Northeast
Daniel Penny trial: Subway madman raised fists before Marine vet's deadly chokehold, witness testifies
Moments before New York Marine veteran Daniel Penny placed the erratic Jordan Neely in a chokehold that proved fatal, the emotionally disturbed homeless man raised his fists in the middle of a subway car while shouting at passengers, a witness testified Thursday.
Moriela Sanchez, an 18-year-old from Harlem, said she was taking the train home from school when chaos broke out.
Neely, 30, threw his jacket down and squared up, she testified on day 11 of what is expected to be a six-week trial in New York City.
“If no one gives him water or food, he’s gonna start putting hands on people,” she said. “He was going to start attacking.”
TEEN WITNESS TO JORDAN NEELY CHOKEHOLD TESTIFIES SHE WAS ‘SCARED’ BY HIS SHOUTING, WANTED TO ‘GET AWAY’
Daniel Penny arrives for opening arguments in his trial at Manhattan Supreme Court in New York City on Nov. 1, 2024. Penny, a Marine veteran, is charged with second-degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in the 2023 death of Jordan Neely on a New York City subway train. (Adam Gray for Fox News Digital)
She added that he was shouting it at everyone on the train car, not any specific rider. Despite the aggression, he did not touch anyone, she added.
“After that, Penny started putting his hands around his neck – and after that he dropped him down so he was closed off from attacking people,” Sanchez testified. “Penny dropped down on his back, and Jordan was on top of him.”
DANIEL PENNY TRIAL: MEET THE JURORS WHO WILL DECIDE MARINE VETERAN’S FATE IN SUBWAY CHOKEHOLD CASE
Screenshot from bystander video showing Jordan Neely being held in a chokehold on the New York City subway. (Luces de Nueva York/Juan Alberto Vazquez via Storyful)
She said that she believed that Penny was doing it to stop Neely from attacking people.
She got off at the next stop and called 911. She said Penny still had Neely in a chokehold at that time. She noted that a second man, whom she described as a Black male wearing a hat, helped Penny hold Neely down during the encounter.
Under cross-examination, she said “yes” when asked if she felt a sense of relief after Penny placed Neely in a headlock, but she contradicted her own grand jury testimony when she said it looked like Penny was squeezing Neely’s neck. She said it did on Thursday. She said the opposite during the grand jury proceedings.
Her previous grand jury testimony was read in court. She was asked, “Did it look like the white man was squeezing the black man’s neck?”
“No, he was holding him down so he wouldn’t attack nobody,” she said.
This was the first time in my life that I took a moment because I was scared that I was going to die in that moment.
The next witness was Kaydren Schrunk, a Nike senior brand manager who lives in Brooklyn and was on her way to meet a friend for coffee when Neely died.
She testified that Neely was shouting in the middle of the train, making threatening gestures. He smelled like “soiled sweatpants” and she feared he might have a gun or a knife, although she didn’t see one.
A still image from NYPD bodycam video shows responding officers examining Jordan Neely, who is on the ground after Daniel Penny placed him in a chokehold. Penny is on trial facing charges of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide. (NYPD)
“It was a scent that took over the subway – it was like physically soiled sweatpants,” she said. “Mr. Neely may not have been showering appropriately – it was a very strong odor and his sweatpants were definitely soiled.”
She could not remember exactly what he was saying, but testified that he was making life-threatening statements.
“This was the first time in my life that I took a moment because I was scared that I was going to die in that moment,” she said.
Penny intervened with a takedown “at the highest level of the outburst,” she said, testifying that his arm was across Neely’s chest. Two other men helped him hold Neely down, she said.
This undated photo, provided by Mills and Edwards, LLP, in New York, Friday, May 12, 2023, shows Jordan Neely, left, with Carolyn Neely, an aunt. (Courtesy Mills & Edwards, LLP via AP)
Next to testify was Johnny Grima, a 40-year-old Bronx resident who is unemployed but spends time working with the homeless. He served 13 months behind bars for bashing someone over the head with a baseball bat – but he claimed on the witness stand he didn’t do it.
Grima said he didn’t see the start of the altercation but arrived after the train’s stopped and watched Penny let go of Neely, who was limp at the time.
Grima testified that he said outloud that they shouldn’t leave Neely on his back while unconscious. He should be on his side so he wouldn’t choke.
Grima, who poured water on Neely’s head, testified that Penny was “flinging Neely’s limbs around carelessly” as he repositioner him on the subway car floor.
After jurors left for lunch, Penny’s defense team took issue with how objections were handled during Grima’ testimony. Judge Maxwell Wiley said he believes that Grima’s “bias” was clear to the jury but that he still had relevant testimony to give.
A court sketch depicts Juan Alberto Vazquez testifying on the second day of testimony in Daniel Penny’s trial at Manhattan Supreme Court in New York City on Monday, November 4, 2024. Penny, a Marine veteran, is on trial for the 2023 death of Jordan Neely on the New York City subway. (Jane Rosenberg )
The trial resumed after lunch with testimony from the prosecution’s 14 witness, an NYPD 911 technician named Paula Williams. She testified about how the NYPD archives and organizes 911 calls, and described the first four calls that came in on the day of Neely’s death.
Then the court heard the first recording aloud, although it was partly muffled.
“Someone started acting crazy on the train talking about hes ready to go to jail hes gonna hurt someone so someone took him down with a chokehold,” the caller said.
“Is there a weapon?” the dispatcher replied.
Protestors gather calling for Justice for Jordan Neely outside of the trial of Daniel Penny at Manhattan Supreme Court in New York City on Friday, November 1, 2024. Today is the first day of opening statements in Penny’s trial, where he is charged with second-degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide in the 2023 death of Jordan Neely on a New York City subway train. (Adam Gray for Fox News Digital)
“Ma’am no, but this guys got him in a restraint,” the caller said.
Witness 15 was NYPD Officer Isatu Cesay, who responded to the scene and took the stand in uniform.
She said that by the time she arrived, Neely was unconscious and did not appear to be breathing. He did not have a pulse when she checked sometime later.
She said she asked Penny, “Did you see what happened?”
“Yeah,” he replied, according to her testimony. “The guy came on the train throwing s— and saying he was ready to die and go to jail for life. I put him in a chokehold and took him to the ground…I had him pretty good.”
Prosecutors then played her bodycam in court which showed a similar conversation.
Under cross-examination, she testified that other officers found a pulse before she checked herself and there wasn’t one.
Manhattan prosecutors say that Penny went too far and negligently caused Neely’s death. The defense argues that his actions were justified defense.
Penny, who is a 25-year-old Marine Corps veteran and college student majoring in architecture, could face up to 19 years in prison if convicted.
Neely had a history of mental illness and criminality, including a prior charge for assaulting a 67-year-old New York City woman in 2021.
This is a developing story. Stick with Fox News Digital for updates.
Read the full article from Here
New York
Video: Racing to the World Cup From New York
By Stefanos Chen, Maria Cramer, Christopher Maag, Wm. Ferguson, Sutton Raphael and Laura Salaberry
June 16, 2026
Boston, MA
Two Things People Are Getting Wrong About Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Fit In Boston
While the veracity of the rumors involving Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Boston Celtics continue to be debated, there are a couple of very important people are missing about all of this should this trade come to pass.
Boston’s style of play will not change, and simply swapping Jaylen Brown for Antetokounmpo doesn’t change the trajectory of the team so significantly that Brad Stevens’ work will be done.
For some reason, there is a school of thought that acquiring Antetokounmpo, a noted non-shooter, would materially change Boston’s offensive strategy. It won’t. It doesn’t mean things won’t be a little different, but this notion that Antetokounmpo will force Mazzulla to scrap his approach and try something new is false.
The Bucks have routinely been in the top five in three-point attempts beginning in the 2018-19 season, Antetokounmpo’s first MVP run. Beginning in that season, they have ranked second, fourth, eighth, fifth, fourth, fifth, 18th, and 10th. The last two seasons when they dropped out of the top were coached by Doc Rivers.
According to PBPStats.com, Antetokounmpo has assisted on more three-pointers than two-pointers in each of the past two seasons, with a low of 209 three created in in the 2023 season, and a high of 290 created the following year. Over his career, he has assisted on 2,325 three-pointers. That’s almost as many as Jaylen Brown and Derrick White have made combined (2,437) over their entire careers.
It should be no surprise that Antetokounmpo is a three-point generating machine. His drives are massively effective, and they generally require a lot of defensive help. That opens up passing lanes to shooters, which Antetokounmpo finds regularly.
If anything, we could see Boston’s three-point volume go up. Brown’s closest season generating that kind of three-point volume was this past season when he created 196 over 71 games. By contrast, Antetokounmpo created 135 over 36 games. So anyone pushing for the Antetokounmpo trade thinking it will force Mazzulla’s hand to change strategies is sorely mistaken. “Mazzulla-ball” will probably take off under these circumstances.
Which brings us to the work Stevens will have to do once they theoretically acquire Antetokounmpo.
Giannis flirted with some volume three-point shooting a few years ago, averaging 4.7 attempts in 2020, his second MVP season, and 3.6 in each of the next two, but he’s a career 28.5% shooter from deep who peaked at 34.7% in his rookie season. Mazzulla is willing to go with one non-shooter on the floor, but generally not two.
So where does that leave Neemias Queta?
How would the Celtics build an offense with Queta, a non-shooter, and Antetokounmpo on the floor at the same time? The drives that Antetokounmpo is known for would be clogged with defenders who already know to build a wall to prevent him from getting to the rim. What worked in Milwaukee was playing Brook Lopez at center and having him stretch the floor. Boston doesn’t have that element right now. The closest thing they had to that, Nikola Vucevic, never got his footing in his short stint in Boston and seems to be done here.
A straight swap of Antetokounmpo and Brown will obviously upgrade a top 15 player to a top five player, but Brown led the NBA in two-point attempts per game last season with 16. At his peak, Antetokounmpo averaged 17 or 18 two-point attempts per game, but Brown’s three-point shooting does add an element of floor spacing that Antetokounmpo doesn’t. A straight swap of those two players creates a bit of a fit issue with the current starting center that would have to be addressed.
This also doesn’t solve Boston’s need for a third scorer and some punch off the bench. Stevens will still have to use his mid-level exception to find that no matter which of the two stars is in Boston to start the season.
We can debate whether Antetokounmpo or Brown make Boston more of a favorite next season, but that debate is leading people down some wrong paths. Giannis isn’t some cure for the three-point-heavy Celtics offense. In fact, it might be more appropriate to call him Gasoline Antetokounmpo for what he might do for the shooting volume. And any notion that everything is fixed with Antetokounmpo in the fold is wrong. Stevens will have to solve some fit issues and still address needs that exist today.
Follow
Pittsburg, PA
Pittsburgh continues free summer meal program for children under 18
As schools close for the summer, many children lose access to meals they rely on during the school year.
However, once again, CitiParks has teamed up with Pittsburgh Public Schools, the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank, Turner’s, Monteverde’s, and the American Dairy Association to continue their free summer meal program. From now until mid-August, any child under the age of 18 can receive free breakfast, lunch and snacks at eight rec centers and more than 40 partner locations across Pittsburgh.
They announced the continuance of the program on Tuesday at the Super Playground in Highland Park, where kids enjoyed face painting, creating their own paintings on canvases, live music and a puppet show, among other activities. CitiParks’ Roving Art Cart hosted the event.
Last year, they provided more than 70,000 breakfast meals, more than 100,000 lunch meals, and more than 20,000 snacks, free of charge.
“This program reflects what can happen when city government, schools, nonprofits and community organizations work together toward a common goal,” said Eric Sloan, the city’s Director of Parks and Recreation. “Together, we’re helping to ensure that children remain healthy, active and connected throughout the summer.”
“Our work does not end when the school year ends, and while the school year may end in June, the need for reliable access to nutritious food does not,” said Pittsburgh Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Wayne Walters, who encouraged families to both take advantage of this program and spread the word to other families who may need it.
Kelsey Gross, director of child nutrition programs for the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank, said an average of nearly 54,000 children per day in Allegheny County rely on school meals. According to Feeding America’s research, 20,000,000 students nationwide were eligible for free and reduced-price school lunches a year ago. But fewer than 5,000,000 participated in summer meal programs. That’s a gap they hope to reduce.
“Because that’s exactly what this program is about: making sure every child has the resources they need to thrive all summer long,” said Sloan.
“A healthy meal helps students to focus, to engage and succeed in the classroom, and that understanding guides our work every day,” said Walters. “It is why programs like Summer Meals are so important.”
-
Movie Reviews10 minutes ago‘Find Your Friends’ Movie Review: Helena Howard Standout Performance Nearly Saves Shudder Misfire – Deepest Dream
-
World22 minutes agoVideo: Among Mexico’s World Cup Fans: Merlin the Duck
-
Lifestyle1 hour agoDMV artist turns belts into a conversation about discipline
-
Technology1 hour agoThe Complete Calvin and Hobbes is a great last-minute Father’s Day gift
-
World1 hour agoAnti-G7 protest turns violent as demonstrators torch Tesla and smash UN office windows
-
Politics1 hour agoDems pick potential successor to DC’s congressional delegate after decades-long incumbency
-
Health1 hour agoBride in full wedding gown makes 2-hour hospital trip to see her mother before the ceremony
-
Sports2 hours agoBest Of World Cup: Top Fan Moments, From Cape Verde’s Goats To Mexico’s Duck