As the rest of the country celebrated the USA’s first World Cup win and the New York Knicks championship, Anthropic spent its weekend fighting the Trump administration over its latest model release. At 5:21 PM on Friday, the company received a US export control directive to suspend access to its Mythos 5 and Fable 5 AI models by “any foreign national” inside or outside the US, “including foreign national Anthropic employees.” The only way that was possible, Anthropic determined, was to completely disable products it spent the past week hyping — and travel to Washington, DC in hopes of changing President Donald Trump’s mind. Now, over the coming days, the US government could dramatically alter the trajectory of the entire industry, dealing a major blow to American AI companies.
Technology
All the latest news on Android 17, Wear OS 7, and Android XR
Google’s Android 17 update includes highlights like new floating “Bubble” app windows for easier multitasking, a Screen Reaction recording mode, and a 50/50 split gaming mode for foldable phones. Meanwhile, Wear OS 7 brings Live Updates, better battery life for smart watches, and prepares connections for new Android XR smart glasses that will launch this fall.
The update is rolling out to Pixel phones first, then other devices, with some features like Gemini Intelligence set to debut later this year.
Follow along here for the latest updates.
Technology
The Father’s Day gift that protects your dad from scammers
The ultimate Father’s Day tech gift list
Kurt ‘CyberGuy’ Knutsson provides an ultimate Father’s Day tech gift list for 2026, offering deals on gadgets and electronics. He recommends Norton Antivirus for digital protection, Rest Evercool+ cooling sheets for comfort, and the Anker Solix portable power station for outages. Additionally, he showcases the Apple Watch Series 11 for health monitoring and a portable espresso machine for coffee lovers.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
You have probably already thought about the usual Father’s Day gifts. A golf shirt. A grill tool set. Another gift card that feels easy, but not exactly meaningful. So, here’s something worth thinking about this year. Your dad’s name, home address, phone number and even your name as his child may already be sitting on dozens of people-search websites. Completely exposed. Visible to anyone with an internet connection and a few minutes to search.
Scammers are not just browsing those sites. They are using them to build detailed profiles. That means they may know where your dad lives, who he is related to and how to make a fake emergency sound real. That is why one of the most useful gifts you can give him this Father’s Day may not come in a box.
It is 30 minutes of your time, a few smart privacy steps and a service that helps protect him the other 364 days of the year. Here’s what is going on and exactly what you can do about it.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
HOW TO REMOVE YOUR PERSONAL INFO FROM PEOPLE-SEARCH SITES
A Father’s Day privacy check can help protect dads from people-search sites, AI voice scams and family impersonation fraud. (shapercharge / Getty Images)
What scammers can find about your dad in under 10 minutes
You don’t have to take my word for it. Go to Spokeo, WhitePages, or BeenVerified right now and type in your dad’s name. What comes back will probably stop you cold. A typical profile looks something like this:
Robert D. Henderson | Age: 67 | Tampa, FL Also known as: Robert David Henderson Current address: [home address] Previous addresses: 5 records found Phone numbers: 3 found Email addresses: 2 found Relatives: 7 found, including [your name] Profile shown for illustrative purposes.
That’s just the preview. The full report costs a few dollars at most. Some of it is completely free. And that “Relatives” field? That’s where your name shows up. Linked directly to his profile. The scammer now has a starting point. From here, they start connecting the dots.
How scammers use your dad’s personal information
Once a scammer has your dad’s basic profile, the damage can grow quickly. Data broker sites do more than list current contact information. They can also show address history, estimated household income, property ownership status and a web of family connections.
Here is how scammers can put that information to work.
Family impersonation scams
A phone call may start with, “Hey Dad, it’s me. I’m in serious trouble, and I can’t tell Mom yet.” The scammer may know your name. They may know your city. They may even know he is your father. Suddenly, the call does not sound like a scam. It sounds like a family crisis.
Bank security question attacks
Many banks and financial institutions still rely on knowledge-based verification. That can include a mother’s maiden name, a previous address or a city of birth. The problem is that those answers may already be sitting in public data broker profiles. A scammer can call his bank, pretend to be him and answer those questions correctly without ever touching his password.
Personalized financial fraud
Data broker profiles often include estimated home value and income range. Those details can come from public property records and marketing databases. If your dad’s profile shows a paid-off home and years of stable residence, he may look like a strong target for investment fraud, fake Medicare schemes and government impersonation scams.
Family-wide targeting
When one person’s profile is exposed, it can map the whole family network. Your dad’s data may lead to your profile. Your profile may lead to his grandchildren. One exposed profile can turn into a family-wide vulnerability.
REMOVE YOUR DATA TO PROTECT YOUR RETIREMENT FROM SCAMMERS
Elder fraud losses are climbing fast
According to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center, complaints from victims over 60 exceeded 201,000 in 2025, with reported losses topping $7.7 billion, a 59% increase in losses compared to the previous year. The average reported loss for older victims was more than $38,000.
This isn’t like a stolen credit card charge that a bank can reverse. For many older victims, the loss can come from a retirement account or home equity built over decades. Once that money disappears, recovery can be difficult and sometimes impossible.
The FTC documented a more than fourfold increase since 2020 in reports from older adults who say they lost $10,000 or more to impersonation scams. Combined losses reported by older adults who lost more than $100,000 increased eightfold, from $55 million in 2020 to $445 million in 2024.
And because most elder fraud goes unreported, out of embarrassment, confusion, or simply not knowing how, the FTC estimates the real losses experienced by older adults in 2024 could be as high as $81.5 billion. Your dad isn’t careless. He’s not naive. He’s just exposed, and he has no idea.
Scammers can use exposed addresses, phone numbers and family connections to make fake emergency calls sound convincing. (iStock)
Why your dad’s personal information may already be exposed
This is the part that surprises most adult children. Your dad didn’t sign up for any of these sites. He didn’t consent to having his address history and family members listed publicly. It happened anyway.
Data brokers pull from voter registration records, property tax filings, court documents, old marketing survey responses, loyalty program memberships, phone directories and from each other. None of that required his permission. Once it’s in the system, it gets bought, sold, refreshed, and resold constantly.
Even if your dad has never heard of Spokeo or BeenVerified, his profile may already be out there. Social media can make the problem worse. A Facebook account, a tagged photo or a public family connection can give scammers more clues. Add that to a data broker profile, and they may have enough detail to sound like someone who actually knows him.
You can run a quick free scan right now at CyberGuy.com/ to see exactly how much of his information is already out there. Results usually arrive by email within an hour. Most people are shocked by what shows up.
The 5-step Father’s Day protection checklist
Think of this as something you do with your dad, not just for him. It takes about 30 minutes together, and it’s worth more than anything on a store shelf.
Step 1: Search for your dad before a scammer does
Open a browser and go to Spokeo.com, Whitepages.com, and BeenVerified.com. Type in his name and state. Screenshot what you find. That’s the baseline, what’s visible right now to anyone who’s looking. While you’re at it, search your own name too. Your profile is his entry point.
Step 2: Remove your dad’s information from data broker sites
Start with the data broker sites that appeared in his search results. Each site should have an opt-out or “Remove My Information” link, although it may be buried in the page footer. Then submit removal requests for the profiles you find. Some sites require email verification. Others may re-list the same information weeks later. A few may make the process frustrating on purpose. Even so, walking through two or three of the biggest sites with your dad can help him see the risk clearly. It also shows him why ongoing protection deserves attention.
WHAT HACKERS CAN LEARN ABOUT YOU FROM A DATA BROKER FILE
Step 3: Change your dad’s bank security answers
Call his bank together and update the knowledge-based security verification on his account. If the bank still asks for his mother’s maiden name or previous address as a verification question, those answers are likely already on a data broker site. The fix is simple: replace them with nonsense answers only he knows and store them somewhere safe. “Mother’s maiden name: BlueTractor62.” No scammer is finding that answer on a people-search site.
Step 4: Create a family code word
This step costs nothing. It may also be the single most effective thing you do together. Agree on a word or short phrase that only your immediate family knows. If he ever gets a call from someone claiming to be you, or claiming to be calling about you, he asks for the code word. No code word means he hangs up and calls you directly. With advances in AI, scammers can now clone the voices of loved ones, making impersonation calls even harder to detect. A pre-agreed family code word cuts right through that. Scams work by creating panic. A calm, pre-planned protocol eliminates the panic before it starts.
Step 5: Set up ongoing data removal as the gift
Here’s the honest limitation of Steps 1 and 2: they’re a snapshot. Data brokers refresh their databases constantly. Information you remove today may quietly reappear in a few months, automatically, without any action on his part or yours. Manual opt-outs don’t fix the underlying problem. They just create a temporary gap. The most genuinely useful Father’s Day gift isn’t a one-time cleanup. It’s ongoing protection that runs in the background without either of you having to think about it.
Updating bank security answers and creating a family code word can help stop scammers from exploiting public personal data. (Antonio Diaz / Getty Images)
The Father’s Day gift worth giving: ongoing data removal
A data removal service can send removal requests to hundreds of data brokers on your dad’s behalf. It can also keep checking for his information and send new requests when it reappears.
That ongoing part is key. You can set it up for him, and neither of you has to keep chasing every people-search site one by one.
A family plan may be the smarter option because your exposure is connected to his. If your name appears in your dad’s profile, scammers can use that link to target both of you. Covering several family members under one plan can help protect your dad, yourself and other relatives at the same time.
Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting CyberGuy.com.
5 STEPS TO PROTECT YOUR FINANCES FROM FAMILY SCAMS
One more thing to tell your dad
Before you wrap up your visit, leave him with one sentence he can actually remember:
“If anyone ever calls claiming to be me and asking for money, hang up and call me back directly. I will never reach out through an unknown number.”
Say it out loud. Make sure he hears it. Then say it again at the end of the visit.
That one instruction can help stop a devastating scam before it starts. It does not require an app, a password or a subscription. It only requires a clear conversation with your dad, which is something you can have this Father’s Day.
Kurt’s key takeaways
Your dad’s personal information may already be sitting on people-search sites, and he may have no idea it is there. Scammers can use that data to make calls, texts and emails feel much more personal. They may know his address, phone number, relatives’ names and even past places he lived. That gives them enough detail to impersonate family members, target his finances or get around weak security questions. That is why a good Father’s Day gift can go beyond another shirt, tool set or gift card. Spend 30 minutes with your dad. Search for his information, remove what you can, update his bank security answers and create a family code word. Then consider automated data removal, so his information does not quietly reappear later. The best gift may be the one that helps him avoid the call, text or email that could cost him far more than money down the road.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Have you ever searched your dad’s name, or your own, on a people-search site and been surprised by what showed up? Let us know by writing to us at CyberGuy.com.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Technology
Inside the fight over Claude Mythos 5
Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 are built on the same foundation as Anthropic’s Mythos Preview, which Anthropic dubbed too dangerous to publicly release. (The company’s warnings could be seen as genuine concern or more hype for their own model — or both.) Mythos 5 was made available to a select group of government agencies and companies, while Fable 5, which featured additional safeguards, was deemed “safe for general use.” But when a report indicated those guardrails may have failed, Anthropic’s dire warnings about Mythos falling into the wrong hands came back to haunt it.
A source familiar with the situation, who participated in the negotiations between Anthropic and the Trump administration, said the administration called the AI lab on Friday around 1pm ET and gave the company a 90-minute ultimatum to shut down access to Mythos 5 and Fable 5. If it didn’t, then the government would impose export controls on Anthropic by authority of the US Commerce Department.
The source said that Anthropic executives were talking to the White House within 15 minutes of that first call, confirming that CEO Dario Amodei joined the discussions about an hour and 15 minutes after that initial call. Amodei directly spoke with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross, in some cases more than once, the source confirmed.
Anthropic wrote in a release on Friday that the company believed that the government “believes it has become aware of a method of bypassing, or ‘jailbreaking’ Fable 5.” Rather than an existential threat, though, Anthropic said that the jailbreak in question was a “potential narrow, non-universal” one that was “shared with the government” by an entity the company declined to name. Moreover, Anthropic said the behavior wasn’t unique to Fable 5. “We have reviewed a report that we believe is the basis of the government’s directive and validated that the level of capability displayed there is widely available from other models (including OpenAI’s GPT-5.5),” Anthropic wrote.
Semafor reported, citing one source familiar, that the hubbub began because the US government was concerned that a China-linked group had accessed the technology. But the source said that the China rumors went back weeks, referring to a large global telecommunications company that was initially cleared to be included in access to Mythos Preview, and that when the US government shared its concerns, Anthropic immediately revoked access.
An X post by David Sacks, the US government’s former AI and crypto czar who stepped down in March, didn’t mention China either. Sacks did, however, mention the unnamed entity that had exposed the issue to the government, calling it “a highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable [which] came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails.”
Some reports point to Amazon CEO Andy Jassy as the person who flagged concerns to the US government after researchers at Amazon had red-teamed Fable 5. That conclusion stands at odds with some independent red-teamers, who have said they were impressed with the level of the protections.
The source familiar with the negotiations said that the Amazon research was explicitly mentioned in conversations with the US government. The person added that Anthropic had had access to that paper within days of the Friday export control directive and had been going back-and-forth since then with Amazon researchers to discuss it.
Everything in that paper, the source said, could be achieved by OpenAI’s GPT-5.5.
Anthropic spent the weekend scrambling to make nice with the Trump administration, beginning with virtual meetings and then flying employees to DC, including Dave Orr, Anthropic’s head of safeguards; Logan Graham, who runs its frontier red team and has led work on Project Glasswing; and Nicholas Carlini, a leading frontier developer and cybersecurity researcher. Axios reported, citing a source familiar with the Trump administration’s thinking, that the company simply has repeatedly made missteps in its communication with the administration and that it “has not done a great job at trying to speak to the administration and appreciate the ideological differences.” For Anthropic, the timing couldn’t be worse: the company had banked on Mythos to help it recover, in part, from months of high-profile clashes with the US Department of Defense.
The source familiar with the negotiations said that Anthropic pre-briefed the administration on Fable 5, and that the US Department of Commerce conducted testing pre-deployment, with no concerns shared at the time. The source added that Anthropic had been working closely with government agencies since Mythos Preview’s release.
The Trump administration initially took a hands-off approach to AI safety — but post-Mythos, it has become more ambivalent, even as it frets over the threat of losing the AI race to China. Now, prominent cybersecurity leaders have warned that sidelining Mythos 5 and Fable 5 could give China a significant AI advantage. Trump’s move has galvanized international calls for alternatives to American AI systems, while effectively putting a major US AI company’s new flagship model on ice.
A public letter from tech and cybersecurity executives called for restrictions on Fable 5 to be repealed on Sunday. “Not all of us agree that AI regulation is the right way forward,” the letter states, adding that if regulations are going to happen regardless, then they should be rooted in “scientific evaluations developed with input from industry and academia.”
Alex Stamos, chief product officer at Corridor, told The Verge he organized the public letter because the countless number of vulnerabilities in the past decade-plus, written in a variety of different coding languages, require AI to patch before bad actors find them. “We’re in a race, and I think policymakers don’t understand that,” Stamos said. “There’s this weird arrogance, this idea that American labs are hugely ahead of our adversaries that will always be true, that it’s really important to restrict access because of that. I just think that’s foolish. If the labs are ahead, it’s only by a matter of months. And you can see that in the open evaluations. The cutting-edge models are only something like six months ahead of the Chinese models — and those are the models we know about.”
The public letter goes on to state that though Anthropic’s Mythos-class models are skilled at finding cybersecurity vulnerabilities and taking advantage of exploits, they aren’t “uniquely good” at these tasks and that Fable 5’s safeguards “were so aggressive as to be the source of humor in the cyber community on launch day.” Stamos told The Verge that “there’s a real overstatement of Mythos’ capabilities. Anthropic is somewhat responsible for this themselves, clearly … Mythos is great, but the real turning point was really last year.”
Stamos said the industry is awash with backup contracts being signed with non-US companies and open-weight models being deployed on alternative hardware arrangements because the past weekend made political risk part of companies’ business plans more than ever before.
“They are laughing at us in Beijing right now,” Stamos said. “One of America’s champions is being kneecapped by the US government while we’re in a race with the Chinese. It’s just incredibly stupid. That’s why I wrote the letter, and I think that’s why a lot of people signed onto it.”
Ben Van Roo, co-founder and CEO of Legion Intelligence, a system of agents for the national security community, told The Verge that “the directive of ‘no foreign national should use this model’ is the most impossible thing to enforce.” He added, “When I first read that, my whole… [network of] AI community nerds was exploding.”
To make matters even more urgent, OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft have all come out with their own comparable products to Anthropic’s Mythos, making many of the same claims about their effectiveness and risks. If the Trump administration bans Anthropic’s advanced cybersecurity models, it can make a case for banning its competitors’ models, too. That could spur AI industry leaders to unite and help out Anthropic or, as with its fight over autonomous weapons with the Pentagon, position themselves as a safer and more compliant alternative.
Even as the Trump administration is trying to free tech companies of regulatory hassles, the Anthropic order could amount to a dramatic restriction on powerful AI models — depending on how the next few days play out.
Legion Intelligence’s Van Roo called it “uncharted territory” in the regulatory setting, adding that he doesn’t think this is the last time something like this will happen.
We’ve also entered the era of AI populism, when a growing number of people are pushing back against the AI industry’s outsized influence and the concentration of power at the top via data center protests, pledges to quit using AI chatbots, lawsuits over wrongful deaths, and even attempted attacks on AI company CEOs. Van Roo says the Trump administration’s recent moves against Anthropic could stoke “greater fears and concerns, potentially for the wrong reasons.”
The source familiar with the negotiations described the weekend’s conversations as constructive, with some members of the administration admitting that putting export controls on model providers isn’t ideal, since competitors with similar products may find themselves under the same restrictions — and since the US government is currently exploring a program that would encourage the export of American AI systems.
Monday’s talks concluded with no resolution as of yet.
As Anthropic continues to negotiate with the US government, there’s little chance that the company’s other myriad issues with the Pentagon won’t come up — namely, the ongoing battle between Anthropic and the Department of Defense over acceptable usage policies for Anthropic’s tech by the US military.
“This is new and we’ve never had anything potentially this drastic before, and it does have some real ramifications” in terms of how to enforce access to powerful models, Van Roo said. “Who gets to use this new technology that continues to outpace our own ability to regulate it?”
Technology
Smart street sensors could be watching your city next
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
New York City is expanding the use of small street activity sensors that count pedestrians, cyclists, buses and vehicles. The city says the goal is safer street design, better traffic planning and a clearer picture of how people actually use roads. That may sound like a very New York story. However, it is really a sign of where many U.S. cities could be headed.
Across America, towns and cities are trying to solve the same problems. Drivers speed through busy corridors. Pedestrians cross where there is no crosswalk. Cyclists squeeze past parked cars. Buses get stuck in traffic. City leaders often have to make expensive safety decisions with limited data. Now, sensors can watch those patterns all day and all night.
HOW SURVEILLANCE TECH LED POLICE TO ACCUSE THE WRONG PERSON
Transportation officials say smart sensors can help reveal how people actually use roads, from mid-block crossings to blocked bike lanes. (NYC DOT)
The promise is safer streets. The concern is privacy. The big question is whether cities can use this technology without making everyone feel like they are being watched.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Smart street sensors are coming to U.S. roads
The New York City Department of Transportation says it will expand its street activity sensor program to about 100 locations across the five boroughs. The city first tested the sensors at 20 intersections during a pilot program that began in 2023. Now, it plans to add about 80 more locations.
The tech behind the sensors is a form of AI called computer vision. In simple terms, the device looks at the street scene and classifies what it sees. That could be a pedestrian, cyclist, car, truck, bus or scooter. NYC DOT says the processing happens in real time. The video frames are deleted nearly instantly after the sensor collects the count.
The devices are mounted on city street infrastructure, such as poles or signs. Beyond counting different road users, the sensors can also measure speeds, capture turning movements and map how people move through a street or intersection.
How smart street sensors track traffic
Traditional traffic studies often depend on workers standing near a road and counting what they see. That can work, but it has limits.
A worker may count vehicles for a few hours. A city may collect data during one part of the day. Bad weather, school schedules, holiday traffic or construction can skew what gets recorded. Smart street sensors change that.
They can collect street activity data continuously. That gives transportation officials a much broader view of what happens over time. For example, a sensor may show that pedestrians cross mid-block every morning because a crosswalk is too far away. It may show that cyclists keep swerving around loading trucks. It may show that vehicles turn too fast near a school or bus stop. That kind of information can help cities redesign streets around real behavior, not just how people are supposed to move.
Why smart street sensors could make roads safer
Street safety often starts after something terrible happens. A crash occurs. A complaint gets filed. A dangerous intersection gets attention.
Smart sensors could help cities act sooner. The sensors can detect what transportation officials call near-misses. These are close calls that do not always show up in crash reports.
Think about a car door that swings open near a cyclist. Or a driver who turns while a pedestrian is already crossing. Or a delivery truck that blocks a driver’s view at a busy corner. Nobody may get hurt in that moment. Still, the pattern can reveal real danger.
If sensors detect repeated close calls in the same place, city planners may have a stronger reason to act before a crash happens. That could mean adding a crosswalk, changing signal timing, redesigning a bike lane or adjusting how curb space gets used.
AI DASHCAMS ENHANCE TRUCKER SAFETY WHILE RAISING PRIVACY CONCERNS
New York City is expanding smart street sensors that count pedestrians, bikes, buses and vehicles as officials look for safer street designs. (NYC DOT)
What smart street sensors may reveal
The most interesting part of this technology may be what it shows cities about everyday habits. Roads rarely work the way they look on a planning map. People cross where it feels convenient. Cyclists avoid lanes that feel unsafe. Drivers speed up when a road feels too wide. Buses slow down when curb space gets clogged. A sensor can help document those patterns.
That could help cities answer practical questions: Are pedestrians crossing in the same unsafe spot every day? Do cyclists avoid a certain bike lane because cars block it? Do buses slow down near busy loading zones? Are drivers turning too quickly near a school? Is a street redesign actually working? Better answers could lead to better decisions. But only if cities use the data in a way people can see and understand.
Smart street sensors raise privacy questions
This is where many people will pause. A sensor on a street pole can sound helpful. It can also sound creepy.
New York City says the sensors are designed with privacy in mind. According to the DOT, video is processed in real time and then discarded. The city says only anonymous data is kept. Faces and license plates are deliberately obscured.
That means the system is supposed to keep the traffic pattern, not the personal identity behind it.
Still, privacy concerns will not disappear with one promise from city officials. People have good reason to ask what gets collected, how long data is stored, who can access it and whether the rules could change later.
Those questions matter for every city that considers similar technology. Safer roads are important. So are clear limits on how much street-level data a city collects.
Why public access to street sensor data matters
If taxpayers help fund street sensors, the public should know what the sensors find. New York City says some information will be added to its open data page. Street safety advocates want more regular reporting. That is important.
A city should not collect information from public streets and then bury the results in a hard-to-find system. Residents should be able to see whether the technology leads to safer crossings, better bike routes, faster buses or fewer dangerous close calls.
Public reporting also helps build trust. If a city says sensors protect privacy, it should show how. If officials say sensors improve safety, they should show the results. Without that transparency, even a useful technology can feel like another layer of surveillance.
WASHINGTON COURT SAYS FLOCK CAMERA IMAGES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS
A Flock camera is shown close up with trees in the background, illustrating how surveillance tools can generate leads but still require human verification to avoid mistakes. (Antranik Tavitian/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
What smart street sensors mean for you
Even if you do not live in New York, this rollout is worth watching. Your city may be paying attention to how New York uses this technology. If the program helps planners make safer decisions faster, similar sensors could show up near schools, busy intersections, bike corridors or downtown streets in other communities.
If you walk often, the data could support better crosswalks and safer signal timing. Cyclists may benefit from stronger evidence for protected bike lanes. Drivers could notice new street designs that slow traffic, change turns or shift parking. Bus riders may see improvements if cities use the data to find where transit gets delayed.
However, cities need clear policies before these systems spread. They should explain what the sensors collect, what they delete, who reviews the data and how the public can see the results. Safer streets are a good goal. Public trust is part of getting there.
Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?
Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com
Kurt’s key takeaways
Smart street sensors could help cities fix dangerous roads before someone gets hurt. That is the strongest argument for this technology. If a city can spot risky patterns, identify near-misses and redesign streets based on real data, that could save lives. At the same time, cities need to handle privacy with care. People should not have to choose between safer streets and reasonable limits on public surveillance. The best version of this technology gives planners better information while keeping personal details out of the system. New York City may be one of the biggest test cases, but this is now a national conversation.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Would smart street sensors make you feel safer, or make public streets feel a little too watched? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
-
Finance5 minutes agoStudy shows that Florida and Georgia rank among top states where people search for financial help
-
Fitness7 minutes agoExpert Available: Curtis Bickham on Fitness, Exercise, and Healthy Living | Newswise
-
Movie Reviews20 minutes ago‘Toy Story 5’ review: The franchise’s best movie in 16 years hilariously tackles AI
-
World28 minutes agoStudiocanal Reveals Sales on Multiple Cannes Market Titles, Including ‘The Midnight Library,’ ‘Words of Love,’ ‘Another Day’
-
News35 minutes agoLive 2026 Election Results: Georgia, Alabama and Oklahoma Primary and Runoff Races
-
Politics37 minutes agoVideo: U.S. Charges 15 in Minneapolis With Conspiracy
-
Lifestyle1 hour agoFaith’s role in U.S. politics ‘requires humility,’ not certainty, says Sen. Warnock
-
World1 hour ago3 Brazilian men charged after woman tossed from bridge without safety rope