Connect with us

Connecticut

Federal grants paused: CT readies lawsuit following Trump order

Published

on

Federal grants paused: CT readies lawsuit following Trump order


The Trump administration’s directive to pause and review trillions of dollars in federal financial assistance faced immediate resistance from critics in Washington and Connecticut, including the threat of litigation from the state attorney general’s office.

The memo sent to federal agencies late Monday set off a scramble as state agencies in Connecticut and across the country start to assess what effects it could have on critical programs. The White House’s Office of Budget and Management directed a temporary pause by 5 p.m. Tuesday on grants and loans that are used “to advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies.”

In that memo, Acting OMB Director Matthew Vaeth argued that Donald Trump’s victory gives his administration a “mandate” to review $3 trillion in federal financial assistance and ensure it complies with the dozens of executive orders signed over the past week.

“In the interim, to the extent permissible under applicable law, Federal agencies must temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance, and other relevant agency activities that may be implicated by the executive orders, including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal,” the memo said.

Advertisement

The White House’s latest order sparked major confusion and fear across the federal government and for states that rely on federal financial assistance. And members of Congress have disputed the legality of the order, arguing that Trump does not have the authority to stop funds from going out that have been approved by Congress.

That has also prompted Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and other state attorneys general to threaten legal action against the Trump administration.

“This is a full assault on Connecticut families — an unprecedented and blatantly lawless and unconstitutional attack on every corner and level of our government and economy. Attorneys general across the country are preparing imminent legal action to protect our states,” Tong said in a statement Tuesday.

“Connecticut and my team are front and center in this fight and will provide updates in real time to Connecticut as this unfolds,” he continued. “Today is not a day for politics — everyone irrespective of party should be standing with Connecticut against this devastating attack on our state.”

The scope and potential consequences of the directive remained unclear on Tuesday morning. The memo noted that it would not affect Social Security and Medicare benefits or assistance “provided directly to individuals.” Officials across Connecticut are still trying to determine what this could mean for specific state departments.

Advertisement

“The Lamont administration is deeply concerned about the federal government’s recent plan to freeze spending on grants and loans. We are closely monitoring this development, analyzing the impact, and remain in close contact with federal partners and our congressional delegation as we develop ways to protect these critical programs,” Office of Policy and Management spokesman Chris Collibee said in a statement. “We plan to share more details and can assure Connecticut that the Lamont administration will do everything we can to ensure residents have access to food, housing, education, and other vital supports.”

Other agencies across Connecticut were directed to provide the same statement when asked about how the freeze could specifically affect their programs.

Still, the memo set off a full-court press Tuesday by Democrats in Washington about potential implications and disruptions if such funding is cut off. Lawmakers, including U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, ran down a list of programs that could face cuts: Title I funding for schools that help low-income families, cancer research, resources for child care and housing, disaster relief efforts and transportation projects.

“Trump’s actions would wreak havoc … in red and blue communities everywhere,” U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said at a Tuesday press conference with Senate Democrats. “This is funding that communities are expecting and this memo is creating chaos and confusion about whether these resources will be available to them.”

Depending on the federal funding potentially delayed, Trump might do more harm to his political base than to the rest of the country. Most of the nation’s wealth already is centered on blue states. 

Advertisement

According to a September analysis from Pew Charitable Trusts, states had enough reserves to operate for a median of 48.1 days. And of the 25 states with rainy day funds below the national median, 14 of them voted for Trump last November.

Connecticut has the reserves and strong cash position that would enable it to weather a delay in federal funding transfers longer than many other states. It ranked 17th in the nation last year with enough reserves to operate 60.4 days. And while Connecticut’s budget reserve stood at $3.3 billion during the 2023-24 fiscal year, it currently stands at a record-setting $4.1 billion.

Staff writer Keith Phaneuf contributed to this story.

This story will be updated.

Advertisement



Source link

Connecticut

Crews battle barn fire in East Windsor

Published

on

Crews battle barn fire in East Windsor


Multiple roads in East Windsor were closed for several hours as crews fought an early morning barn fire.

According to the Broad Brook Fire Department, a large barn fire broke out a 365 North Road around 1:30 Friday morning.

Mutual aid from multiple towns are assisting at the scene.

The fire department had route 140 shut down between Harrington Rd and the old Herb Holden Trucking on Broad Brook Rd. closed due to hydrant lines across the street. Main St at Wesley Rd was also blocked.

Advertisement

The fire was knocked down and roads reopened around 5 a.m.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Hartford HealthCare could acquire 2 Prospect hospitals by year end

Published

on

Hartford HealthCare could acquire 2 Prospect hospitals by year end


After years of uncertainty regarding the future of the Connecticut hospitals owned by bankrupt operator Prospect Medical Holdings, two of the three facilities could have a new owner by the end of the year.

On Tuesday, Hartford HealthCare, one of Connecticut’s largest health systems, presented its case to the state’s Office of Health Strategy to purchase Manchester Memorial and Rockville General Hospitals. Under the new expedited approval timeline for hospitals in bankruptcy, state officials must issue a decision by Dec. 30.

During the public hearing, Hartford HealthCare CEO Jeffrey Flaks said the health system plans to bring all its expertise, resources and capabilities to Manchester, Rockville and the surrounding towns.

“The robust apparatus of Hartford HealthCare will be brought to these communities to make health care better. That’s why I’m so confident that we have this very unique opportunity to dramatically improve health care that will be here for generations going forward,” Flaks said.

Advertisement

Hartford HealthCare will spend $86.1 million to purchase the facilities and pledged to invest an additional $225.7 million towards capital improvements, like facility and IT upgrades, over the next three years. 

Hartford HealthCare also plans to recruit new physicians to the Manchester and Rockville communities, as well as expand access to specialty care, like oncology, inpatient rehabilitation and vascular and orthopedic surgical services, according to the application submitted to the state.

If approved, the deal would serve as the first step towards concluding a lengthy search to find new buyers for Prospect’s Connecticut hospitals — a process that often seemed on the brink of failure.

In 2022, Prospect signed a deal to sell its three Connecticut hospitals — Manchester Memorial, Rockville General and Waterbury — to Yale New Haven Health for $435 million. But the deal was mired in setbacks and litigation. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut police warn parents about new e-bike laws ahead of holiday shopping

Published

on

Connecticut police warn parents about new e-bike laws ahead of holiday shopping


HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – As e-bikes top many teenagers’ holiday wish lists, Connecticut police are reminding parents about new state laws that went into effect October 1 that classify some models as motor vehicles requiring a driver’s license.

More than a million e-bikes were sold in the United States last year, and the devices continue growing in popularity among teenagers and older adults who want to stay active.

“So many kids are buying e-bikes or getting them as gifts, and they can be very powerful,” Chief Joshua Bernegger of the Watertown Police Department said.

The new Connecticut law creates three different classes of e-bikes based on speed and power. All riders must wear helmets regardless of the class.

Advertisement

If the e-bike’s motor is less than 750 watts, there is no age restriction and riders only need to wear a helmet. However, if the motor is 750 watts or more, Connecticut no longer considers it an e-bike but classifies it as a “motor driven cycle.” These require riders to be at least 16 years old and have a driver’s license.

E-bikes with top speeds exceeding 28 miles per hour are not classified as e-bikes under state law.

Bernegger said the new laws address rising safety concerns about e-bike accidents.

“We’ve been seeing a lot of serious accidents in CT over the past year,” Bernegger said. “The number of fatal accidents involving bicycles has risen more than 300% over the prior year, and our emergency rooms are seeing dramatic increase in significant injuries for children and adolescents riding e-bikes.”

The police chief said some e-bikes may be too powerful for young teenagers to handle safely.

Advertisement

“It’s often more of a bike than a young teen, 13, 14, 15-years-old can really handle,” Bernegger said.

Eric Otero, lead salesman at Bikers Edge in Bristol, said e-bikes have transformed his sales floor in recent years.

“Teenagers are kind of taking over the streets on them,” Otero said. “I get calls everyday about them.”

Otero said he sells a couple e-bikes each week, usually to teenagers eager to ride on city streets.

Bernegger advised parents to research their purchases carefully, especially when buying online.

Advertisement

“It’s often more of a bike than a young teen, 13, 14, 15 years old, can really handle,” Bernegger said.

The new law includes specific penalties for violations. Riding without a helmet results in a $90 fine. Riding a modified e-bike costs $100. Riding a motor driven cycle under age 16 or without a driver’s license can result in the bike being impounded.

Otero advised parents to act quickly if they plan to purchase an e-bike for the holidays.

“I’d call now because they’re going faster than you think,” Otero said.

As e-bikes top many teenagers’ holiday wish lists, Connecticut police are reminding parents about new state laws that went into effect October 1.
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending