Connect with us

Maine

Commentary: Want to modernize Maine’s vehicle inspection program? Eliminate it.

Published

on

Commentary: Want to modernize Maine’s vehicle inspection program? Eliminate it.


In response to the Maine Sunday Telegram report of final week (“As different states modernize, Maine automotive security inspection lags behind,” Dec. 25), Maine lags the area in not digitizing its motorized vehicle inspection system.

Andy Libby rotates tires on a automotive at Kimball’s Storage in South Portland, one in every of greater than 2,600 retailers in Maine which can be mailed inspection stickers by the state. Maine is one in every of simply 15 states that require annual car inspections.  Gregory Rec/Workers Photographer

In actuality, the one modernization Maine’s program wants is wholesale elimination.

Maine is amongst a minority of states which have these applications on the books. Thirty-five states don’t require annual car inspections. Fifteen do. Maine is among the many latter group. Why?

Advertisement

If the presence of an inspection program really saved lives and lowered motorized vehicle accidents, each final state would have one. However they don’t. Why? As a result of the proof is evident that these applications don’t save lives or scale back accidents. The proof is within the car crash information.

Quite a few research have proven there isn’t any distinction within the variety of motorized vehicle accidents and fatalities attributable to faulty autos in states that do and don’t require inspections. Nor do the states that repeal these inspection applications see spikes in accidents and deaths after they’re eradicated. That’s as a result of accidents are extra typically attributable to extreme pace, distracted driving or drug and alcohol use.

Over the previous couple of many years, states have been repealing these applications, not implementing them. That’s as a result of they don’t serve their supposed goal, making them tough to justify to the general public. They’re an annual burden, significantly for low-income Mainers, that solely serve to offer individuals the sensation or look of security. The info present they don’t make roads any safer.

Shoppers additionally (typically rightly) don’t belief mechanics. A 2016 AAA survey confirmed that two-in-three People didn’t belief restore retailers, citing extreme fees and pointless service suggestions as high causes for low confidence. Sadly, these sentiments maintain up. In a 1980 American Enterprise Institute research, researchers in Pennsylvania deliberately created 13 defects in a brand new automotive earlier than it was inspected. Among the many garages visited, the detection price of actual defects assorted from 25% to 54%. Whereas mechanics on common discovered solely 5 of 13 defects, additionally they “discovered” a mean of two non-existent ones.

Mainers know the system is imperfect and topic to human error and the improper incentives. Maybe that explains why the Maine State Police need it digitized, to cease us from “sticker procuring.” We’ve all completed it. However that phenomenon reveals why inspections are superfluous, not why they need to be digitized.

Advertisement

As famous within the Dec. 25 article, the Legislature in 2021 fashioned a gaggle to check whether or not Maine wanted to maintain car inspections. The article states that the research group’s “findings have been clear: Maine nonetheless wants security inspections.” However the so-called “research group” was composed completely of people whose employment in a roundabout way hinged on the existence of this system: the individuals who examine the autos (mechanics) and those that implement the rules (the state police).

Why not an neutral occasion on the desk? Ought to we subsequent convene a council of bakers to determine if the state ought to ban the sale of doughnuts to fight weight problems? How a few crew of cobblers to find out the need of shoestring rules to forestall tripping accidents? Let’s ask the mob their ideas on Prohibition whereas we’re at it.

What conclusions do you suppose these teams would attain concerning the guidelines governing their professions? Would they help and oppose guidelines that benefited them or the general public at massive? That is regulatory seize in a nutshell.

Proponents of inspections have solely anecdotes to supply to help their existence. Every time a lawmaker sponsors a invoice to repeal this system, the inspection stations and state police prove of their droves to defend it. Good luck discovering a financially disinterested occasion who helps inspections in legislative testimony.

The retailers say that we should always “see the stuff that comes by means of their doorways.” They declare we’d like inspections due to the quantity of salt and chemical substances used to deal with our roads every winter. But of the 12 states that obtain common annual snowfall in extra of 40 inches, solely 5 require annual inspections. How can all the opposite states get by with out it, however Maine can’t?

Advertisement

As for the state police, Maine regulation permits them to drag over a car in the event that they suppose it’s unsafe for the roads, and this rule needn’t be tied to an inspection program.

There isn’t a want for inspections in Maine. It’s wildly unpopular and disproportionately harms the poor. And whereas any reform is welcome – much less frequent inspections or eradicating the requirement for brand spanking new autos – the Legislature would do us all an awesome favor by eliminating it altogether this session.


Use the shape beneath to reset your password. If you’ve submitted your account electronic mail, we are going to ship an electronic mail with a reset code.

Advertisement

« Earlier



Source link

Maine

Arrest made in shooting incident stemming from fight at Maine steakhouse

Published

on

Arrest made in shooting incident stemming from fight at Maine steakhouse


Police say they have made an arrest in connection with a shooting last month that stemmed from a fight that broke out at a steakhouse in South Portland, Maine, last month.

South Portland police said 21-year-old Jonathan Hanson, of Buxton, was arrested Wednesday in Buxton. He was one of two suspects in a Dec. 18 incident in the Maine Mall area. The other one, 21-year-old Navinn Ean, of Westbrook, is still at large.

Police said they responded to the Kobe Steakhouse at 380 Gorham Road at 5:13 p.m. that day for a report of a possible shooting in the parking lot. Responding officers learned that a fight had broken out inside the restaurant between two sets of individuals. The altercation moved from inside the restaurant to the parking lot, where a suspect from one of the groups displayed and threatened people in the other group with a handgun.

The victims were able to flee in a vehicle, but they were followed by the suspect in another vehicle. When both vehicles reached the intersection of Gorham Road and Western Avenue, the suspect allegedly fired the gun in the direction of the victim’s vehicle. The vehicle was struck by gunfire, and the suspect then fled onto Western Avenue.

Advertisement

No one was injured in the incident, police said.

South Portland police said their investigation led them to believe the vehicle used in the crime, a blue Dodge Charger, was located at an address in Naples. A search warrant for the property was issued, and the vehicle was impounded as evidence. The suspects were not present, however.

On Tuesday night, Buxton police attempted to make a traffic stop on a pickup truck, but the driver sped off in what appeared to be an attempt to avoid contact with police.

Buxton police later located the vehicle in a driveway on Haines Meadow Road, an address with ties to the South Portland shooting suspects. As officers were getting ready to enter the home, they used a loudspeaker system in an attempt to make contact with Hanson, who they believed to be inside. He eventually came out and was arrested around 11:30 p.m.

Hanson was taken to Cumberland County Jail and faces charges of reckless conduct with a dangerous weapon, criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon, criminal mischief and terrorizing. He was arraigned Wednesday and bail was set at $10,000 cash.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

The secret plan to save Maine’s iconic red hot dogs after federal dye ban

Published

on

The secret plan to save Maine’s iconic red hot dogs after federal dye ban


Maine’s last red snapper maker is changing the recipe for its iconic hot dogs after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned a key dye the company uses to give the sausages their distinctive color.

The FDA is banning the use of red dye No. 3 in foods, drinks and medications. The synthetic dye is often used to give products a bright, cherry-red color and was linked more than 30 years ago to cancer in animals.

In November 2022, roughly two dozen advocacy organizations and individuals filed a petition to ban the dye, according to the FDA.

W.A. Bean & Sons, the lone remaining Maine-based company that makes the bright hot dogs often called “red snappers,” uses red dye No. 3 along with red dye No. 40 and yellow dye No. 6, according to the package.

Advertisement

The company expected the FDA to eventually ban the ingredient, said Sean Smith, W.A. Bean & Sons’ sales director. Because of this, the business has been exploring ways to make red snappers without the artificial additive while keeping the color and taste identical, Smith said.

“We’ve done test batches already and we expect to have something ready very soon,” Smith said. “We’ve survived multiple world wars and depressions and our red hot dogs aren’t going anywhere.”

Smith declined to share further details on how the secret recipe for red hot dogs will change.

The FDA’s ban comes at a time when W.A. Bean & Sons is seeing sales of the iconic red snappers soar. The company now makes an estimated 650,000 to 700,000 pounds of red dogs annually, compared with the 400,000 pounds they made a decade ago, Smith previously told the Bangor Daily News.

The hot dogs are often called “red snappers” due to the thick casing that gives the sausages their distinctive “snap” when you bite into them. The product has joined the ranks of blueberries, lobster and whoopie pies as an iconic Maine food, despite other states having hot dogs with a similar hue or snappy consistency.

Advertisement

Food manufacturers have until Jan. 15, 2027, to stop using red dye No. 3 in products while drug manufacturers have until Jan. 18, 2028, according to the FDA. Other countries that allow the ingredient will have to comply with FDA rules if products are imported to the U.S.

W.A. Bean & Sons’ foresight is good news for Simones’ Hot Dog Stand in Lewiston, where red snappers have been a top-selling item throughout its 117-year history, according to owner Jim Simones.

“We’ve been in business since 1908 and we’re synonymous with the red dogs,” Simones said. “We sell beef dogs too, but red dogs are the most popular.”

When tourists stumble upon red hot dogs at Simones’ stand, they often question what gives them their glaring reddish-pink color. But, once customers try them, they usually find they like the sausages, Simones said.

“I tell them they’re just like our lobsters — when we put them in boiling water, they turn red,” Simones said.

Advertisement

Simones was pleased to hear W.A. Bean & Sons is finalizing a red hot dog recipe that doesn’t use the outlawed dye but will keep the product’s color the same.  

“It’s unique to Maine,” he said of the snappers. “You can’t lose that red.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Members of Maine delegation welcome Israel-Hamas ceasefire agreement

Published

on

Members of Maine delegation welcome Israel-Hamas ceasefire agreement


Members of Maine’s congressional delegation welcomed news of a ceasefire agreement in the Israel-Hamas war Wednesday, saying it’s a good first step that will bring hostages home and end the conflict, at least temporarily.

President Joe Biden and other officials announced Wednesday that the two sides have reached a 42-day agreement that includes the release of hostages and Israeli forces withdrawing from more populated areas in Gaza.

The agreement, which is not finalized, is likely to offer respite from a conflict that began in October 2023 and has resulted in the deaths of an estimated 47,000 Palestinians and 2,000 Israelis.

“Today’s ceasefire and hostage agreement is a welcome announcement. … While there is much about the agreement and the future that we do not yet know, what we do know is that the tragedy of October 7 can never be allowed to occur again,” Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said, emphasizing her support for Israel in the statement emailed by her office.

Advertisement

Rep. Jared Golden, D-2nd District, said in a statement Wednesday that the first stage of the agreement calls for an immediate ceasefire, a surge of aid to Gaza and the release of 33 women, children and elderly currently held hostage by Hamas.

Golden said those are all “good first steps.”

“I look forward to the implementation of a final agreement that ensures that all remaining hostages are returned home to their families and that Hamas lays down the weapons it took up when it started this conflict,” he said. “If Hamas abides by the terms of such an agreement, I believe there can be a path towards a more lasting peace in the region.”

Rep. Chellie Pingree, D-1st District, also was relieved to hear of the agreement.

“This could not have been achieved without tireless diplomatic efforts to bring both parties to the table, and I am grateful the Biden Administration got this agreement across the finish line before leaving office,” Pingree said in a statement.

Advertisement

“There is still a lot of uncertainty; the Israeli Cabinet needs to approve the deal, hostages need to be released, and humanitarian aid needs to pour into Gaza. I remain cautiously optimistic, but this is a promising step forward.”

This story will be updated.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending