Connect with us

Connecticut

Housing, education, paid sick days, police and more: Bills that passed in CT’s 2024 legislative session

Published

on

Housing, education, paid sick days, police and more: Bills that passed in CT’s 2024 legislative session


Hundreds of bills came before Connecticut lawmakers in the 2024 session on dozens of subjects from the state insect to solving the state’s housing crisis but only a few will become law. Though many bills were put on the calendar for a vote, a lack of political will or time, as legislators worked down to the last few minutes before the mandatory session ended at midnight Wednesday, limited what was approved. Here is a look at what passed.

Budget Stabilization and Bonding

In lieu of opening up the state budget for revision, lawmakers approved a $360 million spending package that doles out millions of unspent federal pandemic aid to fund higher education, children’s mental health, municipalities and nonprofits, among others.

The legislature also authorized nearly $2.5 billion in bonding for capital projects next year. The package includes up to $625 million in bonding through 2031 for the UConn 2000 development project, on the condition that the university’s philanthropic commitments total at least $100 million over the next eight years.

Paid sick days, strikes

All employees will soon be entitled to paid sick days under House Bill 5005.

Advertisement

The legislation paves the way for a three-year phase-in of Connecticut’s sick leave requirements for companies with fewer than 50 employees. Under the bill, employees will accrue one hour of sick time for every 30 hours worked. Employees become eligible for this time after working for their employer for 120 calendar days. They can use up to a maximum of 40 hours off each year.

Gov. Ned Lamont said the paid sick days expansion “makes Connecticut one of the leaders.”

“You’ve got to work hard in this day and age. Make sure that you keep your workers and make sure they’re able to stay. I don’t want people showing up to work sick. We got that done, and hats off there,” Lamont said.

The governor was not so keen on another labor win, the creation of a state fund to pay striking workers.

Lamont told reporters he would not support House Bill 5431, which would establish a $3 million fund under the direction of the State Comptroller to provide financial assistance to workers who go on strike.

Advertisement

“I support the right to organize, I support defined benefit plans, I support expanded healthcare and I want to make sure that we have a strong labor,” Lamont said. “Does that mean I want the taxpayers subsidizing striking workers? I don’t think I do.”

Senate President Pro Tempore Martin Looney said Lamont’s opposition to the bill is something that Democratic lawmakers “regret and hope he’ll change his mind on.”

Nurses

Lawmakers passed Senate Bill 1, an expansive health care bill that strengthens protections for nurses and home health care providers.

The legislation was inspired by the death of Joyce Grayson, a 63-year-old visiting nurse who was found dead in the basement of a halfway house following an at-home visit with a registered sex offender.

“S.B. 1 was really significant,” Looney said. “It provides protection for home health care workers and tries to have a system for building up security so that people who need home care can get it, but that the workers who provide it have greater protection. That’s important.”

Advertisement

The legislature also passed House Bill 5058, which would allow Connecticut to enter into the Nurse Licensure Compact. The move would ensure that nurses can acquire a multistate license to practice in any state that is a party to the compact.

Housing

This session, House Speaker Matt Ritter, a Hartford Democrat, said the legislature made “incremental progress” on housing but accomplished “certainly, not all that people perhaps had hoped for.”

The highlight was House Bill 5474, a proposal that incorporates numerous concepts from the Majority Leaders Affordable Housing Roundtable to encourage affordable housing development.

It requires municipalities to allow developers to convert vacant nursing homes into multifamily housing. Additionally, it allows cities and towns to regulate short-term rentals like Airbnb and Vrbo rentals. The bill also requires landlords to provide a written notice of proposed rent increases to tenants 45 days in advance.

“I think we made some progress on housing,” Lamont said. “We’ve added population over the last few years, that’s a good thing. The one thing that can slow us down and put us at risk (is if) there’s not a place for people to live.”

Advertisement

Lamont said he is a fan of the provisions in H.B. 5474.

“I like the fact that it gives the added incentives for workforce, housing, and affordable housing in downtown areas. I like the fact it gives a little incentive in terms of why you want to do that. I like the fact you get an extra credit if you zone it accordingly and you get some relaxed relief on 8-30g. I think these are all ways that we work with our municipalities and communities to get more housing out there,” Lamont said.

Elder care reform

Ritter said Connecticut lawmakers had “a really good year in terms of focus on elder care and aging in place type legislation.”

House Bill 5001 makes sweeping changes to the state’s elder care system by increasing oversight, streamlining Medicaid access and requiring the state to maintain a virtual registry of home care providers.

Starting July 1, 2026, H.B. 5046 prohibits new nursing home residents from being admitted to a room with more than two beds. The bill also sets penalties for health care institutions who fail to comply with corrective action plans, among other measures.

Advertisement

Education

After a report from Dalio Education found that one in five youth are at risk of not graduating or already disconnected from education and employment, the legislature will now require the state’s data system to submit annual reports on disconnected youth in Connecticut.

The provision is wrapped into House Bill 5437, a large education package that also takes steps to address school climate and place restrictions on the number of days schools can place students on in or out of school suspensions, among other measures.

House Republican Leader Vincent Candelora of North Branford said the data collection component was “definitely a big highlight” for Republicans.

“For us what was important is a lot of the educational reform bills, for ECS (Education Cost Sharing), for creating a more fair funding stream for our communities, but also starting the pathway of data collection and to begin trying to engage getting our youth reconnected to the classroom,” Candelora said.

Lawmakers also passed Senate Bill 327, a proposal that will establish a task force to study the effects of hate speech and bullying on children’s mental wellbeing, physical health and academic achievement.

Advertisement

House Bill 5436 simplifies the certification process for teachers in the state, among other wide-ranging changes.

Charlene Russell-Tucker, the commissioner of the Connecticut State Department of Education, said the certification regulations were last updated in 1998.

“We are extremely pleased with the passage of H.B. 5436 and believe this is a giant step in the right direction for modernizing our certification laws, breaking down barriers, and recruiting and retaining a diverse workforce,” Russell-Tucker said in a statement Thursday.

Russell-Tucker said the creation of the Connecticut Educator Preparation and Certification Board “will bring the expertise of skilled and veteran educators, together with the State Board of Education, to continuously develop standards and proposals resulting in long-term, meaningful change.”

‘Line of duty’ deaths

This session, state lawmakers passed legislation to expand the definition of a “line of duty” death and extend more benefits to the families of fallen officers.

Advertisement

House Bill 5279 grants police, fire and emergency medical service chiefs the authority to declare that that an officer, firefighter or EMS personnel died in the line of duty “if the death was caused by a cardiac event, stroke, or pulmonary embolism within 24 hours after … a shift or training.” For some surviving families, the broadened definition will unlock access to cash benefits, tuition waivers, health insurance and pension benefits.

Senate Bill 341 codifies a “Fallen Officer Fund” under the office of the state comptroller to provide “a lump sum death benefit totaling $100,000 to a surviving family member or beneficiary of a police officer who was killed in the line of duty or sustained injuries that were the direct and proximate cause of the officer’s death.”

It also allows family members to maintain coverage under the late officer’s health insurance policy for up to five years after the officer’s death.

Candelora said the legislation was an important initiative for the Republican caucus, which pushed for the creation of the fund last year.

“The Fallen Officer’s Fund … now will extend health care benefits to families where an officer is killed on duty,” Candelora said. “I was pleased to see that go through with the comptroller also pushing that agenda and working to keep that bill moving.”

Advertisement

Most of the 2,000 bills CT lawmakers proposed in 2024 failed. Here are the highlights



Source link

Connecticut

CT, US offshore wind projects face second federal pause

Published

on

CT, US offshore wind projects face second federal pause


The federal government is again pausing offshore wind projects in Connecticut and along the East Coast. The Trump administration is citing national security risks the Defense Department found in classified reports. It is the second time the administration attempted to halt offshore wind developments, although the first attempt was blocked after a federal judge ruled the government’s actions were illegal. Connor Yakaitis, deputy director of the…



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

2025 statistics: Impaired driving increasing in Connecticut

Published

on

2025 statistics: Impaired driving increasing in Connecticut


MERIDEN, Conn. (WTNH) — For decades, police have been arresting drunk drivers and measuring their blood alcohol levels.

But in October, the Connecticut Forensic Lab started testing all impaired drivers for drugs, and even the experts were shocked by what they found.

“It’s not simply alcohol combined with one drug combined with alcohol,” Dr. Jessica Gleba, the director of Forensic Lab Operations, said. “We are seeing multiple drugs used together and often combined with alcohol.”

Fentanyl and carfentanyl use are on the rise and the data shows people are combining multiple drugs at an alarming rate.

Advertisement

“The data revealed, in 2025, 14% of cases analyzed had 10 or more drugs present, an increase compared to 2022, when the number was 6%,” Gleba said.

Approximately 50% of cases in 2025 had five or more drugs detected, according to the Connecticut Forensic Lab.

Not only is the state lab finding more and more combinations of drugs in impaired drivers, Connecticut is also seeing more fatal accidents caused by impaired drivers.

Across the country, around 30% of fatal crashes are caused by impaired drivers. Joe Cristalli, Jr., the CTDOT Highway Safety Office director, said Connecticut is well above that.

“The impaired rate is 40% – between 37% and 40% – and we’re one of the highest in the country,” Cristalli said.

Advertisement

It is the season for holiday parties, but it is also cold and flu season, and over the counter medicine can impair your driving, especially combined with alcohol.

The message from law enforcement is clear.

“If you are caught, you will be arrested, you will be presented for prosecution, which means you’re going to have to appear before a judge in the State of Connecticut,” commissioner Ronnell Higgins of the Deptartment of Emergency Services & Public Protection said. “I don’t know how clearer I can be.”

In other words, don’t drink or use drugs and get behind the wheel.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Opinion: Connecticut must plan for Medicaid cuts

Published

on

Opinion: Connecticut must plan for Medicaid cuts


Three hours and nine minutes. That’s how long the average Connecticut resident spends in the emergency department at any one visit. With cuts in Medicaid, that time will only get longer.

 On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump passed the Big Beautiful Bill, which includes major cuts to Medicaid funding. Out of nearly 926,700 CT residents who receive Medicaid, these cuts could remove coverage for up to 170,000 people, many of whom are children, seniors, people with disabilities, and working families already living paycheck-to-paycheck.

This is not a small policy change, but rather a shift with life-altering consequences.

 When people lose their only form of health insurance, they don’t stop needing medical care. They simply delay it. They wait until the infection spreads, the chest pain worsens, or the depression deepens. This is not out of choice, but because their immediate needs come first. Preventable conditions worsen, and what could have been treated quickly and affordably in a primary care office becomes an emergency medical crisis. 

Advertisement

That crisis typically lands in the emergency department: the single part of the healthcare system that is legally required to treat everyone, insured or not. However, ER care is the most expensive, least efficient form of healthcare. More ER use means longer wait times, more hospital crowding, and more delayed care for everyone. No one, not even those who can afford private insurance, is insulated from the consequence.

Not only are individual people impacted, but hospitals too. Medicaid provides significant reimbursements to hospitals and health systems like Yale New Haven and Hartford Healthcare, as well as smaller hospitals that serve rural and low-income regions. Connecticut’s hospitals are already strained and cuts will further threaten their operating budget, potentially leading to cuts in staffing, services, or both.

Vicky Wang

When there’s fewer staff in already short-staffed departments and fewer services, care becomes less available to those who need it the most.

This trend is not hypothetical. It is already happening. This past summer, when I had to schedule an appointment with my primary care practitioner, I was told that the earliest availability was in three months. When I called on September 5 for a specialty appointment at Yale New Haven, the first available date was September 9, 2026. If this is the system before thc cuts, what will it look like after?



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending