Connect with us

Connecticut

CT reports progress on underfunded state employee pension funds

Published

on

CT reports progress on underfunded state employee pension funds


Gov. Ned Lamont and the state’s two elected fiscal officers, the treasurer and comptroller, reported Monday that Connecticut’s once-neglected state-employee pension system is now 55% funded — up from 38% eight years ago, but still a national laggard.

Additional contributions and better investment returns produced gains of $2.7 billion in the state employees retirement system and a similar gain in the separate teachers’ system, which is now 62.3% funded. But the officials warned the state needs to continue the progress.

“It means we’ve gone from being the third-worst-funded pension in the country to the sixth-worst,” Lamont said. “We have a long way to go, and the rest of the country is watching.”

Connecticut is one of six states with a state employees pension fund less than 60% funded, a consequence of decades of neglect: No state contributions were made to the fund from its creation in 1939 to 1971, then inadequate support until Gov. Dannel P. Malloy took office in 2011.

Advertisement

Lamont, Treasurer Erick Russell and Comptroller Sean Scanlon, all Democrats, said the latest pension fund valuations demonstrate that various reforms begun during the Malloy administration and accelerated by Lamont are paying off, but true stability is years away. 

“It takes a long time to dig out of this hole,” Russell said.

For the past 13 years, the state has met the basic standard of making actuarially determined contributions. More recently, it also has seen far better returns on the investment of pension funds, and it’s used six straight years of budget surpluses to reduce the unfunded liability.

“I think we have made incredible progress as a state,” Scanlon said.

“I think we’ve shown we can manage our house,” Lamont said. 

Advertisement

The celebration by Lamont, Russell and Scanlon comes a month before the General Assembly is scheduled to open its annual session and begin a debate on whether the state can afford to loosen the spending controls collectively known as the “fiscal guardrails.”

A volatility cap and other restrictions imposed in 2017 and unanimously renewed last year have required setting aside $4 billion as a budget reserve and using another $8.5 billion in surplus funds to reduce the unfunded pension liability, frustrating advocates who see mounting unmet needs in a time of relative plenty. 

Paying down the unfunded liability has immediate and longterm benefits: Without the added investment over the last few years, the required pension contributions in the next fiscal year would have been about $737 million higher, and the projected savings to taxpayers over the next 25 years are about $18 billion, Scanlon said.

Leaders of the Democratic majorities in the General Assembly, as well as a wide range of advocacy groups, are expected to urge Lamont to recalibrate the volatility cap to allow some surplus funds to be spent. On Monday, Lamont offered them little encouragement.

Lamont pronounced himself “strict” on the question of maintaining the guardrails, while repeatedly refusing to say if he already has decided to propose a budget that will maintain the caps as currently written. Lamont will make a “State of the State” address on Jan. 8 then make his budget proposal a month later.

Advertisement

His only promise was to propose “an honestly balanced budget.”

“We haven’t done that for 30 years in the state, until the last six or seven years. I don’t want a lot of assumptions that just create a hole in the out years. I want to make sure that we have a balanced budget for our kids going forward as well,” Lamont said. “I’m a little surprised — sometimes people say we’ll spend a lot more now and we’ll figure out how to pay for it later. I think that’s the type of credit card mentality that got the state with big problems over the last 30 years. I’m not gonna let it happen again.”

Democrats won majorities of 25-11 in the Senate and 102-49 in the House last month, each veto-proof margins. But there are moderate Democrats who could join minority Republicans in upholding any Lamont veto of changes to the guardrails. Senate Republicans immediately issued a statement urging Lamont to be resolute.

Connecticut for All, a coalition of 60 community, faith, labor and nonprofit groups, said Lamont and the lawmakers have to balance fiscal responsibility against social needs.

“The last several budget cycles have been irresponsibly unbalanced, leaving working families unnecessarily burdened and blocking needed investments in our communities’ futures,” said Norma Martinez-HoSang, the group’s director. “You don’t make extra car payments when your vehicle is missing an engine. It’s time to get Connecticut back on the road with fiscal policies that are responsive to our current financial state and the needs of our state.”

Advertisement

Management of the pension is somewhat separate from the question of adjusting the guardrails. While the requirements of the volatility cap have accelerated paying down the unfunded liability, the pension funds’ fiscal stability has benefitted from other unrelated reforms that Russell and Scanlon say must be preserved.

They included the basic one of making the annual actuarially required contributions, as well as eschewing a gimmick that lawmakers once used to artificially lower those  required contributions — assuming an artificially high rate of return on investments.

“We have to make sure we protect this culture and never allow ourselves to return to habits of ignoring our obligations,” Russell said.

The state once assumed a rate of return of 8.5%, far beyond the actual returns. In 2019, it lowered the assumed returns to 6.9%. The lower the assumed returns, the higher the annual required contribution to make up the difference.

Over the past two years, changes in investment strategies have yielded better returns.

Advertisement

“We’ve gone from being one of the worst performing pension funds over the last 30 years to being in the top quartile, and that makes an enormous difference,” Lamont said.



Source link

Connecticut

Could a big bridge link CT and Long Island?

Published

on

Could a big bridge link CT and Long Island?


Supporters of a $50 billion plan to build a 15-mile bridge between Bridgeport, Connecticut, and Kings Park, New York, say the idea is no less plausible than the Apollo moon landing.

“This isn’t the first idea that people think is a pipe dream,” said Stephen Shapiro, the Connecticut developer spearheading the proposal, at a Capitol press conference on Monday. “The moon landing was a lot more crazy back then than this bridge is now.”

Shapiro has assembled a group of supporters under the banner of a nonprofit, the Connecticut-Long Island Initiative, including current and former elected officials from both sides of the aisle.

Advertisement

“There’s no reason why America and Connecticut and New York together can’t do big projects,” said Bill Finch, a former Democratic state senator and one-time Bridgeport mayor. “This bridge will be an environmental juggernaut, a jobs juggernaut, and it will be the kind of thing that will put us on the map and make us all feel proud of being from the metro New York area.”

Republican state Rep. Joe Hoxha of Bristol is leading the charge for the bridge in the Connecticut House of Representatives. He said he plans to raise a bill next legislative session that would order a feasibility study for the project.

“We need to start thinking big,” Hoxha said. “Yesterday, we had a one-of-a-kind spectacle at the White House. We had the UFC event. Some people agree with it, some people disagree with it, but you can’t argue that it generated attention and it sparked a sense of patriotism in our country. An event like that brought people together.”

“I’m not comparing the two,” Hoxha said, referring to the Long Island Sound bridge proposal and the White House UFC event, “but what I’m comparing is the spirit that we need to engage in, which is to think big.”

Shapiro said $25 billion – 50% – of the project’s $50 billion price tag would be funded via private investment, with $22.5 billion coming from the federal government and $1.25 billion each being contributed by Connecticut and New York.

Advertisement

“I’ve had some conversations with some folks down in the city, and if the government is in on participating on this, Wall Street certainly would be, too,” Shapiro said. “Everyone would see full revitalization of their investment, and then once everyone’s paid back, this thing could generate $3 to $4 billion a year in income for both states.”

The project, which would involve tunnels and a bridge span, is similar to the longer Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel in Virginia. Shapiro said he believed the project would reduce traffic on the Interstate 95 corridor and be a boon for economies on both sides of the crossing.

Shapiro noted he is not the first person to propose such a crossing.

“As early as 1938, U.S. Senator Royal Copeland proposed an 18-mile bridge linking Long Island to either Connecticut or Rhode Island,” the Connecticut-Long Island Initiative website reads. “In 1957, Charles H. Sells of the New York State Department of Public Works proposed two possible crossings, including the well-known Oyster Bay–Rye Bridge.”

“[Former New York Gov. Andrew] Cuomo did a study in 2018,” Shapiro said, adding that he had invited current New York Gov. Kathy Hochul to Monday’s press conference in Hartford. (Hochul did not attend.)

Advertisement

Former Democratic state Rep. Jim Amann, who served as Connecticut House Speaker from 2005 to 2009, said he’s been hearing talk of a Long Island Sound crossing since he first entered the General Assembly in 1991.

“If you believe it, we can achieve it,” Amann said, adding that dozens of current Connecticut state legislators from both parties support the effort. “This would be the greatest thing that this state could have ever done for its residents.”

Shapiro said between approvals, litigation and construction, he hoped his project could be completed in the 2040s.

“I think realistically, for you and me to drive over there on a nice day in a convertible? Fifteen to 20 years ‘til you’re doing that drive,” Shapiro told a reporter.

This story was first published June 15, 2026 by Connecticut Public.

Advertisement

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/15/long-island-ct-bridge-developer-nonprofit/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1171552&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/06/15/long-island-ct-bridge-developer-nonprofit/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Bridgeport City Hall closed Monday due to power outage, officials say

Published

on

Bridgeport City Hall closed Monday due to power outage, officials say


BRIDGEPORT — Bridgeport City Hall was closed Monday due to a power outage, officials said. 

Mayor Joseph Ganim said services at City Hall, located at 45 Lyon Terrace, would be closed for the day and would reopen as soon as power was restored. The building contains many city departments, including the Town Clerk, Tax Collector, Building Department, Licensing and Permits and the Board of Education. 

United Illuminating, which serves Bridgeport and more than a dozen other towns in southern Connecticut, reported 15 power outages in Bridgeport Monday morning. The outage reportedly began around 4 a.m.

The city said any residents who have payment deadlines for Monday will have an extension contingent on the reopening of City Hall. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Water safety expert warns of fast-changing tides as Fairfield police search for missing fisherman

Published

on

Water safety expert warns of fast-changing tides as Fairfield police search for missing fisherman


Fairfield police have shifted their search for a missing fisherman into a recovery effort after he disappeared off the coast over the weekend when rising tides stranded two men on a reef near Penfield Beach.

Police identified the missing man as 34-year-old Kwahiwi Edwards of Queens, New York.

Investigators said two fishermen were on a reef off Penfield Beach on Saturday when an incoming tide quickly surrounded them, leaving them stranded. A witness saw the men in distress and helped one of them reach safety. Edwards remains missing.

As crews continue searching, a water safety expert is reminding beachgoers and fishermen to be aware of changing tide conditions along Connecticut’s shoreline.

Advertisement

Ben Rayner, who runs the nonprofit Water Emergency Training Incorporated, said the state’s coastline can create unpredictable water conditions.

“Because of the jagged nature and kind of irregular nature of the Connecticut coastline, you can get eddies and swirls that form with different tides,” he said.

Rayner said conditions can change rapidly, leaving people stranded in areas that were accessible only a short time earlier.

“You’re not going to be able to find your way back to the beach, which a half hour earlier looked like dry land,” he said.

According to Rayner, anyone heading to a sandbar, reef or other areas affected by tides should wear a life jacket and check tide conditions before going out.

Advertisement

He said several apps can help people monitor tide changes.

“There’s all sorts of apps you can download that’ll show you exactly where high tide and low tide is for where you’re at and try to time that,” he said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending