Connect with us

Maine

Last year, Maine made assaulting an emergency medical worker a felony. The problem of patient violence remains

Published

on

Last year, Maine made assaulting an emergency medical worker a felony. The problem of patient violence remains


A year-old law seems to have done little to curb a surge in violence against health care workers that began during the pandemic, despite increasing charges for assaults on nonmedical staff – such as custodial, security or administrative workers – who are providing emergency medical care.

According to Maine’s Judicial Branch, there have been 12 charges of “assault on an emergency medical care provider” in 2024 – on track to meet similar numbers as the last five years. There were 27 charges in 2023 and 25 in 2022, for example.

Joe Bragg, a registered nurse and nursing supervisor at Down East Community Hospital in Machias, said the expanded definition doesn’t seem to be changing the behavior of patients, many in a state of crisis when they arrive in the emergency department.

“I don’t think anybody is going into the hospital going, ‘Well, I better not act out today because L.D. 1119 is in effect,” said Bragg. “It doesn’t change anything. If violence is going to happen, it’s going to happen.”

Advertisement

The law – L.D. 1119 – which passed in July 2023, increased charges for an assault occurring in an emergency department setting, regardless of whether the victim is a health care worker, from a Class D crime – punishable by up to 364 days in jail and a $2,000 fine – to a Class C crime, punishable by up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

(Felonies are typically crimes punishable by more than a year in prison, while misdemeanors are typically considered less serious crimes punishable by less than a year in jail. Maine no longer uses these categories.)

Between 2017 and 2021, Maine health care workers filed 1,000 claims for lost time due to intentional injury, most related to interactions with patients.

Prior to the new law, health care workers filed 167 intentional injury lost time claims in the first seven months of 2023; 114 were filed in the first four months after the law took effect.

Advocates for the expanded law, including Maine’s two largest health care conglomerates, MaineHealth and Northern Light Health, say the changes were intended to help law enforcement and prosecutors hold people accountable for their behavior and to protect those not previously included, such as security officers.

Advertisement

“L.D. 1119 really doesn’t impact the number of assaults, it simply clarifies the ability to prosecute,” said Jeff Austin, principal lobbyist for the Maine Hospital Association.

Austin said MHA is seeing around 200 incidents per month at its member hospitals, similar to years prior.

To further help combat workplace violence, hospitals have put out campaigns. The Northern Light Hospital system is working to get the ‘Safety from Violence for Healthcare Employees’ Act passed in Congress. At DECH in Machias, administrators have hung signage encouraging  a safer environment and reminding visitors to “be kind to our staff.”

While violence in emergency departments predates the pandemic, its ongoing effects have added to the frequency of assaults.

In testimony last year, a registered nurse within the MaineHealth system described a patient throwing a chair at a sliding door, shattering the glass before grabbing her arm.

Advertisement

In another instance, Nancijean Goudey, the director of emergency services at Maine Medical Center, described a patient who lunged, grabbed her around the neck, threw her on a bed and attempted to climb on top of her.

In testimony, emergency providers described attacks that ranged from spitting to verbal abuse to physical violence. The Maine Medical Center emergency department reported 277 incidents of workplace violence in a three-month period in early 2023.

Nurses and hospital staff pushed for the passage of the law, arguing that something needed to be done to help with the violence and protect nonmedical staff.

Defense attorney Walt McKee believes classifying assault on emergency health care personnel as a felony can be a slippery slope – the person’s job should not be part of the consideration, he said.

“A felony level crime should be dealt with when there is significant bodily harm, not because it was on a nurse and not a teacher,” said McKee.

Advertisement

CRIMINALIZING MENTAL HEALTH

Others argue the expanded law hasn’t helped deter violence in the year since it was passed and that it adversely affects those with mental health issues, who may be more likely to act violently in emergency settings.

Advocates on both sides agree that violence against hospital staff should not be tolerated. But with mental health treatment resources across the state increasingly strained, those in crisis have few places to turn beyond an emergency room.

There are only 10 inpatient psychiatric treatment facilities across Maine, with roughly 500 beds. The long waitlist of people seeking mental health treatment only continues to grow, with wait periods stretching for months.

Facing a lack of resources and appropriate treatment, people turn to their hospitals, said state Rep. Nina Milliken, D-Blue Hill.

Advertisement

“The message is if you have a medical issue, just go to the emergency department,” said Milliken. “These systems are operating as our only response currently to a long list of human suffering. It isn’t fair to the criminal legal system, it isn’t fair to ER staff, and it isn’t fair to anyone else.”

The new law punishes people – some of whom may be in a state of psychosis and unaware of their actions – “for something that is essentially a treatment failure,” said Emily Mott, staff attorney for Disability Rights Maine.

People in crisis brought to an emergency department against their will because they are deemed a danger to themselves or others are often more at risk of lashing out, although they may not be fully in control – or even aware of – their actions.

That was the case for Julie Potter, who brought herself to the emergency room for a dissociative episode while studying for her master’s in social work at the University of New England.

Potter said after explaining her situation to hospital staff that she was led by police officers to a sterile room. Potter said she tried to leave, and remembers only waking up to bruises on her body with officers saying she had assaulted them.

Advertisement

Potter was eventually charged with assault on a police officer – a charge that carries similar punishments to those under L.D. 1119.

While the charges were eventually dropped, after what she said was a lengthy court proceeding and a year of psychiatric supervision, the incident upended her life and ultimately resulted in Potter leaving her master’s program.

“What it’s going to do is criminalize people’s trauma in mental health,” Potter said of the expanded law. “We are going to have more people in prison, in jails, in the court system that are just hurting and more hopeless, and do not believe in a system that cares about them. … You are ruining people’s lives.”

People convicted of a felony may have trouble getting jobs or housing, said Mott, of Disability Rights Maine, which can further delay treatment.

“In a world of collateral damages, it’s important.”

Advertisement

Health care workers shouldn’t have to tolerate assault, said Frayla Tarpinian, district defender at the new Capital Region Defender’s Office, but expanding the law will not effectively deter violence if the behavior is driven by mental illness and the punishment doesn’t include treatment.

“There is just something manifestly unfair about somebody who does not want to be touched to be forcibly medicated, then charging them because they don’t comply.”

WHO BENEFITS?

“It’s a tough situation all around. Who does it help the most? The irony is, it probably helps prosecutors, judges and defense attorneys,” said Brendan Trainor, district attorney for Penobscot County. “It does give us more options to charge somebody.”

Despite this, many district attorney offices and police departments across the state say they have not seen an increase in the number of charges since the law was passed.

Advertisement

The Portland Police Department has only seen four charges since the law was enacted, despite Maine Medical Center reporting large numbers of assaults.

Other departments, including in Augusta, Lewiston and Machias, said they had seen little change in the number of charges since the law’s passage.

In Penobscot County, there have been eight charges for assault on emergency medical service personnel since July 2022. The Lewiston Police Department reported six charges between July 2023, when the law was enacted, and this June, and the Augusta Police Department reported four – on par with the 10 and seven charges, respectively, reported in the year prior.

On the other side, McKee, the defense attorney, felt prosecutors already had enough “tools in the toolbox” to charge someone with assault. Unless judges said they were seeing serious offenses that require more serious charges, he said, there was no reason to increase the penalty.

Health care providers emphasized they do not file charges against a person in a mental health crisis, unable to distinguish right from wrong. Once charges are brought, whether a person is competent to stand trial is decided by the state’s forensic evaluators and a judge.

Advertisement

Austin, of the Maine Hospital Association, and hospital staff recognize that violence can be unintentional, especially if it stems from someone with a mental illness.

But that’s not true for all, said Austin.

“And we believe [they] should be held accountable for their decisions.”

This story was originally published by The Maine Monitor, a nonprofit and nonpartisan news organization. To get regular coverage from the Monitor, sign up for a free Monitor newsletter here.

Advertisement

« Previous

‘The system’s messed up’: Family of Portland shooting victim frustrated with pace of justice after 2 years in court



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters

Published

on

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.

This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.

Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.

Advertisement

The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.

The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.

But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.

Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.

Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.

Advertisement

All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.

This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.

Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Published

on

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection


Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Bev Uhlenhake Maine Democratic Party

The chair of the Maine Democratic Party announced Thursday she won’t seek reelection when members select leaders later this month.

Bev Uhlenhake, a former city councilor and mayor in Brewer and former chair of the Penobscot County Democrats, has served as chair of the state party since January 2023. She is also a previous vice chair of the party.

In a written statement, Uhlenhake noted some of the recent successes and challenges facing Democrats, including the reelection of Democratic majorities in both the Maine House and Senate last November, though by narrower margins, and winning three of Maine’s four electoral votes for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

“While we have laid a solid foundation from which Maine Democrats can build toward even greater success in 2026 and beyond, I have decided to step away from Maine Democratic Party leadership for personal and professional reasons, and will not seek reelection,” Uhlenhake said.

Party Vice Chair Julian Rogers, who was also elected to his post in 2023, announced he also won’t seek reelection to leadership, but will resume a previous role he held as vice chair of the party’s committee on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging.

Democratic State Committee members will vote for the party’s next leaders in elections to be held on Sunday, Jan. 26.

« Previous

South Portland debates natural vs. artificial grass at planned athletic facility



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Shenna Bellows sworn in for third term as Maine Secretary of State

Published

on

Shenna Bellows sworn in for third term as Maine Secretary of State


AUGUSTA, Maine — Secretary of State Shenna Bellows was sworn into office for her third term Wednesday.  Governor Janet Mills conducted the formal swearing-in of all the constitutional officers, which includes Bellows, State Treasurer Joseph Perry, Attorney General Aaron Frey and State Auditor Matthew Dunlap. In her remarks following the swearing-in, Bellows shared a message of transparency and accessibility in continuing to serve the people of Maine. “It is incumbent upon us as elected officials to make government work for the people of Maine,” Bellows said. “We must reduce bureaucracy, improve efficiency, modernize our systems, and above all, bring people together in community to make life better for the people of Maine.”

The Department of the Secretary of State includes three bureaus: The Maine State Archives, the Bureau of Motor Vehicles and the Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions.

Advertisement

Bellows emphasized her commitment to ensuring free, safe, and secure elections, modernizing government services, and preserving Maine’s history through the State Archives. She highlighted the importance of standing up for the rule of law and democracy, referring to the legacy of Civil War General Joshua Chamberlain and referencing the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. “This is our Chamberlain moment. We must stand up for the rule of law and do the right thing even when it is hard. As your Secretary of State, I pledge to always ensure that we have free, safe and secure elections and that we adhere to the Constitution and the rule of law in every aspect of everything that we do,” said Bellows. Bellows, Maine’s 50th Secretary of State, previously served two terms in the Maine Senate from 2016-2020 and was the executive director of the Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine before her election in 2021.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending