Maine
The price of picking blueberries in rural Maine
Milbridge is pretty quiet for a lot of the year. A handful of businesses dot the downtown, which runs for less than half a mile along Route 1 as the road winds its way toward the Canadian border.
With fewer than 1,400 residents, Milbridge doubles its size in the late summer and then again in the fall — first for blueberry season and then for wreath processing in October. Another key industry is the nearly year-round processing of sea cucumbers, which can help make stocks for stews.
When Juana Rodriguez-Vazquez got here with her family in 1998, she was in elementary school — one of only about 150 kids her age in Milbridge at the time — but she’d already seen much of the U.S. Orange season in Florida, apple harvest in Michigan, blueberry picking in Maine.
The farms around Milbridge are dependent on people like the Rodriguez-Vazquez family because there aren’t enough residents to support the workload.
“When I was a kid, when we were traveling, I remember being out there in the fields with apples and oranges and green beans,” Rodriguez-Vazquez said. “A lot of the housing for employees, their housing is pretty much out in the fields.”
This October, about 1,000 workers arrived in the Millbridge area for the wreath season, just as the state’s Department of Labor (DOL) was hosting hearings and discussions on whether farmworkers should be included in the state’s minimum wage law.
They have long been excluded from the state’s regulations for minimum wage, an issue that lawmakers sought to address by passing a law that would have raised the base pay from the federal rate of $7.25 per hour to $13.80 per hour.
But although the law passed, Democratic Gov. Janet Mills vetoed it earlier this summer, opting instead to write an executive order that would create a committee to make recommendations about how to compromise on the issue by increasing the minimum wage while maintaining industry desires, like a potential youth exception.
It’s the second time Mills has vetoed a bill that would have added minimum wage protections for farmworkers.
But advocates for workers argue the process is flawed from the start, failing to provide legal protections for workers that speak out — favoring employers, who have freedom to speak publicly about their needs and who have the legal ability to fire workers who advocate for higher wages.
As a teenager, Rodriguez-Vazquez worked during each season that came up. Raking blueberries, making wreaths for a company that at the time supplied L.L. Bean, and processing sea cucumbers.
“They’re still getting the same pay that I got when I was 15,” Rodriguez-Vazquez said of the wreath workers working in Washington County.
She doesn’t work in the fields anymore. Since 2012, she’s been working with the Milbridge-based nonprofit Mano en Mano, which provides basic services to the local population of migrant farmworkers — this past year she was named executive director.
In the past few months, she said, the state government has put farmworkers in a position where they can’t speak up.
“I think we all know there are some power dynamics played by employers in terms of their ability to speak up, and if they do, there is retaliation in terms of loss of employment,” Rodriguez-Vazquez said. “Farmworkers haven’t had the ability to do that in a way that would feel good for them.”
The issue of minimum wage exemptions for farmworkers certainly isn’t unique to Maine. At the federal level, farms have to pay the $7.25 per hour minimum wage only if they employ “500 man-days” within a three-month period, and family members are exempt from minimum wage — a major benefit for Maine farmers, given that many are family owned and operated.
According to the National Agricultural Law Center (NALC), 22 U.S. states don’t mandate a minimum wage higher than the federal rate. Seven of those are states that actually have passed higher minimum wage laws for the state in general, but exempt agricultural workers. Massachusetts splits the difference: It generally requires employers to pay workers $14.25 per hour, but farmworkers only get $8.00.
In New York, the question of wages has pitted workers against employers in a battle that has played out in both state budget proposals and federal court rooms. In Washington and Oregon, workers won the right to overtime — in Washington, they sued the state to achieve this — and were met with strong opposition from industry groups. And at the federal level, advocacy groups like Farmworker Justice want to end the exemption that keeps farm laborers from getting minimum wage nationally.
In Maine, farmworkers find the starkest wage contrast in the nation, according to NALC’s data. The minimum wage was just increased to $15.00 per hour this summer, but farmworkers have once again been excluded. Despite the exemption, workers are still coming to Maine.
“They’re coming here and they’re able to make more than back home most of the time,” Rodriguez-Vazquez said. “They’re grateful and they don’t want to mess up anything. That can be hard as an advocate and not have a lot of say because we follow the lead of the community.”
Thom Harnett worked with migrant and seasonal farmworkers in the 1980s as a lawyer with United Farm Workers, then later pivoted to local and state politics. He was serving in Maine’s House of Representatives in 2019 when he initially introduced two bills to deal with this problem.
The first would have included agriculture in the state minimum wage and added overtime protection. The second would have allowed workers to participate in collective bargaining without fear of reprisal.
On his first try, the bills didn’t even reach a vote. It was only after several key worker protections were removed, he said, that the bills were able to be passed after being reintroduced early this year.
“The minimum wage bill was continually amended by us giving up issues like overtime,” Harnett said. “It would also have made available to farmworkers an unpaid 30-minute rest period every six hours, which is what all employees in the state of Maine get … and it would have limited overtime to no more than 80 hours of mandatory overtime in a two-week period, meaning that you could not force people to work more than 160 hours in a two-week period.”
The Maine Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association (MOFGA) put out a statement after Mills’ summer veto saying they were “astounded” at her decision and casting doubt on her desire to find a compromise, noting that her opposition came from the amendments to the bill and not the plan to increase the minimum wage itself.
“It is impossible to accept this explanation of her action,” said MOFGA executive director Heather Spalding. “It is disingenuous for her to say that she supports minimum wage for farmworkers when she won’t even allow a stripped-down bill with many exemptions for agricultural employers to pass into law.”
The DOL declined several requests for an interview on the topic, and the governor’s spokesperson did not respond to an interview request. The state is in the middle of hearing input in its committee about how to resolve the issue. They are hearing from farmers, the AFL-CIO, MOFGA, and lobbyists from associations that represent every major crop in the state.
But to Rodriguez-Vazquez, there is a fundamental flaw in the approach: Without protections for workers themselves, they can’t actually speak about their own experience.
“I think it’s hard when there’s a system where you see the resources, the power, the protection, the privilege that farm owners, farm employers have over their employees,” she said. “They’re working for an employer that basically has a lot of power over their hours, their housing, their wage, everything … Farmers, they can speak up, they have nothing to lose in terms of being able to speak up.”
The Maine AFL-CIO has been participating in the DOL’s committee hearings, and executive director Matt Schlobohm said he felt the executive order Mills issued indicated a desire to include farmworkers in the state minimum wage.
That said, the issues he’s noticed in hearings so far is the way farms and lobbyist groups are concerned about specific circumstances, like wanting to carve out an exception for youth workers. He said farmers and agricultural lobbyists have also voiced a desire to ensure that the minimum wage protection isn’t included in the same section of state law that covers minimum wage generally.

Lobbying groups have routinely pointed to pressure from clients like grocery stores as the price fixers in agriculture, saying that meeting the minimum wage will drive farms out of business because they can’t raise the prices supermarkets and restaurants will pay.
The Maine Farm Bureau, one of the groups that opposed the bill before it was vetoed, has used the committee process to advocate for carve-outs rather than fully opposing a minimum wage increase.
Julie Ann Smith, the bureau’s director, told the Maine Morning Star in September that her group supported the effort in general but wanted there to be a smaller minimum wage for youth workers and protection for piece-rate systems where they exist. She also opposed overtime protections for workers.
To Schlobohm, the fundamental economics of agriculture — particularly in a state like Maine with shorter harvest seasons — can exacerbate tensions for workers.
“It in part translates into certain farmers getting pitted against farmworkers that muddies the more systemic issues: that our model of food economics are just incredibly brutal to farmworkers and small farms alike,” he said. “There are times where I’m frustrated, at times I don’t feel like I have an answer. Obviously we should have a minimum wage, but how can we have a healthy, sustainable food system? Because that’s obviously not what we have now.”
Beyond the industry perspective being heard in Augusta, Maine’s deeply mixed political environment can also prove complicated.
Jeff Spinney owns the small family-run Albee Farm in Alna that his wife has managed since they bought it several years ago. He primarily has family work on the property to cultivate fruits and veggies, which they sell locally, but regularly brings in outside employees when there is a larger project.
“You cannot artificially — from the government — say that you have to pay a certain rate for a certain thing that just isn’t worth it,” Spinney said, arguing the market for farm labor couldn’t sustain $15 per hour. In his view, he said, farmworkers simply aren’t worth that amount of money.
“You can make all the compelling, feel-good arguments you want, but certain things are just worth certain amounts. You can’t force it.”
He called the problem one of entitlement and argued that it was less about the economics of agriculture and said it was employees “own fault” if they were stuck in a job that didn’t pay well.
“Those workers need to figure out if it’s sustainable to them,” he said. “If it’s not sustainable to them, then quite frankly they shouldn’t do it, they should go do something else.”
Despite the challenges of operating on tight margins, not all Maine farmers share Spinney’s view. MOGFA and other Maine farming groups have come out in support of the wage increase, while farmer Glenn Shourds of Bowdoinham told a local CBS affiliate, “If they’re going to work as hard as they do, they deserve equal pay.”
“They’ve never really been treated as employees. They’ve been a class of their own. And that’s not fair,” he continued.
The final committee hearing took place in Augusta on December 11, and the DOL will put together a report with suggestions.
Schlobohm said he thinks the 2024 legislative session will end with farmworkers included in the minimum wage, even if other worker protections are still missing. Both Schlobohm and Rodriguez-Vazquez noted the state hadn’t provided a way for farmworkers to speak in support of the minimum wage without fear or retaliation.
Rodriguez-Vazquez, in reflecting on her own journey from working on farms to educating the children of migrant workers — and now advocating for them formally — said she still fears reprisal when she speaks out due to the mentality that protection for workers is bad for business.
“I think for me it’s hard, my family is a business-owning family in the town of Milbridge,” she said. “For me to speak up, there is retaliation even to me and my family. There are employers that are against this … Anything that’s out there that I’ve said can come back to hurt my family and I don’t want to do that.”
Maine
Maine man accused of lighting bed on fire after fight with girlfriend
WISCASSET, Maine (WMTW) – A Maine man has been arrested after police say he intentionally set a bed on fire after a dispute with his girlfriend, while they were still in it.
Police responded Monday, March 9, to a report of a fire that had been intentionally set inside a home on Beechnut Hill Road, according to the Wiscasset Police Department.
Investigators say the homeowner, Terry Couture, 41, set the bed on fire following an argument while both he and his girlfriend were in it. Authorities said the fire was extinguished and no serious injuries were reported.
Couture was arrested and charged with attempted murder, arson, aggravated criminal mischief, and domestic violence criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon.
The investigation is ongoing.
Copyright 2026 WABI. All rights reserved.
Maine
Celebrate Maine Maple Weekend at Williams Family Farm
CLIFTON, Maine (WABI) – Maine Maple Sunday is less than two weeks away, and the Williams Family Farm in Clifton is gearing up for one of the sweetest seasons yet.
A long stretch of frost and snow meant a late start this year, but the first boil of sap has finally run through the evaporator, and maple season is officially underway.
At Williams Family Farm, everything is done by hand:
- Fresh maple syrup, bottled on-site
- Maple sugar, carefully extracted in small batches
- Baked candied pecans, cashews, and more
The Williams family has spent years working with whatever weather sends their way.
Long winters, surprise warmups, and everything in between—they’ve learned how to adapt so community members can enjoy their products.
As co-owner John Williams explains, the key is in the temperature.
“You need to have it warm during the day and still freezing at night, so typically that’s the middle of February,” said Williams. “We have a lot of trees, so we have to start tapping them before the conditions are ideal, so we start tapping way before it’s time for it to run just so we can get them all tapped. If you have ten trees in your backyard, you want to wait until roughly now, the middle of February to now, and when it’s actually running and put them in then because you can put all your taps in, in one day.”
They’re excited to welcome the community during Maine Maple Weekend on March 21 and 22.
They will be boiling up sap, hosting demonstrations, and providing free samples.
Locals can also join them for their third annual pancake breakfast where all proceeds are donated to Holbrook Recreation.
Follow the link to find out their hours for March and more.
Copyright 2026 WABI. All rights reserved.
Maine
AI comes with dangers and opportunities. How is Maine responding?
The ad begins with a woman standing in a department store who sort of looks like Gov. Janet Mills, but not quite.
“Introducing the Janet Mills collection, featuring a confusing choice that forces girls to compete against biological males,” the female narrator says over banal instrumental music as the video cuts to “Mills” holding a stopwatch by an outdoor track.
The Mills collection comes “with a no-parent-permission-required estrogen kit,” the narrator continues, as the imposter holds a kit of syringes while patting a boy’s hair, which seems suspiciously stiff. The commercial ends with a real picture of the governor.
As far as ads generated by artificial intelligence go, the one from the National Republican Senatorial Committee is not very convincing. But the commercial serves as a reminder about how the emerging technology is being integrated into political campaigns and other areas of life in Maine.
If state Democratic leaders get their way, AI-generated ads like this won’t be allowed in Maine without a disclaimer.
As AI technology rapidly improves, state policymakers are weighing a variety of measures that could affect how Mainers interact with it. They are taking a two-pronged approach to protect people, especially children, from potential harms — while also preparing for the possible benefits.
The technology comes in the form of virtual personal assistants, internet search results and targeted advertising by businesses. It’s being used by governments for things ranging from traffic signals to budgets and policymaking to facial recognition to surveillance.
Mills said in a written statement that AI could help improve lives, drive economic growth and solve complex problems, but that it must be used in a “prudent, responsible, and ethical manner.”
“As AI becomes more prevalent in our society, its considerable promise must be balanced against harms — known and unforeseen — that can emerge from its widespread use,” she said. “It’s clear we’re only at the beginning of AI’s evolution.”
The governor has proposed $6.7 million in her supplemental budget to begin implementing some of the recommendations of a 21-member task force she created last year to study the issue.
Her proposal, which is being reviewed by lawmakers, would create a statewide AI literacy campaign; fund local and state partnerships to help municipalities use the technology and offer grants to support job training programs to keep Maine’s workforce competitive and productive in AI-enabled workplaces, among other things.
Lawmakers, meanwhile, are considering bills to address potential harms. In a rare bipartisan move, Republicans and Democrats voted unanimously last month in support of a bill (LD 524) making AI-generated child sex abuse material illegal. But that bill must receive about $55,000 before it can be sent to the governor.
They are also considering bills:
- To require political ads in state and local elections to include a disclosure when AI-generated or altered material is used (LD 517).
- To stop human-like chatbots or social AI companions from interacting with children (LD 2162).
- And to regulate how the technology is used in mental health settings (LD 2082).
Last year, lawmakers passed a measure including AI-generated images in the state’s ban on so-called “revenge porn,” and one requiring companies to inform consumers when they’re interacting with an AI assistant. Mills signed both into law.
Other proposals regulating AI use in medical and dental insurance claims and in setting rents died in committees. So did one prohibiting the use of AI in “dynamic pricing,” in which businesses use the technology to offer different real-time prices to different consumers.
Over 1,000 measures focusing on artificial intelligence were debated in state capitols last year, the National Conference of State Legislatures said.
Some states, such as Colorado and California, are taking steps to enact a broad regulatory framework for AI. California has provisions preventing discrimination in the workplace and requiring watermarks on AI content and transparency around data used to produce reports.
But Maine lawmakers are seeking to address potential harms on a case-by-case basis — at least for now.
“I think of it as almost a whack-a-mole type of approach where we are developing legislation that very narrowly addresses specific harms of AI,” said Rep. Amy Kuhn, D-Falmouth, who is taking the lead for House Democrats.
“That sort of overarching regulatory framework just feels a little premature for Maine to me right now. I want to see that work its way through the states and let some other states take a swing before we get in there.”
Republicans, however, are worried about overregulation.

Rep. Jennifer Poirier, R-Skowhegan, said her caucus is focused on protecting children from potential harms associated with AI, but she worries that regulation will never keep up with AI’s evolution.
“You can’t always legislate your way out of everything,” Poirier said. “If you have a minor that has access to AI, and it can be used to harm them in any way, it’s our responsibility as adults to keep them safe. … But we are adults, and we need to use our own common sense.”
A recent poll from Pan Atlantic Research showed widespread concern about AI, with 66% of the 810 Mainers surveyed saying they’re mostly concerned about the potential problems of AI, while 25% were mostly optimistic.
More advanced programs can generate text, analyze reports and create increasingly lifelike images and videos. A recent AI video purporting to show Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt throwing down over the death of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein raised alarm bells in Hollywood over its realism.
Other programs have been used by businesses in ways critics say can be exploitative. Consumer Reports recently published a story about how the online grocery shopping service Instacart used AI to charge certain customers higher prices — up to 23% more — if they were flagged as having higher incomes. Instacart reportedly stopped offering stores this option for “surveillance pricing” after the story was published in December.
A lobbying effort is underway to promote AI regulation in Maine. The “Protect What’s Human” campaign launched a website earlier this year, and a spokesperson said they have invested about $210,000 in ads supporting AI regulations. The commercials are targeting Republicans voters in the Bangor and Portland regions. The group is planning to spend another $110,000 on TV, streaming services, social media and podcasts.
Other proposals passed by the Legislature reflect lawmakers’ attempts to get ahead of the AI issue in indirect ways.
The House and Senate have each recently passed a strict data privacy law that would greatly restrict the amount of data — a person’s location, browsing and shopping histories and biometric information, for example— that companies can collect, store and sell. One of the main arguments was that such data can be used to train AI models. However, the chambers will have to iron out the differences between their two versions of the measure, LD 1822, if it is to become law.
And local residents are beginning to grapple with proposed data centers, which have been controversial in other parts of the county because they consume large amounts of water. This is especially true for centers powering AI.
Lawmakers are considering a bill, LD 307, to create a moratorium on such centers and establish a state council to study and review the impact of building them in Maine.
Construction is underway on a data center in Aroostook County, while another is being proposed in Sanford. Others have been proposed in Wiscasset and Lewiston, but did not move forward.
“This whole world is shifting to computer everything,” Poirier said, “and it’s important that we keep up with the times on that.”
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Maryland1 week agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Pennsylvania5 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Florida1 week agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Sports6 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death
-
Virginia6 days agoGiants will hold 2026 training camp in West Virginia
-
Detroit, MI4 days agoU.S. Postal Service could run out of money within a year

