambridge Street broke ground in 2022, the hospital’s president David F. M. Brown called it “the most important” building constructed in the hospital’s history since its original building was constructed more than two centuries ago.

Advertisement

“It will create the environment our staff need, and our patients deserve,” he said at the time.

At a recent celebration of the last beam being placed on the building’s East Tower, Jonathan Kraft, chair of the hospital’s board of trustees, said the building will be the “flagship building” of the hospital’s parent organization, Mass General Brigham.

“It will be the signature building of our system and the signature building of the whole health care community in New England,” he said.

The building will rely primarily on renewable electricity and has a net-zero carbon plan for construction and operation, MGH has said. It will potentially house a new T stop on the proposed Red-Blue connector, according to the hospital’s website. Construction is set to be completed in two phases, in 2027 and 2030.

Advertisement
Construction continued on Massachusetts General Hospital’s $1.9 billion Phillip and Susan Ragon Building.David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
The state-of-the-art building along Cambridge Street will house the Mass General Cancer Center and the Corrigan Minehan Heart Center.David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
The project’s two inpatient towers will contain 482 single-bed rooms, and the facility will include rooms for operations, imaging, infusions, and exams.David L. Ryan/Globe Staff

Stella Tannenbaum can be reached at stella.tannenbaum@globe.com.





Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts teenagers learn about social justice with help from Project 351 and Celtics

Published

on

Massachusetts teenagers learn about social justice with help from Project 351 and Celtics


ALLSTON – While the Celtics were at the White House Thursday celebrating their championship, high school students from across Massachusetts gathered in their practice gym in Allston to discuss race, religion, and discrimination. 

Social justice workshops

More than 100 students from 24 different towns participated in the Playbook Initiative at the Auerbach Center, presented by New Balance, the Boston Celtics Shamrock Foundation, and the nonprofit organization Project 351

From 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., the students participated in workshops about social justice issues, aiming to educate them on how to intervene in uncomfortable situations. 

“So they kind of reflect on, OK, what is the safest, most brave path that I can take in this moment,” said Noor Al-Saad, Playbook program manager at Project 351.  

Advertisement

Up stander instead of bystander

After attending today’s event, Chelsea Barnor, a participant of the program, told WBZ-TV she felt empowered to unify her own school by becoming an “up stander, rather than just a bystander.”

“I think it’s really important that we shed light on things in our communities and address these situations that can be hard to talk about,” Barnor said. 

Today’s event was a training session for high school students like her to lead difficult discussions in their own communities. 

“We hope incrementally by like equipping these young students with that ability, that they can change their school climate and culture year after year,” Al-Saad said. 

In January, the high school trainers will be paired with middle school students for a mentorship program.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Weird laws in Massachusetts including a $20 fine, possible jail time for frightening a pigeon

Published

on

Weird laws in Massachusetts including a  fine, possible jail time for frightening a pigeon


Laws on pigeon frightening, milk cart vandalization and belting the national anthem are all present in the state of Massachusetts. 

The 1780 Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is the oldest functioning written constitution in the world, according to Mass.gov. The historical document was drafted by John Adams. 

Scanning through laws in Massachusetts, you are sure to find some head scratchers, but the state is far from the only one that has bizarre laws still technically on the books. 

WEIRD SOUTH CAROLINA LAWS THAT WILL SURPRISE YOU, INCLUDING THE RAMIFICATION OF BUYING SILVERWARE ON SUNDAYS

Advertisement

Below are a few strange laws present in the state of Massachusetts. 

Among the strange laws in Massachusetts you may have not known about include ones regarding pigeons, milk cartons and alcohol-infused candy. (iStock)

  1. Think twice before scaring a pigeon
  2. Fine, possible imprisonment for vandalizing a carton of milk
  3. No more than 1% alcohol in candy
  4. Fines for singing or playing the national anthem
  5. Avoid changing the color of a rabbit or a chicken
  6. Spooky real estate rule

1. Think twice before you scare a pigeon 

Before sneaking up on a pigeon in Massachusetts, consider this strange law. 

You’re likely to see quite a few pigeons in Massachusetts, but it’s best to leave them be, as it’s illegal in Massachusetts to give them a fright. 

BIZARRE LAWS IN WASHINGTON, SUCH AS BEING CHARGED WITH RECKLESS DRIVING IF HUGGING WHILE BEHIND THE WHEEL

“Pigeons, killing or frightening” is covered in Chapter 255, Section 132 of the General Laws of Massachusetts. 

Advertisement

“Whoever wilfully kills pigeons upon, or frightens them from, beds which have been made for the purpose of taking them in nets, by any method, within one hundred rods of the same, except on land lawfully occupied by himself, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than one month or by a fine of not more than twenty dollars, and shall also be liable for the actual damages to the owner or occupant of such beds,” the law states. 

Pigeons in Boston

In Massachusetts, it’s best to leave the pigeons alone. (Stan Grossfeld/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

2. Fine, possible imprisonment for vandalizing a carton of milk

With the average cost of a gallon of milk around $4 in 2024, you could end up spending more than you bargained for by breaking this law. 

In Massachusetts, there is a law explicitly stating the punishment for vandalizing a carton of milk, which is a fine of $10. 

PAST AND PRESENT VERMONT LAWS THAT WILL SHOCK YOU, INCLUDING A HEFTY FINE FOR PAINTING A HORSE

“Whoever, without the consent of the owner thereof, knowingly and wilfully effaces, alters or covers over, or procures to be effaced, altered or covered over, the name, initial or device of any dealer in milk, marked or stamped upon a milk can, or whoever, with intent to defraud and without such consent, detains or uses in his business any such can having the name, initial or device of any dealer in milk so marked or stamped thereon, shall be punished by a fine of not more than ten dollars,” Chapter 255, Section 128 of Massachusetts law states. 

Advertisement

3. No more than 1% alcohol in candy

Don’t expect any boozy candy in Massachusetts, as candy must contain less than 1% alcohol, according to state laws. 

This is written out in Chapter 270, Section 8 of the General Law in Massachusetts. 

Breaking this law could result in a fine of up to $100. 

Alcohol infused Gummy bears

Candy in Massachusetts must contain less than 1% alcohol. (ANDER GILLENEA/AFP via Getty Images)

4. Fines for singing or playing the national anthem

Before the famous lyrics “O say can you see” leave your lips in Massachusetts, consider this law in the state. 

Whoever belts “The Star-Spangled Banner” or plays it on an instrument in any sort of public space “other than as a whole and separate composition or number” could face a fine up to $100. 

Advertisement

BIZARRE NEW YORK LAWS INCLUDE RESTRICTIONS, PENALTIES FOR TAKING A SELFIE WITH A TIGER

Chapter 264, Section 9 of Massachusetts law states that “whoever plays, sings or renders the ‘Star Spangled Banner’ in any public place, theatre, motion picture hall, restaurant or café, or at any public entertainment, other than as a whole and separate composition or number, without embellishment or addition in the way of national or other melodies, or whoever plays, sings or renders the ‘Star Spangled Banner’, or any part thereof, as dance music, as an exit march or as a part of a medley of any kind, shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars.”

5. Avoid changing the color of a rabbit or a chicken

There are several stipulations in Massachusetts law about baby chicks, ducklings, rabbits and other fowl in terms of their sale, barter or gifting. 

This includes the dyeing or coloring of these animals. 

“No person shall sell, offer for sale, barter, display or give away living rabbits, chickens, ducklings or other fowl which have been dyed, colored or otherwise treated so as to impart to them an artificial color,” Chapter 272, Section 80D of state law explains. 

Advertisement
Baby chicks

There is a law against dyeing baby chickens in Massachusetts. (KIRILL KUDRYAVTSEV/AFP via Getty Images)

An additional provision of this law includes the sale, barter or gift of ducklings, baby chickens or fowl under 2 months old. 

“Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the sale or display of baby chickens, ducklings or other fowl under two months of age by breeders or stores engaged in the business of selling for purposes of commercial breeding and raising; provided, however, that prior to May first in any year, such ducklings may be sold or purchased only in quantities of twenty-four or more,” the law explains. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

“This section shall not prohibit, however, the sale or donation of such chickens, ducklings or fowl to schools for use in classroom instruction,” per the state law. 

Those who violate this law could face a fine of up to $100. 

Advertisement

6. Spooky real estate rule

Real estate laws vary state-by-state. 

One differentiation between states in terms of real estate is how much information is legally required to be disclosed to potential buyers. This includes spooky events and the property being haunted.

In Massachusetts, a seller “doesn’t need to disclose psychologically affected property, including an alleged parapsychological or supernatural phenomenon,” according to Zillow’s website. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending