Boston, MA
In last-minute maneuver, Boston’s White Stadium opponents seek new ‘legal theory’ to block city’s soccer project
With half their case already dismissed, a group of plaintiffs vying to stop the City of Boston’s public-private plan to rehab White Stadium for a pro soccer team made a last-minute motion near the end of trial to try to enhance their legal claims.
The late motion aims to provide a layer of insurance to the plaintiffs’ remaining major claim, by way of a legal theory purportedly backed by state law that gives 10 taxpayers the ability, through the court, to block the type of project the city and Boston Unity Soccer Partners are pursuing with their plan to rebuild the stadium on public parkland.
While 20 neighbors of Franklin Park’s White Stadium joined the Emerald Necklace Conservancy in filing last year’s lawsuit, not all of them were homeowners who pay property taxes. The motion adds to their legal challenge, that the proposed for-profit stadium would illegally privatize protected public land, by ensuring that the plaintiffs include 10 “taxable inhabitants of the City of Boston.”
“Under this statute, this court ‘shall have jurisdiction in equity, upon petition of not less than ten taxable inhabitants of the city or town in which such common or park is located, to restrain the erection of a building on a common or park in violation of this section,’” the motion filed Wednesday by Attorneys Alan Lipkind and Nicholas Allen states.
The motion asserts that the city is violating state statute by erecting a more than 600,000 square-foot building on designated public parkland without legislative approval, and by raising funds for the roughly $200 million project.
That legal argument forms the basis of the plaintiffs’ remaining case, which is that the public-private plan violates Article 97 of the state constitution, which voters approved in 1972 and requires two-thirds approval from the state Legislature for other uses for land and easements taken or acquired for conservation purposes. The city and BUSP deny the privatization claim.
The plaintiffs’ motion “to conform their pleadings to the evidence presented at trial,” drew backlash from attorneys for the City of Boston, who argued that the last-minute legal maneuver should not be allowed by Suffolk Superior Court Judge Matthew Nestor.
An attorney for the city, when the motion was introduced at the trial Wednesday, described it as “extremely prejudicial to us,” given that the plaintiffs were seeking to “add claims in the middle of a trial” that the city’s legal team had not had a chance to review nor prepare evidence for.
Lipkind responded by saying there “no new claims” introduced by the motion.
“It’s just another tool to give the court a legal theory to rely on,” Lipkind said.
A city attorney also sought to convince Nestor to disallow the motion by arguing that it was “futile,” given that the city is only paying for its half of the project, there’s “nothing illegal” about the city spending city funds to build a school building and sports stadium, and Boston Public Schools will retain ownership of White Stadium after it’s rebuilt.
The city’s legal team also argued that the proposed use fits under the “works of beauty and public utility” for Boston residents category that the municipality was authorized to use Franklin Park for, when it was purchased by a public charitable trust in 1947 for the purpose of establishing a stadium there.
The plaintiffs’ half of the case arguing that the trust, the George Robert White Fund, does not allow for “joint undertakings” such as what the city and Boston Unity is proposing, was thrown out by Nestor on the eve of trial Monday.
In this instance, Nestor, who ruled in favor of the city on all pre-trial motions, opted to allow the plaintiffs’ last-minute motion on Wednesday. He had also rejected the city and BUSP’s motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims a day earlier, allowing the trial to continue.
Nestor said that while it’s “always good to bring claims before” a trial, the law is clear that there’s nothing barring a new claim in a civil case … “even though it’s late, really late.”
“But it’s not too uncommon,” Nestor said. “I will allow the motion.”
The matter came up again at the end of the day’s trial session, when Gary Ronan, an attorney for the city, told Nestor that the city’s legal team needed more time “to address the amended complaint.”
Nestor, who had said earlier that he would allow the defendants the ability to address the amended claim by introducing new evidence or a new witness, said that he wouldn’t allow much more time, given that he was looking to wrap up the trial with closing statements on Thursday.
“You know what the theory is so nothing from here on out should be a surprise,” Nestor said. “If there’s anything in the written amended complaint that creates something different, I’ll certainly reconsider it.”
The second day of trial revolved around the city’s witnesses, two city officials who were involved in what they described as an extensive review and design process for the White Stadium rehab and a BPS athletics official who spoke of how he felt the plan would bring much-needed improvements to the run-down 76-year-old facility.
While Nestor ruled against allowing the plaintiffs’ pre-trial motion to bring forward public drinking concerns with the plan, he opted on Wednesday to allow their attorneys to raise the issue of state statute not allowing alcohol on school property.
Nestor, after a city attorney objected, said the city’s legal team opened that door when questioning a witness about permitted events at the stadium, which BPS owns and would share use of with the National Women’s Soccer League expansion team.
The city’s contention that its prior classification of Franklin Park as being protected by Article 97 — a key point of contention in the plaintiffs’ case — was due to a mapping mistake by a retired Parks Department employee was raised again during testimony by Interim Parks Commissioner Liza Meyer.
The issue, regarding classification in city open space plans that go back “decades,” was first raised Tuesday in opening statements by the plaintiffs’ and city’s attorneys.
Day 3 of the high-stakes trial, which will determine the fate of the controversial plan championed by Mayor Michelle Wu, will convene at 9 a.m. Thursday. Wu’s opponent in the mayoral race, Josh Kraft, has called for a pause on the project until the litigation is resolved.
Originally Published:
Boston, MA
Photos: See Nicole Kidman, Anne Hathaway, and more stars on the 2026 Met Gala red carpet – The Boston Globe
Held on the first Monday in May each year, the 2026 Met Gala features a “Fashion is Art” dress code, inspired by the institute’s spring exhibition, “Costume Art.” Opening to the public on May 10, the exhibition is the first to be housed in the new Condé M. Nast Galleries, located adjacent to the museum’s Great Hall.
Bringing out fashionable A-list stars from Hollywood and beyond, this year’s soirée once again features Anna Wintour back as a co-chair, marking her first Met Gala since her announcement last year that she was stepping down as editor-in-chief of Vogue. A trio of icons from across entertainment and sports join Wintour for the 2026 festivities, with Beyoncé, Nicole Kidman, and Venus Williams also serving as co-chairs.
Meanwhile, the gala’s host committee is pretty start-studded as well. Co-chaired by fashion designer Anthony Vaccarello and actress Zoë Kravitz, this year’s committee is comprised of Adut Akech, Angela Bassett, Sinéad Burke, Sabrina Carpenter, Doja Cat, Gwendoline Christie, Alex Consani, Misty Copeland, Elizabeth Debicki, Lena Dunham, Paloma Elsesser, Rebecca Hall, LISA, Chloe Malle, Aimee Mullins, Sam Smith, Tschabalala Self, Amy Sherald, Teyana Taylor, Lauren Wasser, Anna Weyant, A’ja Wilson, Chase Sui Wonders, and Yseult.
Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and his wife Lauren Sánchez Bezos are the lead sponsors for both the gala and spring exhibition, and will serve as honorary chairs for Monday’s party.
Check out below to see all the top fashion moments and looks from the 2026 Met Gala red carpet.














































































Matt Juul can be reached at matthew.juul@globe.com.
Boston, MA
‘Distressing’ Number of Boston’s Gen Z Residents Eye the Exit as Housing Costs Soar
Boston is staring down a mass exodus of young residents who are being squeezed out by surging housing costs driving them toward more affordable markets, according to a new survey.
The 2026 Young Residents Survey, commissioned by The Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce Foundation, found that more than a quarter of Bostonians (26%) between the ages of 20 and 30 years old say they plan on leaving the metro in the next five years—a share the organization calls “distressing.”
The survey also determined that newer residents, LGBTQ residents, unemployed residents, students and unmarried people were more likely to report plans to leave Boston.
The share of survey participants heading for the exit is similar to the results of the 2023 survey, which found 25% of respondents eyeing a move three years ago.
The latest study was conducted in February and March and included 600 young people living in the Greater Boston area, which includes Suffolk, Norfolk, Middlesex, Plymouth, and Essex counties.
The findings reveal that when deciding to stay or leave, 78% of respondents said the cost of rent is important, and 72% cited the ability to buy a home.
The cost of staying
As the region grapples with a housing crisis, half of survey respondents said that affordable housing should be a top priority for local leaders.
“It’s no surprise that housing affordability is a top issue in Boston, especially for the youngest residents who are more likely to be renters,” says Realtor.com® senior economist Jake Krimmel.
Median asking rents in Boston stood at $2,918 in March, the second-highest among the nation’s top 50 metros, surpassing New York City, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, and trailing only ultra-expensive San Jose, CA.
On the homebuying side, Boston’s real estate market is one of the nation’s least affordable, with median listing prices climbing to $832,500 in April—the fifth-highest among major U.S. metros and nearly double the national median, according to the latest Realtor.com monthly housing market trends report.
Concerns over housing affordability, along with job availability, and safety, have soured the outlook for young Bostonians, with the report showing that life satisfaction has plummeted from 89% to 79% in just three years.
Why the Sun Belt is winning over Bostonians
Among the responders planning to leave Boston, approximately half are looking to move within Massachusetts and the rest are considering venturing out of the state.
A deeper dive into the 30-page report shows that 46% of Bostonians planning to exit the Northeast are headed South. Specifically, 23% are looking to settle in Southeastern states, such as Florida, Kentucky, or Tennessee, while another 23% are mulling a move to the Southwest, which includes Arizona and New Mexico.
Compared with Massachusetts, these states offer more inventory and lower housing costs, making them magnets for debt-burdened college graduates and early-career professionals.
“The region’s affordability continues to be a concern as young residents struggle to seize opportunities that outweigh challenges, like housing and career growth,” the Chamber of Commerce Foundation said. “Competitor states that are more affordable may be appealing to young residents who are eager to find housing to rent or purchase that is more affordable and accessible.”
Jack Gaughan, a Nashville Re/Max broker and president of Greater Nashville Realtors®, has helped a transplant from Boston in his mid-30 put down roots in Nashville.
“He originally moved right around COVID but rented until he decided Nashville was the place he wanted to call home,” Gaughan tells Realtor.com.
The broker says his client, a western Massachusetts native who spent nearly a decade living in Boston, wanted to invest in a property that was “modern but functional.” In the end, he closed on a four-bedroom home in a trendy part of Nashville.
For perspective, Nashville’s median listing price was just under $539,000 in April, nearly $300,000 below Boston’s.
The hidden cost of losing Gen Z
Krimmel says that while an outflow of young people from Boston might put some downward pressure on rent price growth in the short term, the long-term trade-off would be a major blow to the metro’s economy.
“Boston’s young people are overwhelmingly high-skilled college graduates who play an important role in the job market, entrepreneurship and innovation scene, and the local service economy, too,” he says.
Krimmel also points out that in a metro with so many universities, including Harvard and MIT, even if tens of thousands of young people moved out overnight, there would be tens of thousands of other recent graduates or current students to take their place.
“That’s the root of Boston’s rental market crisis: a seemingly never-ending supply of young, educated renters but never enough supply of rental housing for them,” says the economist.
To reverse this trend, Krimmel says the answer is simple in theory but seemingly impossible in practice: increase housing supply of all types at all price points, both in the urban core and lower-density suburbs.
In 2025, Gov. Maura Healey’s administration unveiled a housing plan indicating that Massachusetts needs to add 222,000 new homes by 2035 to keep up with growing demand while keeping costs in check.
A year earlier, Healey, a Democrat, signed The Affordable Homes Act, which authorized a record $5 billion for housing and created nearly 50 initiatives aimed at speeding up housing production.
Yet, progress has been elusive. Last fall, Massachusetts received an F on the Realtor.com State-by-State Housing Report Card after falling behind most other states on affordability and new home construction.
During her monthly “Ask the Governor” segment on Boston Public Radio that aired in late March, Healey addressed her administration’s efforts to keep Massachusetts’ young people from moving somewhere cheaper, stressing that it is a trend currently haunting other high-cost areas like California and New York.
“Over the last three-and-a-half years, we’ve got 100,000 homes in the pipeline. Is it enough? No,” admitted the governor. “I need every community in the state to understand that housing is fundamental to the vibrancy of our neighborhoods.”
Get real estate news in your inbox
Boston, MA
2 men arrested after armed home invasion with shots fired in Saugus, police say
Gunshots were fired in a daytime armed home invasion in Saugus, Massachusetts, on Sunday, police say, and the two suspects are in custody.
No one was hurt in the shooting on Oakwood Avenue about noon, Saugus police said. Two Boston men, Derek Matarazzo and Timothy Gregory, are facing felony charges including home invasion after their arrest shortly after the 911 calls came in.
The calls reported two men in masks, dressed in black, armed with guns, breaking into a house, police said. They didn’t share what led to the gunfire or how the men were tracked down, saying only that the department wasn’t speculating on their motivation.
Matarazzo and Gregory are believed to be the only people directly involved in the home invasion, police said, and it’s believed to be an isolated incident, so there’s no danger to the public.
Neighbors who spoke with NBC10 Boston say they are shaken up by what occurred, describing a shootout right outside their homes in the middle of the day.
Ring camera video from a nearby home shows the aftermath, as neighbors say you can see the homeowner running into the middle of the street with a phone pressed to his ear, desperately flagging down police — after the chaos.
A neighbor tells us his family first heard what sounded like a pop — something they thought could’ve been a lawn mower backfiring, until they realized it was gunfire. That neighbor says one of his daughters then saw a man carrying a safe — dropping it in their front yard — while shots were being fired.
“I saw somebody come out of the house shooting and then we all hit the deck, because you didn’t want a stray bullet to ricochet off something and come through the window or anything like that,” George Benn said.
“I saw the shots. I saw a man go down. I thought he was going to be dead but apparently he just flipped on that hill,” Tom Bushee said.
The investigation is ongoing.
-
Arizona26 seconds ago2 Arizona Cardinals losing presumed starting jobs to draft picks
-
Arkansas6 minutes agoVehicle crash reported near the University of Arkansas Agriculture Facility
-
California12 minutes agoCalifornia junior college athletes speak out on trans controversy that’s now in the Trump admin’s crosshairs
-
Colorado18 minutes agoBasic income programs remain popular in Colorado despite steep challenges
-
Connecticut24 minutes agoConnecticut Senate approves bill introducing new regulations on homeschooling families
-
Delaware30 minutes agoNeighborhood Feud Spirals Into Felony Charges for Delaware Man
-
Florida36 minutes agoSwig opens in Cape Coral, bringing more ‘dirty soda’ to SW Florida
-
Georgia42 minutes ago
Trump extends red snapper fishing in 4 states, including GA. How long?