Connect with us

News

What North Korea learned from Ukraine: Now’s the perfect time for a nuclear push | CNN

Published

on

What North Korea learned from Ukraine: Now’s the perfect time for a nuclear push | CNN

 

CNN

If North Korea was on the lookout for one other excuse to forge forward with its nuclear weapons program, it simply discovered one in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

That one of many only a few nations to have voluntarily given up a nuclear arsenal is now beneath assault from the identical nation it gave its warheads to won’t be misplaced on Pyongyang.

The truth is, analysts say, Moscow’s actions have gifted the reclusive Asian nation a “excellent storm” of situations beneath which to ramp its program up.

Advertisement

Not solely will North Korea use Ukraine’s plight to bolster its narrative that it wants nukes to ensure its survival, however chief Kim Jong Un could discover that, with all eyes on the struggle in Europe, he can get away with greater than ever.

Divided over Ukraine, the worldwide neighborhood will probably have little urge for food for sanctions on the hermit kingdom; certainly, even unified condemnation of a current North Korean ICBM take a look at stays elusive. What’s extra, the boycott of Russian oil and gasoline might even open the door to cut-price power offers between Pyongyang and Moscow – ideological allies whose friendship harks again to the Korean struggle of the Fifties.

Within the worst-case situation, specialists even ponder whether that is the beginning of a as soon as unthinkable chain of occasions that would finish with a return to inter-Korean battle, maybe even with the North invading the South – although most see this as extremely unlikely.

As professor Andrei Lankov of Kookmin College places it, the lesson North Korea has discovered from Russia’s struggle in Ukraine, is easy:

“By no means, ever give up your nuclear weapons.”

Advertisement

Moscow’s invasion of its neighbor has bolstered a message that has been enjoying on Pyongyang’s thoughts for many years, Lankov stated.

When Ukraine was a part of the USSR, it hosted hundreds of nuclear warheads. It voluntarily handed these over to Russia after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, as a part of a 1994 take care of the US, United Kingdom and Russia which might assure Ukraine’s safety, a deal often known as the Budapest Memorandum.

Ukraine now finds itself beneath brutal assault from the exact same nation that signed the deal to guard its sovereignty – one which now repeatedly refers to its nuclear arsenal to warn the West off intervention.

Would Moscow have invaded if Ukraine had saved its warheads?

Most specialists – and most probably Pyongyang too – assume not.

“Now (the North Koreans) have gotten yet one more affirmation (of this lesson) after Iraq, after Libya,” Lankov stated.

Advertisement

Pyongyang recurrently makes use of the experiences of Saddam Hussein and Moammar Gaddafi, the previous leaders of Iraq and Libya, to justify its nuclear program, each to its personal folks and the world. Each strongmen leaders misplaced their grips on energy – and in the end their very own lives – after their very own nuclear ambitions got here grinding to a halt.

The Russian invasion will bolster that narrative, however in doing so it might even have a “very unfavourable influence” on the thoughts of North Korea’s personal strongman chief, based on Lee Sang-hyun, president and senior analysis fellow of the Sejong Institute.

He says Kim is more likely to reply in just one manner: by turning into “much more obsessed together with his nuclear weapons and missile capabilities.”

Missiles on display during a military parade at Kim Il-sung Square in Pyongyang in April.

Even earlier than the invasion, North Korea had proven indicators of ramping up its nuclear ambitions.

On Saturday, it held its 14th missile launch of the yr – up from simply 4 exams in 2020 and eight in 2021. One of many missiles examined this yr was believed to be an ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) that’s assumed able to hitting the mainland US. That was the primary ICBM take a look at since 2017 and was broadly seen as a harbinger of exams to return.

Kim made clear his intention to go full pace forward together with his nuclear program at a navy parade on April 25.

Advertisement

And business satellite tv for pc photos recommend Pyongyang is making an attempt to revive entry to its Punggye-ri underground testing web site, based on South Korean officers and think-tanks.

US officers inform CNN North Korea might be able to resume nuclear testing later this month.

In opposition to this background the Russian invasion – and the worldwide sanctions that adopted – have created a “excellent storm” of situations for Pyongyang to function in, analysts say.

“There are some fascinating, maybe unintended penalties for the Western response towards Russia particularly, which is {that a} Russia that has been fully remoted from the worldwide financial system and put beneath large sanctions stress. I believe it has only a few incentives to implement sanctions towards North Korea,” stated Ankit Panda, a senior fellow within the Nuclear Coverage Program on the Carnegie Endowment for Worldwide Peace.

A transparent break up amongst United Nations Safety Council everlasting members – Russia and China on one facet, the UK, US and France on the opposite – means any unified determination to punish North Korea is not possible.

Advertisement

“It’s fairly clear that China and Russia will block extra sanctions and albeit it’s not fairly clear, what else are you able to presumably sanction,” Lankov stated.

Even a seventh nuclear take a look at could not provoke the standard unfavourable response from Beijing, “China shouldn’t be going to be blissful sufficient about nuclear exams, however they’ll swallow it,” Lankov stated.

A South Korean news report on a North Korean missile launch in 2019.

If something, North Korea could even profit financially as different nations boycott Russian oil and gasoline. The cash-strapped nation could be very happy to take up a number of the slack, probably at a reduction, and take care of a Russia not constrained by US-led sanctions towards the North.

“I believe that Russia goes to offer extra financial assist and power assist to North Korea,” stated Ramon Pacheco Pardo, the KF-VUB Korea chair on the Institute for European Research of Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

“Oil and gasoline, definitely nevertheless it might additionally embrace meals… fertilizers, it might be all kinds of financial help North Korea needs.”

That Pyongyang would facet with Moscow in a brand new world order shouldn’t be a shock.

Advertisement

Relations between the 2 nations had been solid by the Korean Struggle of 1950-1953, they usually shared a communist ideology for many years.

The previous Soviet Union was a serious benefactor to North Korea, financially propping the Kim regime up. Whereas that job has now transferred to China, the return of Russia to strongman rule beneath President Vladimir Putin has put a brand new shine on the connection.

“(Pyongyang) had been form of disgusted concerning the democratic and liberal or semi-democratic, semi-liberal Russia which used to exist, they usually mainly greeted Vladimir Putin as a frontrunner who was driving the nation into the proper course,” Lankov stated.

Kim’s fleeting dance with the US – holding three conferences with former President Donald Trump that in the end yielded little – solely reminded him his extra pure and profitable allegiances stay with China and Russia.

Pyongyang for its half has made clear the place it locations the blame for the struggle in Ukraine. “The foundation explanation for the Ukraine disaster lies completely within the hegemonic coverage of the US and the West which indulge themselves in high-handedness and arbitrariness in the direction of different nations,” its Overseas Ministry stated.

Advertisement
Workers pour concrete at a construction site for nuclear reactors in Kumho, North Korea, back in 2002.

Since Russia’s invasion, North Korea’s rhetoric in the direction of South Korea has modified.

Final month Kim’s sister, Kim Yo Jong, warned that if South Korea was to confront the North militarily its military would “face a depressing destiny little in need of complete destruction and spoil.”

Threatening language from Pyongyang is nothing new – a US official as soon as described being insulted publicly by North Korea as like a “badge of honor.”

What’s new is that because the invasion, specialists like Lankov have been asking whether or not North Korea would take into account an invasion of the South once more – greater than seven many years after its invasion in 1950 sparked the Korean Struggle.

That query has for years been dismissed out of hand. Most specialists nonetheless see the adjustments as negligible, however the truth it’s even being mentioned is noteworthy.

“North Koreans are in all probability dreaming once more about one thing that (they) used to take severely, however in current many years practically forgot. That’s conquest of the South,” Lankov stated.

Advertisement

For now, the concept appears fanciful. However the future is one other matter.

“Perhaps, simply perhaps, the American President of the yr 2045 or 2055 won’t danger San Francisco with a purpose to save Seoul,” Lankov stated. “(By then) North Koreans might use ICBMs, perhaps nuclear armed submarines to (terrify) People, to blackmail People out of the battle.”

News

Investors only have themselves to blame as Jay Powell steals Christmas

Published

on

Investors only have themselves to blame as Jay Powell steals Christmas

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

For markets, US Federal Reserve chief Jay Powell is the Grinch who stole Christmas. But the festive shakeout in bonds, currencies and stocks now under way in the wake of the US central bank’s latest pronouncements is a mini-crisis of investors’ own making.

Fed meetings, and the minutiae of its public statements, are always marquee events for investors, setting the tone across all major asset classes. Wednesday’s meeting, the last of 2024, always came with the potential for greater punch, given the timing — right on the cusp of Donald Trump’s second stint in the White House. 

The decision on rates itself — a quarter-point chop off the benchmark — was in line with expectations. But it went downhill from there, as the central bank’s apparent cooling on further cuts next year — an allusion to the potentially inflationary impact of Trump’s economic policies — has gone down like a mouldy mince pie.

Advertisement

US stocks nosedived, wiping out almost all of the gains in the S&P 500 benchmark index since Trump’s re-election day. The following morning brought a similar sea of red across Asian and European stocks too. The dollar popped higher, sending the euro and yen tumbling awkwardly hard, and US government bonds weakened, sending the yield on 10-year Treasuries forcefully above 4.5 per cent.

The Fed chair is facing some flak here. His comment in the post-meeting press conference that the year-end projection for inflation has “kind of fallen apart” is not the sort of self-assertion that investors seek in a Fed chair, and the pick-up in some inflation measures comfortably predates the reinauguration of Trump.

But markets are going through the wringer in no small part because the consensus among investors about the next steps for markets had become so intense — curdling hard around the themes of American exceptionalism in stocks and the vanquishing of inflation keeping bonds well supported. The path to an easy run in markets in 2025 had become exceptionally narrow and extremely crowded with like-minded views, and it has taken only a gentle push from the Fed to tip that out of balance.

The annual spectacle of year-ahead market outlooks from the big banks and asset managers demonstrated a near-unanimous set of views. Deutsche Bank is towards the top of the pack with its assessment that the benchmark S&P 500 index of heavyweight US stocks will ascend to 7,000 by the end of next year. After the overnight shock, that projection is 20 per cent above where we are now. It is punchy, but not wildly out of line. Core fundamental differences of opinion are hard to find. “The degree of uniformity in year-ahead projections has broken all previous records,” notes TS Lombard’s Dario Perkins.

The trouble with that was two-fold. First, it meant much, if not all, of the narrative was already baked in. Second, crowding around core themes tends to exaggerate the scale of market reactions when stuff goes wrong. Enter Powell stage left.

Advertisement

“Everyone’s portfolio is pointed towards US exceptionalism,” said Mike Riddell, a portfolio manager on Fidelity’s Strategic Bond Fund, speaking with some foresight the week before the Fed decision. “The consensus can be right, and we don’t see much to derail it. But if you see anything to move the narrative, you can get really violent market moves.”

We have been here before, in a range of different markets, but that does not prevent investors from making the same mistake over and over again. This time last year, Powell caught the market off guard in the opposite direction, dropping a hint of interest rate cuts that investors went on to exaggerate hugely out of proportion.

Crowded bets among investors also stung in early August, when a downbeat US labour market report blasted in to several popular and correlated market bets. In late September, deeply unloved Chinese stocks rocketed higher after Beijing unleashed stimulus measures to try and turn the hobbled economy and markets around. Investors had given China such a wide berth that stocks leapt 40 per cent in just a few days as funds piled in to a narrow entrance.

The latest ructions are a useful reminder that despite the disarming simplicity of the American exceptionalism theme, rakes are scattered all over markets for investors next year.

The assumption that the US economy will sail through the first year of Trump 2.0 is brave. Ignoring the (actually pretty obvious) banana skins, particularly around inflation, is “the ultimate ‘trust me’ trade” says Greg Peters, co-chief investment officer for PGIM Fixed Income. “It seems off to me.”

Advertisement

Now, investors should not assume that the Christmas holiday season will put all this angst to bed. As the final days of 2018 showed, portfolios can and do shake around wildly even when a lot of core markets are shut, on half-days, or on the go-slow. If anything, thinned-out trading volumes at this time of year can make matters worse. 

Some fund managers will be feeling sore about this year-end beating. But Powell has done us all a favour in reminding us that next year will not be for the faint of heart, and the wisdom of crowds is not always your friend.

katie.martin@ft.com

Continue Reading

News

Wisconsin school shooting victims named as teacher Erin West and student Rubi Vergara

Published

on

Wisconsin school shooting victims named as teacher Erin West and student Rubi Vergara

Tributes have been paid to the two victims who died in the shooting at the Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin, on Monday, who have been named as 42-year-old teacher Erin M. West and 14-year-old student Rubi P. Vergara.

The Dane County Medical Examiner’s office confirmed their identities in a press release Wednesday night, while in a separate statement, the school said, “our hearts are heavy with these losses.”

The suspected shooter, 15-year-old Natalie Rupnow, a freshman at the school who was also known as Samantha, died on the way to hospital on Monday from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound, police said.

“ALCS is a better school for the work of Erin West. She brought her love of Jesus and love of people to our staff and school family all wrapped in a hug and topped with a smile,” the school’s statement said.

Erin West.Empire Photography

The school said West worked as a substitute teacher for three years before taking a full-time staff role as an in-house substitute teacher and coordinator, “a role tailor made for her abundant skills and breadth of knowledge.”

Advertisement

“She served our teachers and students with grace, humor, wisdom, and — most importantly — with the love of Jesus. Her loss is a painful and deep one and she will be greatly missed not just among our staff, but our entire ALCS family,” the statement added.

Rubi Vergara, a 9th grade student, had been at the school since kindergarten and was described as popular and a keen volunteer.

“Her gentle, loving, and kind heart was reflected in her smile. Rubi was a blessing to her class and our school. She was not only a good friend, but a great big sister,” the school said.

“Often seen with a book in hand, she had a gift for art and music. Yet, it was Rubi’s love for Jesus that shined brightest and she shared His love with others by volunteering faithfully. She will be missed deeply by her teachers and fellow students,” the statement added.

An online obituary uploaded to a local funeral home website said Vergara loved art, singing and playing keyboard in her family’s worship band. “She shared a special bond with her beloved pets, Ginger (cat) and Coco (dog),” the obituary said.

Advertisement
Wisconsin school shooting victims named as teacher Erin West and student Rubi Vergara
Rubi Patricia Vergara.Jenn Vergara

The funeral home said a service for Vergara would be held on Saturday at 11 a.m. CST (12 a.m. ET) and would be livestreamed online.

The police investigation into the shooting continues. Authorities said Wednesday night that the two unidentified students who received life-threatening injuries remain in a local hospital, while the four people who were treated in hospital for minor injuries sustained in the shooting have been discharged.

Police said that the shooter opened fire in a second-floor classroom “during a study hall for mixed graders.”

Two guns were found at the school, but only one was used in the shooting, police said.

Police said they were working to establish a motive and said they were aware of the suspect’s alleged social media activity and “documents and photos circulating the internet,” that have yet to be verified.

Detectives want to speak to any who may have interacted with Rupnow in the days or weeks before the shooting — they can contact police anonymously through Madison Area Crime Stoppers at p3tips.com or by calling 608-266-6014. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Perplexity’s value triples to $9bn in latest funding round for AI search engine

Published

on

Perplexity’s value triples to bn in latest funding round for AI search engine

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Perplexity, an artificial intelligence-driven search engine, has closed its fourth funding round this year, tripling its valuation to $9bn as it seeks to compete with offerings from Google and OpenAI.

The $500mn round was led by Institutional Venture Partners, with involvement from Nvidia, New Enterprise Associates, B Capital and T Rowe Price, according to multiple people with knowledge of the deal. Previous investors have included SoftBank’s Vision Fund 2, Nvidia and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, as well as several prominent names from the AI industry such as OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy and Meta’s chief AI scientist Yann LeCun.

The San Francisco-based group has grown rapidly this year, with its product receiving hundreds of millions of queries a month. It has 15mn monthly active users with most of that traffic coming from the US.

Advertisement

The new funding will help Perplexity compete with west coast rivals in an increasingly fierce fight for engineers. “The talent war for AI is like no other time before,” according to Ali Ghodsi, co-founder and chief executive of Databricks, the AI and data analytics company that announced a $10bn fundraising round on Tuesday.

Perplexity is seeking to capitalise and improve on the search advertising system pioneered by Google, in which marketers bid to have a sponsored link placed against search queries. It is in talks with major brands to pilot advertising on its platform.  

In a sign of growing competition in the space, AI companies have recently targeted the search market by linking up chatbots to the internet. This week, OpenAI rolled out web searching for its popular ChatGPT product, while Anthropic’s Claude can perform searches through a feature called “computer use”.

Google and Microsoft, which are leaders in the $300bn digital advertising world, have also recently incorporated large language models, which power AI chatbots and make results more conversational, into their search offerings.

The latest round has pushed Perplexity’s valuation higher by nine-fold since the start of the year, in another sign of how hot start-ups developing new AI tools can draw in hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars in investment. 

Advertisement

After OpenAI’s $6.6bn fundraising in October — one of the largest in Silicon Valley — one person close to the company said Perplexity was inundated with unsolicited interest from new investors.

Run by former Google intern Aravind Srinivas, Perplexity raised $250mn this summer, on top of previous funding rounds in January and April.

Perplexity makes money through subscriptions. It says its annualised revenues — a projection of full-year revenues based on extrapolating the most recent month’s sales — have grown from $5mn in January to $35mn in August.

The spate of deals for lossmaking AI start-ups has stoked concern among some investors that rising valuations in the sector show all the hallmarks of a bubble, however. But even those who argue most AI valuations are increasingly detached from reality are willing to stake bets on companies they believe could be winners.

Perplexity and T Rowe Price declined to comment. IVP, B Capital, NEA and Nvidia did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The closing of the round was first reported by Bloomberg.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending