Connect with us

Boston, MA

Boston City Council weighing contentious new food delivery tax

Published

on

Boston City Council weighing contentious new food delivery tax


The Boston City Council is considering hitting companies like DoorDash, Grubhub and Uber Eats with a new delivery tax on food orders as part of a city crackdown on their unruly drivers, but critics say consumers and restaurants will pay the price.

The Council is discussing a potential amendment to a “road safety and accountability for delivery providers ordinance” proposed by the mayor that would tack on a 15-cent delivery fee per order for national third-party food delivery companies that operate in Boston.

The potential new fee has proven to be contentious thus far.

The Massachusetts Restaurant Association sent a letter to the mayor and City Council outlining its opposition, but the councilor behind the idea says it’s a key approach to ensuring enforcement of the proposed ordinance, which aims to crack down on food-app delivery drivers who flout traffic rules.

Advertisement

“The 15-cent delivery fee is a necessary step to address the increased strain delivery traffic places on our streets,” Councilor Sharon Durkan, who proposed the fee amendment, said in a statement to the Herald. “This fee ensures we can effectively implement the ordinance and acknowledge the real costs these services impose on Boston.”

Councilor Gabriela Coletta Zapata, who chairs the subcommittee that has held hearings on the mayor’s proposed ordinance, said the new tax is “currently on the table as a possible addition” to the measure, which needs Council approval.

“It would theoretically be a 15-cent per order fee that would help cover costs of the enforcement of the ordinance,” Coletta Zapata told the Herald.

Stephen Clark, president and CEO of the Massachusetts Restaurant Association, sent letters to Mayor Michelle Wu and the 13 city councilors last Thursday with the group’s concerns about the fee, which had been discussed that morning by the Council as part of a working session it held to tweak the ordinance.

“This will make delivery more expensive in the city and discourages consumers from ordering and doing business with restaurants in Boston,” Clark wrote.

Advertisement

“During a time when our attorney general is looking to limit additional fees and surcharges, it does not seem like the government should be adding new fees to Boston residents,” his letter states.

Clark’s letter also lists a number of concerns the Restaurant Association has with the mayor’s ordinance, which it says will lead to “rising delivery costs” and “increased red tape” and pose a “threat to restaurant and consumer privacy” through its data-sharing requirements.

“The proposed ordinance,” Clark wrote, “is intended to alleviate traffic congestion, but enforcing existing regulations will have a far greater impact. This proposed ordinance … does little to help the problem at hand and will only hurt our small local businesses and consumers who rely on third-party deliveries.”

In a phone interview, Clark clarified that the Restaurant Association is not necessarily opposed to the ordinance as proposed by the mayor. He said the group is open to “commonsense regulations going into effect” and conversations with city officials to tweak the measure’s language to address its concerns.

The Restaurant Association is staunchly opposed, however, to the potential new delivery fee being discussed by the City Council, Clark said.

Advertisement

“I wasn’t bashing the mayor,” Clark said. “I should have just CC’d the mayor. We were writing it to the City Council because they’ve had multiple working sessions on this, and the fee has originated from the City Council, not the mayor.”

Wu’s office said “the mayor did not include any fee or tax on restaurant orders in the original ordinance filed.”

The city has been in close conversation with the delivery companies and advocates to protect consumer privacy, the mayor’s office said.

“This ordinance holds large, national delivery companies accountable and will ensure drivers have insurance coverage while making our streets safer for everyone,” a Wu spokesperson said in a statement.

“Data gathered will help the city better plan for food delivery impacts, which has resulted in an alarming increase of dangerous driving, worsened congestion and double parking — all negatively impacting resident experiences and business operations.”

Advertisement

“We are optimistic that the final bill will earn broad support from neighborhood residents and businesses,” the Wu spokesperson said.

Coletta Zapata said the Council would have to take action on the mayor’s ordinance, and any potential amendments including the new fee, by the first week of April to comply with the 60-day order.

If the Council chooses to take no action, it would go into effect, with the language proposed by the mayor. A vote would have to be taken at the next weekly meeting, on April 2.

“Although I support much of the proposed ordinance, I will vote against it based on a new tax that will ultimately be passed on to restaurants and the public,” Councilor Ed Flynn said in a statement to the Herald. “It’s not the time for a new tax in Boston. We must demonstrate fiscal discipline and responsibility.”

Per the language of the amendment, the Boston Transportation Department “may periodically review and adjust the delivery fee, subject to a review and approval by the City Council, to ensure it remains effective.”

Advertisement

Durkan acknowledged that there’s a “clear debate about who bears these costs,” but said the “hearing really illuminated the Council’s commitment to exploring all avenues to prevent these fees from being passed onto local businesses or delivery drivers.”

“We should ensure a fair and balanced approach that holds third-party delivery companies accountable while protecting our local economy,” Durkan said.

Paul Craney, executive director of the Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance, said he wasn’t buying it.

“Some Boston city councilors have never seen a tax or fee they don’t like,” Craney told the Herald. “In this case, they want to nickel and dime consumers which will only increase the price of food.

“City councilors who favor this have completely lost their bearing,” he added. “Elected officials should not be justifying any taxes or fees that will drive up the cost of food.”

Advertisement

Originally Published:



Source link

Boston, MA

Man accused of abusing dog in Boston has history of mental health issues, defense attorney says

Published

on

Man accused of abusing dog in Boston has history of mental health issues, defense attorney says


A man accused of abusing a dog in Boston’s Dorchester neighborhood over the summer has a history of mental health and other health issues, his attorney said.

Akeem Pierre was arraigned Thursday in Dorchester District Court on animal cruelty charges, where he pleaded not guilty.

Video allegedly shows dog being abused

Back in June, Assistant District Attorney Nadia Eldemery said Pierre was seen walking a dog named Pluto in Dorchester. A witness told police they saw Pierre whip Pluto with the leash several times on the face and body, along with yelling at the dog and threatening him. The witness, who filmed the incident, also said Pierre lifted Pluto up off the ground by the leash and tugged him down the street. The dog allegedly seemed hesitant to walk with Pierre and appeared anxious.

A man is seen allegedly abusing a dog in Dorchester in June 2025.

Advertisement

urgentpetsst


Eldemery said the witness filmed the incident and sent the video to the MSPCA and police. The video was also posted on social media.

When police spoke with Pierre, he told them he was pet-sitting Pluto and “training” him by tapping him on the nose whenever he did something deemed inappropriate. Police said Pierre did not dispute or deny what he did in the video and did not show any remorse.

Suspect has mental health issues, attorney says

Pierre’s defense, attorney Elizabeth Pardy, said he has a long history of medical and mental health issues, which is why he was also in default on an OUI case from 2021. She said he’s bipolar, schizophrenic and has sickle cell anemia, along with other issues. She said he underwent a competency evaluation and the doctor determined that he’s not competent to stand trial.

Advertisement

Judge Thomas Kaplanes released Pierre on his own recognizance, despite the prosecution requesting $2,000 bail. He was ordered to have no interaction with Pluto, surrender any animals in his custody, report to probation weekly and remain drug and alcohol free. The judge also ordered him to undergo a mental health evaluation.

Pluto was taken to a veterinarian and was found to have no injuries. He was then brought to the MSPCA, who confirmed that he’s been adopted and is doing well.

“We’re grateful to the public for bringing this to our attention, which allowed our officers to quickly start a swift investigation that brought Pluto safely into our care and also secured charges, which are now pending before the courts,” said the MSPCA in a statement. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Celtics show flashes, but 76ers claim season opener behind historic rookie performance: 8 takeaways

Published

on

Celtics show flashes, but 76ers claim season opener behind historic rookie performance: 8 takeaways


Boston Celtics

Rookie wing VJ Edgecombe looked more than worth the Sixers’ robust tanking efforts last season in his regular-season debut.

Philadelphia 76ers guard VJ Edgecombe drives to the basket against Celtics guard Anfernee Simons during the second half. AP Photo/Charles Krupa

The Celtics showed flashes of what they can be at their best this season, but the 76ers got a historic rookie performance from VJ Edgecombe and a huge game from Tyrese Maxey to take the season opener. 

Here are the takeaways. 

Advertisement

VJ Edgecombe and Tyrese Maxey both looked incredible

Rookie wing VJ Edgecombe looked more than worth the Sixers’ robust tanking efforts last season in his regular-season debut. Edgecombe broke the NBA record for most points in the first quarter by a rookie with 14, surpassing LeBron James’ record of 12, and he broke the Sixers’ record for points in a rookie debut of 30 set by Allen Iverson, pouring in 34 on 13-for-26 shooting, including several earth-shaking dunks.

“For a rookie to come in, first game and put up (those numbers), it was impressive,” Derrick White said. “I don’t know if I’ve ever seen somebody have that in his debut, but he had a really good game.”

Point guard Tyrese Maxey, meanwhile, looked every bit up to the task of being the Sixers’ primary superstar this season, pushing the Sixers out to a halftime lead and pulling them back from the brink when Boston threatened to pull away in the fourth. Maxey finished with a massive 40-point outing, running rampant through a Celtics’ defense that struggled to get back and defend him whenever they missed shots. 

The Sixers are far from a perfect roster, but tanking last season appears to have worked wonders for them, and as The Process Pt. 1 appears to be coming to a close (more on that in a minute), they appear very well set up to begin The Process Pt. 2. 

The final play(s) were supposed to be for Jaylen Brown

After letting a double-digit lead slip away, the Celtics looked like they were done, but Edgecombe missed two late free throws that gifted them a final chance.

Advertisement

With eight seconds left, Derrick White struggled to inbound the ball before finally dishing to Payton Pritchard. Pritchard drove into the paint and had his shot blocked out of bounds with just over a second remaining.

On their last, last chance, the Celtics once again passed to Pritchard, who created a little space but missed the potential game-winner.

According to Pritchard, the play was designed for Jaylen Brown.

“They kind of shadowed it,” Pritchard said. “I got it, attacked, probably just made the wrong read. Anfernee (Simons and Sam (Hauser) were open on the back side, so that’s just a pass I’ve got to make.”

For his part, Mazzulla said the goal was to get the ball to the Celtics’ ball-handlers.

Advertisement

“We got the ball into the paint, got a decent look,” Mazzulla said. “It’s all you can do is get it to those guys, and they gave us a chance to win.”

The Celtics might regret letting that one slip

At the risk of sounding overly reductive, the Celtics really need to get wins this season when the opportunities presents themselves, and Wednesday’s game was a prime example. 

On a night when the player best suited to hurt them looked like a shell of himself, and when they built a double-digit second-half lead against a shaky roster propped up by two superhuman performances, the Celtics couldn’t claim their first win of the season. 

That puts them in a precarious position over their first seven games. Their next contest is on the road against the Knicks, who are widely considered a genuine championship contender this season. That’s the start of a three-games-in-four-night stretch, during which their most beatable opponent (the Pelicans) is the opponent they face last. They then take on the Cavaliers (another championship contender), this 76ers team again, and the Rockets (yet another championship contender, who looked like a heavyweight in their showdown against the Thunder on Tuesday). 

When the dust settles, the Celtics could be in a tough position in the standings, and while it’s still clearly very early in the season, this is not last year’s roster – digging out of an early hole will be much more difficult. 

Advertisement

The Jaylen Brown/Derrick White tandem debuted well

Brown and White scored 25 points apiece in their debut as the new Celtics stars. Brown dished out four assists early and shot 9-for-18 from the floor, and he played the kind of patient floor game the Celtics need from him in the absence of Jayson Tatum. 

Prior to the game, Brown was questionable with a hamstring injury suffered during preseason.

“It was fine. I thought it held up well,” Brown said. “Definitely got to do some recovery. Within the first two weeks coming back from a strain, you’ve got to make sure that you get your recovery in because that’s when the risk is at its highest.

So I’ve just got to make sure I’m focusing on my body, getting my rest, doing my recovery, and getting ready for the next game.”

White, meanwhile, went ice-cold with the rest of his teammates from three in the second quarter – at one point, the Celtics missed nine straight – but he came alive in the third, and he worked his way to the line seven times. 

Advertisement

Anfernee Simons looked like a nice addition

The Celtics reportedly spent the summer checking on what they could get for Simons on the trade market, and that option is still likely on the table – this is, after all, a team very much in flux – but the early returns are promising.

Simons was as advertised offensively. He hit multiple 3-pointers that barely disturbed the net on their way through, he attacked the basket in late-shot-clock situations and created offense out of nothing, and at one point in the fourth quarter, he exploded to the rim and elevated so quickly off the ground that Tyrese Maxey could only jump out of his way futilely as Simons thundered home a two-handed slam.

Defensively, Simons was clearly trying to make a good impression. He was consistently down in a stance guarding ball-handlers, he ripped Maxey in transition at one point as the Sixers’ speedy guard flew to the rim, and – perhaps most importantly – he battled his way over and around screens without getting stuck, which has been one of his biggest problems as a defender. He still is unlikely to be a positive on the defensive end, but he was undeniably a positive overall.

Simons finished with 13 points on 5-for-10 shooting. On a team that lost its primary bucket-getter last season, he could make up some of the difference.

The duality of Neemias Queta

The Celtics got the full range of the Neemias Queta experience in the fourth quarter – the very good, and the very bad. 

Advertisement

Queta had a good game overall – 17 points on 7-for-8 shooting and eight rebounds, including two big offensive ones. In the fourth quarter, he scored on four out of five consecutive possessions including three in a row. The Celtics needed a big performance from a big man, and they got one. 

“He’s got it in him to be good for us, and he did some really good things,” Joe Mazzulla said. “The standard’s high for him.”

On the other hand, Queta committed a bad offensive foul setting a moving screen at a critical moment with 2:45 remaining and the Celtics nursing a four-point lead, and he fouled out a minute later sending Maxey to the free-throw line. Down the stretch, the Celtics needed Queta, who probably wouldn’t have short-armed the crucial put-back attempt that Xavier Tillman missed.

The Celtics have a lot of flawed-but-useful big men who can each do a little bit of something, but not everything. Queta frequently shows flashes of brilliance followed by moments that will leave Celtics fans pulling at their hair.

The Joel Embiid Era looks like it might be in peril

The first indicator that the 76ers’ big man might not be entirely himself was that he didn’t jump the opening tip, leaving the job to 76ers starting forward Dominick Barlow, who also had the odd distinction of being an Opening Night starter on a two-way contract. 

Advertisement

The second indicator that Embiid wasn’t himself was the first Celtics’ possession, on which Neemias Queta set a screen for Derrick White, and Embiid stayed so far back in the lane, it was a little confusing who he was actually supposed to guard. Eventually, White spotted the amount of space he would have any time Queta set a screen, and the Celtics started going directly at Embiid whenever possible. 

On the other end, Embiid hoisted a few half-hearted jumpers and attempted one half-hearted post move against Xavier Tillman before bailing halfway through, and Tillman poked the ball away. When Embiid sat down halfway through the quarter, the Sixers looked more like a coherent basketball team. 

Things went from bad to worse the rest of the way. At one point, Embiid tried to post up Sam Hauser and failed to do any damage. His presence in the game coincided with the best offensive moments by far for the Celtics, and he sat late with just four points on 1-for-9 shooting.

Embiid’s size and injury history always meant that his aging process was unlikely to be graceful, but it was still jarring to see him moving so poorly this early in the season. The Sixers have plenty of optimism on their roster, but the Joel Embiid era of The Process did not look like it was in a particularly good place on Opening Night.

What’s Next

The Celtics now hit the road on a somewhat nonsensical road trip: They will travel to Madison Square Garden to take on the Knicks on Friday before flying to Detroit for a matchup against the rising Pistons on Sunday. When that game wraps up, they’ll travel to New Orleans to face the Pelicans on Monday.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston Zoning Commission chair to recuse himself from vote on contentious downtown skyscraper plan

Published

on

Boston Zoning Commission chair to recuse himself from vote on contentious downtown skyscraper plan


Boston Zoning Commission Chair Michael Nichols, who heads a downtown advocacy group, said he plans to recuse himself from Wednesday’s vote on a contentious zoning plan that would clear the way for more skyscrapers downtown.

Nichols, president of the Downtown Boston Alliance, said that although he was cleared by the state Ethics Commission to take part in the vote, he ultimately opted not to weigh in on the zoning changes proposed in PLAN: Downtown in his official capacity as chair of the Zoning Commission.

“I was able to get a state ethics opinion that held that I do not actually have any conflicts tomorrow that run afoul of state law, but I nonetheless don’t want it to be a distraction — so I’m opting not to participate,” Nichols told the Herald Tuesday.

Nichols said he sought the ethics opinion based on a potential conflict of interest he may have in voting on the downtown zoning plan due to his advocacy group’s work to “analyze the plan for so long.”

Advertisement

He is the chair and president of the Downtown Boston Alliance, which represents commercial property owners in the city’s core.

Nichols said he is also planning to turn the gavel over to Commission Vice Chair Jill Hatton for the duration of the meeting that pertains to the downtown zoning plan. Ahead of the vote, a public hearing will be held.

The Downtown Boston Alliance submitted a letter in support of the plan — and its proposed creation of new skyline districts that would allow for 500-700 foot towers in parts of the historic downtown — to the Zoning Commission last Friday. It was sent by DBA Chief of Staff Kelsey Pramik.

“The plan’s passage today is critical for completing the neighborhood’s needed transformation such that it can align with a ‘new normal’ that requires a broader mix of uses, a modernized and more predictable zoning code, and a housing-first agenda to welcome a new generation of residents,” the DBA letter states.

The Alliance sent a similar letter of support to the Boston Planning and Development Agency Board last month, ahead of the board’s 4-1 vote in favor of the zoning plan.

Advertisement

If approved by the Zoning Commission, the Wu administration’s downtown plan would go into effect.

The plan would clear the way for new buildings to tower up to 700 feet over the historic downtown.

It has been a source of contention for other stakeholders, particularly the Downtown Boston Neighborhood Association, which has described the proposed changes as “destructive,” in that they would alter the character of the city’s core and turn it into Manhattan.

Critics have also flagged potential violations to the state’s shadow law, which was enacted in 1990 and restricts the creation of new shadows on the Boston Common and Public Garden at certain times of the day.

The Association supports additional towering in the Financial District east of Washington Street, where such heights have traditionally been allowed. It opposes new skyscrapers in the historic and increasingly residential Ladder Blocks and Park Plaza neighborhoods to the west of Washington Street and adjacent to the Boston Common.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending