Northeast
Federal appeals court rejects parents' challenge to school policy that hid students' gender identity
Massachusetts parents hope to take their case before the U.S. Supreme Court after a federal court ruled that they do not have a constitutional right to be notified about their child’s gender transition at school.
In a February 18 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld a lower court’s dismissal of the lawsuit first filed by parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri in 2022 against Ludlow Public Schools.
The lawsuit accuses school staff at Paul R. Baird Middle School in Ludlow, Massachusetts, of secretly encouraging their then- 11-year-old daughter to adopt a new name and different gendered pronouns while at school.
The parents argue that the school’s nondisclosure policy, which keeps a student’s requested gender identity from parents unless the student consents, violates their parental rights protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
JUDGE DISMISSES MA PARENTS’ LAWSUIT OVER SCHOOL GENDER POLICY, SCOLDS DISTRICT: ‘DISCONCERTING’
Parents lost a lawsuit in federal court this month challenging a Massachusetts school district policy that affirmed and concealed their child’s gender identity. (iStock via Getty/AP Photo)
“[The Ludlow School Committee and implicated educators] exceeded the bounds of legitimate pedagogical concerns and usurped the role of [the plaintiffs] and other parents in the Town of Ludlow to direct the education and upbringing of their children, make medical and mental health decisions for their children and to promote and preserve family privacy and integrity,” the lawsuit alleges.
Vernadette Ramirez Broyles, President and General Counsel for the Child & Parental Rights Campaign, represented the parents in court and said that they plan to petition the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.
“We’re very disappointed and frankly disturbed by this decision,” Broyles told Fox News Digital. “I truly believe that parents across the nation, across Massachusetts, of all political stripes, will be disturbed by this.”
According to the lawsuit, Baird Middle School students were given a biographical video assignment by the school librarian that asked them to include their pronouns. Afterward, the plaintiffs’ daughter began receiving “unsolicited” LGBTQ video suggestions on her school computer, which made her start questioning her gender identity and sexuality, the lawsuit says.
CHRISTIAN TEACHER FIRED OVER TRANS POLICY CELEBRATES TRUMP ORDER TARGETING GENDER IDEOLOGY IN SCHOOLS
L.G.B.T. activists and their supporters rally in support of transgender people on the steps of New York City Hall, October 24, 2018, in New York City. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
After a teacher informed the parents that their daughter had confided in her that she was struggling with depression, self-esteem issues and confusion about her sexuality, the parents thanked the teacher and emailed teachers and school administrators to inform them they were seeking private counseling for their child. The parents directly instructed school officials to not have private conversations with their daughter about the issue.
Unbeknownst to the parents, the daughter later e-mailed the school counselor to say she was “genderqueer” and requested to be called by a new name and pronouns while at school.
The parents allege that various school officials — the librarian, principal, counselor and superintendent — violated their request by affirming and privately counseling the student about her gender identity, without their knowledge or consent, in alignment with the district’s nondisclosure policy.
Over one thousand school districts across the nation have gender identity nondisclosure policies, Parents Defending Education says. (istock)
A 3-judge panel of the First Circuit Court, entirely composed of Democratic presidential appointees, sided with the Ludlow school district.
The panel ruled that the district’s nondisclosure policy “does not restrict parental rights in a way courts have recognized as a violation of the guarantees of substantive due process.”
The ruling recognized parents’ rights to be “informed of, and to direct, significant aspects of their child’s life,” but added that those rights “are not unlimited.”
“Parents may not invoke the Due Process Clause to create a preferred educational experience for their child in public school,” the ruling states.
The panel rejected the parents’ argument that the school’s actions constituted medical or mental health treatment, and argued that discussions about gender identity with the student were within the scope of the school’s ability to make “curricular and administrative decisions.”
MASSACHUSETTS PARENTS SUE SCHOOL, SAY OFFICIALS ENCOURAGED CHILDREN TO USE NEW NAMES, PRONOUNS WITHOUT CONSENT
Parents across the nation have filed lawsuits against school districts for concealing students’ gender identity from parents. (Fox News Digital)
The judges argued that Ludlow’s protocol followed guidance handed down by the Commonwealth’s Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), advising schools on how to comply with state laws against gender identity discrimination in public schools.
The DESE guidance suggests school officials accommodate a student’s requested gender identity to make them feel safe and supported and ask for their consent before informing parents, if they are 14 years of age or older.
“If a student is under 14 and is not yet in the ninth grade, the student’s parent (alone) has the authority to decide on disclosures and other student record matters,” the guidance states.
Broyles told Fox News Digital that there were a number of issues with this defense.
First, the Education Department’s guidance was voluntary, so schools were not required to follow it, she said. Second, it did not apply in this case as the students were under 14 years old, and third, this guidance still must be interpreted in light of the U.S. Constitution.
She argued the court ruling expanded the authority of school officials over the family’s “personal, intimate mental health decisions.”
CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST MEDIA AND CULTURE NEWS
Lawyers for Massachusetts parents Stephen Foote and Marissa Silvestri argued the gender identity nondisclosure protocol, affirming students’ gender identity without consulting parents, was an unconstitutional mental health intervention. (iStock)
“Effectively, parents are losing the ability to direct the upbringing of their child if they choose to send their children to public schools that they pay for in their taxes. That cannot possibly be the standard for the children of the First Circuit,” she said.
The lawsuit claimed school officials also applied the gender identity protocol to their 12-year-old son, who also began using a different name and pronouns around the same time of these events. However, the federal court’s decision only focused on the younger child, saying there were “scant relevant details” provided specific to the student’s older sibling.
The Massachusetts Family Institute also represented the parents in court.
The Ludlow defendants’ attorneys did not respond to requests for comment.
David Lawless, a lawyer for the Ludlow School Committee, called the First Circuit’s decision a “characteristically thoughtful and well-reasoned opinion,” Reuters reported.
The case is one of several cases nationally coming from parents suing school districts over their gender identity policies that conceal the child’s transgender identity from parents.
According to conservative education watchdog Parents Defending Education, there are at least 1,195 school districts across 37 states and Washington, D.C., that have policies that explicitly state that school officials “can or should keep a student’s transgender status hidden from parents.”
President Trump signed an executive order in January calling to strip federal funding for “illegal and discriminatory treatment and indoctrination in K-12 schools, including based on gender ideology and discriminatory equity ideology.”
Reuters contributed to this report.
Read the full article from Here
Pittsburg, PA
Panini A. Chowdhury: How much did Pittsburgh buy with its national introduction?
Connecticut
PAID POST: Connecticut Expands AI Workforce Training Through Charter Oak Partnership
Connecticut is taking a major step to prepare its workforce for the growing influence of artificial intelligence, as Charter Oak State College announces a significant expansion of its AI Academy.
Through this initiative, developed in partnership with the Business-Higher Education Forum and Axim Collaborative, Charter Oak learners, job seekers, educators, and employees of small and mid-sized businesses will gain new pathways to in-demand careers using the Open edX platform.
Charter Oak, which is part of the Connecticut State Colleges & Universities (CSCU) system, is the state’s only public online college.
At a time when artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming industries ranging from healthcare to finance, the expansion reflects both urgency and opportunity. Employers are increasingly seeking workers who understand how to apply AI tools effectively, yet many job seekers and organizations lack access to affordable, relevant training. The AI Academy is intended to close that gap by aligning education directly with workforce needs.
This effort addresses a pressing economic challenge: ensuring that small and mid-sized businesses — which employ nearly half of Connecticut’s workforce — are not left behind as AI reshapes industries.
“Connecticut’s economic strength lies in its small and medium-sized businesses. The expansion of the AI Academy is a direct investment in those businesses, providing them with the high-level AI fluency typically reserved for large corporations. Furthermore, by bringing a tool-agnostic, mindset-first approach to our K-12 districts, we are helping educators move past the ‘hype’ and focus on the strategic deployment of AI. We aren’t just teaching people how to use AI; we are empowering Connecticut’s schools and businesses to lead with it,” said Dr. Dave Ferreira, Provost, Charter Oak State College.
The expanded AI Academy will offer stackable credentials over a three-year period, combining technical training with durable skills like communication, problem-solving, adaptability, and digital literacy. Learners will be able to progress at their own pace, building credentials that align with specific career pathways while remaining flexible enough to adapt to changing job market demands.
The program is designed with direct input from more than 100 leaders across business and higher education, including major employers in insurance, consulting, and technology. That collaboration ensures the curriculum reflects real-world needs, helping participants gain skills that are immediately applicable in the workplace.
A key component of the initiative is a new pathway for K-12 school districts. Rather than focusing on specific tools or platforms, the program emphasizes building an “AI mindset” — equipping educators and administrators with the knowledge to make informed, strategic decisions about how AI is used in classrooms and operations. This approach is intended to help school systems develop sustainable policies that can evolve alongside rapidly changing technology.
“The future of work demands a new kind of collaboration,” said Kristen Fox, CEO of the Business-Higher Education Forum. “When employers and institutions join forces to equip learners with AI skills and durable competencies, we create real pathways for people to unlock new opportunities, advance their careers, and thrive in an economy that is changing faster than any one sector can address alone. This is the model we need — and Connecticut is showing how it’s done.”
In addition to supporting businesses and schools, the initiative aims to expand access for individuals who have traditionally faced barriers to career advancement. By offering flexible online learning, the program is designed to reach underemployed workers, adult learners, and those seeking to transition into new fields.
The academy will begin with foundational AI coursework and expand into high-demand fields such as business, health technology, and cybersecurity — sectors where the need for skilled workers continues to grow. Over time, the program is expected to scale statewide before expanding nationally, with a goal of reaching 10,000 learners over the next five years.
“By partnering with employers to co-design AI-focused curricula, Charter Oak and BHEF are equipping learners with the skills and experiences they need to thrive in a changing economy while fueling regional economic development,” said Stephanie Khurana, CEO of Axim Collaborative.
The effort builds on Charter Oak’s existing CT AI Academy, launched in 2025, which has already served more than 3,500 residents with free AI training. That early success demonstrated strong demand for accessible AI education and helped lay the foundation for this expanded, more comprehensive model.
State higher education leaders say the initiative strengthens Connecticut’s long-term workforce pipeline while positioning the state as a model for others seeking to align education with economic development.
As artificial intelligence continues to reshape the workplace, Connecticut’s approach highlights how coordinated investment in education, business partnerships, and workforce development can help ensure that growth is both inclusive and sustainable — and that workers and employers alike are prepared for what comes next.
Maine
Keep Maine beautiful by protecting, investing in our public lands | Opinion
David Heidrich lives in Augusta.
From the cliffs of Acadia to the woods and waters of Katahdin’s national monument, Maine’s public lands are more than scenic, they are the backbone of our economy and way of life. Anyone who has spent any amount of time in these or other public places knows that they offer more than just natural beauty. They are central to our identity, drawing visitors from around the world, supporting small businesses and sustaining jobs in communities across the state.
As someone deeply invested in the success of Maine’s outdoor recreation and tourism industries, I know that investing in our public lands will support thriving communities for generations to come. But maintaining these places requires more than appreciation, it requires sustained investment and action.
In 2020, Congress recognized that many of our country’s national parks and other public lands were suffering from decades of deferred maintenance. Roads, bridges, water systems, historic structures and visitor facilities were aging faster than they could be repaired. In response, lawmakers passed the Great American Outdoors Act, which created the National Parks and Public Lands Legacy Restoration Fund (LRF).
This landmark legislation provided five years of dedicated funding to address long-overdue repairs on federal lands. Here in Maine, the LRF delivered $54 million for critical repairs to our public lands. These investments supported projects at places like Acadia National Park — improving trails, restoring historic carriage roads and upgrading essential infrastructure — as well as work on national forests and wildlife refuges across the state. These projects have served to protect natural resources, improve safety and enhance visitor experiences while supporting local economies.
Now, with that funding having expired, Congress is considering the America the Beautiful Act, introduced by Sen. Steve Daines of Montana and Maine’s own Sen. Angus King. The bill has received strong bipartisan support, and I want to thank Sen. King and Sen. Collins for their leadership in advocating for this important legislation.
The America the Beautiful Act rises above politics and reflects a shared commitment to conservation and safeguarding the places that help define both Maine and our nation. By continuing to invest in our public lands, we ensure they sustain local economies while preserving natural resources for residents, visitors and future generations alike.
Outdoor recreation is a cornerstone of Maine’s economy. Each year, millions of visitors come to experience our parks, trails, waterways and working forests — supporting roughly 32,000 jobs and generating $3.9 billion in economic activity. That is approximately 5% of Maine’s workforce and 4% of its GDP, respectively. Communities throughout Maine depend on these visitors, and the continued health of our public lands is essential to their continued success.
While important progress has been made, maintenance backlogs on our federal lands persist and require reliable, long-term funding. Congress should pass the America the Beautiful Act because it would provide $2 billion per year for eight additional years to address ongoing maintenance needs across national parks and public lands — without raising taxes.
This is accomplished by: 1) dedicating lease and royalty payments from energy producers operating on federal lands and waters to conservation, 2) requiring federal agencies to identify and dispose of unneeded assets, and 3) leveraging private funding by introducing a preference for projects with a 15% financial match from private stakeholders or nonprofit organizations.
By passing this legislation, Congress can ensure that Maine’s treasured public lands remain safe, accessible and vibrant. If we want future generations to experience Maine as we know it today, we need to invest in it now.
-
Pittsburg, PA5 minutes agoPanini A. Chowdhury: How much did Pittsburgh buy with its national introduction?
-
Augusta, GA11 minutes agoWest Augusta festival celebrates Cinco de Mayo with Latin cuisine
-
Washington, D.C17 minutes agoDC Weather: Sunny and pleasantly cool start to May
-
Cleveland, OH23 minutes agoMan in critical condition after shooting on Cleveland’s East Side: EMS
-
Austin, TX29 minutes ago
William Brian Moriarty Obituary
-
Alabama35 minutes agoA quick history of the University of Alabama for commencement weekend
-
Alaska41 minutes agoBook review: ‘The North Face of Summer’ offers a compassionate look at an Alaska conflict
-
Arizona47 minutes agoArizona Lottery Powerball, The Pick results for May 2, 2026