Connect with us

Massachusetts

In Holyoke, a radical approach to mental health care offers respite to a community under siege – The Boston Globe

Published

on

In Holyoke, a radical approach to mental health care offers respite to a community under siege – The Boston Globe


Five of the seven gathered in that kitchen were, like Grady, trans; all had experienced their own mental health challenges.

Grady is among the first guests at Anemoni, a new LGBTQ-focused residential home in Holyoke offering support for people in mental health crisis from trained personnel with similar experiences. Fewer than 40 programs nationwide operate such centers, called peer respite homes, as alternatives to inpatient psychiatric care, according to the National Empowerment Center, a mental health support organization. Anemoni, which also welcomes people recovering from gender-affirming surgeries, is the only home in the country, perhaps in the world, exclusively run by and for trans and queer people, experts said.

Planning for Anemoni began almost three years ago, but it opened in late April amid an all-out assault on the transgender rights movement by the Trump administration. On his first day in office, President Trump invalidated the concept of gender identity and ordered the government to recognize only two sexes. The administration has since terminated scores of medical research grants aimed at improving the health of trans and queer populations and has sought to ban gender-affirming care in minors and adults. And, the nation’s 988 National Suicide & Crisis Lifeline are soon expected to stop providing support specifically tailored to the LGBTQ+ community, a population that reports higher rates of anxiety, depression, trauma, and suicidality.

“It’s [expletive] terrifying in the world right now,” said Juniper Holt, Anemoni’s assistant director.

Advertisement
Wildflower Alliance employees, from left, Ephraim Akiva, Alex Campanario Araica, Juniper Holt, Jennifer Cauldron, and Jordan Fairchild talk at the peer respite house in Holyoke.
Brett Phelps for The Boston Globe

Anemoni, operated by The Wildflower Alliance, a Western Massachusetts-based national peer support and training organization, offers a haven within the somewhat protective bubble of Massachusetts. The state’s progressive politics and healthcare policies have helped draw people who identify as LGBTQ+ from across the country, increasing the state’s LGBTQ+ population to 9 percent of all adults in 2022, from about 7 percent in 2016, according to the Fenway Institute. That migration is likely to increase as the population increasingly feels besieged nationwide.

“We’re probably going to get more people asking to come here,” said Holt. “It makes us more necessary.”

In Holyoke, Anemoni is virtually indistinguishable from the other three-story residential homes on its block. Inside, the walls are painted in soothing pastels, with morning sunlight casting gentle shadows. Two bedrooms are still being furnished on the second floor, which smells like new paint. Three bedrooms downstairs are ready and available.

Reese Boucher was the first person to stay at the home. For years, the 29-year-old had listened with growing disgust as his friends used slurs for the queer community and people with disabilities. The Agawam man never felt he could tell them he is pansexual — a term that describes those who are romantically attracted to people regardless of their sex or gender. He is on the autism spectrum and has been treated for anxiety and depression, which led to periods of inpatient care.

In March, he finally cut those friends off, but feelings of isolation and depression became overwhelming. He learned of Anemoni through a contact.

Advertisement

“It’s a beautiful experience [to meet people] I can trust being myself around,” he said.

People stay for up to two weeks in the respite home. The Wildflower Alliance also runs a mobile peer respite support team. The services are fully covered by a $903,000, one-year contract with the state Department of Mental Health. Despite pressure from the Trump administration to kill gender-related programs, state support feels stable for now, said Sera Davidow, the Wildflower Alliance’s director.

Anemoni is “a significant addition to DMH services,” the agency’s commissioner, Brooke Doyle, said, “serving a community that often faces isolation, depression, threats, violence, and related trauma.”

Respite takes different forms for different guests; for Boucher, that means late-night walks to clear his mind.

He contrasted his welcoming stay at Anemoni with conventional psychiatric facilities, where “your freedom is immediately stripped from you.”

Advertisement

Anemoni staff who have had experience with inpatient care described medications and policies that can be ineffective, administered forcibly, dehumanizing, or cause terrible side effects; such treatments can be particularly difficult for transgender people who may find their identities negated, they said.

“People get misgendered, dead named [identified by a name used before they transitioned], harassed in inpatient units all the time, including by staff,” said Jordan Fairchild, director of the Wildflower Alliance’s social justice network. “We have our hormones taken away from us.”

The Wildflower Alliance’s peer respite house opened its doors in April of this year and has served 13 people so far.Brett Phelps for The Boston Globe

Inpatient care also often involves severing virtually all outside ties, said Gail Hornstein, professor emeritus of psychology at Mount Holyoke College. Such isolation can cost people their jobs or housing, she said.

Practioners of peer respite believe people in crisis still have insight into what they need and can form important, therapeutic connections with others who have lived with mental illness.

Ephraim Akiva, senior director of peer respite for the Wildflower Alliance, dislikes the term mental illness for the people at the home. He sees a community suffering primarily from society’s mistreatment of trans and queer people.

“I am living with a lot of trauma in a world that is incredibly hostile to me and people like me,” he said.

Advertisement

Anemoni is a voluntary program. Forced medication is not allowed, restraints are never used, and the doors are not locked to prevent people from leaving. Guests are asked not to use drugs or drink on the property, but won’t be evicted if they aren’t sober.

Most decisions, from basics such as meal and bed times, to taking medications, are left up to the visitors, who are called guests, not residents or patients. If a guest wants to keep going to work, see a familiar therapist, or visit somewhere that calms them, they can.

“All of those things are possible in a peer respite because no one is not only restraining, but controlling or dictating what it is that’s going to be helpful to that person,” Hornstein said.

Bevin Croft, a researcher for the Human Services Research Institute, a Cambridge nonprofit that analyzes health and social service programs, studied a peer respite home in California from 2010 to 2015, and found that people in crisis who had one stay at a peer respite home were 70 percent less likely than those who did not to need subsequent inpatient or emergency services.

“People are just kind of given space and they can kind of do their own thing and that looks different for everybody,” she said.

Advertisement

As of March, DMH reported 718 people occupying beds in the state’s inpatient psychiatric facilities, 16 more than the facilities are supposed to house. But one strength of the peer respite model — a small, intimate setting — also makes it difficult to scale up. The Massachusetts legislature is considering bills to establish peer respite facilities in every county, along with another home solely for the LGBTQ community and two for nonwhite people.

For Grady, one of the most damaging consequences of her recent trauma was the deepening sense of loneliness.

“I’d like some semblance of not being so alone in the big, great, wide,” said Grady, who is from Northhampton.

At Anemoni, she found empathy.

A week at Anemoni didn’t heal Grady or take away the pain, but it did give relief.

Advertisement

“It makes me feel less weak, less alone, less afraid,” she said.


Jason Laughlin can be reached at jason.laughlin@globe.com. Follow him @jasmlaughlin.





Source link

Massachusetts

People are moving out of Massachusetts but the population still grew

Published

on

People are moving out of Massachusetts but the population still grew


play

More people left Massachusetts than moved in from 2024 to 2025, with the state ranking fourth in the nation for net domestic migration loss, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Thousands of residents left the Bay State for other states during that period. Regionally, the Northeast experienced a net domestic migration loss of 205,552, according to the data.

Advertisement

Despite the domestic outflow, Massachusetts’ population still grew by 15,524 when factoring in births, deaths, and international migration.

Here’s what to know about the states with the highest and lowest net domestic migration across the country:

Massachusetts’ net domestic, international migration from 2024 to 2025

From July 1, 2024, to July 1, 2025, Massachusetts had a net domestic migration of -33,340, with 33,340 more people moving out of the state than moving in, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Meanwhile, the state had a net international migration of 40,240, as 40,240 more people moved into Massachusetts from abroad than left.

Advertisement

States with highest net domestic migration from 2024 to 2025

Here were the states with the highest net domestic migration from July 1, 2024, to July 1, 2025, according to U.S. Census data:

  1. North Carolina: 84,064 residents
  2. Texas: 67,299 residents
  3. South Carolina: 66,622 residents
  4. Tennessee: 42,389 residents
  5. Arizona: 31,107 residents
  6. Georgia: 27,333 residents
  7. Alabama: 23,358 residents
  8. Florida: 22,517 residents
  9. Idaho: 19,915 residents
  10. Nevada: 14,914 residents

States with lowest net domestic migration from 2024 to 2025

Here were the states with the lowest net domestic migration from July 1, 2024, to July 1, 2025, according to U.S. Census data:

  1. California: -229,077 residents
  2. New York: -137,586 residents
  3. Illinois: -40,017 residents
  4. New Jersey: -37,428 residents
  5. Massachusetts: -33,340 residents
  6. Louisiana: -14,387 residents
  7. Maryland: -12,127 residents
  8. Colorado: -12,100 residents
  9. Hawaii: -8,876 residents
  10. Connecticut: -5,945 residents

New England states’ net domestic migration from 2024 to 2025

Here’s how New England states ranked on net domestic migration from July 1, 2024, to July 1, 2025, according to U.S. Census data:

  1. Maine: 7,406 residents (ranked 18th nationally)
  2. New Hampshire: 6,554 residents (ranked 22nd nationally)
  3. Vermont: -726 residents (ranked 34th nationally)
  4. Rhode Island: -1,551 residents (ranked 36th nationally)
  5. Connecticut: -5,945 residents (ranked 42nd nationally)
  6. Massachusetts: -33,340 residents (ranked 47th nationally)

Census regions with highest net domestic migration from 2024 to 2025

Here’s how the four Census regions ranked on net domestic migration from July 1, 2024, to July 1, 2025, according to U.S. Census data:

  1. South: 357,790 residents
  2. Midwest: 16,040 residents
  3. West: -168,278 residents
  4. Northeast: -205,552 residents



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Planning a staycation? Tripadvisor recommends this MA city

Published

on

Planning a staycation? Tripadvisor recommends this MA city


play

Are you thinking about spending some time off but don’t want to splurge on a big international vacation?

A summer 2025 report found that many Americans are choosing nearby staycations over changing time zones.

Advertisement

And Tripadvisor said one of the best travel experiences you could have in the United States would actually be a guided walking tour in Salem, Massachusetts, and the Freedom Trail walking tour in Boston.

As part of 2025 Travelers’ Choice Awards: Best of the Best Things To Do, Tripadvisor said that History and Hauntings of Salem Guided Walking Tour is the second-best experience in the U.S.

As we move on from 2025 onto 2026, here’s what you need to know about this Bay State travel opportunity.

Tripadvisor said Salem has the second best experience in the U.S.

Tripadvisor said the History and Hauntings of Salem Guided Walking Tour is one of the best experiences in the United States. Its AI summary tool said the tour guides paint a vivid portrait of one of America’s most macabre towns.

Advertisement

Here’s what Tripadvisor said about it: “There are many Salem tours out there but few are as compelling as this one, led by a local historian who brings alive the city’s history at the time of day you choose. For a spookier experience, pick a nighttime tour led by lantern light. Visit the Burying Point Cemetery, Witch House, and Ropes Mansion garden as your guide tells stories of the haunted history of Salem, Massachusetts.”

The itinerary says the tour begins at Salem Old Town Hall and ends at Hamilton Hall, visiting sites like the Bewitched statue of Elizabeth Montgomery and The Witch House at Salem on the way.

You can book History and Hauntings of Salem Guided Walking Tour at this link here. Be aware that this event is booked 23 days in advance, the tour’s Tripadvisor page said.

Kathleen Wong contributed to the reporting of this story. Rin Velasco is a trending reporter. She can be reached at rvelasco@gannett.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts beach towns look to ease ‘overly strict’ conservation rules: ‘Common sense’

Published

on

Massachusetts beach towns look to ease ‘overly strict’ conservation rules: ‘Common sense’


As certain shorebirds rebound in population along the Massachusetts coast, beach towns are pushing for the state to strike a healthier balance between conservation and recreation.

State Rep. Kenneth Sweezey, a South Shore Republican, is leading the charge on Beacon Hill, authoring legislation to untangle what he describes as “overly strict” regulations hindering his region’s access to its beaches.

Over the years, Duxbury Beach, in particular, has borne the brunt of protecting recovering bird species, including piping plovers and terns, limiting business and recreational opportunities at the prominent South Shore coastline.

The Duxbury Beach Reservation, a private landlord, has had to close certain roads and portions of the shoreline while birds are nesting. Residents and visitors are also required to have an oversand vehicle permit, which costs more than $150, for beach access.

Advertisement

Under one of Sweezey’s proposals, the state Division of Fisheries and Wildlife would only restrict over-sand vehicle access or other recreational activities if the bird species is listed as endangered or threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act.

Sweezey has said that piping plovers are the only species nesting on Duxbury Beach, which his district includes, that are federally endangered, while other birds carry a state designation.

“Birds may be federally protected because they’re doing poorly in one region of the nation, even though they may be thriving in the Commonwealth,” Sweezey said at the State House last week. “Those differences sort of create problems when you’re looking at human access, recreational opportunities on the beaches and conservation on the beach.”

Sweezey made his appeal to the Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, touting shorebird management expert Chris Kennedy for helping him craft his proposals.

Kennedy, a wildlife biologist who has worked for the state Environmental Police and Division of Fisheries and Wildlife over the decades, is championing an equal balance between conservation and recreation.

Advertisement

In response to a post in the ‘Save Duxbury Beach’ Facebook page, Kennedy highlighted how the Bay State has seen a nearly “tenfold” jump in nesting plovers since 1986, going from 140 to over 1,200 last year. Roseate and common terns are also “strongly increasing,” while least terns are “slowly climbing.”

“Reasonable public access is not anti-birds,” Kennedy stated. “It is simply common sense.”

The 1,221 nesting pairs of plovers identified in 2025 marked a record high for the species’ population, up even from the 1,196 in 2024, numbers show.

According to the state’s Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Duxbury Beach had 149 days of recreational activity last year.

Sweezey is also calling state regulators to conduct a review of their recreational management guidelines that protect piping plovers, terns and their habitats across the state at least once every two years. Part of that process would include two public hearings.

Advertisement

Patrick Parquette, a government affairs officer for the Massachusetts Striped Bass Association, called the state’s current shorebird management program “long outdated,” having been adopted in 1993.

Parquette pointed out how, decades ago, nests of certain shorebirds needed to be a minimum of an eighth of a mile apart. Today, species, including the piping plover, are nesting within 100 feet of each other.

“At the time, it was based on the best thinking that we had,” he said. “I don’t think there’s a reasonable human being in this building, no matter the ilk or philosophy they come from, that would say that our knowledge base 33 years ago could compare with today’s knowledge base.”

Andrew Marshall, founder of the Save Duxbury Beach nonprofit advocacy group, centers his concerns around climate change and its effects on the Plymouth County town of roughly 16,000.

“We’re being unfairly punished due to climate change, with some of these southern birds moving up to the north here,” Marshall told lawmakers. “These birds aren’t rare or threatened. They’re just new in our area.”

Advertisement

A third piece of legislation that Sweezey has crafted would ban state regulators from prohibiting any beach management program from using all legally authorized shorebird nesting mitigation tools under the state’s habitat conservation plan.

Sweezey said a goal of the bill would be to promote parity among Massachusetts beaches.

“These bills,” the representative said, “are critically important to our environment, our coastal traditions and local economies down in Duxbury, but really along the entire coast.”

A woman takes in the shoreline view at Duxbury Beach. (Staff Photo By Faith Ninivaggi/Boston Herald/Media News Group, File)



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending