Connect with us

Massachusetts

$1 million Powerball prize won in Massachusetts on Wednesday

Published

on

$1 million Powerball prize won in Massachusetts on Wednesday


Someone in Massachusetts won $1 million from a Powerball ticket they bought for the $40 million jackpot drawing on Wednesday.

The winning Powerball numbers for the July 10 drawing were 7, 11, 12, 27, 46 and Powerball: 26. The $1 million ticket sold in Massachusetts matched all five of the first numbers drawn.

The $1 million ticket was bought in Fall River from a shop called Amaral’s Market.

There was no jackpot winner during the Wednesday night drawing, rolling over the prize to $54 million. Powerball drawings are held every Monday, Wednesday and Saturday at 10:59 p.m., and tickets cost $2.

Advertisement

The largest prize won yet this year in the state was also claimed on Wednesday. It was a $1 million a year for life prize from the “Lifetime Millions” scratch ticket game. The winning ticket was sold in Bedford at Northside Market & Liquors.

Additionally, a lottery player claimed a $100,000 prize on Wednesday from a winning ticket they also purchased at Northside Market & Liquors. It was from the “$15,000,000 Money Maker” scratch ticket game.

Overall, there were more than 498 prizes worth $600 or more were won or claimed in Massachusetts on Wednesday, including 12 in Springfield, 28 in Worcester and 35 in Boston.

The Massachusetts State Lottery releases a full list of winning tickets every day. The list only includes winning tickets worth more than $600.

So far, the largest lottery prize won in Massachusetts this year was worth $1 million a year for life. The prize was from the lottery’s “Lifetime Millions” scratch ticket game, and was claimed on July 10. The winner claimed their prize through a trust, and opted to receive a one-time payment of $15.4 million.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Trump could see support grow after assassination attempt, even in blue Massachusetts

Published

on

Trump could see support grow after assassination attempt, even in blue Massachusetts


How will the assassination attempt on Trump affect polls in Massachusetts?

Advertisement


How will the assassination attempt on Trump affect polls in Massachusetts?

02:35

Advertisement

CAMBRIDGE – The image of Donald Trump with his fist in the air after an attempted assassination has already become iconic, even in some parts of traditionally blue Massachusetts. 

“I thought he was tough when he stood up and he gave the little fist-pump afterwards,” Tom Fialkosky said Monday.  

“Thank God he survived,” another voter in Billerica added.

Billerica is one of the few communities in greater Boston with a history of residents supporting Donald Trump. 

“I just kind of feel bad that happened to him,” said Elizabeth Hill. “I was just glad he got up and he was OK.”

Advertisement

Political effect of assassination attempts

Presidential historians point to Ronald Reagan, who got a bump in political support after an assassination attempt on him in 1981.

“The wave of sympathy that Reagan received when he was recovering from his wounds from John Hinckley, created this political support that translated into major legislation supporting his conservative program,” said Boston University presidential historian Tom Whalen.

Democrats worried about Trump gaining support   

New England voters on the Democratic side of the aisle worry the same kind of sympathy could translate to votes for Trump in four months. 

“I think that people will feel more on his side. I think…he’ll definitely milk the situation,” Mabel Luther said.

Whalen said whether the event will be on the mind of voters in November remains to be seen. Former president Teddy Roosevelt was shot and survived while campaigning for a third term in 1912, but still lost the race.

Advertisement

“[Trump] is going to enjoy a short-term bump,” Whalen said.. “I don’t know if he’ll be able to sustain it given his extreme views … I think that’s kind of wishful thinking if you’re on the Trump side.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts branded as most expensive state for child care costs, survey shows

Published

on

Massachusetts branded as most expensive state for child care costs, survey shows


From diapers and formula, to daycare and new clothing, it’s no surprise that the financial costs associated with caring for a child in their first years of life can come at a pretty penny — especially in Massachusetts.

While over half of Americans underestimate their state’s average cost to care for a child in their first year, Massachusetts leads the pack as the most expensive, with average annual day care alone costing $24,472 a year, according to a survey published by CardRates.com.

The survey asked 2,100 participants nationwide to estimate five child care expenses including day care, diapers, formula, food and new clothing. It found that Americans nationwide underestimate the annual costs associated with caring for a child in their first year.

  • Read more: Have thoughts on child care? The state’s Child Care Task Force wants to hear ‘em

For day care costs, Bay Staters estimated an expense of $12,738 annually — reflecting a $11,734 difference from what actual costs are according to CardRates.com.

“Therefore, the annual cost of day care is 63% higher in Massachusetts than residents expect,” the release states.

Advertisement

Trailing behind Massachusetts is Washington, D.C, at $24,417, New York at $21,826, Hawaii at $20,647, and Colorado at $19,573.

Participants from New York underestimated day care costs by $8,368, while Washington, D.C participants underestimated by $8,217, and Hawaii underestimated by $7,488.

  • Read more: Mass. Senate Dems plan vote on bill expanding access to early ed., childcare

Massachusetts ranking as the most expensive in the nation for child care may be less of a surprise to some than others.

Though Massachusetts respondents underestimated day care costs by over $10,00, organizations such as the U.S News & World Reports, reported Massachusetts as the most expensive state for day care costs as early as 2017 — reporting an annual average cost of $17,000 even at that time.

While the Bay State is the most expensive for day care costs and shows the greatest discrepancy between residents expected costs versus reality, the study shows all states underestimated the actual costs of a baby’s first year overall, being 37% more expensive than anticipated.

Respondents underestimated costs of day care, formula and food, while overestimating costs of diapers and clothes.

Advertisement

For day care, the average cost is $13,266 per year whereas the average estimate was $12,055, showing a $1,211 difference, CardRates.com reported.

For formula, the average estimate was $2,287 though the actual annual, average cost is $4,800 — a $2,513 increase from what respondents expected.

  • Read more: Free YMCA memberships available for Boston teens this summer

Overall, the survey showed child care costs are nationally underestimated by $6,934. The national average for caring for a child in their first year is $22,111 according to CardRates.com.

Data used in determining national averages was pulled from organizations such as Child Care Aware of America, BabyCenter, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Gerber Childrens wear, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Respondents from Massachusetts and New Hampshire were closest in their total annual cost estimations, differing less than $3,000, according to CardRates.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts truck safety regulations spur division in wake of Cambridge cyclist deaths

Published

on

Massachusetts truck safety regulations spur division in wake of Cambridge cyclist deaths


Opposition from a state municipal lobbying group over regulations that look to bolster safety around large trucks has drawn the ire of elected officials in Cambridge, where two cyclists have died after being struck in recent weeks.

All state-contracted trucks must be equipped with side guards, improved mirrors and backup cameras by January 2025, an order the Massachusetts Municipal Association says is “not reasonable for cities and towns.”

The private nonprofit says it understands the need for “reasonable measures to help to reduce injuries and fatalities on our roadways.”

The regulations, however, are “an unreasonable ask and considerable overstep of regulatory authority,” MMA’s executive director and CEO Adam Chapdelaine wrote in testimony to the state Department of Transportation.

Advertisement

A pair of Cambridge city councilors took to social media after listening to MMA’s testimony during a MassDOT hearing on Friday.

“These regulations will save lives,” Vice Mayor Marc McGovern posted on X. “They would have saved the lives of Kim Staley and Minh-Thi Nguyen.”

Councilor Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler added, “@massmunicipal does not represent Cambridge or plenty of other municipalities on this. When they say they speak for ‘all cities & towns’ in Massachusetts against side guards and other safety features on trucks in municipalities, they don’t speak for us.”

Staley, 55, of Florida, died on June 7 when the driver of a box truck struck her at the intersection of DeWolfe and Mt. Auburn streets, close to Memorial Drive along the Charles River. The truck, which reportedly lacked side guards, turned right as the cyclist traveled straight across, according to authorities.

Two weeks later, on June 21, Nguyen, a third-year physics graduate student at MIT, died at age 24, when a box truck driver struck her at the intersection of Hampshire and Portland streets.

Advertisement

A day before Nguyen’s death, MassDOT sent a guidance memorandum to contractors, subcontractors and municipalities, outlining the so-called “Act to Reduce Traffic Fatalities.”

The law specifically requires “a motor vehicle, trailer, semi-trailer or semi-trailer unit classified as a class 3 or above” to be equipped with a lateral protective device, convex and crossover mirrors, and backup cameras by Jan. 1, 2025.

It will apply to vehicles leased or purchased by the state or operating under a state contract after the new year. Ambulances and other emergency medical vehicles, firetrucks, agricultural tractors and state-owned vehicles leased or purchased before 2023 will be exempt.

Chapdelaine took exception to how the law includes municipal contracts funded with state aid through MassDOT and requires that any providers contracting with municipalities must comply.

Chapdelaine estimated that 90% of each municipal DPW fleet alone would require retrofits that would cost anywhere from $2,500 to $5,000.

Advertisement

“We strongly support making necessary changes to reflect the true intent of the legislation and the legal underpinning of the updated state law,” Chapdelaine added in a statement to the Herald later Friday.

Charlie Baker signed the bill on one of his last days in the governor’s office. It also requires drivers to maintain a four-foot buffer when they pass construction workers, emergency responders, pedestrians and cyclists, and established a process for municipalities to request lower speed limits on state-owned roadways.

So far this year, 11 people have been killed in crashes with large trucks across Massachusetts, according to MassBike. Within the past decade, 28% of fatal bike crashes have involved large trucks, the organization states.

Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Newton, have already enacted similar requirements for their respective municipal agencies and contractors.

Charlotte Fleetwood, a senior transportation planner in Boston, said the ordinance is “not perfect but we believe it has saved lives.” The city recently purchased surround cameras for all of its large fleet vehicles, and officials are working with MassDOT to measure blind zones, she said.

Advertisement

Fleetwood is calling for federal action to require large vehicles be designed to be “inherently safer without these large blind zones and side cavities.”

In late March, a 4-year-old girl, Gracie Gancheva, of Denver, Colorado, died after being struck by a truck driver at an intersection near Boston Children’s Museum. Days later, a cement truck driver collided with and killed a 57-year-old man, Fernando R. Pizzaro, in a wheelchair at another South Boston intersection.

“We need to end this harm, and we can do it,” Fleetwood said.

Owners subject to the law must certify that their motor vehicle is equipped with the required devices, with certification and necessary documentation submitted to the Registry of Motor Vehicles.

Owners may apply for a waiver if their vehicle can’t comply due to the design, operation or other safety considerations.

Advertisement

The regulations have blindsided municipal officials across the state, said Bob Szocik, director of public works in Templeton, a town of roughly 8,000 in northern Worcester County.

“My heart goes out to all of the tragedies that have happened,” he said, “but from the municipality standpoint, we have not been reached out and notified about this change.”

The lack of notification will impact town budgets, Szocik said. Templeton expects to increase its fleet with new trucks in December, he added.

“Can I catch them and have them outfitted?” Szocik asked during MassDOT’s hearing. “Where am I going to get the extra money? It’s not fair to us in a short amount of time.”

Andover resident Eric Olson has turned tragedy into advocacy. His 5-year-old daughter, Sidney Mae, died in May 2023 after being struck by the driver of a tractor-trailer at a busy intersection in Merrimack Valley town.

Advertisement

An investigation into the tragedy found the driver not at fault, Essex County District Attorney Paul Tucker announced last November. The driver did not face any criminal charges.

Olson has been pushing for side guards to be required on all trucks, encouraging MassDOT to provide incentives and grants to business owners to make their vehicles safer.

“Her death shows up as a number – one,” Olson said. “But, its impact is far more rippling. … Every day, we put the livelihood and the well-being of truck drivers at risk by not properly equipping them with safety equipment. One crash can ruin a career and shatter a life.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending