Connect with us

Connecticut

Opinion: CT has stupid high property taxes; a case for regional government

Published

on

Opinion: CT has stupid high property taxes; a case for regional government


Each year, towns in Connecticut go through the painful budget process, and my town of South Windsor is no different. What is different is how politically charged this has become.

The basis of the politicalization seems to be rooted in “the tax issue.” This past year South Windsor went through the real estate re-evaluation process required by law every five years. With the rise in real estate values, those evaluations increased dramatically.

The good news; your house is worth more. The bad news; your tax burden is going up.

This did not sit well with many residents. So, in November, the town voted out our super-majority Democrat Party Town Council and voted in a super-majority Republican Party Town Council. The Republicans had campaigned on a platform of cutting taxes, which obviously appealed to many voters.

Advertisement

It waits to be seen whether new town leadership can hold the line on taxes without negatively impacting our schools, town services, head count, and more. This is not a partisan issue. The dread of higher taxes is not a Republican or a Democratic thing. I view it as a practical thing.

Let me explain. I moved to Connecticut in 2002 having lived most of my life in Maryland and Pennsylvania. I learned quickly after moving here that property taxes in Connecticut were not just high, they’re stupid high. And on top of that I had to pay a tax because I own a car. I’ve never paid a personal property tax in my life previously.

Why is this? It’s simple math – towns need revenue to support expenditures. The revenue side is static. Connecticut does not have a prolific tax base. There is no Boston generating billions in tax revenue. Our statewide population is that of a Minneapolis or Tampa. We are not getting a windfall. So practically speaking, the only place to adjust is on the expense side. And here we have a wonderful opportunity.

That opportunity is called, regional government. It is a state-wide solution. This state is a victim of an incredibly inefficient provincial system of government that goes back to colonial days. We have 169 little kingdoms each duplicating the costs of each other. This creates an insane level of cost redundancy. We operate in fiscal silos with few or no economies of scale.

And you know who agrees with this? Forty-eight other states, none of whom do government this way; only Connecticut and Rhode Island operate in this manner. Think about that enormous duplication of costs across; parks and rec, public works, elderly services, tax collection, legal advisers, economic development, health services, IT infrastructure and education, just to name a few budget line items that could be streamlined.

Advertisement

Back in the 60s and 70s there was an attempt to move to regional government but it was so poorly executed that it failed. The infrastructure already exists as we have counties and planning groups called Regional Councils of Government. For this massive change to occur we need the will of leaders. But the grassroots level is where it needs to start as elected officials will not want to cede power.

Voters have to assert their will.

This is not a solution for today. It would take years if not decades to get to regional government. But 48 states have proven it works. If we’re serious about reducing taxes this is one big swing of the bat can get us there. For young families planning a long-term future in Connecticut, this would benefit kitchen table issues. If we start now, maybe your kids won’t have to pay a tax to own a car.

Paul Bernstein is a retired marketing executive who lives in South Windsor.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Connecticut

Opinion: The CT citizens locked out at the ballot box

Published

on

Opinion: The CT citizens locked out at the ballot box


As voters across Connecticut were casting ballots in this year’s presidential election, over 5,400 residents were being denied the right to vote because of Connecticut’s felony disenfranchisement law, which precludes those currently serving sentences for felonies from casting a ballot.

This practice perpetuates racial and economic injustice, and it undermines the central tenet of participatory democracy: that every citizen have a say over the laws that govern them. To ensure the equal and just treatment of its citizenry, Connecticut should end this practice.

In fact, Connecticut has a chance to become a national leader by ending felony disenfranchisement. Too often throughout history, the state has been among the last to dismantle policies that suppress the political power of communities of color. In 1818, Connecticut limited voting to white people, a restriction it did not repeal until 1876 —six years after the 15th Amendment prohibited racial discrimination in voting. By contrast, every other state in New England enfranchised Black residents before the Civil War.

In 1855, Connecticut was the first state to adopt a literacy test to restrict voting rights, a tactic that would become widely adopted in the Jim Crow South to systematically disenfranchise Black voters. Over a century later, when the Voting Rights Act finally banned the practice nationwide, Connecticut was one of the few states where this policy was still in effect.

Advertisement

Connecticut’s existing felony disenfranchisement policy continues to perpetuate the state’s legacy of suppressing the political power of minority communities. Black and Hispanic residents are incarcerated in Connecticut at nearly 10 and four times the rate of white residents, respectively. This over-representation is no coincidence: racial bias and discrimination are pervasive in the criminal legal system, leading to racially disparate outcomes in sentencing and convictions.

The impact of disenfranchisement also extends far beyond the individuals who have been stripped of their right to vote. Without a voice at the ballot box, incarcerated people are unable to cast votes in the interest of their neighborhoods, their children and families.

The effects ripple across communities —and because Connecticut remains one of the most segregated states in the country, the harm is concentrated in areas already grappling with the impacts of systemic discrimination. These are communities that face chronically underfunded schools, limited access to essential resources like grocery stores, childcare, and healthcare services, and more. By stripping those with felony convictions of their right to vote, Connecticut dilutes the political power of communities that most need to be heard.

In 2021, Connecticut took a meaningful step forward by restoring the vote to individuals on parole —but the state should do more. Connecticut should join Vermont, Maine, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico in granting universal suffrage regardless of incarceration status. It is the right thing to do as a matter of racial and economic justice.

It is also sound, pragmatic policy that promotes safe communities: studies show that voting strengthens ties between individuals and their communities and reduces recidivism among those reintegrating post-incarceration. Finally, universal suffrage would augment the political power of minority groups that have too often been marginalized in our political conversations.

Advertisement

Connecticut has an opportunity —and a responsibility— to advance racial and economic justice, strengthen its democracy, and promote safer communities by ensuring that every citizen, regardless of conviction status, has the right to vote.

Arianna Khan, Ethan Seidenberg, and Lauren Taylor are students in the Civil Rights Advocacy Clinic at Yale Law School.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Woman and 4-month-old boy killed in Hartford shooting

Published

on

Woman and 4-month-old boy killed in Hartford shooting



Copyright © 2024 NBCUniversal Media, LLC. All rights reserved





Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Smoke from MA fire noticed from Southington to New Haven

Published

on

Smoke from MA fire noticed from Southington to New Haven


GREAT BARRINGTON, MA (WFSB) – Smoke from a large fire in Massachusetts wafted into Connecticut.

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection said on Tuesday morning that smoke from the fire in Great Barrington traveled south into the state.

“Many residents from Southington to New Haven and beyond may be noticing a strong smell of smoke and haze [Tuesday] morning,” DEEP said.

DEEP said that Tuesday’s weather conditions caused smoke to spread widely and stay close to the ground. That’s what made it more noticeable.

Advertisement

“Local officials are monitoring the situation,” it said. “If you’re sensitive to smoke, consider staying indoors and keeping windows closed until conditions improve.”

More on the forecast can be read in the technical discussion from Channel 3’s meteorologists here.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending