Connect with us

Maine

Southern Maine residents say they’re being priced out of once-affordable city

Published

on

Southern Maine residents say they’re being priced out of once-affordable city


Daniel Boucher appears to be like out of his condo in Biddeford. Boucher has served on a particular process drive charged with the right way to protect and create inexpensive housing in Biddeford, the place rents have elevated dramatically prior to now few years. Derek Davis/Workers Photographer

If it was as much as Michelle Byras she’d be residing in an condo in Biddeford together with her kids and grandchildren.

However after transferring out of a $2,400-a-month condo she shared with one other household, Byras has been unable to seek out an condo she will afford. She’s watched helplessly as buildings offered and rents jumped dramatically in a metropolis as soon as generally known as an inexpensive place to dwell.

“They’re scooping up all of the buildings in Biddeford, fixing up the residences, and charging New York costs,” stated Byras, who’s now paying $325 every week for a winter rental in Lisbon whereas she appears to be like for an condo.

Advertisement

Many long-term Biddeford residents are struggling to maintain up with the price of housing. A metropolis survey performed final summer season discovered that 70% of respondents knew somebody who needed to transfer as a result of it was too costly. 

Metropolis officers are actually contemplating methods to protect and create extra inexpensive housing whereas sustaining town’s socioeconomic variety.

“We’re making an attempt to assist cease long-term residents from being priced out,” stated Doris Ortiz, a metropolis councilor and chairperson of a process drive that spent the previous 12 months inspecting methods to deal with Biddeford’s inexpensive housing disaster.

The ultimate suggestions from the Mayor’s Reasonably priced Housing Job Power can be offered to the Metropolis Council this month. They mirror a number of efforts in Portland and embrace adopting inclusionary zoning, creating an Affording Housing Fund, and a purpose of making or preserving 900 inexpensive items by 2028. The duty drive stopped in need of recommending hire management.

Revitalization work led by Coronary heart of Biddeford started in 2004, 5 years earlier than town’s final textile mill closed and eight years earlier than town bought the Maine Vitality Restoration Middle, which included the trash incinerator that dominated the downtown panorama. Shawn Patrick Ouellette/Workers Photographer

Advertisement

‘A VERY TOUGH TIME’

Town council started housing affordability a number of years in the past as Biddeford’s revitalization drew extra individuals to town. It adopted an early set of targets: enhance house possession, create extra “subsequent house” alternatives for individuals to maneuver out of starter houses, and rehabilitate rental items to ensure they’re lead-free.

Town needed to create or protect 450 items of inexpensive housing annually for 5 years to serve individuals incomes 40% to 80% of the median earnings and create a minimum of 200 first-time homeownership alternatives for households incomes between 80% and 120% of the median earnings.

Quickly after these targets had been adopted, the pandemic hit. The influence on Biddeford housing was evident virtually instantly as skyrocketing housing prices pushed individuals out of huge cities all alongside the East Coast and distant staff moved to Maine.

Many introduced incomes that permit them to pay increased rents, native officers say. In only a few years, the elevated rental prices far outpaced the incomes of working-class residents.

Advertisement

Market rents in Biddeford – the place for many years it was straightforward to seek out inexpensive residences – have risen steeply since 2012, from $863 for a two-bedroom condo that 12 months to $1,211 in 2020, a 40% enhance in eight years. Some premier downtown rents are actually greater than$2,500 a month.

“It’s a really powerful time to be in Biddeford or a coastal group just like Biddeford as a result of individuals from Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York are coming right here,” stated Daniel Boucher, a member of the housing process drive. “You don’t need to dwell the place you’re employed now in lots of instances. It’s modified the way in which individuals are housing and the place they need to dwell.”

Since 2012, greater than 800 multifamily buildings had been offered and by 2020 had been fetching upward of $94,000 per unit, up from lower than $53,000 per unit three years in the past, based on an evaluation from town’s assessing division.

Boucher, who has lived in Biddeford for 68 years and rents an condo close to downtown, has seen rents and residential costs rise to the best stage in his lifetime. He says he’s fortunate he hasn’t confronted steep hire hikes like many others.

“I’ve seen Biddeford, particularly the downtown space, on its excessive word and I’ve seen it within the ’80s at its lowest,” he stated. “Now I see a resurgence and the price of housing has gone up as a result of it’s now a pretty place to be. It’s come full circle.”

Advertisement

Daniel Boucher has served on a process drive charged with the right way to protect and create inexpensive housing in Biddeford, the place rents have elevated dramatically prior to now few years. Derek Davis/Workers Photographer

As process drive members examined the housing market, they had been confronted with a paradox: as a result of the earnings of renters in the neighborhood rose almost 52% in simply three years ($31,048 in 2017 to $47,140 in 2020) town seemed to be extra inexpensive to renters, based on the Division of Housing and City Growth’s Rental Affordability Index.

However the actuality was completely different for a lot of people. Many long-term residents pay a better share of their month-to-month earnings at present than they did after they began renting 5 or 10 years in the past, the duty drive concluded.

“The longer you’ve lived right here, the much less possible you’ll be capable to afford it,” Ortiz stated.

STRATEGIES CONSIDERED

Advertisement

After almost a 12 months of analysis and dialogue, the duty drive voted this month to current its suggestions to town council on the Jan. 24 assembly. Metropolis Supervisor James Bennett instructed the duty drive he anticipates the council will take up the problem immediately, whilst they head into the busy funds season.

“I don’t imagine there’s any member of the council that doesn’t see this as a urgent challenge,” he stated.

Probably the most important suggestion is that town adopts an inclusionary zoning ordinance that requires all new rental buildings to put aside some items as inexpensive housing.

Biddeford Metropolis Supervisor James Bennett Metropolis of Biddeford Photograph

Portland adopted an identical inclusionary zoning ordinance in 2015 that requires all new developments with 10 or extra items to fulfill a ten% workforce housing requirement or pay a payment. In 2020, voters elevated the workforce housing requirement to 25%.

Advertisement

Biddeford is contemplating a tiered strategy primarily based on the variety of inexpensive items and the way lengthy the hire can be capped primarily based on the affordability stage. For instance, if the items had been inexpensive at 80% of the world median earnings, 7.5% of items would should be inexpensive for 10 years.

Or builders may apply for a waiver and pay $100,000 per unit that might have been rented at an inexpensive charge. Smaller initiatives, between 5 and 9 items, would pay a hard and fast payment of $7,500 per unit, although some members need the council to contemplate an inexpensive unit choice, too. That cash would go into an Reasonably priced Housing Fund to help new inexpensive housing and the homeless inhabitants.

Job drive member Ian Garcia-Grant stated throughout a Jan. 3 assembly that the main focus all alongside has been on ensuring {that a} share of recent housing is locked in at inexpensive charges. 

“The extra provide we create in Biddeford, the extra demand that comes into Biddeford from the encircling space. We now have all of the overflow from Portland and its surrounding cities,” he stated. “We’re in a scenario on the bottom the place there’s primarily a limiteless demand that can at all times saturate any provide we will create.”

The duty drive finally determined hire management was not a superb match due to potential unfavorable impacts seen in different cities, together with property house owners changing rental items to condos and landlords not sustaining buildings. Ortiz stated process drive members didn’t really feel hire management would assist obtain its targets.

Advertisement

Portland, the place voters accepted hire management in 2020 and added new restrictions final 12 months, is the one Maine metropolis with community-wide hire management. The ordinance caps the quantity landlords can enhance hire yearly, places limits on safety deposits, outlines how a lot discover landlords can provide for hire will increase, and outlaws software charges.

Ortiz is keen to leap into discussions with the council, however acknowledges it’s a fancy challenge and stated “time isn’t on our facet.” She additionally is aware of town can’t repair the issue alone.

“It’s one thing that we’re making an attempt to do domestically right here, but it surely’s one thing that as a area we’re going to need to work on as effectively,” she stated. “We’re going to finish up with loads of homeless individuals. We don’t have a shelter right here and the state has not but executed one thing to assist the area. We’re making an attempt to keep away from that scenario and maintain of us right here.”


Use the shape beneath to reset your password. Once you’ve submitted your account electronic mail, we are going to ship an electronic mail with a reset code.

« Earlier

Subsequent »



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Boothbay's botanical garden wants to collect samples of every native Maine plant 

Published

on

Boothbay's botanical garden wants to collect samples of every native Maine plant 


This story first appeared in the Midcoast Update, a newsletter published every Tuesday and Friday morning. Sign up here to receive stories about the midcoast delivered to your inbox each week, along with our other newsletters.

The Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens in Boothbay has big goals for its plants. 

The gardens are now looking to build several new facilities that would total 42,000 square feet and eventually include a collection of all native Maine plant life. 

Since opening in 2007, the gardens have drawn growing numbers of visitors to the midcoast — now more than 200,000 per year — with 300 acres of plants and grounds, as well as popular holiday light displays. But after that immense growth, the organization is now looking to focus more on its research capabilities. 

Advertisement

The expansion, which still requires local approval, would include a 10,770-square-foot administrative and laboratory building, a head house, two greenhouses, a storage building, three hoop houses and several outdoor planting areas. The project would likely cost between $20 million and $25 million, with private grants helping to fund it. Construction could begin as soon as this spring.

Gretchen Ostherr, president and CEO of the gardens, said the expansion would help to pursue the gardens’ larger goal of inspiring connections between people and nature. 

“A part of that design is really about teaching people about plants and about plant conservation, and just really trying to inspire a love of plants, especially in young people, but really kids of all ages,” Ostherr said. 

While the organization currently does field research on plants, it does not have any labs where its scientists can work. Introducing a lab would allow the gardens to take more student researchers, use molecular biology and bring more educational value for visitors, according to Ostherr. 

It would also allow the organization to begin storing more plants in a variety of ways. That would include a collection of seeds from native Maine plants that have been dried and frozen — or “cryo-preserved.” The researchers would also be able to expand their herbarium — which stores plants that have been pressed onto paper — from 20,000 to 100,000 specimens. Ostherr said DNA can be extracted from these specimens. 

Advertisement

Ostherr said the goal is to prevent any Maine plants from going extinct. The herbarium would initially gather specimens of all native plants in the state. Eventually, the organization hopes to gather specimens for all of them in northern New England.

“At the end of the day, we’re all reliant on the plants for life,” Ostherr said. “You know that we will at least have the DNA material, either in seeds or in the herbarium or in cryo-preservation, so that if something happens to a plant, we would have the ability to still study it and potentially even restore it.”

The new facilities would be located behind the back parking lot of the gardens and wouldn’t be open to the public, Ostherr said. However, guests would be updated on the ongoing research by educational signs and classes. 

Ostherr noted that the new facilities would be carbon neutral, using solar panels and electric heat pumps, as well as cisterns to collect and reuse rainwater.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

How Donald Trump’s ‘day 1’ agenda would hit Maine

Published

on

How Donald Trump’s ‘day 1’ agenda would hit Maine


President-elect Donald Trump will return to the Oval Office Monday and has vowed to carry out various “day one” priorities that could affect Maine.

Although the specifics of various pledges are still unclear or subject to changes from the mercurial Republican, the promises that could come to fruition as soon as Trump’s inauguration concludes Monday touch on everything from offshore wind to Jan. 6 rioters, among other issues.

His offshore wind ban is in the works.

Maine has failed to win a massive federal grant for a contentious offshore wind port that Gov. Janet Mills is proposing on Sears Island in Searsport, but that all may not matter if Trump carries through on his vows to halt offshore wind development.

Trump reportedly told U.S. Jeff Van Drew, R-New Jersey, to draft an executive order to halt wind projects. Van Drew told the Associated Press on Wednesday his draft order would halt offshore wind development from Rhode Island to Virginia for six months.

Advertisement

That could allow Trump’s interior secretary nominee, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum, to review how leases and permits were issued. Under questioning from U.S. Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, he would not commit Thursday to honoring existing leases but generally said projects that “make sense” and are currently in law would continue.

Time will tell if Maine is included. Outgoing President Joe Biden’s administration already started selling leases for areas in the Gulf of Maine that could power more than 4.5 million homes.

Pardons may be on the table for Jan. 6 rioters from Maine.

Trump has vowed to pardon as soon as next week rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and disrupted Congress as it certified Biden’s 2020 election victory, but he has not been clear on whether he will seek to pardon all of the more than 1,500 people who have been charged, with more than 1,000 sentenced so far, or only pardon non-violent offenders.

Roughly a dozen Mainers have been charged in connection with the deadly riot that featured attacks on law enforcement officers. Four Mainers have been charged with violent offenses, and not every case is resolved.

The most prominent defendant, Matthew Brackley, a former Maine Senate candidate from Waldoboro, is serving a 15-month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty to assaulting police. Kyle Fitzsimmons, of Lebanon, received a seven-year prison sentence in July 2023.

Advertisement

His Canada tariff plan already has Maine’s attention.

Trump has threatened to immediately slap 25 percent tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico and higher rates on China. A delegation from Prince Edward Island is in Maine and other New England states this week to make the case for free trade.

Neighboring Canada is the state’s top trade partner, with wood products, seafood and mineral fuels among the key products that cross the border. Tariffs have previously played well politically in Maine but have hurt heritage industries at times, including during Trump’s first term.

U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from the rural 2nd District, reintroduced his measure Thursday to create a universal 10 percent tariff. Golden pointed to a Congressional Budget Office analysis that found it would raise $2.2 trillion through 2032. But economists have also warned of higher prices for consumers and slower global growth under Trump’s plan.

“Tariffs can be very complicated, but at the end of the day, this is what it means: If it costs our goods and services 25 percent more to come across the border, they’re going to be costing Americans 25 percent more to consume them,” Prince Edward Island Premier Dennis King said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Golden proposes universal 10% tariff, saying it will protect Maine workers

Published

on

Golden proposes universal 10% tariff, saying it will protect Maine workers


Rep. Jared Golden, D-2nd District, at his home in Lewiston in October. Brianna Soukup/Portland Press Herald file

President-elect Donald Trump promised to impose sweeping tariffs. Days before Trump is set to take office, Maine’s 2nd District Rep. Jared Golden has introduced similar legislation — a 10% tariff on all imported goods.

It’s intended to protect Maine industries and workers against unfair competition, Golden said.

The Democrat from Lewiston, fresh off a narrow reelection win in November, said in an interview that his proposal would put the U.S. on more equal footing with trading partners that for years have protected their industries and workers. In contrast, Maine has lost jobs in manufacturing, lumber and other industries because the U.S. has failed to shield its workers and markets from unbalanced trade, he says.

Advertisement

“It’s a lie that we allowed ourselves to believe, that our allies around the world don’t pursue protectionist measures,” he said.

Golden pushed back against two arguments against tariffs: that the levies are inflationary because producers will pass added costs to consumers and that governments will retaliate against the U.S. with tariffs of their own.

He said an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office shows that a 10% “universal tariff” could spur a short-term increase in prices of some foreign goods and services, but would likely reduce the cost of other goods and services, drive up the incomes of American workers and have no long-term effect on inflation. Addressing the possibility of protectionist retaliation, Golden said U.S. markets are among the largest in the world widely sought by trading partners and other countries.

“For the time being, dollar for dollar, we’ll out-compete them. They need us,” Golden said.

Although the CBO report acknowledged no long-term inflationary impact, it predicts that cost increases would “put upward pressure on inflation over the first few years in which the tariffs were in place.” The analysis said increases in tariffs on U.S. imports and retaliation from trading partners over the next decade would reduce the size of the economy and increase businesses’ uncertainty about barriers to trade, cutting returns on new investments.

Advertisement

Golden told the Washington Post that no House Republican or Democrat has agreed to co-sponsor his bill.

Representatives of Rep. Chellie Pingree, D-1st district, and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, did not respond to emails Thursday seeking their opinions of Golden’s legislation. A spokesman for Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, said King is withholding comment on the issue of tariffs until more details emerge about policies developed by the Trump administration and Congress.

Kristin Vekasi, an associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Maine, argues that tariffs are inflationary and would likely lead to a cascade of policies and responses that could ultimately undermine Golden’s intent to protect jobs.

“There’s broad consensus about some aspects of tariffs,” she said. “The thing that we generally see with tariffs is they increase prices for consumers.”

That could prompt the Federal Reserve to again raise interest rates to fend off inflation, in turn prodding investors to shift money to bonds, increasing the value of the dollar that would make goods less competitive in global markets and hurting production and jeopardizing jobs, Vekasi said.

Advertisement

In addition, if retaliatory tariffs are imposed on hydropower from Canada and oil from other nations, higher energy costs would affect most industries, she said.

Stefano Tijerina, who teaches international business at the University of Maine Business School, said more than 50% of Maine’s trade is with Canada and tariffs “would affect us tremendously.” Lumber and tourists “mostly come from Canada” and lobsters fished off Maine typically end up in Canadian canneries, he said.

Many companies have moved to Canada and other nations to sell goods back to U.S. consumers, he said. “We’d be putting tariffs on our own products,” Tijerina said.

While Golden’s legislation can be interpreted as bolstering President-elect Donald Trump’s push for tariffs after he takes office Monday, Golden introduced similar legislation in September and said tariffs were established by President Barack Obama and President Joe Biden, both Democrats. A softwood lumber tariff dates to the Obama administration, he said, and Biden raised tariffs against China.

The 10% percent tariff would apply to all imported goods and services, and would increase or decrease by 5%, depending on whether the U.S. maintains a trade deficit or surplus.

Advertisement

Golden said job losses accelerated in the 1990s due to the North American Free Trade Agreement, which has become a magnet of anti-free trade animus that crosses political lines from Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders on the left to Trump on the right.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending