Connect with us

Maine

Opinion: Project 2025 will worsen Maine’s housing crisis

Published

on

Opinion: Project 2025 will worsen Maine’s housing crisis


I’ve been glad to see recent coverage of the extreme Project 2025, the blueprint members of the far right created to run the country if former President Trump is re-elected. I’ve seen little discussion of Project 2025’s plans for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), so I read the HUD chapter in this “Mandate for Leadership,” written by Trump’s HUD Secretary, Ben Carson (Chapter 15).

I believe the proposed “reforms” in Project 2025 will worsen the housing and homelessness crisis in Maine.

Among other things, Carson proposes to: 1) Divert funding from construction of new affordable rental housing to single-family homeownership; 2) Prioritize rental assistance for married heads of households; 3) Limit how long people can receive rental assistance; 3) Create work requirements for housing assistance; 4) Preference use of shorter term mortgages (less than 20 years) to speed up wealth-building (limiting buyers’ affordability); and 5) Prohibit undocumented people from receiving housing assistance (even when married to a U.S. citizen).

Everyone who works with HUD would agree it needs reform. But there’s also no doubt these Project 2025 policies would hurt those who need housing assistance the most. In one footnote (p. 515), Carson acknowledges that “Housing supply does remain a problem in the U.S., but constructing more units at the low end of the market will not solve the problem.”

Advertisement

His solution is to turn the private sector loose on the problem, conveniently ignoring that it’s the market’s utter failure to supply decent, livable housing at the low end of the market that led to Congress creating housing programs to address the issue. Carson’s “trickle down housing” will only reward the already affluent.

Carson believes that when it comes to affordable housing, “… American homeowners and citizens know best what is in the interest of their neighborhoods and communities.” I’m a strong advocate for community involvement, but the reality is that existing homeowners’ misperceptions that affordable housing will reduce their property values leads them to reject such projects. Their goal is to increase their home values, which they believe are enhanced by limiting development and restricting it to high-cost homes.

Carson wants to promote homeownership as a pathway to wealth building, and generations Americans have, in fact, benefited from this. But the windfall profits many of us will enjoy from the sale of our homes are the barrier to entry for the next generation of homebuyers. In Maine, the median sale price of a home recently topped $400,000. Promotion of housing as an investment through tax incentives such as the mortgage interest tax deduction (MID) disproportionately benefits the most affluent homeowners (who are predominantly white. The MID is one of the largest federal expenditures for housing assistance and it skews the single family-market in favor of those who need the assistance the least.

As young people struggle to afford their first homes or apartments, and homelessness is steadily increasing, the MID also subsidizes the purchase of vacation homes, including those purchased in other countries. Carson doesn’t address this.

Nowhere does Carson suggest that HUD should promote use of shared equity ownership models, such as low-income housing cooperatives or community land trusts. That’s a shame. Shared equity models benefit lower-income households by reducing the cost of entry, holding down their housing costs over the long term and giving them much greater control over their living situations than renting in the private market. Currently, public subsidies used to make home purchase more affordable end up in those fortunate homebuyers’ pockets when the short-term affordability requirements end. Because they are permanently attached to the housing, shared equity models are a far thriftier use of public subsidies.

Advertisement

We should reject Project 2025 by voting against Trump in the November election. Maine, and the country, can’t afford either Carson’s proposed housing policies or the threat the overall plan poses to our democracy.

« Previous

Commentary: Extreme heat is making our mental health worse

Next »

Today’s editorial cartoon



Source link

Advertisement

Maine

NECEC conservation plan will not protect Maine’s mature forests | Opinion

Published

on

NECEC conservation plan will not protect Maine’s mature forests | Opinion


Robert Bryan is a licensed forester from Harpswell and author or co-author of numerous publications on managing forests for wildlife. Paul Larrivee is a licensed forester from New Gloucester who manages both private and public lands, and a former Maine Forest Service forester.

In November 2025, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) approved a conservation plan and forest management plan as mitigation for impacts from the NECEC transmission corridor that runs from the Quebec border 53 miles to central Maine.

As professional foresters, we were astonished by the lack of scientific credibility in the definition of “mature forest habitat” that was approved by DEP, and the business-as-usual commercial forestry proposed for over 80% of the conservation area.

The DEP’s approval requires NECEC to establish and protect 50,000 acres to be managed for mature-forest wildlife species and wildlife travel corridors along riparian areas and between mature forest habitats. The conservation plan will establish an area adjacent to the new transmission corridor to be protected under a conservation easement held by the state. Under this plan, 50% of the area will be managed as mature forest habitat.

Advertisement

Under the forest management plan, a typical even-aged stand will qualify as “mature forest habitat” once 50 feet tall, which is only about 50 years old. These stands will lack large trees that provide wildlife denning and nesting sites, multiple vegetation layers that mature-forest birds use for nesting and feeding habitats and large decaying trees and downed logs that provide habitat for insects, fungi and small mammals, which in turn benefit larger predators.

Another major concern is that contrary to the earlier DEP order, the final approval allows standard sustainable forestry operations on the 84% of the forest located outside the stream buffers and special habitats. These stands may be harvested as soon as they achieve the “mature forest habitat” definition, as long as 50% of the conserved land is maintained as “mature.”

After the mature forest goal is reached, clearcutting or other heavy harvesting could occur on thousands of acres every 10 years. Because the landowner — Weyerhaeuser — owns several hundred thousand acres in the vicinity, any reductions in harvesting within the conservation area can simply be offset by cutting more heavily nearby. As a result, the net
mature-forest benefit of the conservation area will be close to zero.

Third, because some mature stands will be cut before the 50% mature forest goal is reached, it will take 40 years — longer than necessary — to reach the goal.

In the near future the Board of Environmental Protection (BEP) will consider an appeal from environmental organizations of the plan approval. To ensure that ecologically mature forest develops in a manner that meets the intent of the DEP/BEP orders, several things need to change.

Advertisement

First and most important, to ensure that characteristics of mature forest habitat have time to develop it is critical that the definition include clear requirements for the minimum number of large-diameter (hence more mature) trees, adjusted by forest type. At least half the stocking of an area of mature forest habitat should be in trees at least 10 inches in diameter, and at least 20% of stands beyond the riparian buffers should have half the stocking in trees greater than or equal to 16 inches in diameter.

Current research as well as guidelines for defining ecologically mature forests, such as those in Maine Audubon’s Forestry for Maine Birds, should be followed.

Second, limits should be placed on the size and distribution of clearcut or “shelterwood” harvest patches so that even-aged harvests are similar in size to those created by typical natural forest disturbance patterns. These changes will help ensure that the mature-forest block and connectivity requirements of the orders are met.

Third, because the forest impacts have already occurred, no cutting should be allowed in the few stands that meet or exceed the DEP-approved definition — which needs to be revised as described above — until the 50% or greater mature-forest goal is reached.

If allowed to stand, the definitions and management described in the forest management plan would set a terrible precedent for conserving mature forests in Maine. The BEP should uphold the appeal and establish standards for truly mature forest habitat.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Rage Room in Portland, Maine, Developing ‘Scream Room’ Addition

Published

on

Rage Room in Portland, Maine, Developing ‘Scream Room’ Addition


For a lot of people throughout Maine, there’s some built up frustration that they’ve just been keeping inside.

That frustration can come in a lot of different forms. From finances to relationships to the world around you.

So it makes plenty of sense that a rage room opened in Portland, Maine, where people can let some of that frustration out.

It’s called Mayhem and people have been piling in to smash, crush and do dastardly things to inanimate objects that had no idea what was coming.

Advertisement

But Mayhem has realized not everyone is down with swinging a sledgehammer. So they’ve decided to cook up something new.

Mayhem Creating ‘Scream Room’ at Their Space in Portland, Maine

Perhaps the thought of swinging a baseball bat and destroying a glass vase brings you joy. The thought of how sore your body will be after that moment makes you less excited.

Mayhem Portland has heard you loud and clear and is developing a new way to get the rage out. By just screaming.

Mayhem is working on opening their very first scream room. It’s exactly what you think it is, a safe place to spend some time just screaming all of the frustration out.

There isn’t an official opening date set yet but it’s coming soon along with pricing.

Advertisement

Mayhem in Portland, Maine, Will Still Offer Rage Rooms and Paint Splatter

While a scream room is on the way, you can still experience a good time at Mayhem with one of their rage rooms or a paint splatter room.

Both can be experienced in either 20-minute or 30-minute sessions.

All the details including some age and attire requirements can be found here.

TripAdvisor’s Top 10 Things to do in Portland, Maine

Looking for fun things to do in Portland, ME? Here is what the reviewers on TripAdvisor say are the 10 best attractions.

This list was updated in March of 2026

Advertisement

Gallery Credit: Chris Sedenka

Top 15 of The Most Powerful People in Maine

Ever wonder who the most powerful players are in Maine? I’ve got a list!

Gallery Credit: Getty Images





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine competition gives creative entrepreneurs the chance to win money

Published

on

Maine competition gives creative entrepreneurs the chance to win money


BANGOR, Maine (WABI) – If you’ve ever wondered what goes into pitching a good business idea, you might want to stop by a Big Gig event.

The Big Gig Entrepreneurship Pitch Off brings professionals from across the state together to network and pitch their early-stage business ideas for a chance to win $500.

Tuesday’s competition was held at the Salty Brick Market in Bangor, and it drew a lot of spectators.

“The winners of each semifinal event get $500 and the opportunity to compete for $5,000, so that can make a huge impact on a business that’s just getting off the ground,” said Renee Kelly, a Big Gig organizer.

Advertisement

The winner of the competition, Colin McGuire, was also grateful for the opportunity to showcase his idea “Art on Tap,” which would connect local artists with local venues trying to put on events.

“The support tonight is huge, and it’s just giving me more enthusiasm for running with the idea,” he said.

The season finale of the competition will be held May 19th.

The location is yet to be determined.

If you’d like to apply to compete in the contest, you can go to biggig.org.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending