Connect with us

Massachusetts

How Massachusetts can limit ICE enforcement – The Boston Globe

Published

on

How Massachusetts can limit ICE enforcement – The Boston Globe


Plymouth County Correctional Facility currently holds about 350 detainees on behalf of ICE, marking a sharp increase over the past year. Absent state intervention, the detained population at Plymouth will likely continue to grow under the Trump administration. Sheriff Joseph McDonald recently renewed the county’s contract with ICE for five more years, despite mounting reports of flagrant human rights abuses — including allegations of unsanitary conditions, abusive staff, overcrowding, rotten food, and inadequate health care.

Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren are aware of the abysmal conditions at Plymouth, and have spoken out against the jail’s continued failure to abide by detention standards. The jail is currently under review by the attorney general. As long as there are ICE beds to fill at Plymouth, immigration detention will continue.

Though some have characterized Massachusetts as a sanctuary state, gaps between statewide laws and city policies remain vulnerable to exploitation in service of mass deportation. For example, the Boston Regional Intelligence Center — a fusion center enabling extensive information sharing between federal immigration authorities and local law enforcement — easily sidesteps toothless commitments to non-cooperation. Between 2014 and 2017, the BRIC reported 135 children to ICE after incidents at school, putting them at serious risk of deportation. Ending, or at least vastly limiting, the scope of the BRIC is a concrete step that state and local leaders can take to stymie the information sharing that inevitably leads to detention and deportation.

Three quarters of ICE arrests in the interior of the United States happen as a result of interactions with the criminal legal system. Though a handful of sanctuary cities exist in the Commonwealth, and though case law prohibits law enforcement from holding noncitizens solely on the basis of an ICE detainer, nothing prevents a local sheriff’s office or state prosecutor from notifying ICE of a noncitizen in their custody or courtroom. Elected officials must instruct district attorneys, sheriffs, police chiefs, and other law enforcement officials that they are not to communicate with ICE regarding noncitizens’ presence in jails or courtrooms.

Advertisement

Moreover, guidance should be provided to district attorney offices to encourage non-prosecution and reduced sentences where possible, to avoid deportation consequences. Healey can also grant pardons to protect longtime residents whose state criminal convictions make them deportable, in consideration of their records of rehabilitation, contributions, and roots in the state.

Finally, Massachusetts must reinstate the state’s right-to-shelter law for all residents. The pipeline from homelessness to deportation is well documented. Healey should reverse her recent decision to impose a strict six-month limit on family stays in shelters. The families in shelters have fled violence, poverty, civil strife, and natural disasters; they are traumatized and struggling to find safety and stability. Unhoused families living on the streets of Massachusetts will be sitting ducks for ICE enforcement efforts under Trump. State leaders can take steps now to protect these families from deportation by reinstating the availability of stable, long-term shelter.

As elected officials consider how to make good on their promises to push back against an increasingly hostile Trump agenda, they should implement these four recommendations. Absent concrete, immediate actions at the state and local level, noncitizen community members in Massachusetts will remain at significant risk of detention, deportation, and family separation.

Sarah Sherman-Stokes is a clinical associate professor of law and associate director of the Immigrants’ Rights and Human Trafficking Clinic at Boston University School of Law. Leah Hastings is a staff attorney at Prisoners’ Legal Services of Massachusetts, where she runs the Immigrant Detention Conditions Project.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Pensions vs. classrooms: Rising retirement costs are squeezing Massachusetts education – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Pensions vs. classrooms: Rising retirement costs are squeezing Massachusetts education – The Boston Globe


While standardized test scores of Massachusetts students are still mostly below pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels, one education statistic that keeps rising is the cost to the state of funding teachers’ pensions.

In a new report on pension costs across six populous states including Massachusetts, we found that in the Bay State, 14 cents of every tax dollar dedicated to associated education spending went to pensions in 2022. That’s up from 9 cents in 2015 and far above the 8 cents forked over by taxpayers in our runner-up state, California.

Despite this increase in resources, the financial strength of the Massachusetts Teachers Retirement System hasn’t improved. Over this period, the percentage of assets the fund has relative to the value of its pension commitments remained consistently low, increasing from just below 57 percent to just below 58 percent.

Yes that’s right, MTRS has less than 58 cents saved for every dollar it owes, even under its assumption of a 7.15 percent return on investments every year. To put that in perspective, MTRS would consider a $100,000 payment due in 10 years as “fully funded” if it had just over $50,000 in its account today. And yet, this eye-popping increase in cash has barely kept MTRS treading water. This means that without policy reforms, Bay State taxpayers will probably pay an increasingly hefty bill.

Advertisement

While the MTRS funding ratio and contribution increases are worse than its peers, these trends reflect a nationwide problem. Public pensions when properly measured are underfunded to the tune of $5.12 trillion, and the cost burden on state and local governments is increasing.

To understand how the contribution increases impact education, consider that Massachusetts’ current education budget for fiscal 2024 is $7.95 billion. The fact that pension contributions have increased by 5 percentage points translates into $398 million per year of additional money going into the fund than if the share had remained at its 2015 level.

This means that the state has $398 million fewer dollars per year to dedicate to important expenditures such as salaries for new teachers, classroom resources, or support services such as counselors, technicians, or librarians.

State revenues generally rise of course, as they have in recent years, giving the state more money at its disposal to offset these increases. For example, while pension contributions per pupil in Massachusetts have risen by 109 percent since 2015, revenues per pupil have increased by 21 percent, softening the blow.

Yet this pace of revenue growth is not guaranteed. While Massachusetts fiscal 2025 budget foresees a $2 billion or roughly 3.5 percent spending increase, the incremental revenues are coming mostly from the significant Fair Share tax increase. Money to fund education, pensions, and other public priorities does not grow on trees. It comes out of taxpayers’ pockets.

Advertisement

Massachusetts officials could address the pension challenge through one key policy change: moving new employees from traditional defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans similar to 401(k)s.

Current teachers typically receive pensions based on a formula that uses a series of inputs including employees’ salaries, the ages of the employees, and the number of years of employees’ service. If an employee leaves their job, pension benefits are reduced or lost.

401(k)-type plans conversely require the state to contribute a flat percent of pay to a tax-deferred account as long as the employee is working in the job. Employees who leave the job can take their full accumulated retirement savings with them, and the state avoids the creation of more long-term obligations.

The mobility of 401(k)-type plans could attract more young people to the teaching profession, since they often prioritize flexibility early in their careers. While public sector defined benefit plans tend to be more generous than private sector 401(k) plans, that difference can be reduced by offering higher employer contributions. This setup would vastly improve the state’s finances while ensuring that retirement contributions do not continue to consume ever-increasing shares of education budgets.

Ultimately the burden of pension contributions will threaten the Commonwealth’s ability to remain a national leader in education. It would serve the state and its valued teachers well to move to a more sustainable model for retirement benefits before it’s too late.

Advertisement

Joshua Rauh is a professor of finance at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. Gregory Kearney is a senior research analyst at the Hoover Institution.






Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts police charge 3 teenagers in alleged assault of trans teen

Published

on

Massachusetts police charge 3 teenagers in alleged assault of trans teen


Police in Massachusetts have charged three teenagers with assault and battery for allegedly assaulting a transgender boy.

The Gloucester Police Department filed the charges against the unnamed teenagers, two of whom are 17 years old and one of whom is 16 years old, after what it called a “months-long investigation” in a Friday press release.

The department said in the release that the investigation was assigned a hate crime investigator but the evidence did not support hate crime charges.

“Our department conducted a meticulous, thorough, and compassionate investigation, and the resulting charges are consistent with the evidence,” Gloucester Police Chief Edward Conley said in the statement.

Advertisement

Trans teen knew alleged assailants through football

Police responded to report of an assault during a party in a wooded area in Gloucester, approximately 38 miles northeast of Boston, on Aug. 30, according to the press release.

Jasmine Tkaczyk, mother to victim 16-year-old Jayden Tkaczyk, wrote in a now-deleted Facebook post that her son was left with a broken nose after being beaten, kicked into a rock and stomped in the face as the alleged attackers used anti-LGBTQ slurs against him, according to MassLive.

Jasmine Tkaczyk did not immediately respond to a request for comment from USA TODAY.

“One second, I was having fun, the next second, I was on the ground getting my face stomped and beat up,” Jayden told NBC News. “They were just saying the F slur over and over and over as they were punching me and stomping me.”

Advertisement

Jayden, who is a transgender boy, told reporters at the time that he knew his alleged assailants through playing high school football at Gloucester High School.

The charged teens will face a Clark Magistrate hearing to determine if there is probable cause for the charges to proceed.



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Who’s the most popular NFL player in Massachusetts? He doesn’t play for the Patriots

Published

on

Who’s the most popular NFL player in Massachusetts? He doesn’t play for the Patriots


Who is the most popular NFL player in Massachusetts? Hint: It’s not a New England Patriot.

According to a new study from FlashPicks, a sports betting website, the most popular NFL player in Massachusetts as well as in an astonishing 48 other states is Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce.

FlashPicks’ study is based on analyzing Google search data in all 50 states this year. It found that Kelce receives a whopping 4.75 million average monthly searches 3 million more than any other NFL player (his teammate, quarterback Patrick Mahomes, is second with 1.68 million monthly searches).

Advertisement

While the 35-year-old Kelce has been a very fine player for a long time he’s a four-time All-Pro there’s another obvious reason why he’s so popular in search: his yearlong-plus relationship with mega-pop star Taylor Swift. So his personal life has clearly had a positive impact on his commerciality, FlashPicks’ research shows.

There’s only one state in which Kelce is not first in search

The only state in which Kelce is not the undisputed top the No. 1 searched player? Minnesota, whose fans are apparently still brooding over the loss of longtime quarterback Kirk Cousins (110,000 monthly searches), who left the Vikings this past offseason via free agency for the Atlanta Falcons. In neighboring Wisconsin, Kelce is tied for the top spot with former Green Bay Packers (and current New York Jets) quarterback Aaron Rodgers (90,500 monthly searches).

In Massachusetts, Kelce receives 135,000 searches per month, more than double anyone else, according to FlashPicks. Second place is also not a New England Patriot at least not anymore. It’s former quarterback Mac Jones, who was traded by the Patriots to the Jacksonville Jaguars earlier this year and who gets 60,500 searches every month. 

Rodgers is tied for third with Mahomes, as each receives an average of 40,500 searches per month in Massachusetts. Finally, in fifth place, is current Patriots quarterback Drake Maye, who is searched for 33,100 times every month in Massachusetts.

Advertisement

The rest of the top 10 for Massachusetts searches: San Francisco 49ers quarterback Brock Purdy (sixth, 27,100 monthly searches); 49ers running back Christian McCaffrey, Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow and Miami Dolphins wide receiver Tyreek Hill (tie for seventh, 22,200 searches); and Chicago Bears quarterback Caleb Williams, Los Angeles Rams quarterback (and former Patriot) Jimmy Garoppolo and Buffalo Bills quarrterback Josh Allen (tie for 10th, 18,100 monthly searches).



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending