Connect with us

Maine

Advocates prepare for Supreme Court to overturn Maine’s religious school funding ban

Published

on

Advocates prepare for Supreme Court to overturn Maine’s religious school funding ban


The U.S. Supreme Court docket seems primed to overturn Maine’s ban on public funding for non secular colleges later this spring. However cash gained’t begin flowing to Catholic and evangelical colleges with out adjustments to different state legal guidelines that advocates for non secular colleges at the moment are eyeing.

These adjustments might come if Republicans win legislative majorities and the governor’s workplace this fall, however they’re extra prone to come from additional authorized motion in Maine and out of doors the state, in accordance with Carroll Conley, govt director of the Christian Civic League of Maine.

The league sponsored a gathering earlier this week to debate the following steps in eradicating obstacles to public funding for non secular colleges in Maine.

The group’s preparations sign optimism from non secular conservatives {that a} Supreme Court docket with a 6-3 conservative majority will rule in non secular colleges’ favor when it decides the Maine case. Additionally they sign the potential for political battles over the state’s anti-discrimination legal guidelines as non secular college advocates attempt to make it simpler for public funds to circulation to non secular colleges.

Advertisement

“We didn’t wish to wait till June, when the choice is anticipated, to start speaking about what the following steps could be,” mentioned Conley, a former principal at Bangor Christian Faculties. “We would like academic alternatives to be obtainable to everybody no matter their monetary scenario.”

Whereas non secular conservatives put together for the ruling, the state’s Division of Training gained’t provide you with tips for what non secular colleges would want to do to obtain public funds till after the courtroom publicizes its choice, in accordance with a division spokesperson.

The case, Carson v. Makin, challenges a state regulation underneath which districts with out public excessive colleges pay tuition so native college students can attend a public or non-public college of their alternative in one other group, so long as it’s not a spiritual college. At situation is whether or not Maine is barring funds from going to non secular colleges as a result of they might use the cash for non secular functions or just because they’re religiously affiliated.

Maine allowed public funding for non secular colleges till the early Nineteen Eighties. It stopped after Legal professional Basic Richard Cohen, a Republican, issued an opinion discovering that public funding for non secular colleges violated the First Modification.

A Supreme Court docket ruling that strikes down the Maine ban that has been in place ever since wouldn’t apply on to many college students right here with out adjustments to different legal guidelines.

Advertisement

That’s due to the small variety of college students who attend non-public colleges with public tuition funds — about 4,500 college students, or 2.5 % of the general public college inhabitants, within the 2017-18 college 12 months. But it surely’s additionally as a result of an modification to Maine’s Human Rights Act that took impact final fall prohibits non secular colleges that settle for public funds from discriminating in opposition to LGBTQ college students and staff.

The households suing the state sought public tuition so their youngsters might attend Bangor Christian Faculties and Temple Academy in Waterville.

These colleges mentioned in depositions submitted to the Supreme Court docket that they might not settle for tuition cash if it meant they must abide by the anti-LGBTQ discrimination provision.

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland has not mentioned whether or not it will settle for public funds for its colleges. Traditionally, the diocese has opposed protections for LGBTQ residents and same-sex marriage.

Whereas eradicating that provision from state regulation is a risk for non secular college advocates, eradicating protections for LGBTQ Mainers from the Maine Human Rights Act can be an uphill battle in a state the place such protections have been in place for thus lengthy and have broad electoral assist.

Advertisement

One other risk for permitting public funds for non secular colleges, Conley mentioned, is making use of a federal choose’s ruling in a Maryland case to Maine.

Maryland’s college voucher program forbids discrimination in admissions primarily based on sexual orientation.

However a latest choice by a federal choose in Baltimore discovered that the state in 2018 had illegally eradicated Bethel Christian Academy from this system primarily based not on its admissions coverage however on statements in its pupil handbook. The handbook mentioned that the college’s beliefs are that marriage can solely be between a person and a girl and that God assigns a gender to a toddler at beginning.

Eliminating the college from the voucher program primarily based on these statements violated the academy’s 1st Modification proper to free speech, the Maryland choose dominated in December. Maryland might enchantment the case to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, and it might finally find yourself earlier than the Supreme Court docket.

Conley mentioned he and others are hopeful the choice may very well be utilized to Maine whether it is upheld.

Advertisement

One other case the Christian Civic League and religious-based authorized teams are watching is making its means by means of the courts in Michigan.

In that case, 5 households are difficult Michigan’s choice to maintain them from utilizing academic financial savings plans for tuition at non secular colleges. The plans permit people to take a position after-tax revenue in accounts wherein the cash grows tax-free and can be utilized for training bills, together with for school and Ok-12 training.

Michigan claims that permitting the cash to circulation to non secular colleges violates its Blaine Modification, which 37 states have of their constitutions prohibiting public funds for non secular colleges. The Michigan case takes direct purpose on the modification, whereas the Maine case doesn’t.

Maine stays one of many 13 states with out such an modification, however a broad ruling within the Michigan case that strikes down Blaine amendments might apply to Maine, in accordance with Conley.

Spiritual conservatives anticipate and are making ready for opposition to public funding for non secular colleges, Conley mentioned.

Advertisement

“We assume there might be authorized resistance to this effort in Maine and fewer conservative states,” he mentioned.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine electricity bills increased again this month

Published

on

Maine electricity bills increased again this month


Central Maine Power Co. customers began paying 7% more in their monthly bills Jan. 1 to help fund $3.3 billion of upgrades to transmission lines, poles and other equipment in New England. Versant Power ratepayers can also expect increases, though smaller, later this year.

Federal regulators are apportioning about $280 million of the region’s costs to Maine’s two major utilities, with the remainder assigned to utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. The costs are divided based on load, or how much electricity each service area uses.

Consumer advocates in the region have criticized the practice of assigning transmission costs to ratepayers, saying upgrades proposed by utilities are often unnecessary, insufficiently regulated and enhance the value of assets for shareholders at the expense of customers.

“The ratepayers are the only wallets in the room,” said Donald M. Kreis, New Hampshire’s consumer advocate who says poles, wires and other components of transmission are overbuilt.

Advertisement

As an example, one energy company proposed rebuilding a 49-mile transmission line in New Hampshire for $384 million, when less than 8% of it needed to be replaced, according to consumer advocates.

Versant said transmission rates are set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “using a preset formula and cover needed investments” in local transmission and regional investments.

“Most of the transmission rate increase is due to Versant paying our share to support regional transmission projects as part of our ISO-New England membership,” it said in an emailed statement.

CMP spokesman Jon Breed said ratepayer-funded spending authorized by FERC “will help reduce outages and protect our system from the threats of extreme weather in Maine.” New England’s transmission is a nearly 9,000-mile system, he said.

How the money in its entirety will eventually be spent is unclear. Eversource Energy, the parent company of utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, has plans for numerous projects, such as a partial line rebuild and other work totaling nearly $80 million in Connecticut, and a $7.4 million rebuild of a substation in Massachusetts.

Advertisement

“We’re responsible for maintaining just under half of the regional transmission system in New England and are constantly working to upgrade and modernize the transmission system, making the electric grid more resilient to increasing extreme weather caused by climate change and improving reliability for customers across New England,” Eversource spokeswoman Jamie Ratliff said in an email.

A representative of National Grid, parent company of New England Power Co., which said its revenue requirement is $485.4 million this year, did not respond to an emailed request for information about its projects.

CMP customers who use an average of 550 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month are paying $149.83, up from $139.62 in 2024, according to the Maine Office of the Public Advocate. Versant customers in the Bangor Hydro District who use the same amount of power pay $155.80, up from $148.09, a 5.2% increase, the utility said. Customers in Versant’s Maine Public District in the northern reaches of the state pay $146.37, an increase from $144.35.

Utilities in New England say “revenue requirements” of $3.3 billion are needed for 2025, up more than 16% from last year, according to the New England Power Pool, or NEPOOL, an advisory group of utilities, consumer advocates, consumers and others.  

Together, CMP and Versant account for 8.4% of the revenue needed in the region for the transmission upgrades, as identified by the utilities. In contrast, subsidiaries of Eversource Energy account for nearly 59%, or about $1.9 billion.

Advertisement

Increased rates for consumers are not due solely to transmission costs. Utilities also are collecting more than $254 million, including interest, to compensate for previous under-collecting of revenue based on the difference between cost forecasts and actual costs last year.

Ratiliff said the rate change is “largely the result” of utilities recovering less of their 2023 transmission costs.

Still, the largest driver of higher rates that took effect Wednesday is significant construction by utilities and replacing older transmission equipment, Landry said.

“They figured out they can build stuff and send the bills and everyone has to pay them,” he said.

The transmission costs will overwhelm a slight decline in electricity bills approved by Maine regulators in November. A lower 2025 standard offer rate — the default supply price for most home and small-business customers who don’t buy electricity with competitive energy providers – reflects stable natural gas prices, the main driver of power generation in New England.

Advertisement

Seth Berry, a former state legislator who chaired the Legislature’s Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee and is critical of the performance of investor-owned utilities, said scrutiny by state regulators could uncover weaknesses in the argument for transmission upgrades and force utilities to scale back their plans.

The lure of profitability is difficult for utilities to resist and the result, he said, is “a race to a very expensive and overbuilt transmission network.”

Utilities should instead focus on repairing and upgrading “very creaky” distribution systems, he said. The networks of roadside power lines is most vulnerable to storms and potential damage that knocks out power.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Pistons to sign Maine Celtics forward to two-way deal (report)

Published

on

Pistons to sign Maine Celtics forward to two-way deal (report)


The Pistons have plucked some depth away from the Maine Celtics, agreeing to a two-way deal with Rob Harper Jr. according to a report from ESPN’s Tim Bontemps.

Harper Jr. played for the Celtics in the Summer League and signed an Exhibit 10 deal with the team before being waived at the end of training camp. He earned a bonus after suiting up for the Maine Celtics where he had been a standout in recent weeks. Harper Jr. played the entirely of the G-League Showcase Cup with Maine and had put together a terrific stretch in recent days up North.

Over the past four regular season games, he was averaging 22 points per game off the bench while shooting 42.5 percent from 3-point range, playing alongside JD Davison, Baylor Scheierman, Drew Peterson and Anton Watson in Maine.

The 24-year-old wing went undrafted out of Rutgers in 2022 but played the first two years of his career with the Raptors. He was waived by Toronto after suffering a season-ending injury last December before catching on with the Celtics this summer when he was recovered.

Advertisement

The 6-foot-4 wing still has two years left of two-way eligibility, making him an appealing prospect to Detroit likely after they lost a key guard in Jaden Ivey last week to a season-ending knee injury. The Pistons will need to release one of their two-way players in order to make room to sign Harper Jr. officially.

The Celtics filled all of their own three two-way spots with Davison, Peterson and Watson, so the team had no way of retaining Harper Jr. without offering him a spot on the 15-man roster.

  • BETTING: Check out our MA sports betting guide, where you can learn basic terminology, definitions and how to read odds for those interested in learning how to bet in Massachusetts.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Missing Maine teen found safe, police say

Published

on

Missing Maine teen found safe, police say


Police in Maine say an at-risk teen from Limerick who was reported missing Saturday night has been found.

Maine State Police said 13-year-old Madelyn “Ash” Fogg had last been seen on Central Avenue in Limerick around 8 p.m.

In an update shortly before 1 p.m. Sunday, they said the teen had been found safe.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending