Connect with us

News

When will emerging stocks finally emerge?

Published

on

When will emerging stocks finally emerge?

Many things have changed since I began as a fund manager in 1995. My bosses flew Concorde and we could smoke at our desks after 6pm as we pondered what to buy with our car allowance.

But so much more has stayed the same. When it comes to investing, US companies still trump all comers. Europe muddles along, as ever. And of course a new century dominated by emerging nations is due any second now.

When I say “just around the next corner” my children immediately assume the pub is miles away. So how anyone has managed to keep a straight face selling emerging market equities is one of the mysteries of finance.

Aside from a seven-year stretch beginning in 2002, developed market stocks have trounced them pretty much my whole career. So relentlessly dire have relative returns been, especially post-financial crisis, that when the word “emerging” is spoken, all I hear is a gurgling noise.

My ears have unblocked recently, however. First, because I’m conscious that beyond Asia and India my portfolio doesn’t have a penny in another emerging market (as defined by MSCI).

Advertisement

No Latin America, Africa, nor all those places in central Europe you backpacked through after the Berlin Wall came down because they were basically free. That’s 15 per cent of the world’s 70,000 public companies, according to my Capital IQ database.

Second, I’m a contrarian. Global inflows into emerging market funds since January are 30 per cent down on this point last year, according to LSEG Lipper estimates, which in turn were two-thirds lower than 2021.

Then on Monday along comes Ruchir Sharma, chair of Rockefeller International, who wrote in this newspaper that “a major comeback is under way” and investors have “yet to respond”. He was persuasive.

To summarise, emerging economies are outpacing developed-world ones on an output per capita basis and no longer just because of China. Earnings are expanding faster, too — as are margins. All positive stuff, he said.

Sharma also reminded us that many western countries are heavily debt dependent, with expensive stocks to boot. Emerging economies in aggregate are less stretched. Likewise, their stock markets trade at deep discounts to developed equities.

Advertisement

And yet and yet. The problem for me is that I remember reading such arguments back when I was wearing pinstripe suits (no belt, obviously) and Hermès ties. The buy-pitch never seems to change. 

Emerging nations have young and fast-growing populations! They want to buy more things! Companies are cheap and less reliant on dollar funding! Governments are reforming! The west’s apogee has passed!

So why haven’t these obvious facts — as true as when you could fly from London to New York in 3.5 hours as they are today — translated into emerging stocks outperforming old-world bourses?

They still might. But I fear the likes of Sharma misread the runes. Take the statistic that from next year more than 80 per cent of emerging nations will have output per capita growth exceeding that of the US — up from about half in the period between 2020 and 2024.

Sounds good apart from the fact this level was also reached in the first 15 years of this millennium, when emerging markets only outperformed their developed cousins for less than half the period. That’s also a quarter century of no relative progress.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, median US household real income fell from $67,650 in 1999 to $63,350 in 2012 and real wages did nothing but move sideways. Over these years, however, the S&P 500 rose a fifth, a period which includes the dotcom bust and financial crisis.

Clearly there is more to equity prices than money in pockets — a point I have made often in this column. The mistake is equating volumes and value. Top line growth does not guarantee superior shareholder returns.

It doesn’t even guarantee rising profits. Think of what happens when demand surges for a product or service in Nigeria or Brazil (or anywhere for that matter). Capital flows in, competition increases, returns moderate.

And even that assumes all companies are trying to maximise their returns on capital. Often, bosses are more interested in empire building, market share, or paying themselves more. In many emerging markets, holders of equity are far down any priority list.

Another big mistake I think believers in emerging markets often make is also ubiquitous, but they make it with bells and sparkles on. And that is to forget that current prices discount the future many years and decades out.

Advertisement

My pet crocodile knows that power, influence and wealth are shifting south and eastward — as my colleague Janan Ganesh reiterated in his column on Tuesday. The stats are clear. Demography is destiny.

Thus, the emerging world’s golden century is already reflected in prices to a large extent. Nor are valuations any more attractive just because they are at least 35 per cent lower on a forward price-to-earnings basis, say, than the developed world’s. Such claims are simplistic and mislead absolute investors, those focused on making money, as opposed to institutional investors more concerned with relative returns against a benchmark.

It’s not just that the MSCI world index, for example, is crammed full of insanely expensive technology stocks (the US now makes up 72 per cent of this index and IT a quarter), making any claim to be cheaper somewhat, er, rich.

The MSCI emerging markets index is itself skewed by a 25 per cent weighting to China which, due to an imploding real estate sector among other reasons, has a forward price/earnings ratio of nine times — flattering comparisons still further.

In other words, it is perfectly possible that the valuation discount between emerging and developing market stocks will narrow, but owners of the former still incur losses. Not good: investors such as me are not playing a relative game.

Advertisement

If emerging equities are a bargain relative to history and their own fundamentals, however, that’s different. I will be exploring this next week.

The author is a former portfolio manager. Email: stuart.kirk@ft.com; Twitter: @stuartkirk__

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Palisades and Eaton Fires May Not Be Fully Extinguished for Weeks

Published

on

Palisades and Eaton Fires May Not Be Fully Extinguished for Weeks

It may take weeks or longer for firefighters to fully extinguish the two most destructive fires that have ravaged parts of the Los Angeles area, fire officials warned.

The sheer sizes of those blazes, the Palisades and Eaton fires, have presented a significant challenge. They have charred almost 40,000 acres combined and are still only partly contained.

Difficult weather conditions have also hindered efforts. David Acuna, a battalion chief with Cal Fire, said the persistence of strong winds, and the fact that fires were burning through homes, which can generate intense heat, made containment impossible when the blazes first ignited.

Crews have been trying to establish a boundary around the fires, using trenches, natural barriers and other methods to prevent further spread. But Capt. Erik Scott, a spokesman for the Los Angeles Fire Department, said, “It’s going to be a slow, arduous process.”

The emergence of smaller fires over the last week has further complicated efforts. Of particular concern was the Auto fire in Ventura County, northwest of Los Angeles, which grew to more than 50 acres before being contained. Officials worried about it breaking free again in windy conditions.

Advertisement

These fires have required an immediate response from both air and ground crews to prevent them from growing, Mr. Acuna said, which diverts resources from the larger blazes.

Stopping the fires’ forward progress is only the first step. Firefighters must also extinguish all remaining flames inside the contained area.

Mr. Scott said this second part of the process would also take time. Among other steps, he said, firefighters need to use hand tools to scrape away brush near the burn perimeter and turn over smoldering piles to ensure nothing is hot enough to reignite.

These timelines are not unusual for large fires. In 2018, the Woolsey fire burned through nearly 100,000 acres in Los Angeles and Ventura counties, destroying over 1,600 structures. The fire ignited in early November and was not contained for two weeks. And it took until early January for the fire to be fully extinguished.

The Santa Ana winds that have repeatedly raised the fire danger over the last week have so far proven lighter than anticipated on Tuesday, but forecasters warn that wind speeds could increase on Wednesday. The region remains critically dry, with little rain expected in the near future. The combination of those elements is threatening to ignite more fires across Southern California, and could further hinder firefighters’ efforts.

Advertisement

Erin McCann contributed reporting.

Continue Reading

News

Top BlackRock executive Mark Wiedman to depart

Published

on

Top BlackRock executive Mark Wiedman to depart

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Top BlackRock executive Mark Wiedman is departing, in a move that disrupts the asset manager’s planning for the eventual departure of founder Larry Fink, according to four people close to the company.

Wiedman had been widely discussed as a potential successor to Fink for more than a decade and had recently been one of the $11.5tn asset manager’s most prominent public faces as the head of its client business.

BlackRock’s board described him in as a regulatory filing last year as one of three “senior leaders who we believe will play critical roles in BlackRock’s future” as it granted him a special retention package.

Advertisement

However, Wiedman, who led the integration and rapid growth of BlackRock’s flagship index and exchange traded fund business, has opted not to wait around. His departure is expected to be announced very shortly, the people said. He is forfeiting $8mn in stock options, according to the proxy.

Wiedman’s departure comes after the world’s largest asset manager embarked on a $28bn acquisition spree last year to bulk up its footprint in the fast-growing and lucrative alternative assets sector. The strategic moves not only put pressure on Fink, 72, to personally oversee their success, but also brought in a clutch of high-powered and high-paid executives who need to be carefully managed.

Fink, who has led BlackRock since its 1988 founding, is very popular with investors and is among the most influential figures in finance. But analysts and some within the firm have begun expressing concerns whether the slow pace of succession planning will drive the next generation of top talent to start going elsewhere. BlackRock president Rob Kapito, 67, is also a founder of the firm.

BlackRock declined to comment.

Wiedman is leaving almost exactly a year after Salim Ramji, another executive who was also once touted as a potential leader. Ramji became chief executive of Vanguard, BlackRock’s chief rival in the US and the world’s second-largest asset manager. Several other lower-ranking executives have also left in the past few years to take leadership jobs at smaller firms, including Daniel Gamba to Northern Trust and Zach Buchwald to Russell Investments.

Advertisement

After Ramji left, the group touted its strong stable of current leaders, including Wiedman and two other executives who also received special option grants: chief operating officer Robert Goldstein and chief financial officer Martin Small.

“BlackRock is proud to have a record of our firm’s alumni going on to lead multiple investment management companies and financial institutions,” it has previously said.

A senior Wall Street figure with knowledge of the situation said “Larry [Fink] and Rob [Kapito] are not going anywhere. They just made a major acquisition and you have to see that through, [but] Wiedman is at an age where if he doesn’t make a move, he ages out of being a CEO.”

A lawyer by training, Wiedman joined BlackRock in 2004 after stints at the US Treasury and McKinsey. He started BlackRock’s financial markets advisory consulting arm, which helped central banks and government agencies dig through the rubble of the 2008 financial crisis.

Wiedman negotiated the 2009 purchase and integration of Barclays Global Investors, the deal widely seen as the most important in BlackRock’s history. He then headed up the resulting iShares business from 2011 to 2019 as it developed into a juggernaut in index and ETFs.

Advertisement

Keenly interested in talent development, Wiedman recruited or promoted many of BlackRock’s top executives, including Small and Rachel Lord, who heads the international business.

Continue Reading

News

World News Live Today January 15, 2025: Donald Trump says to create new department to collect revenue from foreign sources on inauguration day

Published

on

World News Live Today January 15, 2025: Donald Trump says to create new department to collect revenue from foreign sources on inauguration day

Live

World News Live: Get real-time updates on international politics, economic changes, conflicts, and environmental issues. Access the latest breaking news and in-depth stories as they happen, keeping you informed of events shaping the world.

Latest news on January 15, 2025: Trump did not specify whether the new agency would replace collections of tariffs, duties, fees and fines by US Customs and Border Protection.

World News Live: Welcome to our World News live blog, your go-to source for instant updates on major events across the globe. Whether it’s political shifts, economic trends, environmental crises, or international conflicts, we deliver real-time reports to keep you informed and engaged with the latest global developments. Disclaimer: This is an AI-generated live blog and has not been edited by Hindustan Times staff.…Read More

Advertisement

Follow all the updates here:

Jan 15, 2025 12:30 AM IST

US News Live : Donald Trump says to create new department to collect revenue from foreign sources on inauguration day

  • Donald Trump said in a social media post he would create the department on January 20, the day he takes office as president for a second term

Read the full story here

Jan 15, 2025 12:15 AM IST

US News Live : Speaker Johnson orders US Capitol flags raised to full height for Donald Trump’s inauguration

  • The Republican leader’s decision means that President-elect Donald Trump will not take the oath of office for his second term under a half-staff flag

Read the full story here

Continue Reading

Trending