Massachusetts
‘A bloodbath’: New wave of cuts to NIH research grants hit Mass. hard – The Boston Globe
Charlton no longer had money to pay her staff or any of her researchers. On Monday afternoon, she called and fired the center’s executive director — who just months earlier had uprooted her family and relocated from Los Angeles.
“It breaks my heart to see years of work wiped off the map,” said Charlton, associate professor and founding director of the LGBTQ Health Center of Excellence at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. “I’m not sure we will ever recover.”
In what has become a weekly ritual, the NIH on Friday afternoon abruptly terminated tens of millions of health research grants in New England and around the country. The latest round of cuts strikes deep at the heart of the medical research infrastructure in Greater Boston, imperiling years of research into disease prevention and health disparities among traditionally underserved populations, according to a half-dozen health researchers whose funding was cut Friday.
Among those hardest hit is the research arm of Fenway Health, which for five decades has pioneered infectious disease research in the gay and lesbian community. On Friday, the NIH terminated five of its research grants. These included multi-year studies into prevention and treatment of HIV for adolescents and the effects of social isolation among older LGBTQ people. Including Friday’s cuts, the Fenway Institute has seen a dozen of its 27 NIH grants terminated since Trump took office — amounting to $1.8 million in lost funding.
“It’s being called a bloodbath,” said Dr. Kenneth Mayer, medical research director at Fenway Health. “The government is essentially saying that, only certain people with certain characteristics matter… and the less you know the better.”
An NIH spokesperson did not respond to questions about the scale and legality of the NIH cuts, instead sharing a link to an agency website and a list of terminated grants. The list shows that more than 300 NIH research grants — with anticipated funding of nearly $200 million — were cancelled between Feb. 20 and last Thursday, March 20th. The cancellations from last Friday are not included in the latest tally.
The cuts are part of the Trump administration’s crackdown on research focused on gender and diversity issues, and appear to violate federal court orders blocking the NIH cuts.
Two legal experts who reviewed NIH termination letters shared with the Globe said they violate federal administrative process law, which prohibits “arbitrary and capricious” policy changes. The mass cancellations also violate contract law because the NIH is imposing conditions on research projects that did not exist at the time the grants were awarded, the legal experts said.
“These terminations are illegal,” said David Super, a constitutional law expert at Georgetown Law, who reviewed the termination letters at the Globe’s request. “NIH has no authority to cancel these contracts without individualized assessments, and doing so violates court orders against blanket cutoffs of legally obligated federal funding.”
The financial impact of the grant cuts has rippled through universities, hospitals and other research institutions in Massachusetts, which is the largest recipient of NIH grant funding per capita. Already, academic scientists are warning of a massive brain drain, as graduate students and post doctoral researchers rethink their futures and consider whether to abandon medical research entirely.
More than a dozen universities, including Harvard, MIT, Brown, and the University of Pennsylvania, have frozen hiring, and the University of Massachusetts’ medical school has rescinded dozens of admissions offers to Ph.D. candidates.
“This could destroy a generation of scientists,” said Dr. Bruce Fischl, a professor of radiology at Harvard Medical School. “A lot of young people see the potential dismantling of medical research and they don’t want to stick around for it.”
Julia Marcus, an infectious disease epidemiologist and associate professor of population medicine at Harvard Medical School, said she burst into tears after the NIH abruptly terminated three of her research grants late last week. Among them was a $2.5 million grant that funded a five-year study exploring the implementation of a long-acting, injectable drug that has been shown to be highly effective at preventing HIV.
Now, she is scrambling to find money to issue paychecks to her research team.
“It’s peak inefficiency,” Marcus said of the cuts. “We poured so much time and effort into this study and then to have it terminated, on the verge of a payoff is, well, I’m running out of words.”
Nearly all biomedical researchers in academia rely to some extent on support from the NIH. Laboratories are run like small businesses, with scientists constantly applying for grants to pay for salaries, supplies and computers. Preparing a grant proposal for the NIH is a monthslong process, with many grant applications running more than 100 pages long, say university researchers.
Some researchers said they were hopeful the NIH cuts that began in earnest last month would slow, or even stop, after the courts intervened. A federal judge in Maryland twice over the past six weeks blocked the administration from terminating funding, saying in his most recent decision that the cuts “punish, or threaten to punish, individuals and institutions based on the content of their speech, and in doing so they specifically target viewpoints the government seems to disfavor.”
But the NIH continues to send out large batches of termination notices, which often arrive in researchers’ email inboxes on Friday afternoons. Many share nearly identical phrasing, including, “This award no longer effectuates agency priorities.”
“Research programs based primarily on artificial and non-scientific categories, including amorphous equity objectives, are antithetical to the scientific inquiry… and ultimately do not enhance health, lengthen life, or reduce illness,” one of the form letters says.
Ariel Beccia, an instructor at the LGBTQ center at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, has spent the past two years studying how the COVID-19 pandemic caused health disparities to widen among LGBTQ people; and had entered the most important phase of the study exploring the factors causing the diverse outcomes. A grant from the NIH funded her data analysis work as well as her salary.
Like many of her peers, Beccia has been anxious about losing her grant money since February when Trump issued a series of directives aimed at rooting out “gender ideology.”
Then last Friday afternoon, Beccia was anxiously rebooting her email when a termination letter appeared in her inbox at 4:30 p.m. In a moment, she learned that her sole source of income, including the money she needs to buy groceries and pay rent on her Cambridge apartment, had vanished. Like many of her peers, Beccia is now scrambling to raise money from private funding sources — but the grants are smaller than those awarded by the NIH and the competition is fierce.
In her case, the NIH form letter said diversity, equity and inclusion studies “are often used to support unlawful discrimination” and harm the health of Americans. “It’s disgusting and wildly incorrect,” Beccia said of the letter. “Everyone has a gender identity. So research related to gender is critically important to improving health.”
On Tuesday afternoon, Charlton held a Zoom call to deliver the grim news about the NIH cuts to a dozen members of her research team. They were already reeling from an earlier round of notifications that had terminated a five-year, $4 million study to explore how discriminatory laws, such as so-called “Don’t Say Gay” bills, impact mental health among LGBTQ adolescents and how the laws can potentially lead to suicide. Charlton’s team had interviews lined up with more than 100 adolescents across the country when the termination note arrived.
On the call, Charlton became emotional as she explained that she no longer had the money to pay them but was aggressively seeking private donations to fill the gap.
“I am feeling really hopeful that we’ll figure this out,” she said. “But I also believe it’s going to get a lot worse before it gets better.”
Chris Serres can be reached at chris.serres@globe.com. Follow him @ChrisSerres.
Massachusetts
The challenges and joys of being a Christmas tree farmer in Massachusetts
Local News
Christmas tree season is short, intense, and years in the making.
Christmas tree farmers across Massachusetts had their own kind of Black Friday this year. On Nov. 28, Governor Maura Healey dubbed the day “Green Friday,” a push to kick off the holiday season while spotlighting the state’s Christmas tree and nursery industries.
While shoppers elsewhere woke before dawn to map out traffic-free routes, scour deals, and stack lawn chairs in car trunks to claim a place in line, farmers were already in the thick of a different kind of rush — one that had been years in the making.
The Christmas tree season, after all, begins long before the holidays arrive. For Meagan MacNeill, the new co-owner of River Wind Tree Farm in Lancaster, this year marked her very first season in the business. And as it turned out, she was unprepared, she said.
Customers began gathering at 9 a.m., an hour before opening, eager to flood the fields and begin their search for the perfect tree. It was all-hands on deck for the MacNeills; Meagan assembled both her immediate and extended family to help out.
The season began and closed in a flash. They sold out of cut-your-own trees the very next day, on Saturday, Nov. 29, and of pre-cut trees two weekends later.
The one word Meagan used to describe the season? “Insanity,” she said without missing a beat.
“I think it’s a new Olympic sport, getting the biggest and best Christmas tree,” she added with a laugh.
The challenges
The MacNeills are one of 459 Christmas tree farms across the state, which operate on nearly 3,000 acres of land and contribute more than $4.5 million to the local economy every year.
Like MacNeill, many farmers sold out of trees quicker this year than in years past (particularly since before the pandemic), according to David Morin, the communications liaison and former president of the Massachusetts Christmas Tree Association. He also owns Arrowhead Acres in Uxbridge, a Christmas tree farm and wedding venue.
Pre-pandemic, he was open for four weekends: Thanksgiving weekend, plus the three following it. He doubled his sales in 2020 during the pandemic. Now, he’s struggling to meet demand with a lower inventory.
“I was lucky to make it through two weekends. I actually shut down early on the second weekend because I didn’t have enough trees,” he said.
It’s not just that individual farms are struggling to meet demand, but that the number of farms nationally are dwindling. Between 2002 and 2022, the number of farms growing Christmas trees fell by nearly 30%, down from more than 13,600 to about 10,000, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation, an agricultural organization.
Why are there fewer farms? Illan Kessler, who operates North Pole Xmas Trees, a wholesale grower in Colebrook, New Hampshire and choose-and-cut Noel’s Tree Farm in Litchfield, attributed the decline to farmers aging out of the industry. This, coupled with a lack of interest from the next generation to continue the business, means fewer farms.
“They get older, and then no one takes over, so there’s less and less tree farms,” he said.
It takes between seven and 10 years to grow a Christmas tree. Farmers are competing not just with national chains like Home Depot or Walmart — which “are super-influencers when it comes to price,” Kessler said — but also with artificial Christmas tree suppliers.
“The artificial Christmas tree companies make so much revenue that they have a marketing budget that eclipses — at a magnitude of thousands-to-one — what real Christmas tree growers have to promote and market their own products,” Kessler added.
Prices of trees have gone up this year compared to last too, driven by inflation and tariffs along with a dwindling labor force and increasing costs of seedlings and machinery, Kessler and Morin said.
Morin likened being a Christmas tree farmer to a “love-hate” relationship.
“The week after you’ve sold the trees, you’re in love with them. But for the other 11 months of the year, if it isn’t gypsy moths or caterpillars or one kind of a bug or another, or lack of rain or too much rain, it’s a constant hassle,” he said.
But despite it all, they wouldn’t give it up for the world.
“It’s like a Hallmark movie,” said Kessler. “We love selling Christmas trees, and we are super grateful to be in this business. I feel so blessed. I love what I do,” he added.
Joy to the world
Meagan and Steven MacNeill had dreamed of owning a Christmas tree farm in Vermont when they were newlyweds, but life got in the way. Before becoming farmers, Meagan worked as a school counselor, and Steven worked as a pharmacist — a job he still holds full time, she said.
“I knew, for me in particular, the traditional kind of 9-to-5 job didn’t feel right,” she said. She started working at a garden center and volunteering at an alpaca farm in Harvard on Sundays to satisfy the itch to be outdoors working in nature. Her husband later joined her at the alpaca farm, and it became their Sunday morning tradition for almost two years.
The couple bought River Wind Tree Farm in June from the Wareck family, fulfilling their two-decades-old dream to be Christmas tree farmers.
But it wasn’t the fairy tale they had dreamed it to be. From learning to identify the farm’s many tree varieties — including exotic Christmas trees such as Nordmann fir, Korean balsam, and noble fir — to navigating drought and pest pressures, the experience was as much a challenge as it was a labor of love for the MacNeill family.
“The way the season looked was kind of a crapshoot because we had no idea what we were doing,” Meagan laughed. “It’s been a big learning curve for us. We still have a ton to learn.”
The MacNeills plan on adding alpacas to the farm next year, and are getting creative on keeping revenue flowing outside of the Christmas tree season by holding photoshoots at the farm.
Despite the arduous work, whirlwind season, years of preparation, and fierce competition, Meagan is grateful to be in the industry — and she’s not looking back.
For many Christmas tree farmers, herself included, the pull is hard to define. It’s rooted in community, tradition, and the simple joy of bringing people together for the holidays.
“It’s the joy of people coming to pick out their Christmas tree, and even having my family be a part of it,” Meagan said. “People coming out and just connecting to the land for a little while, or being with their family, and having these traditions that are not centered around electronics, but just being present. It’s so special.”
The Queue: holiday streaming edition
Massachusetts
Driver charged in Plymouth hit-and-run
Authorities said a driver is facing charges after a hit-and-run crash left a pedestrian badly hurt this weekend in Plymouth, Massachusetts.
The crash happened around 6:30 p.m. Saturday on Court Street. Police said the driver briefly stopped before fleeing the scene.
The victim was airlifted to a Boston hospital with critical injuries. Plymouth police said Monday that the patient is in stable condition and faces a long road to recovery.
The driver, identified as Francis Kelly of Plymouth, is charged with negligent operation and leaving the scene of a crash causing personal injury.
“We would like to sincerely thank the public for the tips provided and for sharing surveillance footage that proved critical to this investigation,” Plymouth Police Capt. Marc Higgins said in a statement. “Incidents like this underscore the strength of community cooperation in supporting victims and ensuring accountability.”
Massachusetts
White Christmas chances rise in western Massachusetts
CHICOPEE, Mass. (WWLP) – There is a chance for snow leading up to Christmas.
In western Massachusetts, the chances for a white Christmas go up the farther north you are or the closer you are to the Berkshires. In Springfield, the chance for at least one inch of snow on Christmas Day is around 40 to 50 percent.
In Pittsfield, the chances are over 75 percent. In the extreme northwest corner of Massachusetts, near North Adams, the historical chance for a white Christmas is over 90 percent. So, it definitely helps your chances for snow if you’re in one of the higher-elevation areas.
How much snow is expected Tuesday
Light snow will begin on Tuesday around sunrise and continue on and off for much of the day until the evening. A minor accumulation is expected in the Pioneer Valley with a few inches in the hills and Berkshires. Slick roads and sidewalks are possible, especially if not treated. High temperatures will be in the low to mid-30s.
What’s the chance of a white Christmas in western Mass?
As of right now, the chances for a white Christmas this year are definitely higher than in the past few years, with some snow on Tuesday. Of course, the best chance for the snow to stick around until Christmas Day without melting will be back in the Berkshires.
December 25 2025 12:00 am
Christmas Eve and Christmas Day both look dry and comfortable.
Local News Headlines
WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Download the 22News Plus app on your TV to watch live-streaming newscasts and video on demand.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico7 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Maine7 days agoFamily in Maine host food pantry for deer | Hand Off


