Connect with us

Maine

Plan to add teaching of Holocaust, genocide to science education draws questions from Maine teachers

Published

on

Plan to add teaching of Holocaust, genocide to science education draws questions from Maine teachers


Augusta, Maine — Teachers and science advocates are voicing skepticism about a Maine proposal to update standards to incorporate teaching about genocide, eugenics and the Holocaust into middle school science education. They argue that teachers need more training before introducing such subjects that are both sensitive and nuanced.

While critics of the proposed updates said they are borne of good intentions — the proposal states that science has “sometimes been used by those in power to oppress and abuse others” — they also said that injecting the materials into a middle school science curriculum could distract from conventional scientific principles and could jeopardize science education.

The proposal states that science education in the state should reflect that “misinterpretation of fossil observations has led to the false idea of human hierarchies and racial inequality.” The proposal also states that “historically, some people have misused and/or applied the ideas of natural selection and artificial selection to justify genocide of various groups, such as Albinos in Africa or Jews in Europe.”

Advertisement

The proposed updates have drawn the attention of teachers’ groups in the state as well as national organizations that advocate for a better understanding of science. The concern in Democrat-controlled Maine contrasts conflicts over education in some more conservative states, where criticism has focused on the teaching of climate change, U.S. history and evolution in recent years.

The Maine Science Teachers Association testified before the state that adding the proposed content to education standards without providing professional training for teachers could jeopardize science education. The updates, which are geared toward middle schoolers, could also make it harder for young minds to absorb the more basic science concepts they are encountering for the first time, said Tonya Prentice, president of the Maine Science Teachers Association.

“As far as critical thinking skills, middle school students are still developing those, and that’s just putting it at a level that is fundamentally higher than we should expect them to handle,” Prentice said. “That’s a lot for adults to take in.”

Others said they felt the state is well-intentioned to try to incorporate social history into science education, but agreed Maine needs to first ensure that its teachers are equipped to do it. The contributions scientists have made to theories like eugenics belong in science class, but it needs to be done right, said Joseph Graves Jr., a professor of biology who is on the board of directors of the National Center for Science Education, which includes hundreds of teachers.

Advertisement

“The question is, should those things be incorporated into science class? My answer is absolutely yes,” Graves Jr. said. “But it comes down to when to do that and whether the people doing it are doing it in a way that is knowledgeable and pedagogically sound.”

The Maine Department of Education is performing the update, which is part of a review of standards that is required every five years. The proposed updates would have to ultimately be approved by a committee of the Maine Legislature.

The Maine Department of Education took public comments about the proposal until the middle of November and the next step is for the Legislature’s Education and Cultural Affairs Committee to make a determination about the standards, said Marcus Mrowka, a spokesperson for the education department.

The updates are the result of new requirements from the Legislature to include certain kinds of education into the curriculum, Mrowka said. Schools are now required to include content about Native American and African American histories as well as the history of genocide, including the Holocaust, Mrowka said. Mrowka said the update doesn’t constitute a change to the standards but rather represents the inclusion of a further explanation section to provide educators with additional contexts and opportunities to encourage critical thinking.

The recommended updates that are up for adoption were made by teachers, and the education department opened up the revision process to any science teachers who wanted to be involved, Mrowka said. A group of two dozen Maine science educators met several times over the summer to lead the review of the science standards, Mrowka said.

Advertisement

The teachers also worked with scholars and experts to include the additional content areas that the Legislature required, Mrowka said.

“The teachers included a further explanation section to provide educators with additional contexts and opportunities to encourage critical thinking that incorporate the additional content required by the Legislature,” Mrowka said.

The state sought public comments about the current science standards earlier in the year and received numerous comments from educators about the importance of challenging students. Middle schoolers can grapple with “rigorous and relevant learning for the world that we live in,” testified Robert Ripley, a sixth grade teacher in the Oxford Hills School District.

“We want our students to be the builders of tomorrow, and they need the skills to create that unknown future world,” Ripley testified.

Alison Miller, an associate professor at Bowdoin College who served on the state steering committee for science standards, called the revisions “misguided.” Miller said the heavy subjects of genocide and scientific racism seemed to be shoehorned into the standards.

Advertisement

“This is not a shoehorn-able subject,” Miller said. “This is about context and nuance, and asking teachers to do it without the context and nuance that it takes to take on a subject so large and so important is asking them to do it superficially or not at all.”



Source link

Maine

Maine delegation hopes for budget deal as shutdown looms

Published

on

Maine delegation hopes for budget deal as shutdown looms


Members of Maine’s congressional delegation spent much of Thursday watching closely for details on a new federal spending plan after President-elect Donald Trump derailed an earlier proposal in a move that threatened to result in a government shutdown.

Three of Maine’s four representatives — Sen. Susan Collins, Sen. Angus King. and Rep. Chellie Pingree — were preparing to support the deal to fund the federal government through mid-March when Trump intervened and urged Republicans earlier this week to reject it.

Rep. Jared Golden had planned to vote against the deal over his opposition to pay raises and a change in health care benefits for members of Congress that he said would have the federal government pick up more of the cost of members’ health care premiums.

On Thursday evening, the House rejected Trump’s new plan to fund federal operations and suspend the debt ceiling a day before a government shutdown, as Democrats refused to accommodate his sudden demands and the quick fix cobbled together by Republican leaders.

Advertisement

“Speaker Mike Johnson and the House have come to a very good Deal for the American People,” Trump said in a statement posted on the social media platform Truth Social. “The newly agreed to American Relief Act of 2024 will keep the Government open, fund our Great Farmers and others, and provide relief for those severely impacted by the devastating hurricanes.”

Here’s where Maine’s Congressional delegation stood on the negotiations as of Thursday afternoon:

Sen. Susan Collins, a Republican, said this week that she was planning to support the original continuing resolution to temporarily fund the government through mid-March. In a written statement Thursday, she said she was hoping to avoid a government shutdown since it could have negative consequences across government.

Shutdowns can disrupt everything from air travel to the ability of older Americans to apply for Social Security benefits to pay for members of the military and other essential federal employees, Collins said.

“In fact, government shutdowns actually cost taxpayers money by increasing the cost of short-term borrowing by the government and by adversely affecting the entire economy,” Collins said.  “As we await the House’s deliberations, I am continuing to work with my colleagues to find a path forward to fund the government ahead of Friday’s midnight deadline.”

Advertisement

Sen. Angus King, an independent, told reporters on Wednesday that he also had planned to support the original plan and said there is “no excuse” to shut down the government.

pingree

King also said he was hoping lawmakers in the House wouldn’t enforce a rule that says they don’t vote on anything until it has been in their possession for 72 hours, to avoid votes going into the weekend.

“The question is, are they going to enforce that rule, or will they move forward so that we can avoid the shutdown that would occur on Friday night?” King said. “But, I am hoping that reasonableness will prevail, and we’ll get this thing done before Friday night.”

A spokesperson for King said early Thursday afternoon that it would be hard to discuss the latest plans because everything was changing very rapidly amid the negotiations.

Advertisement

Rep. Jared Golden, D-2nd District, announced Wednesday that he planned to vote against the funding plan that was before lawmakers earlier this week because he is opposed to a $6,600 raise for members of Congress for a 3.8% cost-of-living adjustment. The adjustment would bring annual salaries to just over $180,000.

Golden was also opposed to a provision that would allow members to purchase health insurance through the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program, rather than the Affordable Care Act exchange, a move he said would result in the federal government funding larger shares of members’ health insurance premiums at the expense of taxpayers.

“I think it would be wrong of Congress to vote to give itself a pay raise and lower our health care costs at a time when the inverse may be true for many Americans,” Golden said in an interview Thursday.

He said he would continue to oppose any new plan if it continued to include those measures. “Sometimes there are things that are just so egregiously out of step with the values that this institution should represent and with what I think the American people would view as right versus very clearly wrong, that it’s worth being a ‘no,’” Golden said.

Rep. Chellie Pingree, D-1st District, said in a written statement Thursday that she had been preparing to vote in favor of the original funding package to make sure the government remained open and that critical programs would not be interrupted.

Advertisement

“From the devastating storms in Maine last winter, hurricanes in the Southeast, and wildfires in the West, natural disasters have devastated countless communities,” Pingree said. “That package would have delivered billions — including $325 million for Maine — in essential relief to help families rebuild their homes, restore local economies, and fortify critical infrastructure, as well as assistance for our farmers.”

In her work as ranking member on the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Interior, Pingree said she was happy to see the bill include $2.26 billion for the National Park Service to address storm damage at impacted parks around the country, including Acadia National Park and $14 million that would have helped Maine address the spread of the invasive spruce budworm.

“But it took less than 24 hours for Republicans to kill their own bill at Trump’s order and concede to the online rantings of Elon Musk,” Pingree said.

“Now, just days before Christmas, Congress is left scrambling down to the wire to avoid a government shutdown. It’s my hope we can come to a bipartisan agreement — that includes this crucial funding for Maine communities and farmers — before it’s too late.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Stunning View Of Mammoth Ice Jam In Northern Maine – Videos from The Weather Channel

Published

on

Stunning View Of Mammoth Ice Jam In Northern Maine – Videos from The Weather Channel




Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Cows fall from trailer onto Maine Turnpike after door unlatches, officials say

Published

on

Cows fall from trailer onto Maine Turnpike after door unlatches, officials say


Local News

One animal suffered a broken leg while two others sustained road rash.

Maine State Police

Several cows were injured this week when they fell out of an improperly secured trailer while traveling on the Maine Turnpike, officials said. 

Maine State Police said troopers responded to the crash around 11:30 a.m. on Monday in Lewiston. The initial investigation indicates that the doors of the cattle trailer, which was attached to a pickup truck, were not properly secured, causing them to unlatch on the highway. 

Advertisement

The doors opening resulted in three animals falling from the back of the trailer onto the roadway and one cow running from the container once the vehicle stopped. 

According to police, one cow landed in the passing lane and broke its leg, while two others sustained road rash and were found on the shoulder of the road by police. 

The fourth ran into the woods nearby. 

“Troopers secured one of the cows by tying it to the back of his cruiser, using a buddy system to help calm the other animals and prevent further movement,” police said. 

As a result of the crash, one lane was temporarily shut down as the driver of the pickup, 39-year-old Dustin Bubar of Stetson, Maine, worked to reload the animals into the trailer. Police said Bubar was cited for unsecured load on a vehicle. 

Advertisement

Police said animal control officers from Lewiston as well as passersby assisted in the incident. 

The crash remains under investigation, according to police. 





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending